Align the baselines of two nodes placed side by side











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1












I have the following code with two nodes:



documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) { shortstack{double \ type} };
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) { shortstack{single \ type} };

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


Because the content of node A has no "long" character that ranges below the baseline, the distance between the two lines is closer than in the second node B. There, the "g" character ranges below the baseline and therefore it seems that additional space is used and the two blocks are not aligned.



I could fix that by including a vphantom{g} into node A. However, that would make the line spacing large in both blocks.



Instead, I want that the line space is small, just as if there were no characters that range below the baseline.



Is it possible to somehow "ignore" these characters?










share|improve this question
























  • shortstack{sinsmash{g}le \ type}
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Nov 15 at 20:45















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1












I have the following code with two nodes:



documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) { shortstack{double \ type} };
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) { shortstack{single \ type} };

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


Because the content of node A has no "long" character that ranges below the baseline, the distance between the two lines is closer than in the second node B. There, the "g" character ranges below the baseline and therefore it seems that additional space is used and the two blocks are not aligned.



I could fix that by including a vphantom{g} into node A. However, that would make the line spacing large in both blocks.



Instead, I want that the line space is small, just as if there were no characters that range below the baseline.



Is it possible to somehow "ignore" these characters?










share|improve this question
























  • shortstack{sinsmash{g}le \ type}
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Nov 15 at 20:45













up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have the following code with two nodes:



documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) { shortstack{double \ type} };
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) { shortstack{single \ type} };

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


Because the content of node A has no "long" character that ranges below the baseline, the distance between the two lines is closer than in the second node B. There, the "g" character ranges below the baseline and therefore it seems that additional space is used and the two blocks are not aligned.



I could fix that by including a vphantom{g} into node A. However, that would make the line spacing large in both blocks.



Instead, I want that the line space is small, just as if there were no characters that range below the baseline.



Is it possible to somehow "ignore" these characters?










share|improve this question















I have the following code with two nodes:



documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) { shortstack{double \ type} };
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) { shortstack{single \ type} };

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


Because the content of node A has no "long" character that ranges below the baseline, the distance between the two lines is closer than in the second node B. There, the "g" character ranges below the baseline and therefore it seems that additional space is used and the two blocks are not aligned.



I could fix that by including a vphantom{g} into node A. However, that would make the line spacing large in both blocks.



Instead, I want that the line space is small, just as if there were no characters that range below the baseline.



Is it possible to somehow "ignore" these characters?







tikz-pgf shortstack






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 19:32









AndréC

6,53711140




6,53711140










asked Nov 15 at 20:35









SampleTime

2426




2426












  • shortstack{sinsmash{g}le \ type}
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Nov 15 at 20:45


















  • shortstack{sinsmash{g}le \ type}
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Nov 15 at 20:45
















shortstack{sinsmash{g}le \ type}
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 15 at 20:45




shortstack{sinsmash{g}le \ type}
– Steven B. Segletes
Nov 15 at 20:45










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










You should just smash the [b]aseline of those words/phrases:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

usepackage{tikz,amsmath}

begin{document}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{double \ type}};
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{smash[b]{single} \ type}};
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


amsmath provides the extended version of smash.






share|improve this answer





















  • +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
    – AndréC
    Nov 15 at 20:53






  • 3




    See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
    – Werner
    Nov 15 at 21:00


















up vote
8
down vote













Another method is to use the NextLine macro instead of \. This eliminates the need to go back and change things just because you changed the text:



enter image description here



References




  • How to make mdframed ignore descenders in last line


Code:



documentclass[crop,tikz, border=2pt]{standalone}
begin{document}

%% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/51406/4301
newcommand*{IgnodeDescenders}{-dimexprdpstrutbox+baselineskip}
newcommand*{NextLine}{strut\[IgnodeDescenders]}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{doubleNextLine type}};
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{singleNextLine type}};

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
    – SampleTime
    Nov 15 at 22:25


















up vote
6
down vote













This is discussed at length in the pgfmanual on p. 65. The upshot is that you can add a suitable text depth.



documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}

usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
tikzset{block/.style={draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm,
outer sep=0pt,text height=3ex,text depth=.25ex}}

begin{tikzpicture}
node [block,align=center](A) { double \ type };
node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {single \ type };
draw[red] (A.west) -- (B.east);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



The red line is only to guide the eye.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460191%2falign-the-baselines-of-two-nodes-placed-side-by-side%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    8
    down vote



    accepted










    You should just smash the [b]aseline of those words/phrases:



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{tikz,amsmath}

    begin{document}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{double \ type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{smash[b]{single} \ type}};
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    amsmath provides the extended version of smash.






    share|improve this answer





















    • +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
      – AndréC
      Nov 15 at 20:53






    • 3




      See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
      – Werner
      Nov 15 at 21:00















    up vote
    8
    down vote



    accepted










    You should just smash the [b]aseline of those words/phrases:



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{tikz,amsmath}

    begin{document}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{double \ type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{smash[b]{single} \ type}};
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    amsmath provides the extended version of smash.






    share|improve this answer





















    • +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
      – AndréC
      Nov 15 at 20:53






    • 3




      See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
      – Werner
      Nov 15 at 21:00













    up vote
    8
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    8
    down vote



    accepted






    You should just smash the [b]aseline of those words/phrases:



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{tikz,amsmath}

    begin{document}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{double \ type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{smash[b]{single} \ type}};
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    amsmath provides the extended version of smash.






    share|improve this answer












    You should just smash the [b]aseline of those words/phrases:



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{tikz,amsmath}

    begin{document}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{double \ type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{smash[b]{single} \ type}};
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    amsmath provides the extended version of smash.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 at 20:47









    Werner

    433k609531634




    433k609531634












    • +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
      – AndréC
      Nov 15 at 20:53






    • 3




      See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
      – Werner
      Nov 15 at 21:00


















    • +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
      – AndréC
      Nov 15 at 20:53






    • 3




      See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
      – Werner
      Nov 15 at 21:00
















    +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
    – AndréC
    Nov 15 at 20:53




    +1 This is the first time I've seen this smash command, can you give me more details about it?
    – AndréC
    Nov 15 at 20:53




    3




    3




    See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
    – Werner
    Nov 15 at 21:00




    See this code and its associated output. smash removes the height and depth of its argument, while smash[b]/smash[t] removes only the depth/height.
    – Werner
    Nov 15 at 21:00










    up vote
    8
    down vote













    Another method is to use the NextLine macro instead of \. This eliminates the need to go back and change things just because you changed the text:



    enter image description here



    References




    • How to make mdframed ignore descenders in last line


    Code:



    documentclass[crop,tikz, border=2pt]{standalone}
    begin{document}

    %% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/51406/4301
    newcommand*{IgnodeDescenders}{-dimexprdpstrutbox+baselineskip}
    newcommand*{NextLine}{strut\[IgnodeDescenders]}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{doubleNextLine type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{singleNextLine type}};

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer





















    • Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
      – SampleTime
      Nov 15 at 22:25















    up vote
    8
    down vote













    Another method is to use the NextLine macro instead of \. This eliminates the need to go back and change things just because you changed the text:



    enter image description here



    References




    • How to make mdframed ignore descenders in last line


    Code:



    documentclass[crop,tikz, border=2pt]{standalone}
    begin{document}

    %% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/51406/4301
    newcommand*{IgnodeDescenders}{-dimexprdpstrutbox+baselineskip}
    newcommand*{NextLine}{strut\[IgnodeDescenders]}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{doubleNextLine type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{singleNextLine type}};

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer





















    • Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
      – SampleTime
      Nov 15 at 22:25













    up vote
    8
    down vote










    up vote
    8
    down vote









    Another method is to use the NextLine macro instead of \. This eliminates the need to go back and change things just because you changed the text:



    enter image description here



    References




    • How to make mdframed ignore descenders in last line


    Code:



    documentclass[crop,tikz, border=2pt]{standalone}
    begin{document}

    %% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/51406/4301
    newcommand*{IgnodeDescenders}{-dimexprdpstrutbox+baselineskip}
    newcommand*{NextLine}{strut\[IgnodeDescenders]}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{doubleNextLine type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{singleNextLine type}};

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer












    Another method is to use the NextLine macro instead of \. This eliminates the need to go back and change things just because you changed the text:



    enter image description here



    References




    • How to make mdframed ignore descenders in last line


    Code:



    documentclass[crop,tikz, border=2pt]{standalone}
    begin{document}

    %% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/51406/4301
    newcommand*{IgnodeDescenders}{-dimexprdpstrutbox+baselineskip}
    newcommand*{NextLine}{strut\[IgnodeDescenders]}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm, outer sep=0pt]

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) {shortstack{doubleNextLine type}};
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {shortstack{singleNextLine type}};

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 at 20:57









    Peter Grill

    163k24432742




    163k24432742












    • Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
      – SampleTime
      Nov 15 at 22:25


















    • Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
      – SampleTime
      Nov 15 at 22:25
















    Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
    – SampleTime
    Nov 15 at 22:25




    Somehow, when I tested this, it seems that the NewLine-line is larger than the "standard" line... If I replace the NewLine command in the A node with \, then distance of both lines is smaller although it should be the same?
    – SampleTime
    Nov 15 at 22:25










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    This is discussed at length in the pgfmanual on p. 65. The upshot is that you can add a suitable text depth.



    documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
    begin{document}

    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    tikzset{block/.style={draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm,
    outer sep=0pt,text height=3ex,text depth=.25ex}}

    begin{tikzpicture}
    node [block,align=center](A) { double \ type };
    node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {single \ type };
    draw[red] (A.west) -- (B.east);
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    The red line is only to guide the eye.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      This is discussed at length in the pgfmanual on p. 65. The upshot is that you can add a suitable text depth.



      documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
      begin{document}

      usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
      tikzset{block/.style={draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm,
      outer sep=0pt,text height=3ex,text depth=.25ex}}

      begin{tikzpicture}
      node [block,align=center](A) { double \ type };
      node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {single \ type };
      draw[red] (A.west) -- (B.east);
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      The red line is only to guide the eye.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        This is discussed at length in the pgfmanual on p. 65. The upshot is that you can add a suitable text depth.



        documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
        begin{document}

        usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
        tikzset{block/.style={draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm,
        outer sep=0pt,text height=3ex,text depth=.25ex}}

        begin{tikzpicture}
        node [block,align=center](A) { double \ type };
        node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {single \ type };
        draw[red] (A.west) -- (B.east);
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        The red line is only to guide the eye.






        share|improve this answer












        This is discussed at length in the pgfmanual on p. 65. The upshot is that you can add a suitable text depth.



        documentclass[crop,tikz]{standalone}
        begin{document}

        usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
        tikzset{block/.style={draw, rectangle, minimum height=1cm, minimum width=1cm,
        outer sep=0pt,text height=3ex,text depth=.25ex}}

        begin{tikzpicture}
        node [block,align=center](A) { double \ type };
        node [block,align=center,right=1.5cm of A](B) {single \ type };
        draw[red] (A.west) -- (B.east);
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        The red line is only to guide the eye.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 15 at 20:55









        marmot

        79.9k491171




        79.9k491171






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460191%2falign-the-baselines-of-two-nodes-placed-side-by-side%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents