biblatex-chicago: How do I make use of “supranotes”?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Like the title says. I have supranotes=true
in the options for the package. I have two footnotes (made with footcite{}
) with another footnote in between so I don't just get "ibid". But still the footnote is printed with the usual information, no "supra". The biblatex-chicago manual says "you’ll only see it in certain sorts of citation, automatically controlled by biblatex-chicago in accordance with the Bluebook specification". What kind of citations are these?
biblatex-chicago
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Like the title says. I have supranotes=true
in the options for the package. I have two footnotes (made with footcite{}
) with another footnote in between so I don't just get "ibid". But still the footnote is printed with the usual information, no "supra". The biblatex-chicago manual says "you’ll only see it in certain sorts of citation, automatically controlled by biblatex-chicago in accordance with the Bluebook specification". What kind of citations are these?
biblatex-chicago
New contributor
Which style do you use?notes
orauthordate
?
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:07
@moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 19:09
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Like the title says. I have supranotes=true
in the options for the package. I have two footnotes (made with footcite{}
) with another footnote in between so I don't just get "ibid". But still the footnote is printed with the usual information, no "supra". The biblatex-chicago manual says "you’ll only see it in certain sorts of citation, automatically controlled by biblatex-chicago in accordance with the Bluebook specification". What kind of citations are these?
biblatex-chicago
New contributor
Like the title says. I have supranotes=true
in the options for the package. I have two footnotes (made with footcite{}
) with another footnote in between so I don't just get "ibid". But still the footnote is printed with the usual information, no "supra". The biblatex-chicago manual says "you’ll only see it in certain sorts of citation, automatically controlled by biblatex-chicago in accordance with the Bluebook specification". What kind of citations are these?
biblatex-chicago
biblatex-chicago
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Nov 22 at 18:15
user.S
31
31
New contributor
New contributor
Which style do you use?notes
orauthordate
?
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:07
@moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 19:09
add a comment |
Which style do you use?notes
orauthordate
?
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:07
@moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 19:09
Which style do you use?
notes
or authordate
?– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:07
Which style do you use?
notes
or authordate
?– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:07
@moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 19:09
@moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 19:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Checking the sources of biblatex-chicago
we find supra
related content in the bibmacros cite:short:legislation
, cite:short:legal
and cite:shorthand:legal
which are applied to their respective entrytypes: legislation
and legal
.
1
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
Oh, I see. I only tried for the@book
and@article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?
– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, andbiblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Checking the sources of biblatex-chicago
we find supra
related content in the bibmacros cite:short:legislation
, cite:short:legal
and cite:shorthand:legal
which are applied to their respective entrytypes: legislation
and legal
.
1
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
Oh, I see. I only tried for the@book
and@article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?
– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, andbiblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Checking the sources of biblatex-chicago
we find supra
related content in the bibmacros cite:short:legislation
, cite:short:legal
and cite:shorthand:legal
which are applied to their respective entrytypes: legislation
and legal
.
1
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
Oh, I see. I only tried for the@book
and@article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?
– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, andbiblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Checking the sources of biblatex-chicago
we find supra
related content in the bibmacros cite:short:legislation
, cite:short:legal
and cite:shorthand:legal
which are applied to their respective entrytypes: legislation
and legal
.
Checking the sources of biblatex-chicago
we find supra
related content in the bibmacros cite:short:legislation
, cite:short:legal
and cite:shorthand:legal
which are applied to their respective entrytypes: legislation
and legal
.
answered Nov 22 at 18:57
gusbrs
6,2142838
6,2142838
1
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
Oh, I see. I only tried for the@book
and@article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?
– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, andbiblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
add a comment |
1
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
Oh, I see. I only tried for the@book
and@article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?
– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, andbiblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
1
1
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
That makes sense since the Bluebook is a style guide for legal citations and the CMS defers to the Bluebook when it comes to citations of case law and legislations.
– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:06
Oh, I see. I only tried for the
@book
and @article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
Oh, I see. I only tried for the
@book
and @article
bibliography entry types so that's why it doesn't work. But I think it's correct to use supra for anything. I've seen other authors in law use it for articles for example. Do you know if I can expand it to work for other entry types?– user.S
Nov 22 at 21:42
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, and
biblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
@user.S What is "correct" or "incorrect" is a matter of standard, and
biblatex-chicago
tries to follow the Chicago Manual of Style.– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 22:46
add a comment |
user.S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user.S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user.S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user.S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461329%2fbiblatex-chicago-how-do-i-make-use-of-supranotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Which style do you use?
notes
orauthordate
?– moewe
Nov 22 at 19:07
@moewe, as far as I could gr[e|as]p both styles use the supra facilities, but in not precisely identical ways.
– gusbrs
Nov 22 at 19:09