Proof verification of $lim_{n to infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0$ for $|q| < 1$ using $epsilon$ definition
Prove
$$
lim_{n to infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0
$$ for $|q| < 1$ using $epsilon$ definition.
Using the definition of a limit:
$$
lim_{nto infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0 stackrel{text{def}}{iff} { forallepsilon>0 ,exists Ninmathbb N, forall n > N : left|frac{q^n}{n} - 0right| < epsilon }
$$
Consider the following:
$$
left|frac{q^n}{n}right| < epsilon iff frac{|q|^n}{n} < epsilon
$$
Redefine $|q|^n$:
$$
|q|^n = frac{1}{(1+t)^n} lefrac{1}{(1+nt)}
$$
Thus:
$$
frac{|q|^n}{n} < frac{1}{n(1+nt)} < frac{1}{n^2t} < frac{1}{n} < epsilon
$$
So from this we may find $N$ such that:
$$
frac{1}{n} < frac{1}{N} < epsilon
$$
Thus the limit is $0$.
Is it a correct proof?
calculus limits proof-verification limits-without-lhopital epsilon-delta
add a comment |
Prove
$$
lim_{n to infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0
$$ for $|q| < 1$ using $epsilon$ definition.
Using the definition of a limit:
$$
lim_{nto infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0 stackrel{text{def}}{iff} { forallepsilon>0 ,exists Ninmathbb N, forall n > N : left|frac{q^n}{n} - 0right| < epsilon }
$$
Consider the following:
$$
left|frac{q^n}{n}right| < epsilon iff frac{|q|^n}{n} < epsilon
$$
Redefine $|q|^n$:
$$
|q|^n = frac{1}{(1+t)^n} lefrac{1}{(1+nt)}
$$
Thus:
$$
frac{|q|^n}{n} < frac{1}{n(1+nt)} < frac{1}{n^2t} < frac{1}{n} < epsilon
$$
So from this we may find $N$ such that:
$$
frac{1}{n} < frac{1}{N} < epsilon
$$
Thus the limit is $0$.
Is it a correct proof?
calculus limits proof-verification limits-without-lhopital epsilon-delta
add a comment |
Prove
$$
lim_{n to infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0
$$ for $|q| < 1$ using $epsilon$ definition.
Using the definition of a limit:
$$
lim_{nto infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0 stackrel{text{def}}{iff} { forallepsilon>0 ,exists Ninmathbb N, forall n > N : left|frac{q^n}{n} - 0right| < epsilon }
$$
Consider the following:
$$
left|frac{q^n}{n}right| < epsilon iff frac{|q|^n}{n} < epsilon
$$
Redefine $|q|^n$:
$$
|q|^n = frac{1}{(1+t)^n} lefrac{1}{(1+nt)}
$$
Thus:
$$
frac{|q|^n}{n} < frac{1}{n(1+nt)} < frac{1}{n^2t} < frac{1}{n} < epsilon
$$
So from this we may find $N$ such that:
$$
frac{1}{n} < frac{1}{N} < epsilon
$$
Thus the limit is $0$.
Is it a correct proof?
calculus limits proof-verification limits-without-lhopital epsilon-delta
Prove
$$
lim_{n to infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0
$$ for $|q| < 1$ using $epsilon$ definition.
Using the definition of a limit:
$$
lim_{nto infty}frac{q^n}{n} = 0 stackrel{text{def}}{iff} { forallepsilon>0 ,exists Ninmathbb N, forall n > N : left|frac{q^n}{n} - 0right| < epsilon }
$$
Consider the following:
$$
left|frac{q^n}{n}right| < epsilon iff frac{|q|^n}{n} < epsilon
$$
Redefine $|q|^n$:
$$
|q|^n = frac{1}{(1+t)^n} lefrac{1}{(1+nt)}
$$
Thus:
$$
frac{|q|^n}{n} < frac{1}{n(1+nt)} < frac{1}{n^2t} < frac{1}{n} < epsilon
$$
So from this we may find $N$ such that:
$$
frac{1}{n} < frac{1}{N} < epsilon
$$
Thus the limit is $0$.
Is it a correct proof?
calculus limits proof-verification limits-without-lhopital epsilon-delta
calculus limits proof-verification limits-without-lhopital epsilon-delta
edited Nov 21 '18 at 16:51
asked Nov 21 '18 at 16:28
roman
1,93921221
1,93921221
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Your proof is almost correct, but there is a small problem concerning the inequality $dfrac1{n^2t}<dfrac1n$. This is equivalent to $nt>1$. Why would that be true? All you know about $t$ is that $t>0$. So, you should deal with the inequality $dfrac1{nt}<varepsilon$. That is, choose $N$ such that $dfrac1{Nt}<varepsilon$.
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
add a comment |
Yes, your proof is fine. You should mention, that the inequality $frac{1}{n^2t }<frac{1}{n}$ does not hold for all $n $, but for almost all $n $.
add a comment |
You have::
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} < dfrac{1}{n^2t}< dfrac{1}{nt},$ $t>0$.
Let $epsilon$ be given.
Archimedean principle:
There is a $N$, positive interger, s.t.
$N >dfrac{1}{t epsilon}$.
For $n ge N$:
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} <dfrac{1}{nt} le dfrac{1}{Nt} <epsilon$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007962%2fproof-verification-of-lim-n-to-infty-fracqnn-0-for-q-1-using%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your proof is almost correct, but there is a small problem concerning the inequality $dfrac1{n^2t}<dfrac1n$. This is equivalent to $nt>1$. Why would that be true? All you know about $t$ is that $t>0$. So, you should deal with the inequality $dfrac1{nt}<varepsilon$. That is, choose $N$ such that $dfrac1{Nt}<varepsilon$.
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
add a comment |
Your proof is almost correct, but there is a small problem concerning the inequality $dfrac1{n^2t}<dfrac1n$. This is equivalent to $nt>1$. Why would that be true? All you know about $t$ is that $t>0$. So, you should deal with the inequality $dfrac1{nt}<varepsilon$. That is, choose $N$ such that $dfrac1{Nt}<varepsilon$.
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
add a comment |
Your proof is almost correct, but there is a small problem concerning the inequality $dfrac1{n^2t}<dfrac1n$. This is equivalent to $nt>1$. Why would that be true? All you know about $t$ is that $t>0$. So, you should deal with the inequality $dfrac1{nt}<varepsilon$. That is, choose $N$ such that $dfrac1{Nt}<varepsilon$.
Your proof is almost correct, but there is a small problem concerning the inequality $dfrac1{n^2t}<dfrac1n$. This is equivalent to $nt>1$. Why would that be true? All you know about $t$ is that $t>0$. So, you should deal with the inequality $dfrac1{nt}<varepsilon$. That is, choose $N$ such that $dfrac1{Nt}<varepsilon$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 16:33
José Carlos Santos
151k22123224
151k22123224
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
add a comment |
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
That's a nice catch, thank you!
– roman
Nov 21 '18 at 16:50
add a comment |
Yes, your proof is fine. You should mention, that the inequality $frac{1}{n^2t }<frac{1}{n}$ does not hold for all $n $, but for almost all $n $.
add a comment |
Yes, your proof is fine. You should mention, that the inequality $frac{1}{n^2t }<frac{1}{n}$ does not hold for all $n $, but for almost all $n $.
add a comment |
Yes, your proof is fine. You should mention, that the inequality $frac{1}{n^2t }<frac{1}{n}$ does not hold for all $n $, but for almost all $n $.
Yes, your proof is fine. You should mention, that the inequality $frac{1}{n^2t }<frac{1}{n}$ does not hold for all $n $, but for almost all $n $.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 16:39
Fred
44.2k1845
44.2k1845
add a comment |
add a comment |
You have::
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} < dfrac{1}{n^2t}< dfrac{1}{nt},$ $t>0$.
Let $epsilon$ be given.
Archimedean principle:
There is a $N$, positive interger, s.t.
$N >dfrac{1}{t epsilon}$.
For $n ge N$:
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} <dfrac{1}{nt} le dfrac{1}{Nt} <epsilon$.
add a comment |
You have::
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} < dfrac{1}{n^2t}< dfrac{1}{nt},$ $t>0$.
Let $epsilon$ be given.
Archimedean principle:
There is a $N$, positive interger, s.t.
$N >dfrac{1}{t epsilon}$.
For $n ge N$:
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} <dfrac{1}{nt} le dfrac{1}{Nt} <epsilon$.
add a comment |
You have::
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} < dfrac{1}{n^2t}< dfrac{1}{nt},$ $t>0$.
Let $epsilon$ be given.
Archimedean principle:
There is a $N$, positive interger, s.t.
$N >dfrac{1}{t epsilon}$.
For $n ge N$:
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} <dfrac{1}{nt} le dfrac{1}{Nt} <epsilon$.
You have::
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} < dfrac{1}{n^2t}< dfrac{1}{nt},$ $t>0$.
Let $epsilon$ be given.
Archimedean principle:
There is a $N$, positive interger, s.t.
$N >dfrac{1}{t epsilon}$.
For $n ge N$:
$dfrac{|q|^n}{n} <dfrac{1}{nt} le dfrac{1}{Nt} <epsilon$.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 16:56
Peter Szilas
10.7k2720
10.7k2720
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007962%2fproof-verification-of-lim-n-to-infty-fracqnn-0-for-q-1-using%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown