Alternative proof that if $a,b,c in mathbb{R}$ and $(a+b+c)c0$?
$begingroup$
A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?
The question emerged from a reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/
inequality contest-math
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?
The question emerged from a reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/
inequality contest-math
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?
The question emerged from a reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/
inequality contest-math
$endgroup$
A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?
The question emerged from a reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/
inequality contest-math
inequality contest-math
edited Nov 24 '18 at 5:33
user21820
38.8k543153
38.8k543153
asked Nov 23 '18 at 21:54
guestguest
4,232919
4,232919
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have
$$
(b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
$$
To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
guest's answer
and is just a simplification of that solution.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
5
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:
Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.
Solution:
First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
Then form the matrix
$$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
b & 2a \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
$$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
2 & 1 \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
$$det(SM) = det
left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
4c+b & 2(a+b) \
end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$
But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If all you know is completing the square:
Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.
By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.
We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:
$$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
&geq0text{.}
end{align}$$
Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.
1) By assumption
$$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$
2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$
$$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$
3) From 2 by addition
$$ b^2 le 4ac $$
4) expand 1
$$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$
5) From 4 by addition
$$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$
6) From 5 by multiplication
$$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$
7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$
$$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$
8) from 7 by addition.
$$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$
9) (7) is a perfect square
$$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$
10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.
$$ bot $$
Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010886%2falternative-proof-that-if-a-b-c-in-mathbbr-and-abcc0-then-b2-4ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have
$$
(b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
$$
To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
guest's answer
and is just a simplification of that solution.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
5
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have
$$
(b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
$$
To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
guest's answer
and is just a simplification of that solution.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
5
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have
$$
(b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
$$
To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
guest's answer
and is just a simplification of that solution.
$endgroup$
We have
$$
(b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
$$
To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
guest's answer
and is just a simplification of that solution.
edited Nov 23 '18 at 22:50
answered Nov 23 '18 at 22:15
Martin RMartin R
27.5k33255
27.5k33255
1
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
5
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
5
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
1
1
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:16
5
5
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
$begingroup$
@guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:
Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.
Solution:
First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
Then form the matrix
$$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
b & 2a \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
$$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
2 & 1 \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
$$det(SM) = det
left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
4c+b & 2(a+b) \
end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$
But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:
Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.
Solution:
First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
Then form the matrix
$$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
b & 2a \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
$$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
2 & 1 \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
$$det(SM) = det
left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
4c+b & 2(a+b) \
end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$
But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:
Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.
Solution:
First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
Then form the matrix
$$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
b & 2a \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
$$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
2 & 1 \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
$$det(SM) = det
left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
4c+b & 2(a+b) \
end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$
But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.
$endgroup$
Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:
Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.
Solution:
First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
Then form the matrix
$$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
b & 2a \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
$$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
2 & 1 \
end{array}right)$$
whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
$$det(SM) = det
left( begin{array}{cc}
2c & b \
4c+b & 2(a+b) \
end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$
But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 21:55
guestguest
4,232919
4,232919
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
$b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
$endgroup$
– guest
Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If all you know is completing the square:
Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.
By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.
We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:
$$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
&geq0text{.}
end{align}$$
Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If all you know is completing the square:
Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.
By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.
We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:
$$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
&geq0text{.}
end{align}$$
Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If all you know is completing the square:
Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.
By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.
We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:
$$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
&geq0text{.}
end{align}$$
Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.
$endgroup$
If all you know is completing the square:
Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.
By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.
We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:
$$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
&=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
&geq0text{.}
end{align}$$
Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 0:58
obscuransobscurans
898311
898311
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.
1) By assumption
$$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$
2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$
$$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$
3) From 2 by addition
$$ b^2 le 4ac $$
4) expand 1
$$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$
5) From 4 by addition
$$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$
6) From 5 by multiplication
$$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$
7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$
$$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$
8) from 7 by addition.
$$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$
9) (7) is a perfect square
$$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$
10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.
$$ bot $$
Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.
1) By assumption
$$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$
2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$
$$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$
3) From 2 by addition
$$ b^2 le 4ac $$
4) expand 1
$$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$
5) From 4 by addition
$$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$
6) From 5 by multiplication
$$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$
7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$
$$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$
8) from 7 by addition.
$$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$
9) (7) is a perfect square
$$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$
10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.
$$ bot $$
Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.
1) By assumption
$$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$
2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$
$$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$
3) From 2 by addition
$$ b^2 le 4ac $$
4) expand 1
$$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$
5) From 4 by addition
$$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$
6) From 5 by multiplication
$$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$
7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$
$$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$
8) from 7 by addition.
$$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$
9) (7) is a perfect square
$$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$
10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.
$$ bot $$
Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .
$endgroup$
Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.
1) By assumption
$$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$
2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$
$$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$
3) From 2 by addition
$$ b^2 le 4ac $$
4) expand 1
$$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$
5) From 4 by addition
$$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$
6) From 5 by multiplication
$$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$
7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$
$$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$
8) from 7 by addition.
$$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$
9) (7) is a perfect square
$$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$
10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.
$$ bot $$
Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .
edited Dec 27 '18 at 2:10
answered Nov 24 '18 at 2:53
Gregory NisbetGregory Nisbet
561312
561312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010886%2falternative-proof-that-if-a-b-c-in-mathbbr-and-abcc0-then-b2-4ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown