Show that $limlimits_{x to infty}frac{ln x}{x}=0$ from definition.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Show that $displaystylelim_{x to infty}frac{ln x}{x}=0$.
I know this is a simple application of the L'Hopital's rule, but can we also show this from the $displaystyleepsilon-delta$ definition?
I am stuck because while it is easy to find a lower bound for the denominator $x$, the numerator does not have an upper bound - it merely increases less fast than the denominator. Is there a way to manipulate the expression to get a bound?
calculus real-analysis limits limits-without-lhopital
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Show that $displaystylelim_{x to infty}frac{ln x}{x}=0$.
I know this is a simple application of the L'Hopital's rule, but can we also show this from the $displaystyleepsilon-delta$ definition?
I am stuck because while it is easy to find a lower bound for the denominator $x$, the numerator does not have an upper bound - it merely increases less fast than the denominator. Is there a way to manipulate the expression to get a bound?
calculus real-analysis limits limits-without-lhopital
$ln(x)leq x$ for $x>0$ and show it for the function $frac{1}{x}$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 15 at 18:38
@Rustyn there is one for infinite limits
– gt6989b
Nov 15 at 18:38
@gt6989b many thanks, I'll have a look
– Rustyn
Nov 15 at 18:39
3
If you let $x = e^y$, then it's equivalent to show that $$ lim_{y to infty} frac{y}{e^y} = 0 $$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 15 at 18:42
1
Well its just an immediate but non-obvious consequence of the inequality $log xleq x-1$ or if you prefer the simpler inequality $log x<x$. The non-obvious part is related to the fact that we need to replace $x$ with $sqrt{x} $ in above inequality to get $log x<2sqrt{x}$.
– Paramanand Singh
Nov 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Show that $displaystylelim_{x to infty}frac{ln x}{x}=0$.
I know this is a simple application of the L'Hopital's rule, but can we also show this from the $displaystyleepsilon-delta$ definition?
I am stuck because while it is easy to find a lower bound for the denominator $x$, the numerator does not have an upper bound - it merely increases less fast than the denominator. Is there a way to manipulate the expression to get a bound?
calculus real-analysis limits limits-without-lhopital
Show that $displaystylelim_{x to infty}frac{ln x}{x}=0$.
I know this is a simple application of the L'Hopital's rule, but can we also show this from the $displaystyleepsilon-delta$ definition?
I am stuck because while it is easy to find a lower bound for the denominator $x$, the numerator does not have an upper bound - it merely increases less fast than the denominator. Is there a way to manipulate the expression to get a bound?
calculus real-analysis limits limits-without-lhopital
calculus real-analysis limits limits-without-lhopital
edited Nov 16 at 11:55
Martin Sleziak
44.4k7115268
44.4k7115268
asked Nov 15 at 18:33
Bunbury
627
627
$ln(x)leq x$ for $x>0$ and show it for the function $frac{1}{x}$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 15 at 18:38
@Rustyn there is one for infinite limits
– gt6989b
Nov 15 at 18:38
@gt6989b many thanks, I'll have a look
– Rustyn
Nov 15 at 18:39
3
If you let $x = e^y$, then it's equivalent to show that $$ lim_{y to infty} frac{y}{e^y} = 0 $$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 15 at 18:42
1
Well its just an immediate but non-obvious consequence of the inequality $log xleq x-1$ or if you prefer the simpler inequality $log x<x$. The non-obvious part is related to the fact that we need to replace $x$ with $sqrt{x} $ in above inequality to get $log x<2sqrt{x}$.
– Paramanand Singh
Nov 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
$ln(x)leq x$ for $x>0$ and show it for the function $frac{1}{x}$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 15 at 18:38
@Rustyn there is one for infinite limits
– gt6989b
Nov 15 at 18:38
@gt6989b many thanks, I'll have a look
– Rustyn
Nov 15 at 18:39
3
If you let $x = e^y$, then it's equivalent to show that $$ lim_{y to infty} frac{y}{e^y} = 0 $$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 15 at 18:42
1
Well its just an immediate but non-obvious consequence of the inequality $log xleq x-1$ or if you prefer the simpler inequality $log x<x$. The non-obvious part is related to the fact that we need to replace $x$ with $sqrt{x} $ in above inequality to get $log x<2sqrt{x}$.
– Paramanand Singh
Nov 15 at 18:53
$ln(x)leq x$ for $x>0$ and show it for the function $frac{1}{x}$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 15 at 18:38
$ln(x)leq x$ for $x>0$ and show it for the function $frac{1}{x}$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 15 at 18:38
@Rustyn there is one for infinite limits
– gt6989b
Nov 15 at 18:38
@Rustyn there is one for infinite limits
– gt6989b
Nov 15 at 18:38
@gt6989b many thanks, I'll have a look
– Rustyn
Nov 15 at 18:39
@gt6989b many thanks, I'll have a look
– Rustyn
Nov 15 at 18:39
3
3
If you let $x = e^y$, then it's equivalent to show that $$ lim_{y to infty} frac{y}{e^y} = 0 $$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 15 at 18:42
If you let $x = e^y$, then it's equivalent to show that $$ lim_{y to infty} frac{y}{e^y} = 0 $$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 15 at 18:42
1
1
Well its just an immediate but non-obvious consequence of the inequality $log xleq x-1$ or if you prefer the simpler inequality $log x<x$. The non-obvious part is related to the fact that we need to replace $x$ with $sqrt{x} $ in above inequality to get $log x<2sqrt{x}$.
– Paramanand Singh
Nov 15 at 18:53
Well its just an immediate but non-obvious consequence of the inequality $log xleq x-1$ or if you prefer the simpler inequality $log x<x$. The non-obvious part is related to the fact that we need to replace $x$ with $sqrt{x} $ in above inequality to get $log x<2sqrt{x}$.
– Paramanand Singh
Nov 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Assuming you define the $ln(cdot) $ by the integral, then it is more or less enough to notice that
$$0leq int^x_1frac 1 t, dtleq int^x_1frac 1{ sqrt t} , dtleq int^x_0frac{1}{sqrt t} , dt$$
This leads to
$$left |frac{ln(x)} {x} right|leq left|frac{2sqrt{x}}{x} right|$$
The rest is straightforward.
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
For all $x > 0, ln x < sqrt x$
$frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x}$
When $N > frac {1}{epsilon^2},$ then $x>N implies frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x} < epsilon$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Assuming you define the $ln(cdot) $ by the integral, then it is more or less enough to notice that
$$0leq int^x_1frac 1 t, dtleq int^x_1frac 1{ sqrt t} , dtleq int^x_0frac{1}{sqrt t} , dt$$
This leads to
$$left |frac{ln(x)} {x} right|leq left|frac{2sqrt{x}}{x} right|$$
The rest is straightforward.
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Assuming you define the $ln(cdot) $ by the integral, then it is more or less enough to notice that
$$0leq int^x_1frac 1 t, dtleq int^x_1frac 1{ sqrt t} , dtleq int^x_0frac{1}{sqrt t} , dt$$
This leads to
$$left |frac{ln(x)} {x} right|leq left|frac{2sqrt{x}}{x} right|$$
The rest is straightforward.
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Assuming you define the $ln(cdot) $ by the integral, then it is more or less enough to notice that
$$0leq int^x_1frac 1 t, dtleq int^x_1frac 1{ sqrt t} , dtleq int^x_0frac{1}{sqrt t} , dt$$
This leads to
$$left |frac{ln(x)} {x} right|leq left|frac{2sqrt{x}}{x} right|$$
The rest is straightforward.
Assuming you define the $ln(cdot) $ by the integral, then it is more or less enough to notice that
$$0leq int^x_1frac 1 t, dtleq int^x_1frac 1{ sqrt t} , dtleq int^x_0frac{1}{sqrt t} , dt$$
This leads to
$$left |frac{ln(x)} {x} right|leq left|frac{2sqrt{x}}{x} right|$$
The rest is straightforward.
edited Nov 15 at 18:56
answered Nov 15 at 18:39
Shashi
6,9191527
6,9191527
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
add a comment |
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
Ah yes! I forgot that's how we defined log function. Thank you!
– Bunbury
Nov 15 at 18:51
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
@Bunbury glad I could help, I made it a little bit easier now.
– Shashi
Nov 15 at 18:58
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
For all $x > 0, ln x < sqrt x$
$frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x}$
When $N > frac {1}{epsilon^2},$ then $x>N implies frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x} < epsilon$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
For all $x > 0, ln x < sqrt x$
$frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x}$
When $N > frac {1}{epsilon^2},$ then $x>N implies frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x} < epsilon$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
For all $x > 0, ln x < sqrt x$
$frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x}$
When $N > frac {1}{epsilon^2},$ then $x>N implies frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x} < epsilon$
For all $x > 0, ln x < sqrt x$
$frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x}$
When $N > frac {1}{epsilon^2},$ then $x>N implies frac {ln x}{x} < frac {1}{sqrt x} < epsilon$
answered Nov 15 at 18:53
Doug M
43k31752
43k31752
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000091%2fshow-that-lim-limits-x-to-infty-frac-ln-xx-0-from-definition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$ln(x)leq x$ for $x>0$ and show it for the function $frac{1}{x}$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 15 at 18:38
@Rustyn there is one for infinite limits
– gt6989b
Nov 15 at 18:38
@gt6989b many thanks, I'll have a look
– Rustyn
Nov 15 at 18:39
3
If you let $x = e^y$, then it's equivalent to show that $$ lim_{y to infty} frac{y}{e^y} = 0 $$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 15 at 18:42
1
Well its just an immediate but non-obvious consequence of the inequality $log xleq x-1$ or if you prefer the simpler inequality $log x<x$. The non-obvious part is related to the fact that we need to replace $x$ with $sqrt{x} $ in above inequality to get $log x<2sqrt{x}$.
– Paramanand Singh
Nov 15 at 18:53