Ubuntu 16.04 kvm bridges not working












0














i've got a windows 2008 server vm running on kvm, it had an rtl nic. i did a patch install on the vm, did a 'dist-upgrade' on the host, and now the bridges do not appear to be forwarding packets! the host has several nics and all are statically assigned. brDMZ is the bridge i'm interested in, its assigned 192.168.4.4 and i can ping that from another (physical) host. i've tried rolling back to 4.4.0-98 with no luck. any suggestions!? here's some output:



uname -a
Linux vmhost-01 4.4.0-101-generic #124-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 10 18:29:59 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
brCSS 8000.001e0b480aba yes eth0
brDMZ 8000.d485644f4aee yes eth3
docker0 8000.0242823a37ed no
virbr0 8000.525400cf415c yes virbr0-nic

sudo ifconfig brDMZ
brDMZ Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee
inet addr:192.168.4.4 Bcast:192.168.4.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::d685:64ff:fe4f:4aee/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:9004 (9.0 KB) TX bytes:648 (648.0 B)

brctl showstp brDMZ
brDMZ
bridge id 8000.d485644f4aee
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee
root port 0 path cost 0
max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00
hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00
forward delay 2.00 bridge forward delay 2.00
ageing time 300.00
hello timer 0.52 tcn timer 0.00
topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 171.35
flags


eth3 (1)
port id 8001 state forwarding
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee path cost 4
designated bridge 8000.d485644f4aee message age timer 0.00
designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00
designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00
flags

brctl showmacs brDMZ
port no mac addr is local? ageing timer
1 00:06:5b:f6:8b:dc no 179.48
1 00:0c:29:04:87:83 no 157.46
1 00:0c:29:f1:90:8e no 52.99
1 00:14:5e:77:f7:d7 no 59.09
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00

sudo ebtables -t filter -L
Bridge table: filter
Bridge chain: INPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: FORWARD, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: OUTPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT









share|improve this question






















  • update: i created an ubuntu 16.04 host on the same bridge, with same results. however, if i run tcpdump IN the vm, it sees ARP requests coming from machine out on the network trying to ping it!?
    – david
    Nov 27 '17 at 17:23
















0














i've got a windows 2008 server vm running on kvm, it had an rtl nic. i did a patch install on the vm, did a 'dist-upgrade' on the host, and now the bridges do not appear to be forwarding packets! the host has several nics and all are statically assigned. brDMZ is the bridge i'm interested in, its assigned 192.168.4.4 and i can ping that from another (physical) host. i've tried rolling back to 4.4.0-98 with no luck. any suggestions!? here's some output:



uname -a
Linux vmhost-01 4.4.0-101-generic #124-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 10 18:29:59 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
brCSS 8000.001e0b480aba yes eth0
brDMZ 8000.d485644f4aee yes eth3
docker0 8000.0242823a37ed no
virbr0 8000.525400cf415c yes virbr0-nic

sudo ifconfig brDMZ
brDMZ Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee
inet addr:192.168.4.4 Bcast:192.168.4.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::d685:64ff:fe4f:4aee/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:9004 (9.0 KB) TX bytes:648 (648.0 B)

brctl showstp brDMZ
brDMZ
bridge id 8000.d485644f4aee
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee
root port 0 path cost 0
max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00
hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00
forward delay 2.00 bridge forward delay 2.00
ageing time 300.00
hello timer 0.52 tcn timer 0.00
topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 171.35
flags


eth3 (1)
port id 8001 state forwarding
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee path cost 4
designated bridge 8000.d485644f4aee message age timer 0.00
designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00
designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00
flags

brctl showmacs brDMZ
port no mac addr is local? ageing timer
1 00:06:5b:f6:8b:dc no 179.48
1 00:0c:29:04:87:83 no 157.46
1 00:0c:29:f1:90:8e no 52.99
1 00:14:5e:77:f7:d7 no 59.09
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00

sudo ebtables -t filter -L
Bridge table: filter
Bridge chain: INPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: FORWARD, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: OUTPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT









share|improve this question






















  • update: i created an ubuntu 16.04 host on the same bridge, with same results. however, if i run tcpdump IN the vm, it sees ARP requests coming from machine out on the network trying to ping it!?
    – david
    Nov 27 '17 at 17:23














0












0








0







i've got a windows 2008 server vm running on kvm, it had an rtl nic. i did a patch install on the vm, did a 'dist-upgrade' on the host, and now the bridges do not appear to be forwarding packets! the host has several nics and all are statically assigned. brDMZ is the bridge i'm interested in, its assigned 192.168.4.4 and i can ping that from another (physical) host. i've tried rolling back to 4.4.0-98 with no luck. any suggestions!? here's some output:



uname -a
Linux vmhost-01 4.4.0-101-generic #124-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 10 18:29:59 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
brCSS 8000.001e0b480aba yes eth0
brDMZ 8000.d485644f4aee yes eth3
docker0 8000.0242823a37ed no
virbr0 8000.525400cf415c yes virbr0-nic

sudo ifconfig brDMZ
brDMZ Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee
inet addr:192.168.4.4 Bcast:192.168.4.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::d685:64ff:fe4f:4aee/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:9004 (9.0 KB) TX bytes:648 (648.0 B)

brctl showstp brDMZ
brDMZ
bridge id 8000.d485644f4aee
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee
root port 0 path cost 0
max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00
hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00
forward delay 2.00 bridge forward delay 2.00
ageing time 300.00
hello timer 0.52 tcn timer 0.00
topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 171.35
flags


eth3 (1)
port id 8001 state forwarding
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee path cost 4
designated bridge 8000.d485644f4aee message age timer 0.00
designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00
designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00
flags

brctl showmacs brDMZ
port no mac addr is local? ageing timer
1 00:06:5b:f6:8b:dc no 179.48
1 00:0c:29:04:87:83 no 157.46
1 00:0c:29:f1:90:8e no 52.99
1 00:14:5e:77:f7:d7 no 59.09
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00

sudo ebtables -t filter -L
Bridge table: filter
Bridge chain: INPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: FORWARD, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: OUTPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT









share|improve this question













i've got a windows 2008 server vm running on kvm, it had an rtl nic. i did a patch install on the vm, did a 'dist-upgrade' on the host, and now the bridges do not appear to be forwarding packets! the host has several nics and all are statically assigned. brDMZ is the bridge i'm interested in, its assigned 192.168.4.4 and i can ping that from another (physical) host. i've tried rolling back to 4.4.0-98 with no luck. any suggestions!? here's some output:



uname -a
Linux vmhost-01 4.4.0-101-generic #124-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 10 18:29:59 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
brCSS 8000.001e0b480aba yes eth0
brDMZ 8000.d485644f4aee yes eth3
docker0 8000.0242823a37ed no
virbr0 8000.525400cf415c yes virbr0-nic

sudo ifconfig brDMZ
brDMZ Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee
inet addr:192.168.4.4 Bcast:192.168.4.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::d685:64ff:fe4f:4aee/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:9004 (9.0 KB) TX bytes:648 (648.0 B)

brctl showstp brDMZ
brDMZ
bridge id 8000.d485644f4aee
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee
root port 0 path cost 0
max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00
hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00
forward delay 2.00 bridge forward delay 2.00
ageing time 300.00
hello timer 0.52 tcn timer 0.00
topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 171.35
flags


eth3 (1)
port id 8001 state forwarding
designated root 8000.d485644f4aee path cost 4
designated bridge 8000.d485644f4aee message age timer 0.00
designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00
designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00
flags

brctl showmacs brDMZ
port no mac addr is local? ageing timer
1 00:06:5b:f6:8b:dc no 179.48
1 00:0c:29:04:87:83 no 157.46
1 00:0c:29:f1:90:8e no 52.99
1 00:14:5e:77:f7:d7 no 59.09
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00
1 d4:85:64:4f:4a:ee yes 0.00

sudo ebtables -t filter -L
Bridge table: filter
Bridge chain: INPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: FORWARD, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: OUTPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT






networking virtualization kvm






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 27 '17 at 14:54









david

212




212












  • update: i created an ubuntu 16.04 host on the same bridge, with same results. however, if i run tcpdump IN the vm, it sees ARP requests coming from machine out on the network trying to ping it!?
    – david
    Nov 27 '17 at 17:23


















  • update: i created an ubuntu 16.04 host on the same bridge, with same results. however, if i run tcpdump IN the vm, it sees ARP requests coming from machine out on the network trying to ping it!?
    – david
    Nov 27 '17 at 17:23
















update: i created an ubuntu 16.04 host on the same bridge, with same results. however, if i run tcpdump IN the vm, it sees ARP requests coming from machine out on the network trying to ping it!?
– david
Nov 27 '17 at 17:23




update: i created an ubuntu 16.04 host on the same bridge, with same results. however, if i run tcpdump IN the vm, it sees ARP requests coming from machine out on the network trying to ping it!?
– david
Nov 27 '17 at 17:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














running the tcpdump (in multiple places) gave me the clue to the fix on this. i noticed that arp traffic was showing up in the dumps on the vm and on the host, but outgoing and incoming traffic would only show up at the host, not at the vm. ufw was running but nothing was set (far as i could tell, dont really know anything about it), BUT i noticed that iptables -L showed the FORWARD chain had a policy of DENY! i compared that with another ubuntu installation i had and it had a default policy of ACCEPT, so - sure enough - change the policy to be ACCEPT and all was well!



i have a feeling that installing docker.io made some iptables changes, but i wont know for sure, just glad to have this issue behind me!



hope it helps someone else






share|improve this answer





















  • I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
    – jamesy829
    Jan 15 at 4:13











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f980752%2fubuntu-16-04-kvm-bridges-not-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














running the tcpdump (in multiple places) gave me the clue to the fix on this. i noticed that arp traffic was showing up in the dumps on the vm and on the host, but outgoing and incoming traffic would only show up at the host, not at the vm. ufw was running but nothing was set (far as i could tell, dont really know anything about it), BUT i noticed that iptables -L showed the FORWARD chain had a policy of DENY! i compared that with another ubuntu installation i had and it had a default policy of ACCEPT, so - sure enough - change the policy to be ACCEPT and all was well!



i have a feeling that installing docker.io made some iptables changes, but i wont know for sure, just glad to have this issue behind me!



hope it helps someone else






share|improve this answer





















  • I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
    – jamesy829
    Jan 15 at 4:13
















2














running the tcpdump (in multiple places) gave me the clue to the fix on this. i noticed that arp traffic was showing up in the dumps on the vm and on the host, but outgoing and incoming traffic would only show up at the host, not at the vm. ufw was running but nothing was set (far as i could tell, dont really know anything about it), BUT i noticed that iptables -L showed the FORWARD chain had a policy of DENY! i compared that with another ubuntu installation i had and it had a default policy of ACCEPT, so - sure enough - change the policy to be ACCEPT and all was well!



i have a feeling that installing docker.io made some iptables changes, but i wont know for sure, just glad to have this issue behind me!



hope it helps someone else






share|improve this answer





















  • I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
    – jamesy829
    Jan 15 at 4:13














2












2








2






running the tcpdump (in multiple places) gave me the clue to the fix on this. i noticed that arp traffic was showing up in the dumps on the vm and on the host, but outgoing and incoming traffic would only show up at the host, not at the vm. ufw was running but nothing was set (far as i could tell, dont really know anything about it), BUT i noticed that iptables -L showed the FORWARD chain had a policy of DENY! i compared that with another ubuntu installation i had and it had a default policy of ACCEPT, so - sure enough - change the policy to be ACCEPT and all was well!



i have a feeling that installing docker.io made some iptables changes, but i wont know for sure, just glad to have this issue behind me!



hope it helps someone else






share|improve this answer












running the tcpdump (in multiple places) gave me the clue to the fix on this. i noticed that arp traffic was showing up in the dumps on the vm and on the host, but outgoing and incoming traffic would only show up at the host, not at the vm. ufw was running but nothing was set (far as i could tell, dont really know anything about it), BUT i noticed that iptables -L showed the FORWARD chain had a policy of DENY! i compared that with another ubuntu installation i had and it had a default policy of ACCEPT, so - sure enough - change the policy to be ACCEPT and all was well!



i have a feeling that installing docker.io made some iptables changes, but i wont know for sure, just glad to have this issue behind me!



hope it helps someone else







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 29 '17 at 2:53









david

212




212












  • I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
    – jamesy829
    Jan 15 at 4:13


















  • I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
    – jamesy829
    Jan 15 at 4:13
















I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
– jamesy829
Jan 15 at 4:13




I would like to add, the command to set policy is sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT for the above scenario
– jamesy829
Jan 15 at 4:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f980752%2fubuntu-16-04-kvm-bridges-not-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?