Why does biber segfault using a macro in the author field?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Before I updated my TexLive2018 (Win7-64bit, Texstudio) 5 minutes ago, the following code compiled fine:



documentclass[12pt]{article}

usepackage{filecontents}

begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@book{authorA20,
author = {Author, A.},
translator = {Translator, A.},
title = {These and that},
subtitle = {Nothing special},
volume = 1,
location = {Here and there},
publisher = {Who knows},
year = {2020},
isbn = {978-0-000-00000-2},
}
@book{buthorB22,
author = {authorSn, authorGivenname},
shorthand = {volTwoShorthand},
translator = {volTwoTranslator},
title = {volTwoTitle},
subtitle = {volTwoSubtitle},
volume = {volTwoNumber},
location = {volTwoLocation},
publisher = {volTwoPublisher},
year = {volTwoYear},
isbn = {volTwoIsbn},
}
end{filecontents}

usepackage{xstring} %<- provides StrLeft/-Right (s. below)
newcommand{authorSn}{Buthor}
newcommand{authorGivenname}{B.}
newcommand{volTwoTranslator}{Translator, B.}
newcommand{volTwoTitle}{These and that}
newcommand{volTwoSubtitle}{Nothing special}
newcommand{volTwoNumber}{2}
newcommand{volTwoLocation}{Here and there}
newcommand{volTwoPublisher}{Who knows}
newcommand{volTwoYear}{2022}
newcommand{volTwoShorthand}{StrLeft{authorSn}{3}%
StrRight{volTwoYear}{2}}

newcommand{volTwoIsbn}{978-1-111-11111-1}

usepackage[style=alphabetic]{biblatex}
addbibresource{bib.bib}

begin{document}

Wow cite{authorA20}!

Crazy cite{buthorB22}!

printbibliography

end{document}


After the update, biber 2.12 reproducible segfaults. I don't know exactly what biber version I've used before (my previous updated was some time ago, in this summer).



The problematic field seems to be author = {authorSn, authorGivenname}. If I replace this field using hard coded values, e.g. author = {Bauthor, B.} the compilation succeeds, with obvious - in my opinion harmless - warnings.



Running biber --tool --validate-datamodel bib.bib SEGV, too.










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    You'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to explain what has changed for this new behavior. But, in the meantime, you could try author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname}. You will still continue to receive warnings on your year and isbn fields though.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:36






  • 1




    @gusbrs Thanks a lot for this workaround - seems to work fine. Now I'm completely relaxed. ;-)
    – lAtExFaN
    Nov 25 at 23:43








  • 1




    Well, don't get too comfy. You are indeed stretching what biber expects there. As you see, even when it runs, sorting seems wrong. Do you have a strong reason to use this?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:53








  • 1




    Well, that's a good requirement in general, I concur. But usually there's more than one way to achieve it. You could invert the logic here, you could call the data from the bibentry to fill in your macros, and then use them in the other places you need. If you think that might be an alternative, extend your MWE to show some use cases of the macros elsewhere, and I see what can do.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 26 at 0:06








  • 4




    how can biber possibly sort the bibliography without having access to the names? (it shouldn't segfault of course but it can't work)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 26 at 0:22

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Before I updated my TexLive2018 (Win7-64bit, Texstudio) 5 minutes ago, the following code compiled fine:



documentclass[12pt]{article}

usepackage{filecontents}

begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@book{authorA20,
author = {Author, A.},
translator = {Translator, A.},
title = {These and that},
subtitle = {Nothing special},
volume = 1,
location = {Here and there},
publisher = {Who knows},
year = {2020},
isbn = {978-0-000-00000-2},
}
@book{buthorB22,
author = {authorSn, authorGivenname},
shorthand = {volTwoShorthand},
translator = {volTwoTranslator},
title = {volTwoTitle},
subtitle = {volTwoSubtitle},
volume = {volTwoNumber},
location = {volTwoLocation},
publisher = {volTwoPublisher},
year = {volTwoYear},
isbn = {volTwoIsbn},
}
end{filecontents}

usepackage{xstring} %<- provides StrLeft/-Right (s. below)
newcommand{authorSn}{Buthor}
newcommand{authorGivenname}{B.}
newcommand{volTwoTranslator}{Translator, B.}
newcommand{volTwoTitle}{These and that}
newcommand{volTwoSubtitle}{Nothing special}
newcommand{volTwoNumber}{2}
newcommand{volTwoLocation}{Here and there}
newcommand{volTwoPublisher}{Who knows}
newcommand{volTwoYear}{2022}
newcommand{volTwoShorthand}{StrLeft{authorSn}{3}%
StrRight{volTwoYear}{2}}

newcommand{volTwoIsbn}{978-1-111-11111-1}

usepackage[style=alphabetic]{biblatex}
addbibresource{bib.bib}

begin{document}

Wow cite{authorA20}!

Crazy cite{buthorB22}!

printbibliography

end{document}


After the update, biber 2.12 reproducible segfaults. I don't know exactly what biber version I've used before (my previous updated was some time ago, in this summer).



The problematic field seems to be author = {authorSn, authorGivenname}. If I replace this field using hard coded values, e.g. author = {Bauthor, B.} the compilation succeeds, with obvious - in my opinion harmless - warnings.



Running biber --tool --validate-datamodel bib.bib SEGV, too.










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    You'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to explain what has changed for this new behavior. But, in the meantime, you could try author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname}. You will still continue to receive warnings on your year and isbn fields though.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:36






  • 1




    @gusbrs Thanks a lot for this workaround - seems to work fine. Now I'm completely relaxed. ;-)
    – lAtExFaN
    Nov 25 at 23:43








  • 1




    Well, don't get too comfy. You are indeed stretching what biber expects there. As you see, even when it runs, sorting seems wrong. Do you have a strong reason to use this?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:53








  • 1




    Well, that's a good requirement in general, I concur. But usually there's more than one way to achieve it. You could invert the logic here, you could call the data from the bibentry to fill in your macros, and then use them in the other places you need. If you think that might be an alternative, extend your MWE to show some use cases of the macros elsewhere, and I see what can do.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 26 at 0:06








  • 4




    how can biber possibly sort the bibliography without having access to the names? (it shouldn't segfault of course but it can't work)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 26 at 0:22















up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Before I updated my TexLive2018 (Win7-64bit, Texstudio) 5 minutes ago, the following code compiled fine:



documentclass[12pt]{article}

usepackage{filecontents}

begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@book{authorA20,
author = {Author, A.},
translator = {Translator, A.},
title = {These and that},
subtitle = {Nothing special},
volume = 1,
location = {Here and there},
publisher = {Who knows},
year = {2020},
isbn = {978-0-000-00000-2},
}
@book{buthorB22,
author = {authorSn, authorGivenname},
shorthand = {volTwoShorthand},
translator = {volTwoTranslator},
title = {volTwoTitle},
subtitle = {volTwoSubtitle},
volume = {volTwoNumber},
location = {volTwoLocation},
publisher = {volTwoPublisher},
year = {volTwoYear},
isbn = {volTwoIsbn},
}
end{filecontents}

usepackage{xstring} %<- provides StrLeft/-Right (s. below)
newcommand{authorSn}{Buthor}
newcommand{authorGivenname}{B.}
newcommand{volTwoTranslator}{Translator, B.}
newcommand{volTwoTitle}{These and that}
newcommand{volTwoSubtitle}{Nothing special}
newcommand{volTwoNumber}{2}
newcommand{volTwoLocation}{Here and there}
newcommand{volTwoPublisher}{Who knows}
newcommand{volTwoYear}{2022}
newcommand{volTwoShorthand}{StrLeft{authorSn}{3}%
StrRight{volTwoYear}{2}}

newcommand{volTwoIsbn}{978-1-111-11111-1}

usepackage[style=alphabetic]{biblatex}
addbibresource{bib.bib}

begin{document}

Wow cite{authorA20}!

Crazy cite{buthorB22}!

printbibliography

end{document}


After the update, biber 2.12 reproducible segfaults. I don't know exactly what biber version I've used before (my previous updated was some time ago, in this summer).



The problematic field seems to be author = {authorSn, authorGivenname}. If I replace this field using hard coded values, e.g. author = {Bauthor, B.} the compilation succeeds, with obvious - in my opinion harmless - warnings.



Running biber --tool --validate-datamodel bib.bib SEGV, too.










share|improve this question















Before I updated my TexLive2018 (Win7-64bit, Texstudio) 5 minutes ago, the following code compiled fine:



documentclass[12pt]{article}

usepackage{filecontents}

begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@book{authorA20,
author = {Author, A.},
translator = {Translator, A.},
title = {These and that},
subtitle = {Nothing special},
volume = 1,
location = {Here and there},
publisher = {Who knows},
year = {2020},
isbn = {978-0-000-00000-2},
}
@book{buthorB22,
author = {authorSn, authorGivenname},
shorthand = {volTwoShorthand},
translator = {volTwoTranslator},
title = {volTwoTitle},
subtitle = {volTwoSubtitle},
volume = {volTwoNumber},
location = {volTwoLocation},
publisher = {volTwoPublisher},
year = {volTwoYear},
isbn = {volTwoIsbn},
}
end{filecontents}

usepackage{xstring} %<- provides StrLeft/-Right (s. below)
newcommand{authorSn}{Buthor}
newcommand{authorGivenname}{B.}
newcommand{volTwoTranslator}{Translator, B.}
newcommand{volTwoTitle}{These and that}
newcommand{volTwoSubtitle}{Nothing special}
newcommand{volTwoNumber}{2}
newcommand{volTwoLocation}{Here and there}
newcommand{volTwoPublisher}{Who knows}
newcommand{volTwoYear}{2022}
newcommand{volTwoShorthand}{StrLeft{authorSn}{3}%
StrRight{volTwoYear}{2}}

newcommand{volTwoIsbn}{978-1-111-11111-1}

usepackage[style=alphabetic]{biblatex}
addbibresource{bib.bib}

begin{document}

Wow cite{authorA20}!

Crazy cite{buthorB22}!

printbibliography

end{document}


After the update, biber 2.12 reproducible segfaults. I don't know exactly what biber version I've used before (my previous updated was some time ago, in this summer).



The problematic field seems to be author = {authorSn, authorGivenname}. If I replace this field using hard coded values, e.g. author = {Bauthor, B.} the compilation succeeds, with obvious - in my opinion harmless - warnings.



Running biber --tool --validate-datamodel bib.bib SEGV, too.







biblatex biber






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 23:34

























asked Nov 25 at 23:25









lAtExFaN

567418




567418








  • 2




    You'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to explain what has changed for this new behavior. But, in the meantime, you could try author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname}. You will still continue to receive warnings on your year and isbn fields though.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:36






  • 1




    @gusbrs Thanks a lot for this workaround - seems to work fine. Now I'm completely relaxed. ;-)
    – lAtExFaN
    Nov 25 at 23:43








  • 1




    Well, don't get too comfy. You are indeed stretching what biber expects there. As you see, even when it runs, sorting seems wrong. Do you have a strong reason to use this?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:53








  • 1




    Well, that's a good requirement in general, I concur. But usually there's more than one way to achieve it. You could invert the logic here, you could call the data from the bibentry to fill in your macros, and then use them in the other places you need. If you think that might be an alternative, extend your MWE to show some use cases of the macros elsewhere, and I see what can do.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 26 at 0:06








  • 4




    how can biber possibly sort the bibliography without having access to the names? (it shouldn't segfault of course but it can't work)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 26 at 0:22
















  • 2




    You'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to explain what has changed for this new behavior. But, in the meantime, you could try author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname}. You will still continue to receive warnings on your year and isbn fields though.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:36






  • 1




    @gusbrs Thanks a lot for this workaround - seems to work fine. Now I'm completely relaxed. ;-)
    – lAtExFaN
    Nov 25 at 23:43








  • 1




    Well, don't get too comfy. You are indeed stretching what biber expects there. As you see, even when it runs, sorting seems wrong. Do you have a strong reason to use this?
    – gusbrs
    Nov 25 at 23:53








  • 1




    Well, that's a good requirement in general, I concur. But usually there's more than one way to achieve it. You could invert the logic here, you could call the data from the bibentry to fill in your macros, and then use them in the other places you need. If you think that might be an alternative, extend your MWE to show some use cases of the macros elsewhere, and I see what can do.
    – gusbrs
    Nov 26 at 0:06








  • 4




    how can biber possibly sort the bibliography without having access to the names? (it shouldn't segfault of course but it can't work)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 26 at 0:22










2




2




You'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to explain what has changed for this new behavior. But, in the meantime, you could try author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname}. You will still continue to receive warnings on your year and isbn fields though.
– gusbrs
Nov 25 at 23:36




You'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to explain what has changed for this new behavior. But, in the meantime, you could try author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname}. You will still continue to receive warnings on your year and isbn fields though.
– gusbrs
Nov 25 at 23:36




1




1




@gusbrs Thanks a lot for this workaround - seems to work fine. Now I'm completely relaxed. ;-)
– lAtExFaN
Nov 25 at 23:43






@gusbrs Thanks a lot for this workaround - seems to work fine. Now I'm completely relaxed. ;-)
– lAtExFaN
Nov 25 at 23:43






1




1




Well, don't get too comfy. You are indeed stretching what biber expects there. As you see, even when it runs, sorting seems wrong. Do you have a strong reason to use this?
– gusbrs
Nov 25 at 23:53






Well, don't get too comfy. You are indeed stretching what biber expects there. As you see, even when it runs, sorting seems wrong. Do you have a strong reason to use this?
– gusbrs
Nov 25 at 23:53






1




1




Well, that's a good requirement in general, I concur. But usually there's more than one way to achieve it. You could invert the logic here, you could call the data from the bibentry to fill in your macros, and then use them in the other places you need. If you think that might be an alternative, extend your MWE to show some use cases of the macros elsewhere, and I see what can do.
– gusbrs
Nov 26 at 0:06






Well, that's a good requirement in general, I concur. But usually there's more than one way to achieve it. You could invert the logic here, you could call the data from the bibentry to fill in your macros, and then use them in the other places you need. If you think that might be an alternative, extend your MWE to show some use cases of the macros elsewhere, and I see what can do.
– gusbrs
Nov 26 at 0:06






4




4




how can biber possibly sort the bibliography without having access to the names? (it shouldn't segfault of course but it can't work)
– David Carlisle
Nov 26 at 0:22






how can biber possibly sort the bibliography without having access to the names? (it shouldn't segfault of course but it can't work)
– David Carlisle
Nov 26 at 0:22












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Interestingly on my machine I can reproduce the segfault (I don't get any error report, Biber just dies and does not write a .bbl) in about 70% of runs, while the other 30% compile just fine (with slightly weird data in the .bbl: family={volTwoTranslator}, familyi={rbibinitperiod}).



You can and should probably report this at https://github.com/plk/biber/issues (Stackexchange is not a bug tracker), but it might turn out that there is no good way to solve this in Biber. Biber relies on the Perl module Text::BibTeX, which in term delegates its work to the C library btparse. Catching errors (especially segfaults) from that module sometimes proves a little difficult.



In this case it seems that the code to parse names, in particular the code that deals with name initials, is ill-equipped to deal with a name that consists only of macros. Remember that Biber does not know LaTeX, which means that it does not expand/unpack macro definitions (except in very specific, hard-coded cases). At the same time Biber needs access to the proper string values of fields to do its job: Sorting can only be performed as expected if Biber really knows the expansion of the macros and not just their name. And – this is the issue here – initials can only be generated from names if their string values are known.



There are two workaround that I can think of.





  1. As mentioned by gusbrs in the comments already, use relax in the author field: relax can be used as a marker for BibTeX/btparse in names to tell it to parse the current bit of the name differently.



    author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname},


    compiles to



    family={relaxauthorSn},
    familyi={\bibinitperiod},
    given={relaxauthorGivenname},
    giveni={\bibinitperiod}}}%


    which is still wrong, but at least does not let Biber die.



    BibTeX treats groups in names that start with a control sequence as one character, which means that {'E}cole would be abbreviated as {'E} and not as {'} or {E} or something else. In BibTeX this allows for the neat trick {relax Th}omas to get "Th." as name initial (this no longer works in Biber).




  2. You can turn off the calculation of initials by giving them yourself with the extended name format.



    author = {family={authorSn}, given={authorGivenname},
    family-i={authorSn}, given-i={authorGivenname}},


    compiles to



    family={authorSn},
    familyi={authorSnbibinitperiod},
    given={authorGivenname},
    giveni={authorGivennamebibinitperiod}}}%


    still not great, but better than nothing.



    Of course you could give the real initials explicitly if you determine them yourself beforehand.








share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461746%2fwhy-does-biber-segfault-using-a-macro-in-the-author-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Interestingly on my machine I can reproduce the segfault (I don't get any error report, Biber just dies and does not write a .bbl) in about 70% of runs, while the other 30% compile just fine (with slightly weird data in the .bbl: family={volTwoTranslator}, familyi={rbibinitperiod}).



    You can and should probably report this at https://github.com/plk/biber/issues (Stackexchange is not a bug tracker), but it might turn out that there is no good way to solve this in Biber. Biber relies on the Perl module Text::BibTeX, which in term delegates its work to the C library btparse. Catching errors (especially segfaults) from that module sometimes proves a little difficult.



    In this case it seems that the code to parse names, in particular the code that deals with name initials, is ill-equipped to deal with a name that consists only of macros. Remember that Biber does not know LaTeX, which means that it does not expand/unpack macro definitions (except in very specific, hard-coded cases). At the same time Biber needs access to the proper string values of fields to do its job: Sorting can only be performed as expected if Biber really knows the expansion of the macros and not just their name. And – this is the issue here – initials can only be generated from names if their string values are known.



    There are two workaround that I can think of.





    1. As mentioned by gusbrs in the comments already, use relax in the author field: relax can be used as a marker for BibTeX/btparse in names to tell it to parse the current bit of the name differently.



      author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname},


      compiles to



      family={relaxauthorSn},
      familyi={\bibinitperiod},
      given={relaxauthorGivenname},
      giveni={\bibinitperiod}}}%


      which is still wrong, but at least does not let Biber die.



      BibTeX treats groups in names that start with a control sequence as one character, which means that {'E}cole would be abbreviated as {'E} and not as {'} or {E} or something else. In BibTeX this allows for the neat trick {relax Th}omas to get "Th." as name initial (this no longer works in Biber).




    2. You can turn off the calculation of initials by giving them yourself with the extended name format.



      author = {family={authorSn}, given={authorGivenname},
      family-i={authorSn}, given-i={authorGivenname}},


      compiles to



      family={authorSn},
      familyi={authorSnbibinitperiod},
      given={authorGivenname},
      giveni={authorGivennamebibinitperiod}}}%


      still not great, but better than nothing.



      Of course you could give the real initials explicitly if you determine them yourself beforehand.








    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      Interestingly on my machine I can reproduce the segfault (I don't get any error report, Biber just dies and does not write a .bbl) in about 70% of runs, while the other 30% compile just fine (with slightly weird data in the .bbl: family={volTwoTranslator}, familyi={rbibinitperiod}).



      You can and should probably report this at https://github.com/plk/biber/issues (Stackexchange is not a bug tracker), but it might turn out that there is no good way to solve this in Biber. Biber relies on the Perl module Text::BibTeX, which in term delegates its work to the C library btparse. Catching errors (especially segfaults) from that module sometimes proves a little difficult.



      In this case it seems that the code to parse names, in particular the code that deals with name initials, is ill-equipped to deal with a name that consists only of macros. Remember that Biber does not know LaTeX, which means that it does not expand/unpack macro definitions (except in very specific, hard-coded cases). At the same time Biber needs access to the proper string values of fields to do its job: Sorting can only be performed as expected if Biber really knows the expansion of the macros and not just their name. And – this is the issue here – initials can only be generated from names if their string values are known.



      There are two workaround that I can think of.





      1. As mentioned by gusbrs in the comments already, use relax in the author field: relax can be used as a marker for BibTeX/btparse in names to tell it to parse the current bit of the name differently.



        author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname},


        compiles to



        family={relaxauthorSn},
        familyi={\bibinitperiod},
        given={relaxauthorGivenname},
        giveni={\bibinitperiod}}}%


        which is still wrong, but at least does not let Biber die.



        BibTeX treats groups in names that start with a control sequence as one character, which means that {'E}cole would be abbreviated as {'E} and not as {'} or {E} or something else. In BibTeX this allows for the neat trick {relax Th}omas to get "Th." as name initial (this no longer works in Biber).




      2. You can turn off the calculation of initials by giving them yourself with the extended name format.



        author = {family={authorSn}, given={authorGivenname},
        family-i={authorSn}, given-i={authorGivenname}},


        compiles to



        family={authorSn},
        familyi={authorSnbibinitperiod},
        given={authorGivenname},
        giveni={authorGivennamebibinitperiod}}}%


        still not great, but better than nothing.



        Of course you could give the real initials explicitly if you determine them yourself beforehand.








      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted






        Interestingly on my machine I can reproduce the segfault (I don't get any error report, Biber just dies and does not write a .bbl) in about 70% of runs, while the other 30% compile just fine (with slightly weird data in the .bbl: family={volTwoTranslator}, familyi={rbibinitperiod}).



        You can and should probably report this at https://github.com/plk/biber/issues (Stackexchange is not a bug tracker), but it might turn out that there is no good way to solve this in Biber. Biber relies on the Perl module Text::BibTeX, which in term delegates its work to the C library btparse. Catching errors (especially segfaults) from that module sometimes proves a little difficult.



        In this case it seems that the code to parse names, in particular the code that deals with name initials, is ill-equipped to deal with a name that consists only of macros. Remember that Biber does not know LaTeX, which means that it does not expand/unpack macro definitions (except in very specific, hard-coded cases). At the same time Biber needs access to the proper string values of fields to do its job: Sorting can only be performed as expected if Biber really knows the expansion of the macros and not just their name. And – this is the issue here – initials can only be generated from names if their string values are known.



        There are two workaround that I can think of.





        1. As mentioned by gusbrs in the comments already, use relax in the author field: relax can be used as a marker for BibTeX/btparse in names to tell it to parse the current bit of the name differently.



          author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname},


          compiles to



          family={relaxauthorSn},
          familyi={\bibinitperiod},
          given={relaxauthorGivenname},
          giveni={\bibinitperiod}}}%


          which is still wrong, but at least does not let Biber die.



          BibTeX treats groups in names that start with a control sequence as one character, which means that {'E}cole would be abbreviated as {'E} and not as {'} or {E} or something else. In BibTeX this allows for the neat trick {relax Th}omas to get "Th." as name initial (this no longer works in Biber).




        2. You can turn off the calculation of initials by giving them yourself with the extended name format.



          author = {family={authorSn}, given={authorGivenname},
          family-i={authorSn}, given-i={authorGivenname}},


          compiles to



          family={authorSn},
          familyi={authorSnbibinitperiod},
          given={authorGivenname},
          giveni={authorGivennamebibinitperiod}}}%


          still not great, but better than nothing.



          Of course you could give the real initials explicitly if you determine them yourself beforehand.








        share|improve this answer














        Interestingly on my machine I can reproduce the segfault (I don't get any error report, Biber just dies and does not write a .bbl) in about 70% of runs, while the other 30% compile just fine (with slightly weird data in the .bbl: family={volTwoTranslator}, familyi={rbibinitperiod}).



        You can and should probably report this at https://github.com/plk/biber/issues (Stackexchange is not a bug tracker), but it might turn out that there is no good way to solve this in Biber. Biber relies on the Perl module Text::BibTeX, which in term delegates its work to the C library btparse. Catching errors (especially segfaults) from that module sometimes proves a little difficult.



        In this case it seems that the code to parse names, in particular the code that deals with name initials, is ill-equipped to deal with a name that consists only of macros. Remember that Biber does not know LaTeX, which means that it does not expand/unpack macro definitions (except in very specific, hard-coded cases). At the same time Biber needs access to the proper string values of fields to do its job: Sorting can only be performed as expected if Biber really knows the expansion of the macros and not just their name. And – this is the issue here – initials can only be generated from names if their string values are known.



        There are two workaround that I can think of.





        1. As mentioned by gusbrs in the comments already, use relax in the author field: relax can be used as a marker for BibTeX/btparse in names to tell it to parse the current bit of the name differently.



          author = {relaxauthorSn, relaxauthorGivenname},


          compiles to



          family={relaxauthorSn},
          familyi={\bibinitperiod},
          given={relaxauthorGivenname},
          giveni={\bibinitperiod}}}%


          which is still wrong, but at least does not let Biber die.



          BibTeX treats groups in names that start with a control sequence as one character, which means that {'E}cole would be abbreviated as {'E} and not as {'} or {E} or something else. In BibTeX this allows for the neat trick {relax Th}omas to get "Th." as name initial (this no longer works in Biber).




        2. You can turn off the calculation of initials by giving them yourself with the extended name format.



          author = {family={authorSn}, given={authorGivenname},
          family-i={authorSn}, given-i={authorGivenname}},


          compiles to



          family={authorSn},
          familyi={authorSnbibinitperiod},
          given={authorGivenname},
          giveni={authorGivennamebibinitperiod}}}%


          still not great, but better than nothing.



          Of course you could give the real initials explicitly if you determine them yourself beforehand.









        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered Nov 26 at 7:37









        moewe

        83.6k8107321




        83.6k8107321






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461746%2fwhy-does-biber-segfault-using-a-macro-in-the-author-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?