How did Einstein integrate $frac{partial tau}{partial x'}+frac{v}{c^2-v^2}frac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$?
In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation
$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$
where
$tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)
- $x'=x-vt$
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)
$c$ is a constant
$x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables
and he derives that
$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$
where $a=a(v)$
Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.
Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?
linear-algebra pde linear-transformations partial-derivative
add a comment |
In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation
$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$
where
$tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)
- $x'=x-vt$
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)
$c$ is a constant
$x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables
and he derives that
$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$
where $a=a(v)$
Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.
Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?
linear-algebra pde linear-transformations partial-derivative
It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18
6
The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26
@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation
$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$
where
$tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)
- $x'=x-vt$
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)
$c$ is a constant
$x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables
and he derives that
$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$
where $a=a(v)$
Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.
Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?
linear-algebra pde linear-transformations partial-derivative
In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation
$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$
where
$tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)
- $x'=x-vt$
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)
$dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)
$c$ is a constant
$x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables
and he derives that
$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$
where $a=a(v)$
Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.
Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?
linear-algebra pde linear-transformations partial-derivative
linear-algebra pde linear-transformations partial-derivative
edited Dec 30 '18 at 17:13
TheSimpliFire
12.7k62260
12.7k62260
asked Dec 30 '18 at 15:55
Rational FunctionRational Function
719
719
It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18
6
The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26
@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18
6
The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26
@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28
It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18
It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18
6
6
The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26
The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26
@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28
@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
From the definitions given:
$$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
Also:
$$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
From the differential equation we get:
$$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$
Now using the definition given for $tau$:
$$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
$$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
add a comment |
There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
$$
frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
$$
begin{cases}xi= x'\
u=t-k x'
end{cases}
qquad
text{or equivalently,}qquad
begin{cases}x'=xi\
t=u+kxi.
end{cases}
$$
This gives
$$
frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
$$
tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
$$
for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).
1
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
1
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
add a comment |
Making the change of variables
$$
x'=x- vt\
t'=alpha t
$$
we have
$$
(v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
$$
so choosing
$$
alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
$$
we get
$$
frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056953%2fhow-did-einstein-integrate-frac-partial-tau-partial-x-fracvc2-v2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the definitions given:
$$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
Also:
$$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
From the differential equation we get:
$$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$
Now using the definition given for $tau$:
$$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
$$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
add a comment |
From the definitions given:
$$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
Also:
$$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
From the differential equation we get:
$$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$
Now using the definition given for $tau$:
$$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
$$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
add a comment |
From the definitions given:
$$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
Also:
$$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
From the differential equation we get:
$$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$
Now using the definition given for $tau$:
$$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
$$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.
From the definitions given:
$$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
Also:
$$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
From the differential equation we get:
$$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$
Now using the definition given for $tau$:
$$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
$$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 16:44
answered Dec 30 '18 at 16:21
Niki Di GianoNiki Di Giano
941211
941211
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
add a comment |
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:39
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:45
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
add a comment |
There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
$$
frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
$$
begin{cases}xi= x'\
u=t-k x'
end{cases}
qquad
text{or equivalently,}qquad
begin{cases}x'=xi\
t=u+kxi.
end{cases}
$$
This gives
$$
frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
$$
tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
$$
for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).
1
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
1
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
add a comment |
There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
$$
frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
$$
begin{cases}xi= x'\
u=t-k x'
end{cases}
qquad
text{or equivalently,}qquad
begin{cases}x'=xi\
t=u+kxi.
end{cases}
$$
This gives
$$
frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
$$
tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
$$
for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).
1
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
1
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
add a comment |
There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
$$
frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
$$
begin{cases}xi= x'\
u=t-k x'
end{cases}
qquad
text{or equivalently,}qquad
begin{cases}x'=xi\
t=u+kxi.
end{cases}
$$
This gives
$$
frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
$$
tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
$$
for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).
There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
$$
frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
$$
begin{cases}xi= x'\
u=t-k x'
end{cases}
qquad
text{or equivalently,}qquad
begin{cases}x'=xi\
t=u+kxi.
end{cases}
$$
This gives
$$
frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$
meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
$$
tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
$$
for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).
answered Dec 30 '18 at 17:01
timurtimur
11.8k2043
11.8k2043
1
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
1
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
add a comment |
1
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
1
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
1
1
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
– Rational Function
Dec 30 '18 at 17:18
1
1
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
add a comment |
Making the change of variables
$$
x'=x- vt\
t'=alpha t
$$
we have
$$
(v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
$$
so choosing
$$
alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
$$
we get
$$
frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
$$
add a comment |
Making the change of variables
$$
x'=x- vt\
t'=alpha t
$$
we have
$$
(v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
$$
so choosing
$$
alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
$$
we get
$$
frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
$$
add a comment |
Making the change of variables
$$
x'=x- vt\
t'=alpha t
$$
we have
$$
(v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
$$
so choosing
$$
alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
$$
we get
$$
frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
$$
Making the change of variables
$$
x'=x- vt\
t'=alpha t
$$
we have
$$
(v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
$$
so choosing
$$
alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
$$
we get
$$
frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
$$
answered Dec 30 '18 at 19:17
CesareoCesareo
8,3413516
8,3413516
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056953%2fhow-did-einstein-integrate-frac-partial-tau-partial-x-fracvc2-v2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18
6
The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26
@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28