Why doesn't lineno number a paragraph when it is followed by an indented equation?
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
While searching for the source of missing line numbers, I realized that paragraphs followed immediately by an equation have no line number, but this is fixed when a space is included,
e.g. the following document has no line numbers:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
But this one does:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
The only difference is the space above the equation.
Why is this the case (and is there a simple workaround)?
Is it incorrect to include an indented equation in a paragraph, or is this just a 'feature' of
lineno
?
equations amsmath line-numbering
add a comment |
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
While searching for the source of missing line numbers, I realized that paragraphs followed immediately by an equation have no line number, but this is fixed when a space is included,
e.g. the following document has no line numbers:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
But this one does:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
The only difference is the space above the equation.
Why is this the case (and is there a simple workaround)?
Is it incorrect to include an indented equation in a paragraph, or is this just a 'feature' of
lineno
?
equations amsmath line-numbering
add a comment |
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
While searching for the source of missing line numbers, I realized that paragraphs followed immediately by an equation have no line number, but this is fixed when a space is included,
e.g. the following document has no line numbers:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
But this one does:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
The only difference is the space above the equation.
Why is this the case (and is there a simple workaround)?
Is it incorrect to include an indented equation in a paragraph, or is this just a 'feature' of
lineno
?
equations amsmath line-numbering
While searching for the source of missing line numbers, I realized that paragraphs followed immediately by an equation have no line number, but this is fixed when a space is included,
e.g. the following document has no line numbers:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
But this one does:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
$$1+1=2$$
end{document}
The only difference is the space above the equation.
Why is this the case (and is there a simple workaround)?
Is it incorrect to include an indented equation in a paragraph, or is this just a 'feature' of
lineno
?
equations amsmath line-numbering
equations amsmath line-numbering
asked Aug 15 '11 at 20:47
David LeBauer
2,54863053
2,54863053
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
$$...$$
is obsolete, see Why is [ … ] preferable to $$. If you use the correct LaTeX displayed math environment, the numbering works without the empty line:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
[1+1=2]
end{document}
thank you, is$
also obsolete?
– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
2
@David: that's true, see: Are( and )
preferable to $. At least:( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX.$...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer$...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
3
@David:(
and)
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you usefixltx2e
package. And the default(
and)
have very few advantages compared with$
.
– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@Sigur Use anequation
environment.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
23
down vote
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the ''linenomath`` code as follows:
begin{linenomath*}
begin{equation}
a^2=b^2+c^2
end{equation}
end{linenomath*}
some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text heresome text here.
end{document}
1
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Mathematics environments need to be wrapped by begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
as mentioned in Bamzi's answer.
A quick way to change all your equations is to renew the equation environment by adding the code
letoldequationequation
letoldendequationendequation
renewenvironment{equation}
{linenomathNonumbersoldequation}
{oldendequationendlinenomath}
before begin{document}
.
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
1
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Use the mathlines
option for lineno and write:
begin{linenomath}
begin{align*}
z_{1}&=x_{1}+y_{1}\
z_{2}&=x_{2}+y_{2}
end{align*}
end{linenomath}
to obtain
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As @Denis has said, the mathlines
option can be used in some cases (for article
, but not for iopart
, for example). If you do so, and you are also using the amsmath
package, be sure to load lineno
after amsmath
. This MWE can be used to easily see the effect of that change:
documentclass{article}
% usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
begin{document}
linenumbers
Line number
No line number if lineno is loaded before amsmath!
begin{equation}
x = y
end{equation}
Line number
end{document}
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
$$...$$
is obsolete, see Why is [ … ] preferable to $$. If you use the correct LaTeX displayed math environment, the numbering works without the empty line:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
[1+1=2]
end{document}
thank you, is$
also obsolete?
– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
2
@David: that's true, see: Are( and )
preferable to $. At least:( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX.$...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer$...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
3
@David:(
and)
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you usefixltx2e
package. And the default(
and)
have very few advantages compared with$
.
– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@Sigur Use anequation
environment.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
$$...$$
is obsolete, see Why is [ … ] preferable to $$. If you use the correct LaTeX displayed math environment, the numbering works without the empty line:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
[1+1=2]
end{document}
thank you, is$
also obsolete?
– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
2
@David: that's true, see: Are( and )
preferable to $. At least:( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX.$...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer$...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
3
@David:(
and)
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you usefixltx2e
package. And the default(
and)
have very few advantages compared with$
.
– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@Sigur Use anequation
environment.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
$$...$$
is obsolete, see Why is [ … ] preferable to $$. If you use the correct LaTeX displayed math environment, the numbering works without the empty line:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
[1+1=2]
end{document}
$$...$$
is obsolete, see Why is [ … ] preferable to $$. If you use the correct LaTeX displayed math environment, the numbering works without the empty line:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit:
[1+1=2]
end{document}
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35
Community♦
1
1
answered Aug 15 '11 at 20:56
Stefan Kottwitz♦
175k63566756
175k63566756
thank you, is$
also obsolete?
– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
2
@David: that's true, see: Are( and )
preferable to $. At least:( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX.$...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer$...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
3
@David:(
and)
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you usefixltx2e
package. And the default(
and)
have very few advantages compared with$
.
– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@Sigur Use anequation
environment.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
|
show 1 more comment
thank you, is$
also obsolete?
– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
2
@David: that's true, see: Are( and )
preferable to $. At least:( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX.$...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer$...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
3
@David:(
and)
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you usefixltx2e
package. And the default(
and)
have very few advantages compared with$
.
– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@Sigur Use anequation
environment.
– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
thank you, is
$
also obsolete?– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
thank you, is
$
also obsolete?– David LeBauer
Aug 15 '11 at 21:04
2
2
@David: that's true, see: Are
( and )
preferable to $. At least: ( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX. $...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer $...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
@David: that's true, see: Are
( and )
preferable to $. At least: ( ... )
is LaTeX syntax, so better supported in LaTeX. $...$
is plain TeX. However, usually both work well, many prefer $...$
because it's easier to write or just classic.– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Aug 15 '11 at 21:09
3
3
@David:
(
and )
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you use fixltx2e
package. And the default (
and )
have very few advantages compared with $
.– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@David:
(
and )
are fragile by default. So, as Will Robertson said, don't use them unless you use fixltx2e
package. And the default (
and )
have very few advantages compared with $
.– Leo Liu
Aug 16 '11 at 5:05
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@StefanKottwitz, what could I do if I need numbered equations?
– Sigur
Apr 3 '13 at 20:08
@Sigur Use an
equation
environment.– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
@Sigur Use an
equation
environment.– Stefan Kottwitz♦
Apr 3 '13 at 20:37
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
23
down vote
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the ''linenomath`` code as follows:
begin{linenomath*}
begin{equation}
a^2=b^2+c^2
end{equation}
end{linenomath*}
some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text heresome text here.
end{document}
1
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the ''linenomath`` code as follows:
begin{linenomath*}
begin{equation}
a^2=b^2+c^2
end{equation}
end{linenomath*}
some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text heresome text here.
end{document}
1
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
up vote
23
down vote
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the ''linenomath`` code as follows:
begin{linenomath*}
begin{equation}
a^2=b^2+c^2
end{equation}
end{linenomath*}
some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text heresome text here.
end{document}
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lineno}
linenumbers
begin{document}
For line numbering to be done correctly the math environments has to be wrapped using the ''linenomath`` code as follows:
begin{linenomath*}
begin{equation}
a^2=b^2+c^2
end{equation}
end{linenomath*}
some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text here some text heresome text here.
end{document}
edited Dec 5 '17 at 15:38
Stefan Pinnow
19.2k83175
19.2k83175
answered May 11 '15 at 16:53
Bamzi
23123
23123
1
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
add a comment |
1
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
1
1
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
This is particularly valuable, because it works for the AMS align environment, too!
– AJK
Nov 21 '15 at 0:41
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Mathematics environments need to be wrapped by begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
as mentioned in Bamzi's answer.
A quick way to change all your equations is to renew the equation environment by adding the code
letoldequationequation
letoldendequationendequation
renewenvironment{equation}
{linenomathNonumbersoldequation}
{oldendequationendlinenomath}
before begin{document}
.
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
1
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Mathematics environments need to be wrapped by begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
as mentioned in Bamzi's answer.
A quick way to change all your equations is to renew the equation environment by adding the code
letoldequationequation
letoldendequationendequation
renewenvironment{equation}
{linenomathNonumbersoldequation}
{oldendequationendlinenomath}
before begin{document}
.
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
1
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Mathematics environments need to be wrapped by begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
as mentioned in Bamzi's answer.
A quick way to change all your equations is to renew the equation environment by adding the code
letoldequationequation
letoldendequationendequation
renewenvironment{equation}
{linenomathNonumbersoldequation}
{oldendequationendlinenomath}
before begin{document}
.
Mathematics environments need to be wrapped by begin{linenomath*}
and end{linenomath*}
as mentioned in Bamzi's answer.
A quick way to change all your equations is to renew the equation environment by adding the code
letoldequationequation
letoldendequationendequation
renewenvironment{equation}
{linenomathNonumbersoldequation}
{oldendequationendlinenomath}
before begin{document}
.
edited Dec 5 '17 at 15:37
Stefan Pinnow
19.2k83175
19.2k83175
answered Dec 5 '17 at 15:10
R.M
412
412
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
1
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
1
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
Welcome to TeX.SX!
– Bobyandbob
Dec 5 '17 at 15:18
1
1
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
I'd say this is the most convenient answer. Thanks!
– Yo B.
Oct 18 at 10:36
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
This answer should be upvoted to top. Definitely.
– WDC
Nov 26 at 3:19
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Use the mathlines
option for lineno and write:
begin{linenomath}
begin{align*}
z_{1}&=x_{1}+y_{1}\
z_{2}&=x_{2}+y_{2}
end{align*}
end{linenomath}
to obtain
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Use the mathlines
option for lineno and write:
begin{linenomath}
begin{align*}
z_{1}&=x_{1}+y_{1}\
z_{2}&=x_{2}+y_{2}
end{align*}
end{linenomath}
to obtain
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Use the mathlines
option for lineno and write:
begin{linenomath}
begin{align*}
z_{1}&=x_{1}+y_{1}\
z_{2}&=x_{2}+y_{2}
end{align*}
end{linenomath}
to obtain
Use the mathlines
option for lineno and write:
begin{linenomath}
begin{align*}
z_{1}&=x_{1}+y_{1}\
z_{2}&=x_{2}+y_{2}
end{align*}
end{linenomath}
to obtain
answered Dec 23 '15 at 15:33
Denis
2,038520
2,038520
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As @Denis has said, the mathlines
option can be used in some cases (for article
, but not for iopart
, for example). If you do so, and you are also using the amsmath
package, be sure to load lineno
after amsmath
. This MWE can be used to easily see the effect of that change:
documentclass{article}
% usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
begin{document}
linenumbers
Line number
No line number if lineno is loaded before amsmath!
begin{equation}
x = y
end{equation}
Line number
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As @Denis has said, the mathlines
option can be used in some cases (for article
, but not for iopart
, for example). If you do so, and you are also using the amsmath
package, be sure to load lineno
after amsmath
. This MWE can be used to easily see the effect of that change:
documentclass{article}
% usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
begin{document}
linenumbers
Line number
No line number if lineno is loaded before amsmath!
begin{equation}
x = y
end{equation}
Line number
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As @Denis has said, the mathlines
option can be used in some cases (for article
, but not for iopart
, for example). If you do so, and you are also using the amsmath
package, be sure to load lineno
after amsmath
. This MWE can be used to easily see the effect of that change:
documentclass{article}
% usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
begin{document}
linenumbers
Line number
No line number if lineno is loaded before amsmath!
begin{equation}
x = y
end{equation}
Line number
end{document}
As @Denis has said, the mathlines
option can be used in some cases (for article
, but not for iopart
, for example). If you do so, and you are also using the amsmath
package, be sure to load lineno
after amsmath
. This MWE can be used to easily see the effect of that change:
documentclass{article}
% usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}
begin{document}
linenumbers
Line number
No line number if lineno is loaded before amsmath!
begin{equation}
x = y
end{equation}
Line number
end{document}
answered Oct 22 at 7:34
bers
2,29511436
2,29511436
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f25784%2fwhy-doesnt-lineno-number-a-paragraph-when-it-is-followed-by-an-indented-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown