If $f(4xy)=2y[f(x+y)+f(x-y)]$ and $f(5)=3$, find $f(2015)$
$begingroup$
Suppose the function $f:Bbb RtoBbb R$ satisfies the following conditions:
$$begin{align}
f(4xy)&=2y[f(x+y)+f(x-y)] \[4pt]
f(5)&=3
end{align}$$
Find the value of $f(2015)$.
I have tried to find some other hiding condition, like $f(0)=0,$ but which is useless.
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose the function $f:Bbb RtoBbb R$ satisfies the following conditions:
$$begin{align}
f(4xy)&=2y[f(x+y)+f(x-y)] \[4pt]
f(5)&=3
end{align}$$
Find the value of $f(2015)$.
I have tried to find some other hiding condition, like $f(0)=0,$ but which is useless.
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose the function $f:Bbb RtoBbb R$ satisfies the following conditions:
$$begin{align}
f(4xy)&=2y[f(x+y)+f(x-y)] \[4pt]
f(5)&=3
end{align}$$
Find the value of $f(2015)$.
I have tried to find some other hiding condition, like $f(0)=0,$ but which is useless.
functions
$endgroup$
Suppose the function $f:Bbb RtoBbb R$ satisfies the following conditions:
$$begin{align}
f(4xy)&=2y[f(x+y)+f(x-y)] \[4pt]
f(5)&=3
end{align}$$
Find the value of $f(2015)$.
I have tried to find some other hiding condition, like $f(0)=0,$ but which is useless.
functions
functions
edited Dec 31 '18 at 22:27
Blue
49.7k870158
49.7k870158
asked Dec 27 '18 at 0:20
yuanming luoyuanming luo
10211
10211
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Firstly, it’s trivial that
$$f(0) = f(4cdot 0cdot 0) = 2cdot 0 cdot [f(0) + f(0)] = 0$$
Next, we see that
$$0 = f(0) = f(4cdot 0 cdot y) = 2ycdot [f(y) + f(-y)]text{,}$$
which implies that $f(-y) = -f(y)$ for all $yneq 0$.
Afterwards, one notices that
$$f(4xy) = f(4yx)$$
Hence,
$$2ycdot [f(x+y) + f(x-y)] = 2xcdot [f(x+y) + f(y-x)]$$
$$Leftrightarrow (x-y)cdot f(x+y) = (x+y)cdot f(x-y)$$
$$Leftrightarrow f(x+y) = frac{x+y}{x-y}cdot f(x-y)$$
If we substitute now $x=1010$ and $y=1005$, we get that
$$f(2015) = frac{2015}{5}cdot 3 = 1209$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With the provided function,
$$fleft(4xyright) = 2yleft[fleft(x + yright) + fleft(x - yright)right] tag{1}label{eq1}$$
First, substitute $y = 0$ to get
$$fleft(0right) = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Next, substitute $x = 0$ and use eqref{eq2} to get
$$0 = 2yleft[fleft(yright) + fleft(-yright)right] tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, for all values of $y$ other than $0$, dividing both sides by $2y$ gives
$$fleft(yright) = -fleft(-yright) tag{4}label{eq4}$$
In other words, $f$ is an odd function. Next, substituting $y = 1$ into eqref{eq1} gives
$$fleft(4xright) = 2left[fleft(x + 1right) + fleft(x - 1right)right] tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Now, using $x = 1$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2left[fleft(2right) + fleft(0right)right] tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq2} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2fleft(2right) tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Similarly, using $x = 3$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 2left[fleft(4right) + fleft(2right)right] tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq7} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 6fleft(2right) tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Note that eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq4}, eqref{eq7} and eqref{eq9} all satisfy
$$fleft(nxright) = nfleft(xright) forall ; n in N tag{10}label{eq10}$$
In particular, for eqref{eq2}, $n = 0 ; forall ; x in R$; for eqref{eq4}, $n = -1 ; forall ; x in R$; and for eqref{eq7} & eqref{eq9}, $x = 2$ only, with $n = 2$ & $n = 6$, respectively. This doesn't prove eqref{eq10} always works, but it suggests that $f$ is a linear multiple of $x$, i.e, $fleft(xright) = kx text{ for a non-zero constant } k in R$, which from the given condition of
$$fleft(5right) = 3 tag{11}label{eq11}$$
gives a value of $k = frac{3}{5}$ so the function would be
$$fleft(xright) = cfrac{3x}{5} tag{12}label{eq12}$$
To confirm this, substitute eqref{eq12} into eqref{eq5} to give on the left side
$$cfrac{12x}{5} tag{13}label{eq13}$$
with the right side becoming
$$2left[cfrac{3left(x + 1right)}{5} + cfrac{3left(x - 1right)}{5} right] = 2left[cfrac{left(3x + 3 + 3x - 3right)}{5} right] = cfrac{12x}{5} tag{14}label{eq14}$$
Similarly, using eqref{eq12} in eqref{eq1} gives a left & right hand side of $frac{12xy}{5}$, confirming it's also a solution of the original equation. I'm not quite sure offhand how to prove it's unique, but I assume it is. We thus get a final answer of
$$fleft(2015right) = cfrac{3 times 2015}{5} = 1209 tag{15}label{eq15}$$
Note: The solution could involve just "guessing" the function being a constant multiple of the argument, and then showing this works to determine the final answer, but I thought it might be useful for people to see how one can approach solving this problem somewhat systematically as I did. In particular, I tried using small constant values for $x$ and $y$, checking what information this offered, and then seeing if I could leverage this when using other values. For example, I started with $x = 0$ and $y = 0$, then used $y = 1$, $x = 1$ and $x = 3$. Each time, I used previous details to help simplify and learn more about the new values, until I saw the pattern which I then confirmed worked.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
1
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053456%2fif-f4xy-2yfxyfx-y-and-f5-3-find-f2015%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Firstly, it’s trivial that
$$f(0) = f(4cdot 0cdot 0) = 2cdot 0 cdot [f(0) + f(0)] = 0$$
Next, we see that
$$0 = f(0) = f(4cdot 0 cdot y) = 2ycdot [f(y) + f(-y)]text{,}$$
which implies that $f(-y) = -f(y)$ for all $yneq 0$.
Afterwards, one notices that
$$f(4xy) = f(4yx)$$
Hence,
$$2ycdot [f(x+y) + f(x-y)] = 2xcdot [f(x+y) + f(y-x)]$$
$$Leftrightarrow (x-y)cdot f(x+y) = (x+y)cdot f(x-y)$$
$$Leftrightarrow f(x+y) = frac{x+y}{x-y}cdot f(x-y)$$
If we substitute now $x=1010$ and $y=1005$, we get that
$$f(2015) = frac{2015}{5}cdot 3 = 1209$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Firstly, it’s trivial that
$$f(0) = f(4cdot 0cdot 0) = 2cdot 0 cdot [f(0) + f(0)] = 0$$
Next, we see that
$$0 = f(0) = f(4cdot 0 cdot y) = 2ycdot [f(y) + f(-y)]text{,}$$
which implies that $f(-y) = -f(y)$ for all $yneq 0$.
Afterwards, one notices that
$$f(4xy) = f(4yx)$$
Hence,
$$2ycdot [f(x+y) + f(x-y)] = 2xcdot [f(x+y) + f(y-x)]$$
$$Leftrightarrow (x-y)cdot f(x+y) = (x+y)cdot f(x-y)$$
$$Leftrightarrow f(x+y) = frac{x+y}{x-y}cdot f(x-y)$$
If we substitute now $x=1010$ and $y=1005$, we get that
$$f(2015) = frac{2015}{5}cdot 3 = 1209$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Firstly, it’s trivial that
$$f(0) = f(4cdot 0cdot 0) = 2cdot 0 cdot [f(0) + f(0)] = 0$$
Next, we see that
$$0 = f(0) = f(4cdot 0 cdot y) = 2ycdot [f(y) + f(-y)]text{,}$$
which implies that $f(-y) = -f(y)$ for all $yneq 0$.
Afterwards, one notices that
$$f(4xy) = f(4yx)$$
Hence,
$$2ycdot [f(x+y) + f(x-y)] = 2xcdot [f(x+y) + f(y-x)]$$
$$Leftrightarrow (x-y)cdot f(x+y) = (x+y)cdot f(x-y)$$
$$Leftrightarrow f(x+y) = frac{x+y}{x-y}cdot f(x-y)$$
If we substitute now $x=1010$ and $y=1005$, we get that
$$f(2015) = frac{2015}{5}cdot 3 = 1209$$
$endgroup$
Firstly, it’s trivial that
$$f(0) = f(4cdot 0cdot 0) = 2cdot 0 cdot [f(0) + f(0)] = 0$$
Next, we see that
$$0 = f(0) = f(4cdot 0 cdot y) = 2ycdot [f(y) + f(-y)]text{,}$$
which implies that $f(-y) = -f(y)$ for all $yneq 0$.
Afterwards, one notices that
$$f(4xy) = f(4yx)$$
Hence,
$$2ycdot [f(x+y) + f(x-y)] = 2xcdot [f(x+y) + f(y-x)]$$
$$Leftrightarrow (x-y)cdot f(x+y) = (x+y)cdot f(x-y)$$
$$Leftrightarrow f(x+y) = frac{x+y}{x-y}cdot f(x-y)$$
If we substitute now $x=1010$ and $y=1005$, we get that
$$f(2015) = frac{2015}{5}cdot 3 = 1209$$
answered Dec 31 '18 at 23:59
Jonas De SchouwerJonas De Schouwer
4089
4089
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
$begingroup$
Very nice! It's a more direct way to get the function value than what I did in my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 1 at 1:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With the provided function,
$$fleft(4xyright) = 2yleft[fleft(x + yright) + fleft(x - yright)right] tag{1}label{eq1}$$
First, substitute $y = 0$ to get
$$fleft(0right) = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Next, substitute $x = 0$ and use eqref{eq2} to get
$$0 = 2yleft[fleft(yright) + fleft(-yright)right] tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, for all values of $y$ other than $0$, dividing both sides by $2y$ gives
$$fleft(yright) = -fleft(-yright) tag{4}label{eq4}$$
In other words, $f$ is an odd function. Next, substituting $y = 1$ into eqref{eq1} gives
$$fleft(4xright) = 2left[fleft(x + 1right) + fleft(x - 1right)right] tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Now, using $x = 1$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2left[fleft(2right) + fleft(0right)right] tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq2} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2fleft(2right) tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Similarly, using $x = 3$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 2left[fleft(4right) + fleft(2right)right] tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq7} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 6fleft(2right) tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Note that eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq4}, eqref{eq7} and eqref{eq9} all satisfy
$$fleft(nxright) = nfleft(xright) forall ; n in N tag{10}label{eq10}$$
In particular, for eqref{eq2}, $n = 0 ; forall ; x in R$; for eqref{eq4}, $n = -1 ; forall ; x in R$; and for eqref{eq7} & eqref{eq9}, $x = 2$ only, with $n = 2$ & $n = 6$, respectively. This doesn't prove eqref{eq10} always works, but it suggests that $f$ is a linear multiple of $x$, i.e, $fleft(xright) = kx text{ for a non-zero constant } k in R$, which from the given condition of
$$fleft(5right) = 3 tag{11}label{eq11}$$
gives a value of $k = frac{3}{5}$ so the function would be
$$fleft(xright) = cfrac{3x}{5} tag{12}label{eq12}$$
To confirm this, substitute eqref{eq12} into eqref{eq5} to give on the left side
$$cfrac{12x}{5} tag{13}label{eq13}$$
with the right side becoming
$$2left[cfrac{3left(x + 1right)}{5} + cfrac{3left(x - 1right)}{5} right] = 2left[cfrac{left(3x + 3 + 3x - 3right)}{5} right] = cfrac{12x}{5} tag{14}label{eq14}$$
Similarly, using eqref{eq12} in eqref{eq1} gives a left & right hand side of $frac{12xy}{5}$, confirming it's also a solution of the original equation. I'm not quite sure offhand how to prove it's unique, but I assume it is. We thus get a final answer of
$$fleft(2015right) = cfrac{3 times 2015}{5} = 1209 tag{15}label{eq15}$$
Note: The solution could involve just "guessing" the function being a constant multiple of the argument, and then showing this works to determine the final answer, but I thought it might be useful for people to see how one can approach solving this problem somewhat systematically as I did. In particular, I tried using small constant values for $x$ and $y$, checking what information this offered, and then seeing if I could leverage this when using other values. For example, I started with $x = 0$ and $y = 0$, then used $y = 1$, $x = 1$ and $x = 3$. Each time, I used previous details to help simplify and learn more about the new values, until I saw the pattern which I then confirmed worked.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
1
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
With the provided function,
$$fleft(4xyright) = 2yleft[fleft(x + yright) + fleft(x - yright)right] tag{1}label{eq1}$$
First, substitute $y = 0$ to get
$$fleft(0right) = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Next, substitute $x = 0$ and use eqref{eq2} to get
$$0 = 2yleft[fleft(yright) + fleft(-yright)right] tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, for all values of $y$ other than $0$, dividing both sides by $2y$ gives
$$fleft(yright) = -fleft(-yright) tag{4}label{eq4}$$
In other words, $f$ is an odd function. Next, substituting $y = 1$ into eqref{eq1} gives
$$fleft(4xright) = 2left[fleft(x + 1right) + fleft(x - 1right)right] tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Now, using $x = 1$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2left[fleft(2right) + fleft(0right)right] tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq2} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2fleft(2right) tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Similarly, using $x = 3$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 2left[fleft(4right) + fleft(2right)right] tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq7} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 6fleft(2right) tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Note that eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq4}, eqref{eq7} and eqref{eq9} all satisfy
$$fleft(nxright) = nfleft(xright) forall ; n in N tag{10}label{eq10}$$
In particular, for eqref{eq2}, $n = 0 ; forall ; x in R$; for eqref{eq4}, $n = -1 ; forall ; x in R$; and for eqref{eq7} & eqref{eq9}, $x = 2$ only, with $n = 2$ & $n = 6$, respectively. This doesn't prove eqref{eq10} always works, but it suggests that $f$ is a linear multiple of $x$, i.e, $fleft(xright) = kx text{ for a non-zero constant } k in R$, which from the given condition of
$$fleft(5right) = 3 tag{11}label{eq11}$$
gives a value of $k = frac{3}{5}$ so the function would be
$$fleft(xright) = cfrac{3x}{5} tag{12}label{eq12}$$
To confirm this, substitute eqref{eq12} into eqref{eq5} to give on the left side
$$cfrac{12x}{5} tag{13}label{eq13}$$
with the right side becoming
$$2left[cfrac{3left(x + 1right)}{5} + cfrac{3left(x - 1right)}{5} right] = 2left[cfrac{left(3x + 3 + 3x - 3right)}{5} right] = cfrac{12x}{5} tag{14}label{eq14}$$
Similarly, using eqref{eq12} in eqref{eq1} gives a left & right hand side of $frac{12xy}{5}$, confirming it's also a solution of the original equation. I'm not quite sure offhand how to prove it's unique, but I assume it is. We thus get a final answer of
$$fleft(2015right) = cfrac{3 times 2015}{5} = 1209 tag{15}label{eq15}$$
Note: The solution could involve just "guessing" the function being a constant multiple of the argument, and then showing this works to determine the final answer, but I thought it might be useful for people to see how one can approach solving this problem somewhat systematically as I did. In particular, I tried using small constant values for $x$ and $y$, checking what information this offered, and then seeing if I could leverage this when using other values. For example, I started with $x = 0$ and $y = 0$, then used $y = 1$, $x = 1$ and $x = 3$. Each time, I used previous details to help simplify and learn more about the new values, until I saw the pattern which I then confirmed worked.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
1
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
With the provided function,
$$fleft(4xyright) = 2yleft[fleft(x + yright) + fleft(x - yright)right] tag{1}label{eq1}$$
First, substitute $y = 0$ to get
$$fleft(0right) = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Next, substitute $x = 0$ and use eqref{eq2} to get
$$0 = 2yleft[fleft(yright) + fleft(-yright)right] tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, for all values of $y$ other than $0$, dividing both sides by $2y$ gives
$$fleft(yright) = -fleft(-yright) tag{4}label{eq4}$$
In other words, $f$ is an odd function. Next, substituting $y = 1$ into eqref{eq1} gives
$$fleft(4xright) = 2left[fleft(x + 1right) + fleft(x - 1right)right] tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Now, using $x = 1$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2left[fleft(2right) + fleft(0right)right] tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq2} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2fleft(2right) tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Similarly, using $x = 3$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 2left[fleft(4right) + fleft(2right)right] tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq7} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 6fleft(2right) tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Note that eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq4}, eqref{eq7} and eqref{eq9} all satisfy
$$fleft(nxright) = nfleft(xright) forall ; n in N tag{10}label{eq10}$$
In particular, for eqref{eq2}, $n = 0 ; forall ; x in R$; for eqref{eq4}, $n = -1 ; forall ; x in R$; and for eqref{eq7} & eqref{eq9}, $x = 2$ only, with $n = 2$ & $n = 6$, respectively. This doesn't prove eqref{eq10} always works, but it suggests that $f$ is a linear multiple of $x$, i.e, $fleft(xright) = kx text{ for a non-zero constant } k in R$, which from the given condition of
$$fleft(5right) = 3 tag{11}label{eq11}$$
gives a value of $k = frac{3}{5}$ so the function would be
$$fleft(xright) = cfrac{3x}{5} tag{12}label{eq12}$$
To confirm this, substitute eqref{eq12} into eqref{eq5} to give on the left side
$$cfrac{12x}{5} tag{13}label{eq13}$$
with the right side becoming
$$2left[cfrac{3left(x + 1right)}{5} + cfrac{3left(x - 1right)}{5} right] = 2left[cfrac{left(3x + 3 + 3x - 3right)}{5} right] = cfrac{12x}{5} tag{14}label{eq14}$$
Similarly, using eqref{eq12} in eqref{eq1} gives a left & right hand side of $frac{12xy}{5}$, confirming it's also a solution of the original equation. I'm not quite sure offhand how to prove it's unique, but I assume it is. We thus get a final answer of
$$fleft(2015right) = cfrac{3 times 2015}{5} = 1209 tag{15}label{eq15}$$
Note: The solution could involve just "guessing" the function being a constant multiple of the argument, and then showing this works to determine the final answer, but I thought it might be useful for people to see how one can approach solving this problem somewhat systematically as I did. In particular, I tried using small constant values for $x$ and $y$, checking what information this offered, and then seeing if I could leverage this when using other values. For example, I started with $x = 0$ and $y = 0$, then used $y = 1$, $x = 1$ and $x = 3$. Each time, I used previous details to help simplify and learn more about the new values, until I saw the pattern which I then confirmed worked.
$endgroup$
With the provided function,
$$fleft(4xyright) = 2yleft[fleft(x + yright) + fleft(x - yright)right] tag{1}label{eq1}$$
First, substitute $y = 0$ to get
$$fleft(0right) = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Next, substitute $x = 0$ and use eqref{eq2} to get
$$0 = 2yleft[fleft(yright) + fleft(-yright)right] tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, for all values of $y$ other than $0$, dividing both sides by $2y$ gives
$$fleft(yright) = -fleft(-yright) tag{4}label{eq4}$$
In other words, $f$ is an odd function. Next, substituting $y = 1$ into eqref{eq1} gives
$$fleft(4xright) = 2left[fleft(x + 1right) + fleft(x - 1right)right] tag{5}label{eq5}$$
Now, using $x = 1$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2left[fleft(2right) + fleft(0right)right] tag{6}label{eq6}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq2} gives
$$fleft(4right) = 2fleft(2right) tag{7}label{eq7}$$
Similarly, using $x = 3$ in eqref{eq5} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 2left[fleft(4right) + fleft(2right)right] tag{8}label{eq8}$$
Thus, using eqref{eq7} gives
$$fleft(12right) = 6fleft(2right) tag{9}label{eq9}$$
Note that eqref{eq2}, eqref{eq4}, eqref{eq7} and eqref{eq9} all satisfy
$$fleft(nxright) = nfleft(xright) forall ; n in N tag{10}label{eq10}$$
In particular, for eqref{eq2}, $n = 0 ; forall ; x in R$; for eqref{eq4}, $n = -1 ; forall ; x in R$; and for eqref{eq7} & eqref{eq9}, $x = 2$ only, with $n = 2$ & $n = 6$, respectively. This doesn't prove eqref{eq10} always works, but it suggests that $f$ is a linear multiple of $x$, i.e, $fleft(xright) = kx text{ for a non-zero constant } k in R$, which from the given condition of
$$fleft(5right) = 3 tag{11}label{eq11}$$
gives a value of $k = frac{3}{5}$ so the function would be
$$fleft(xright) = cfrac{3x}{5} tag{12}label{eq12}$$
To confirm this, substitute eqref{eq12} into eqref{eq5} to give on the left side
$$cfrac{12x}{5} tag{13}label{eq13}$$
with the right side becoming
$$2left[cfrac{3left(x + 1right)}{5} + cfrac{3left(x - 1right)}{5} right] = 2left[cfrac{left(3x + 3 + 3x - 3right)}{5} right] = cfrac{12x}{5} tag{14}label{eq14}$$
Similarly, using eqref{eq12} in eqref{eq1} gives a left & right hand side of $frac{12xy}{5}$, confirming it's also a solution of the original equation. I'm not quite sure offhand how to prove it's unique, but I assume it is. We thus get a final answer of
$$fleft(2015right) = cfrac{3 times 2015}{5} = 1209 tag{15}label{eq15}$$
Note: The solution could involve just "guessing" the function being a constant multiple of the argument, and then showing this works to determine the final answer, but I thought it might be useful for people to see how one can approach solving this problem somewhat systematically as I did. In particular, I tried using small constant values for $x$ and $y$, checking what information this offered, and then seeing if I could leverage this when using other values. For example, I started with $x = 0$ and $y = 0$, then used $y = 1$, $x = 1$ and $x = 3$. Each time, I used previous details to help simplify and learn more about the new values, until I saw the pattern which I then confirmed worked.
edited Jan 1 at 0:04
answered Dec 27 '18 at 1:05
John OmielanJohn Omielan
5,2542218
5,2542218
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
1
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
1
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
$begingroup$
I am trying to give a reason for the 10th step.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 2:08
1
1
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
@yuanmingluo I don't offhand see any easy way to directly prove from the provided functional equation that the function is linear. However, the various sets of values all match this so it would have to be a somewhat "perverse" function to not be linear, but the provided equation indicates it is a relatively simple function. I know this is not very precise, but it's the best I can do for now. As I mention in my answer, I am quite rusty at solving these types of problems, but I was once fairly good at it many years ago.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 27 '18 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Yeah, I know. It was my first time to see this type of questions. So, I also want to do my best.
$endgroup$
– yuanming luo
Dec 27 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
I don't see how (10) is implied by the equations you claim imply it.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Dec 31 '18 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thanks for your question. ($10$) works with all the equations I list. With ($2$), $fleft(0xright) = 0x forall ; x in R$; with ($4$), $fleft(-xright) = -x forall ; x in R$; with ($7$), $fleft(2 times 2right) = 2left(2right)$; & with ($9$), $fleft(6 times 2right) = 6fleft(2right)$. I have updated my solution so this is more clear. This obviously doesn't prove that ($10$) works for all values of $x$ & $n$, but it would have to be a quite unusual function for it not to. I just used the apparent pattern to determine a proposed solution that I confirmed works.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 31 '18 at 22:55
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053456%2fif-f4xy-2yfxyfx-y-and-f5-3-find-f2015%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown