ConTeXt: Is ist possible to use matrices nested like in 'block' matrices?












4















I tried to use context's startmatrix/stopmatrix nested with predefined matrix blocks. In latex it works like this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

defmatOne{begin{matrix}1 & 0 \ 0 & 1end{matrix}}
defmatTwo{begin{matrix}a\bend{matrix}}
defmatThree{begin{matrix}c & dend{matrix}}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
begin{pmatrix}
matOne & matTwo\
matThree & e\
end{pmatrix}\
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & a\
0 & 1 & b\
c & d & e\
end{pmatrix}
end{align*}
end{document}


The top matrix out of blocks looks the same as the bottom one. In context I tried the following:



definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=1em]

defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

starttext

startformula
startpmatrix
NC matOne NC matTwoNR
NC matThree NC eNR
stoppmatrix
stopformula
startformula
startpmatrix
NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
NC c NC d NC eNR
stoppmatrix
stopformula

stoptext


Here the top matrix looks different than the bottom one. It seems that the distance isn't applied after a block matrix. Is there a way to fix this?










share|improve this question



























    4















    I tried to use context's startmatrix/stopmatrix nested with predefined matrix blocks. In latex it works like this:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    defmatOne{begin{matrix}1 & 0 \ 0 & 1end{matrix}}
    defmatTwo{begin{matrix}a\bend{matrix}}
    defmatThree{begin{matrix}c & dend{matrix}}

    begin{document}
    begin{align*}
    begin{pmatrix}
    matOne & matTwo\
    matThree & e\
    end{pmatrix}\
    begin{pmatrix}
    1 & 0 & a\
    0 & 1 & b\
    c & d & e\
    end{pmatrix}
    end{align*}
    end{document}


    The top matrix out of blocks looks the same as the bottom one. In context I tried the following:



    definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=1em]

    defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
    defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
    defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

    starttext

    startformula
    startpmatrix
    NC matOne NC matTwoNR
    NC matThree NC eNR
    stoppmatrix
    stopformula
    startformula
    startpmatrix
    NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
    NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
    NC c NC d NC eNR
    stoppmatrix
    stopformula

    stoptext


    Here the top matrix looks different than the bottom one. It seems that the distance isn't applied after a block matrix. Is there a way to fix this?










    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4








      I tried to use context's startmatrix/stopmatrix nested with predefined matrix blocks. In latex it works like this:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}

      defmatOne{begin{matrix}1 & 0 \ 0 & 1end{matrix}}
      defmatTwo{begin{matrix}a\bend{matrix}}
      defmatThree{begin{matrix}c & dend{matrix}}

      begin{document}
      begin{align*}
      begin{pmatrix}
      matOne & matTwo\
      matThree & e\
      end{pmatrix}\
      begin{pmatrix}
      1 & 0 & a\
      0 & 1 & b\
      c & d & e\
      end{pmatrix}
      end{align*}
      end{document}


      The top matrix out of blocks looks the same as the bottom one. In context I tried the following:



      definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=1em]

      defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
      defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
      defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

      starttext

      startformula
      startpmatrix
      NC matOne NC matTwoNR
      NC matThree NC eNR
      stoppmatrix
      stopformula
      startformula
      startpmatrix
      NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
      NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
      NC c NC d NC eNR
      stoppmatrix
      stopformula

      stoptext


      Here the top matrix looks different than the bottom one. It seems that the distance isn't applied after a block matrix. Is there a way to fix this?










      share|improve this question














      I tried to use context's startmatrix/stopmatrix nested with predefined matrix blocks. In latex it works like this:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}

      defmatOne{begin{matrix}1 & 0 \ 0 & 1end{matrix}}
      defmatTwo{begin{matrix}a\bend{matrix}}
      defmatThree{begin{matrix}c & dend{matrix}}

      begin{document}
      begin{align*}
      begin{pmatrix}
      matOne & matTwo\
      matThree & e\
      end{pmatrix}\
      begin{pmatrix}
      1 & 0 & a\
      0 & 1 & b\
      c & d & e\
      end{pmatrix}
      end{align*}
      end{document}


      The top matrix out of blocks looks the same as the bottom one. In context I tried the following:



      definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=1em]

      defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
      defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
      defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

      starttext

      startformula
      startpmatrix
      NC matOne NC matTwoNR
      NC matThree NC eNR
      stoppmatrix
      stopformula
      startformula
      startpmatrix
      NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
      NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
      NC c NC d NC eNR
      stoppmatrix
      stopformula

      stoptext


      Here the top matrix looks different than the bottom one. It seems that the distance isn't applied after a block matrix. Is there a way to fix this?







      math-mode context matrices






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Aug 22 '17 at 20:32









      IcxoluIcxolu

      1475




      1475






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          I'm unsure whether this breaks something else but it seems as if the definition of NC is not reverted properly. Reported here: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089631.html



          I cranked distance up to 2em to make the difference more visible.



          unprotect

          defmath_matrix_stop
          {crcr
          % ifgridsnapping else
          mathstrutcrcr
          noalign{vskip-baselineskip}%
          % fi
          egroup
          gdefmath_matrix_NC{endmathaligntab}
          egroup
          mathmatrixright
          endgroup}

          protect

          definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=2em]

          defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
          defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
          defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

          starttext

          startformula
          startpmatrix
          NC matOne NC matTwo NC matTwo NR
          NC matThree NC e NC eNR
          stoppmatrix
          stopformula
          startformula
          startpmatrix
          NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
          NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
          NC c NC d NC eNR
          stoppmatrix
          stopformula

          stoptext


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

            – Icxolu
            Aug 23 '17 at 11:27











          • @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

            – Henri Menke
            Aug 23 '17 at 21:06











          • Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

            – Icxolu
            Aug 24 '17 at 17:24





















          1














          FWIW, nested matrices work currently with the current version of ConTeXt (2019.03.21). The bug was fixed with this commit. The code listed in the example gives the following:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f387718%2fcontext-is-ist-possible-to-use-matrices-nested-like-in-block-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            I'm unsure whether this breaks something else but it seems as if the definition of NC is not reverted properly. Reported here: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089631.html



            I cranked distance up to 2em to make the difference more visible.



            unprotect

            defmath_matrix_stop
            {crcr
            % ifgridsnapping else
            mathstrutcrcr
            noalign{vskip-baselineskip}%
            % fi
            egroup
            gdefmath_matrix_NC{endmathaligntab}
            egroup
            mathmatrixright
            endgroup}

            protect

            definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=2em]

            defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
            defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
            defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

            starttext

            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC matOne NC matTwo NC matTwo NR
            NC matThree NC e NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula
            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
            NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
            NC c NC d NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula

            stoptext


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 23 '17 at 11:27











            • @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

              – Henri Menke
              Aug 23 '17 at 21:06











            • Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 24 '17 at 17:24


















            2














            I'm unsure whether this breaks something else but it seems as if the definition of NC is not reverted properly. Reported here: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089631.html



            I cranked distance up to 2em to make the difference more visible.



            unprotect

            defmath_matrix_stop
            {crcr
            % ifgridsnapping else
            mathstrutcrcr
            noalign{vskip-baselineskip}%
            % fi
            egroup
            gdefmath_matrix_NC{endmathaligntab}
            egroup
            mathmatrixright
            endgroup}

            protect

            definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=2em]

            defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
            defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
            defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

            starttext

            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC matOne NC matTwo NC matTwo NR
            NC matThree NC e NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula
            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
            NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
            NC c NC d NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula

            stoptext


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 23 '17 at 11:27











            • @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

              – Henri Menke
              Aug 23 '17 at 21:06











            • Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 24 '17 at 17:24
















            2












            2








            2







            I'm unsure whether this breaks something else but it seems as if the definition of NC is not reverted properly. Reported here: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089631.html



            I cranked distance up to 2em to make the difference more visible.



            unprotect

            defmath_matrix_stop
            {crcr
            % ifgridsnapping else
            mathstrutcrcr
            noalign{vskip-baselineskip}%
            % fi
            egroup
            gdefmath_matrix_NC{endmathaligntab}
            egroup
            mathmatrixright
            endgroup}

            protect

            definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=2em]

            defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
            defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
            defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

            starttext

            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC matOne NC matTwo NC matTwo NR
            NC matThree NC e NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula
            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
            NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
            NC c NC d NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula

            stoptext


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer















            I'm unsure whether this breaks something else but it seems as if the definition of NC is not reverted properly. Reported here: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/089631.html



            I cranked distance up to 2em to make the difference more visible.



            unprotect

            defmath_matrix_stop
            {crcr
            % ifgridsnapping else
            mathstrutcrcr
            noalign{vskip-baselineskip}%
            % fi
            egroup
            gdefmath_matrix_NC{endmathaligntab}
            egroup
            mathmatrixright
            endgroup}

            protect

            definemathmatrix[pmatrix][left={left(}, right={right)}, distance=2em]

            defmatOne{startmatrixNC 1 NC 0 NRNC 0 NC 1NRstopmatrix}
            defmatTwo{startmatrixNC aNRNC bNRstopmatrix}
            defmatThree{startmatrixNC c NC dNRstopmatrix}

            starttext

            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC matOne NC matTwo NC matTwo NR
            NC matThree NC e NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula
            startformula
            startpmatrix
            NC 1 NC 0 NC a NR
            NC 0 NC 1 NC b NR
            NC c NC d NC eNR
            stoppmatrix
            stopformula

            stoptext


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Aug 23 '17 at 21:06

























            answered Aug 22 '17 at 23:19









            Henri MenkeHenri Menke

            77.3k8171285




            77.3k8171285













            • Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 23 '17 at 11:27











            • @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

              – Henri Menke
              Aug 23 '17 at 21:06











            • Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 24 '17 at 17:24





















            • Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 23 '17 at 11:27











            • @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

              – Henri Menke
              Aug 23 '17 at 21:06











            • Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

              – Icxolu
              Aug 24 '17 at 17:24



















            Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

            – Icxolu
            Aug 23 '17 at 11:27





            Thanks Henry, so it seems like this is a bug in context. Your fix works in this case, but if a add a fourth column with another mathTwo in the first row and an f in the second it doesn't work anymore. If you keep adding some columns it adds the distance only every second column.

            – Icxolu
            Aug 23 '17 at 11:27













            @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

            – Henri Menke
            Aug 23 '17 at 21:06





            @Icxolu Maybe it works now, maybe I broke something else this time...

            – Henri Menke
            Aug 23 '17 at 21:06













            Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

            – Icxolu
            Aug 24 '17 at 17:24







            Thanks. I haven't found any issue, so I will accept this answer.

            – Icxolu
            Aug 24 '17 at 17:24













            1














            FWIW, nested matrices work currently with the current version of ConTeXt (2019.03.21). The bug was fixed with this commit. The code listed in the example gives the following:



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              FWIW, nested matrices work currently with the current version of ConTeXt (2019.03.21). The bug was fixed with this commit. The code listed in the example gives the following:



              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                FWIW, nested matrices work currently with the current version of ConTeXt (2019.03.21). The bug was fixed with this commit. The code listed in the example gives the following:



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer













                FWIW, nested matrices work currently with the current version of ConTeXt (2019.03.21). The bug was fixed with this commit. The code listed in the example gives the following:



                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 27 at 23:20









                AdityaAditya

                55.8k2110237




                55.8k2110237






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f387718%2fcontext-is-ist-possible-to-use-matrices-nested-like-in-block-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                    Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

                    Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents