Proving such a function is always constant
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $I subset R$ be an interval. Let $f : I to R$ be a continuous function.
Assume that $I := [a, b]$. Assume that for all $c, d in [a, b]$ such that $c < d$, there exists $e in [c,d]$ such that $f(e) = f(a)$ or $f(e) = f(b)$. Prove that $f$ is a constant.
Consider this statement: For all $c in [a,b], f(c) in {f(a),f(b)}$
I figured that proving this statement would allow me to prove the function to be constant, but I'm unable to do so. Any thoughts?
real-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $I subset R$ be an interval. Let $f : I to R$ be a continuous function.
Assume that $I := [a, b]$. Assume that for all $c, d in [a, b]$ such that $c < d$, there exists $e in [c,d]$ such that $f(e) = f(a)$ or $f(e) = f(b)$. Prove that $f$ is a constant.
Consider this statement: For all $c in [a,b], f(c) in {f(a),f(b)}$
I figured that proving this statement would allow me to prove the function to be constant, but I'm unable to do so. Any thoughts?
real-analysis
Are (or were) you unable to prove the result from your statement, your statement from the given information or both?
– PJTraill
Nov 22 at 21:53
The latter actually. @PJTraill
– Ahmad Lamaa
Nov 23 at 1:43
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $I subset R$ be an interval. Let $f : I to R$ be a continuous function.
Assume that $I := [a, b]$. Assume that for all $c, d in [a, b]$ such that $c < d$, there exists $e in [c,d]$ such that $f(e) = f(a)$ or $f(e) = f(b)$. Prove that $f$ is a constant.
Consider this statement: For all $c in [a,b], f(c) in {f(a),f(b)}$
I figured that proving this statement would allow me to prove the function to be constant, but I'm unable to do so. Any thoughts?
real-analysis
Let $I subset R$ be an interval. Let $f : I to R$ be a continuous function.
Assume that $I := [a, b]$. Assume that for all $c, d in [a, b]$ such that $c < d$, there exists $e in [c,d]$ such that $f(e) = f(a)$ or $f(e) = f(b)$. Prove that $f$ is a constant.
Consider this statement: For all $c in [a,b], f(c) in {f(a),f(b)}$
I figured that proving this statement would allow me to prove the function to be constant, but I'm unable to do so. Any thoughts?
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Nov 23 at 0:18
amWhy
191k27223438
191k27223438
asked Nov 22 at 15:37
Ahmad Lamaa
1265
1265
Are (or were) you unable to prove the result from your statement, your statement from the given information or both?
– PJTraill
Nov 22 at 21:53
The latter actually. @PJTraill
– Ahmad Lamaa
Nov 23 at 1:43
add a comment |
Are (or were) you unable to prove the result from your statement, your statement from the given information or both?
– PJTraill
Nov 22 at 21:53
The latter actually. @PJTraill
– Ahmad Lamaa
Nov 23 at 1:43
Are (or were) you unable to prove the result from your statement, your statement from the given information or both?
– PJTraill
Nov 22 at 21:53
Are (or were) you unable to prove the result from your statement, your statement from the given information or both?
– PJTraill
Nov 22 at 21:53
The latter actually. @PJTraill
– Ahmad Lamaa
Nov 23 at 1:43
The latter actually. @PJTraill
– Ahmad Lamaa
Nov 23 at 1:43
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
We will proceed by contradiction:
I assume you want to prove that the function is constant given the statement
$c in [a, b] Rightarrow f(c) in {f(a), f(b) }$
if that's the case, then we get a continuous function to a discrete space.
If the function takes more than one value, the image of our function will be$ {f(a), f(b)}$ which is disconnected. But continous functions preserve connectedness.
Contradiction Q.E.D.
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
1
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Let $c$ in $(a,b)$ and let $epsilon$ be a positive real number such that $[c-epsilon,c+epsilon]subseteq[a,b]$. Define a sequence of intervals $(I_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ by the formula $I_n=[c-frac{epsilon}{n},c+frac{epsilon}{n}]$. By hypothesis, there exists a sequence of points $(c_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ such that $c_nin I_n$ and $f(c_n)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Then $c_n$ tends to $c$ and, by continuity of $f$, we have that $f(c)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Thus, by continuity, $f$ is constant because it takes values in a discrete space.
New contributor
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The set $D:=f^{-1}(f(a))cup f^{-1}(f(b))$ is closed by continuity of $f$ and dense in $I$ by the special property. Clearly $D$ does not intersect the open set $Isetminus D$. By defnition of dense, this means that $Isetminus D$ is empty. Hence $I=D$. This makes $I$ the union of the two non-empty closed sets $f^{-1}(f(a))$, $f^{-1}(f(b))$. As $I$ is connected, these sets must overlap, which means that $f(a)=f(b)$ and ultimately that $f^{-1}(f(a))=I$, i.e., $f$ is constant.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You need to use intermediate value property of continuous functions.
Suppose $f(a) =f(b) $. If $f$ is not constant in $[a, b] $ then there is some value of $f$ which differs from $f(a) =f(b) $ and let's suppose this value $f(c) > f(a) $ (the case $f(c) <f(a) $ is handled in a similar manner). By continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ are greater than $f(a) $. And this contradicts the given hypotheses. Thus $f$ must be a constant function.
The case when $f(a) neq f(b) $ leads us to a contradiction as shown next. Let's us assume $f(a) <f(b) $ and choose $k$ such that $f(a) <k<f(b) $. By intermediate value property there is a $cin(a, b) $ for which $f(c) =k$. And by continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ lie strictly between $f(a)$ and $f(b) $. This contradiction shows that we must have $f(a) =f(b) $ and as shown earlier the function is constant.
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
We will proceed by contradiction:
I assume you want to prove that the function is constant given the statement
$c in [a, b] Rightarrow f(c) in {f(a), f(b) }$
if that's the case, then we get a continuous function to a discrete space.
If the function takes more than one value, the image of our function will be$ {f(a), f(b)}$ which is disconnected. But continous functions preserve connectedness.
Contradiction Q.E.D.
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
1
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
We will proceed by contradiction:
I assume you want to prove that the function is constant given the statement
$c in [a, b] Rightarrow f(c) in {f(a), f(b) }$
if that's the case, then we get a continuous function to a discrete space.
If the function takes more than one value, the image of our function will be$ {f(a), f(b)}$ which is disconnected. But continous functions preserve connectedness.
Contradiction Q.E.D.
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
1
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
We will proceed by contradiction:
I assume you want to prove that the function is constant given the statement
$c in [a, b] Rightarrow f(c) in {f(a), f(b) }$
if that's the case, then we get a continuous function to a discrete space.
If the function takes more than one value, the image of our function will be$ {f(a), f(b)}$ which is disconnected. But continous functions preserve connectedness.
Contradiction Q.E.D.
We will proceed by contradiction:
I assume you want to prove that the function is constant given the statement
$c in [a, b] Rightarrow f(c) in {f(a), f(b) }$
if that's the case, then we get a continuous function to a discrete space.
If the function takes more than one value, the image of our function will be$ {f(a), f(b)}$ which is disconnected. But continous functions preserve connectedness.
Contradiction Q.E.D.
answered Nov 22 at 15:48
Aleks J
1796
1796
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
1
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
add a comment |
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
1
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
I suppose here $f(c)in[f(a), f(b)]$. Otherwise the function is discontinuous assuming $f(a)neq f(b)$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 15:52
1
1
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
Yes, assuming $f(a) neq (fb) $ would mean it is discontinous, which is precisely the contradiction we're using that in fact $f(a)$ must be equal to $f(b)$ and the function is in fact constant. [think about the fact that if in the end both of them were to not be the same, the function would not be constant anyway ]
– Aleks J
Nov 22 at 15:55
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Let $c$ in $(a,b)$ and let $epsilon$ be a positive real number such that $[c-epsilon,c+epsilon]subseteq[a,b]$. Define a sequence of intervals $(I_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ by the formula $I_n=[c-frac{epsilon}{n},c+frac{epsilon}{n}]$. By hypothesis, there exists a sequence of points $(c_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ such that $c_nin I_n$ and $f(c_n)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Then $c_n$ tends to $c$ and, by continuity of $f$, we have that $f(c)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Thus, by continuity, $f$ is constant because it takes values in a discrete space.
New contributor
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Let $c$ in $(a,b)$ and let $epsilon$ be a positive real number such that $[c-epsilon,c+epsilon]subseteq[a,b]$. Define a sequence of intervals $(I_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ by the formula $I_n=[c-frac{epsilon}{n},c+frac{epsilon}{n}]$. By hypothesis, there exists a sequence of points $(c_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ such that $c_nin I_n$ and $f(c_n)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Then $c_n$ tends to $c$ and, by continuity of $f$, we have that $f(c)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Thus, by continuity, $f$ is constant because it takes values in a discrete space.
New contributor
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Let $c$ in $(a,b)$ and let $epsilon$ be a positive real number such that $[c-epsilon,c+epsilon]subseteq[a,b]$. Define a sequence of intervals $(I_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ by the formula $I_n=[c-frac{epsilon}{n},c+frac{epsilon}{n}]$. By hypothesis, there exists a sequence of points $(c_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ such that $c_nin I_n$ and $f(c_n)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Then $c_n$ tends to $c$ and, by continuity of $f$, we have that $f(c)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Thus, by continuity, $f$ is constant because it takes values in a discrete space.
New contributor
Let $c$ in $(a,b)$ and let $epsilon$ be a positive real number such that $[c-epsilon,c+epsilon]subseteq[a,b]$. Define a sequence of intervals $(I_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ by the formula $I_n=[c-frac{epsilon}{n},c+frac{epsilon}{n}]$. By hypothesis, there exists a sequence of points $(c_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ such that $c_nin I_n$ and $f(c_n)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Then $c_n$ tends to $c$ and, by continuity of $f$, we have that $f(c)in{f(a),f(b)}$. Thus, by continuity, $f$ is constant because it takes values in a discrete space.
New contributor
edited Nov 22 at 23:38
New contributor
answered Nov 22 at 15:54
Dante Grevino
5017
5017
New contributor
New contributor
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
add a comment |
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
@PJTraill Yes, I corrected it.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 22 at 23:41
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The set $D:=f^{-1}(f(a))cup f^{-1}(f(b))$ is closed by continuity of $f$ and dense in $I$ by the special property. Clearly $D$ does not intersect the open set $Isetminus D$. By defnition of dense, this means that $Isetminus D$ is empty. Hence $I=D$. This makes $I$ the union of the two non-empty closed sets $f^{-1}(f(a))$, $f^{-1}(f(b))$. As $I$ is connected, these sets must overlap, which means that $f(a)=f(b)$ and ultimately that $f^{-1}(f(a))=I$, i.e., $f$ is constant.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The set $D:=f^{-1}(f(a))cup f^{-1}(f(b))$ is closed by continuity of $f$ and dense in $I$ by the special property. Clearly $D$ does not intersect the open set $Isetminus D$. By defnition of dense, this means that $Isetminus D$ is empty. Hence $I=D$. This makes $I$ the union of the two non-empty closed sets $f^{-1}(f(a))$, $f^{-1}(f(b))$. As $I$ is connected, these sets must overlap, which means that $f(a)=f(b)$ and ultimately that $f^{-1}(f(a))=I$, i.e., $f$ is constant.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The set $D:=f^{-1}(f(a))cup f^{-1}(f(b))$ is closed by continuity of $f$ and dense in $I$ by the special property. Clearly $D$ does not intersect the open set $Isetminus D$. By defnition of dense, this means that $Isetminus D$ is empty. Hence $I=D$. This makes $I$ the union of the two non-empty closed sets $f^{-1}(f(a))$, $f^{-1}(f(b))$. As $I$ is connected, these sets must overlap, which means that $f(a)=f(b)$ and ultimately that $f^{-1}(f(a))=I$, i.e., $f$ is constant.
The set $D:=f^{-1}(f(a))cup f^{-1}(f(b))$ is closed by continuity of $f$ and dense in $I$ by the special property. Clearly $D$ does not intersect the open set $Isetminus D$. By defnition of dense, this means that $Isetminus D$ is empty. Hence $I=D$. This makes $I$ the union of the two non-empty closed sets $f^{-1}(f(a))$, $f^{-1}(f(b))$. As $I$ is connected, these sets must overlap, which means that $f(a)=f(b)$ and ultimately that $f^{-1}(f(a))=I$, i.e., $f$ is constant.
answered Nov 22 at 20:19
Hagen von Eitzen
274k21266494
274k21266494
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You need to use intermediate value property of continuous functions.
Suppose $f(a) =f(b) $. If $f$ is not constant in $[a, b] $ then there is some value of $f$ which differs from $f(a) =f(b) $ and let's suppose this value $f(c) > f(a) $ (the case $f(c) <f(a) $ is handled in a similar manner). By continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ are greater than $f(a) $. And this contradicts the given hypotheses. Thus $f$ must be a constant function.
The case when $f(a) neq f(b) $ leads us to a contradiction as shown next. Let's us assume $f(a) <f(b) $ and choose $k$ such that $f(a) <k<f(b) $. By intermediate value property there is a $cin(a, b) $ for which $f(c) =k$. And by continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ lie strictly between $f(a)$ and $f(b) $. This contradiction shows that we must have $f(a) =f(b) $ and as shown earlier the function is constant.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You need to use intermediate value property of continuous functions.
Suppose $f(a) =f(b) $. If $f$ is not constant in $[a, b] $ then there is some value of $f$ which differs from $f(a) =f(b) $ and let's suppose this value $f(c) > f(a) $ (the case $f(c) <f(a) $ is handled in a similar manner). By continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ are greater than $f(a) $. And this contradicts the given hypotheses. Thus $f$ must be a constant function.
The case when $f(a) neq f(b) $ leads us to a contradiction as shown next. Let's us assume $f(a) <f(b) $ and choose $k$ such that $f(a) <k<f(b) $. By intermediate value property there is a $cin(a, b) $ for which $f(c) =k$. And by continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ lie strictly between $f(a)$ and $f(b) $. This contradiction shows that we must have $f(a) =f(b) $ and as shown earlier the function is constant.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You need to use intermediate value property of continuous functions.
Suppose $f(a) =f(b) $. If $f$ is not constant in $[a, b] $ then there is some value of $f$ which differs from $f(a) =f(b) $ and let's suppose this value $f(c) > f(a) $ (the case $f(c) <f(a) $ is handled in a similar manner). By continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ are greater than $f(a) $. And this contradicts the given hypotheses. Thus $f$ must be a constant function.
The case when $f(a) neq f(b) $ leads us to a contradiction as shown next. Let's us assume $f(a) <f(b) $ and choose $k$ such that $f(a) <k<f(b) $. By intermediate value property there is a $cin(a, b) $ for which $f(c) =k$. And by continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ lie strictly between $f(a)$ and $f(b) $. This contradiction shows that we must have $f(a) =f(b) $ and as shown earlier the function is constant.
You need to use intermediate value property of continuous functions.
Suppose $f(a) =f(b) $. If $f$ is not constant in $[a, b] $ then there is some value of $f$ which differs from $f(a) =f(b) $ and let's suppose this value $f(c) > f(a) $ (the case $f(c) <f(a) $ is handled in a similar manner). By continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ are greater than $f(a) $. And this contradicts the given hypotheses. Thus $f$ must be a constant function.
The case when $f(a) neq f(b) $ leads us to a contradiction as shown next. Let's us assume $f(a) <f(b) $ and choose $k$ such that $f(a) <k<f(b) $. By intermediate value property there is a $cin(a, b) $ for which $f(c) =k$. And by continuity there is an interval of type $[c-delta, c+delta] $ where all values of $f$ lie strictly between $f(a)$ and $f(b) $. This contradiction shows that we must have $f(a) =f(b) $ and as shown earlier the function is constant.
answered Nov 23 at 3:03
Paramanand Singh
48.2k555156
48.2k555156
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009279%2fproving-such-a-function-is-always-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are (or were) you unable to prove the result from your statement, your statement from the given information or both?
– PJTraill
Nov 22 at 21:53
The latter actually. @PJTraill
– Ahmad Lamaa
Nov 23 at 1:43