Continuous embedding of weighted Lebesgue space












0














Let $w$ belong to the class of Muckenhoupt weight $A_p$ for some $1<p<infty$ and define the weighted Lebsgue space $L^p(Omega,w):={u:Omegatomathbb{R} text{ measurable }: ||u||=(int_{Omega}|u|^pw(x),dx)^frac{1}{p}<infty}$.



One can prove that for any cube $Q$ in $mathbb{R}^N$ ($Ngeq 2$), there exist $s=s(A_p(w))>1$ such that for $q=frac{ps}{p+s-1}$, we have
$$
(frac{1}{|Q|}int_{Q}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))(frac{1}{w(Q)}int_{Q}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p},
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ and for some constant $C=C(A_p(w))$ depending on the $A_p$ constant $A_p(w)$ of $w$.



My question is that does the above inequality imply that for any bounded smooth domain $Omega$ in $mathbb{R}^N$, one has
$$
(int_{Omega}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ with some constant $C$ independent of $f$.



Can you please help me regarding this.



This is mentioned in the paper (page 7) in the link : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.05061.pdf






functional-analysis analysis pde sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Just encase your domain $Omega$ in a big cube, extend $f$ by zero and apply the inequality above, the one on cubes.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:18






  • 1




    By entending $f$ by zero in $QsetminusOmega$, I have got the following inequality,
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:26






  • 1




    $(int_{Omega}|f|^q w,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))frac{|Q|^frac{1}{q}}{w(Q)^frac{1}{p}}(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}$, where $w(Q)=int_{Q}w,dx$.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:27








  • 1




    Now, the right side constant is fixed for any fixed $w$ and positive, so I have the requried embedding. Is the argument correct? Thank you very much.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    Yes, it is. Best write it as an answer.
    – MaoWao
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:05
















0














Let $w$ belong to the class of Muckenhoupt weight $A_p$ for some $1<p<infty$ and define the weighted Lebsgue space $L^p(Omega,w):={u:Omegatomathbb{R} text{ measurable }: ||u||=(int_{Omega}|u|^pw(x),dx)^frac{1}{p}<infty}$.



One can prove that for any cube $Q$ in $mathbb{R}^N$ ($Ngeq 2$), there exist $s=s(A_p(w))>1$ such that for $q=frac{ps}{p+s-1}$, we have
$$
(frac{1}{|Q|}int_{Q}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))(frac{1}{w(Q)}int_{Q}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p},
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ and for some constant $C=C(A_p(w))$ depending on the $A_p$ constant $A_p(w)$ of $w$.



My question is that does the above inequality imply that for any bounded smooth domain $Omega$ in $mathbb{R}^N$, one has
$$
(int_{Omega}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ with some constant $C$ independent of $f$.



Can you please help me regarding this.



This is mentioned in the paper (page 7) in the link : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.05061.pdf






functional-analysis analysis pde sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Just encase your domain $Omega$ in a big cube, extend $f$ by zero and apply the inequality above, the one on cubes.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:18






  • 1




    By entending $f$ by zero in $QsetminusOmega$, I have got the following inequality,
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:26






  • 1




    $(int_{Omega}|f|^q w,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))frac{|Q|^frac{1}{q}}{w(Q)^frac{1}{p}}(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}$, where $w(Q)=int_{Q}w,dx$.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:27








  • 1




    Now, the right side constant is fixed for any fixed $w$ and positive, so I have the requried embedding. Is the argument correct? Thank you very much.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    Yes, it is. Best write it as an answer.
    – MaoWao
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:05














0












0








0







Let $w$ belong to the class of Muckenhoupt weight $A_p$ for some $1<p<infty$ and define the weighted Lebsgue space $L^p(Omega,w):={u:Omegatomathbb{R} text{ measurable }: ||u||=(int_{Omega}|u|^pw(x),dx)^frac{1}{p}<infty}$.



One can prove that for any cube $Q$ in $mathbb{R}^N$ ($Ngeq 2$), there exist $s=s(A_p(w))>1$ such that for $q=frac{ps}{p+s-1}$, we have
$$
(frac{1}{|Q|}int_{Q}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))(frac{1}{w(Q)}int_{Q}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p},
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ and for some constant $C=C(A_p(w))$ depending on the $A_p$ constant $A_p(w)$ of $w$.



My question is that does the above inequality imply that for any bounded smooth domain $Omega$ in $mathbb{R}^N$, one has
$$
(int_{Omega}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ with some constant $C$ independent of $f$.



Can you please help me regarding this.



This is mentioned in the paper (page 7) in the link : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.05061.pdf






functional-analysis analysis pde sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question















Let $w$ belong to the class of Muckenhoupt weight $A_p$ for some $1<p<infty$ and define the weighted Lebsgue space $L^p(Omega,w):={u:Omegatomathbb{R} text{ measurable }: ||u||=(int_{Omega}|u|^pw(x),dx)^frac{1}{p}<infty}$.



One can prove that for any cube $Q$ in $mathbb{R}^N$ ($Ngeq 2$), there exist $s=s(A_p(w))>1$ such that for $q=frac{ps}{p+s-1}$, we have
$$
(frac{1}{|Q|}int_{Q}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))(frac{1}{w(Q)}int_{Q}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p},
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ and for some constant $C=C(A_p(w))$ depending on the $A_p$ constant $A_p(w)$ of $w$.



My question is that does the above inequality imply that for any bounded smooth domain $Omega$ in $mathbb{R}^N$, one has
$$
(int_{Omega}|f|^q,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}
$$
for every $fin L^p(Q,w)$ with some constant $C$ independent of $f$.



Can you please help me regarding this.



This is mentioned in the paper (page 7) in the link : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.05061.pdf






functional-analysis analysis pde sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis




functional-analysis analysis pde sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 9:25

























asked Nov 21 '18 at 8:07









Mathlover

1388




1388








  • 1




    Just encase your domain $Omega$ in a big cube, extend $f$ by zero and apply the inequality above, the one on cubes.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:18






  • 1




    By entending $f$ by zero in $QsetminusOmega$, I have got the following inequality,
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:26






  • 1




    $(int_{Omega}|f|^q w,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))frac{|Q|^frac{1}{q}}{w(Q)^frac{1}{p}}(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}$, where $w(Q)=int_{Q}w,dx$.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:27








  • 1




    Now, the right side constant is fixed for any fixed $w$ and positive, so I have the requried embedding. Is the argument correct? Thank you very much.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    Yes, it is. Best write it as an answer.
    – MaoWao
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:05














  • 1




    Just encase your domain $Omega$ in a big cube, extend $f$ by zero and apply the inequality above, the one on cubes.
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Nov 21 '18 at 8:18






  • 1




    By entending $f$ by zero in $QsetminusOmega$, I have got the following inequality,
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:26






  • 1




    $(int_{Omega}|f|^q w,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))frac{|Q|^frac{1}{q}}{w(Q)^frac{1}{p}}(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}$, where $w(Q)=int_{Q}w,dx$.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:27








  • 1




    Now, the right side constant is fixed for any fixed $w$ and positive, so I have the requried embedding. Is the argument correct? Thank you very much.
    – Mathlover
    Nov 21 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    Yes, it is. Best write it as an answer.
    – MaoWao
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:05








1




1




Just encase your domain $Omega$ in a big cube, extend $f$ by zero and apply the inequality above, the one on cubes.
– Giuseppe Negro
Nov 21 '18 at 8:18




Just encase your domain $Omega$ in a big cube, extend $f$ by zero and apply the inequality above, the one on cubes.
– Giuseppe Negro
Nov 21 '18 at 8:18




1




1




By entending $f$ by zero in $QsetminusOmega$, I have got the following inequality,
– Mathlover
Nov 21 '18 at 9:26




By entending $f$ by zero in $QsetminusOmega$, I have got the following inequality,
– Mathlover
Nov 21 '18 at 9:26




1




1




$(int_{Omega}|f|^q w,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))frac{|Q|^frac{1}{q}}{w(Q)^frac{1}{p}}(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}$, where $w(Q)=int_{Q}w,dx$.
– Mathlover
Nov 21 '18 at 9:27






$(int_{Omega}|f|^q w,dx)^frac{1}{q}leq C(A_p(w))frac{|Q|^frac{1}{q}}{w(Q)^frac{1}{p}}(int_{Omega}|f|^p w,dx)^frac{1}{p}$, where $w(Q)=int_{Q}w,dx$.
– Mathlover
Nov 21 '18 at 9:27






1




1




Now, the right side constant is fixed for any fixed $w$ and positive, so I have the requried embedding. Is the argument correct? Thank you very much.
– Mathlover
Nov 21 '18 at 9:33




Now, the right side constant is fixed for any fixed $w$ and positive, so I have the requried embedding. Is the argument correct? Thank you very much.
– Mathlover
Nov 21 '18 at 9:33




1




1




Yes, it is. Best write it as an answer.
– MaoWao
Nov 21 '18 at 14:05




Yes, it is. Best write it as an answer.
– MaoWao
Nov 21 '18 at 14:05















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007413%2fcontinuous-embedding-of-weighted-lebesgue-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007413%2fcontinuous-embedding-of-weighted-lebesgue-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
Read more

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Image
up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
Read more