To have no pagebreak before Bibliography
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.
How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.
bibliographies page-breaking
add a comment |
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.
How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.
bibliographies page-breaking
You can check thereport
source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and userenewcommand
in your preamble to remove the call topagebreak
or similar.
– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28
So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31
@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32
add a comment |
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
up vote
28
down vote
favorite
The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.
How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.
bibliographies page-breaking
The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.
How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.
bibliographies page-breaking
bibliographies page-breaking
edited Sep 27 '12 at 7:31
lockstep
189k52585719
189k52585719
asked Sep 27 '12 at 4:25
white-shy-guy
295247
295247
You can check thereport
source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and userenewcommand
in your preamble to remove the call topagebreak
or similar.
– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28
So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31
@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32
add a comment |
You can check thereport
source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and userenewcommand
in your preamble to remove the call topagebreak
or similar.
– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28
So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31
@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32
You can check the
report
source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand
in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak
or similar.– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28
You can check the
report
source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand
in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak
or similar.– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28
So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31
So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31
@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32
@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
Internally, thebibliography
environment uses chapter*
; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography
command to use section*
instead of chapter*
. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:
usepackage{etoolbox}
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
A complete example:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{a} Test A.
end{thebibliography}
end{document}
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading
to define a heading using section*
:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
section*{#1}%
markboth{#1}{#1}}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
printbibliography[heading=secbib]
end{document}
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
If you are using the natbib
package, you may try the option sectionbib
:
usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}
2
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
1
Solved a similar issue with thebibentry
package
– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography
You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex
manual.
3
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command isprintbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
bilatex
package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,
You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
begin{document}
tableofcontents
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
% un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
%printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
%printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
end{document}
1
I removed the definition ofsecbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
1
FWIW I think this use ofsubbibliography
orsubbibintoc
(orsubbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such assecbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
FWIW, when using the llncs
class together with the natbib
package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1]
, [2]
... instead of 1.
, 2.
... as expected by LNCS.
To avoid that problem, I use:
usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
% Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
% section with small font and no square brackets.
renewcommandbibsection
{section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
Internally, thebibliography
environment uses chapter*
; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography
command to use section*
instead of chapter*
. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:
usepackage{etoolbox}
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
A complete example:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{a} Test A.
end{thebibliography}
end{document}
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading
to define a heading using section*
:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
section*{#1}%
markboth{#1}{#1}}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
printbibliography[heading=secbib]
end{document}
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
Internally, thebibliography
environment uses chapter*
; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography
command to use section*
instead of chapter*
. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:
usepackage{etoolbox}
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
A complete example:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{a} Test A.
end{thebibliography}
end{document}
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading
to define a heading using section*
:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
section*{#1}%
markboth{#1}{#1}}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
printbibliography[heading=secbib]
end{document}
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
Internally, thebibliography
environment uses chapter*
; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography
command to use section*
instead of chapter*
. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:
usepackage{etoolbox}
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
A complete example:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{a} Test A.
end{thebibliography}
end{document}
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading
to define a heading using section*
:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
section*{#1}%
markboth{#1}{#1}}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
printbibliography[heading=secbib]
end{document}
Internally, thebibliography
environment uses chapter*
; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography
command to use section*
instead of chapter*
. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:
usepackage{etoolbox}
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
A complete example:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{a} Test A.
end{thebibliography}
end{document}
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading
to define a heading using section*
:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
section*{#1}%
markboth{#1}{#1}}
begin{document}
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
printbibliography[heading=secbib]
end{document}
edited Sep 27 '12 at 4:57
answered Sep 27 '12 at 4:37
Gonzalo Medina
394k4012921558
394k4012921558
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
add a comment |
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
– Seeda
Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
If you are using the natbib
package, you may try the option sectionbib
:
usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}
2
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
1
Solved a similar issue with thebibentry
package
– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
If you are using the natbib
package, you may try the option sectionbib
:
usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}
2
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
1
Solved a similar issue with thebibentry
package
– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
up vote
14
down vote
If you are using the natbib
package, you may try the option sectionbib
:
usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}
If you are using the natbib
package, you may try the option sectionbib
:
usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}
answered Jul 12 '16 at 13:23
Björn
24123
24123
2
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
1
Solved a similar issue with thebibentry
package
– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
add a comment |
2
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
1
Solved a similar issue with thebibentry
package
– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
2
2
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
– Yan King Yin
Jun 13 '17 at 14:38
1
1
Solved a similar issue with the
bibentry
package– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
Solved a similar issue with the
bibentry
package– Heather Turner
Nov 9 at 15:41
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography
You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex
manual.
3
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command isprintbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography
You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex
manual.
3
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command isprintbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography
You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex
manual.
If the biblatex
package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography
You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex
manual.
answered Nov 24 '14 at 20:35
zakkak
25237
25237
3
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command isprintbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
add a comment |
3
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command isprintbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
3
3
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
– Mr. Tao
Jul 27 at 0:30
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
bilatex
package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,
You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
begin{document}
tableofcontents
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
% un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
%printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
%printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
end{document}
1
I removed the definition ofsecbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
1
FWIW I think this use ofsubbibliography
orsubbibintoc
(orsubbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such assecbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
bilatex
package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,
You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
begin{document}
tableofcontents
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
% un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
%printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
%printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
end{document}
1
I removed the definition ofsecbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
1
FWIW I think this use ofsubbibliography
orsubbibintoc
(orsubbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such assecbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
bilatex
package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,
You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
begin{document}
tableofcontents
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
% un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
%printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
%printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
end{document}
bilatex
package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,
You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use
printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
begin{document}
tableofcontents
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
% un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
%printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
%printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
end{document}
edited Nov 30 at 12:03
moewe
84.1k9107322
84.1k9107322
answered Nov 30 at 11:29
Wings
469
469
1
I removed the definition ofsecbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
1
FWIW I think this use ofsubbibliography
orsubbibintoc
(orsubbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such assecbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
add a comment |
1
I removed the definition ofsecbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
1
FWIW I think this use ofsubbibliography
orsubbibintoc
(orsubbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such assecbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
1
1
I removed the definition of
secbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
I removed the definition of
secbib
that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:04
1
1
FWIW I think this use of
subbibliography
or subbibintoc
(or subbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
FWIW I think this use of
subbibliography
or subbibintoc
(or subbibnumbered
) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib
in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.– moewe
Nov 30 at 12:05
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
FWIW, when using the llncs
class together with the natbib
package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1]
, [2]
... instead of 1.
, 2.
... as expected by LNCS.
To avoid that problem, I use:
usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
% Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
% section with small font and no square brackets.
renewcommandbibsection
{section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
FWIW, when using the llncs
class together with the natbib
package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1]
, [2]
... instead of 1.
, 2.
... as expected by LNCS.
To avoid that problem, I use:
usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
% Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
% section with small font and no square brackets.
renewcommandbibsection
{section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
FWIW, when using the llncs
class together with the natbib
package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1]
, [2]
... instead of 1.
, 2.
... as expected by LNCS.
To avoid that problem, I use:
usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
% Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
% section with small font and no square brackets.
renewcommandbibsection
{section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}
FWIW, when using the llncs
class together with the natbib
package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1]
, [2]
... instead of 1.
, 2.
... as expected by LNCS.
To avoid that problem, I use:
usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
% Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
% section with small font and no square brackets.
renewcommandbibsection
{section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}
answered Mar 1 '16 at 12:55
akim
25718
25718
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74296%2fto-have-no-pagebreak-before-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can check the
report
source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and userenewcommand
in your preamble to remove the call topagebreak
or similar.– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28
So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31
@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32