Prove that that PDF can be “factorized”, if its log satisfies a homogeneous PDE of the second order












0












$begingroup$


The following problem is taken from "The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Kendall & Stuart, Volume 1, Second Edition, excercise 1.17:



Let $f(x,y)$ be a probability density function. Prove that the linear transformation, that transforms variables to the independent ones, exists if and only if $f(x,y)$ satisfies the following equation:



$$
left( A frac{ partial^2 }{partial x^2} +
2 H frac{ partial^2 }{partial x partial y} +
B frac{ partial^2 }{partial y^2} right) log f = 0,
$$

where $A$, $H$ and $B$ are some constants.



Variables $xi$, $phi$ are called independent if $f(xi, phi) = f_{1}(xi)f_{2}(phi)$, where $f_{1}(xi)$, $f_{2}(phi)$ are density functions.



I'd like to prove the "if" part. The most obvious way is to separate the variables, assuming $log f = u(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)$, though two quesions immidiately arise:




  1. Is it possible, that there are other solutions, that can't be represented in the form of $X(x)Y(y)$?

  2. Are there any simpler methods that don't use PDE technique? Kendall & Stuart is a statistics texbook, after all, so it's rather suspicious that it requires the knowledge of PDEs.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Using a PDE is not that weird, is it? It measures the rate of change of one variable when another one changes. Which is more or less measuring dependence.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Lindqvist
    Dec 28 '18 at 21:24
















0












$begingroup$


The following problem is taken from "The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Kendall & Stuart, Volume 1, Second Edition, excercise 1.17:



Let $f(x,y)$ be a probability density function. Prove that the linear transformation, that transforms variables to the independent ones, exists if and only if $f(x,y)$ satisfies the following equation:



$$
left( A frac{ partial^2 }{partial x^2} +
2 H frac{ partial^2 }{partial x partial y} +
B frac{ partial^2 }{partial y^2} right) log f = 0,
$$

where $A$, $H$ and $B$ are some constants.



Variables $xi$, $phi$ are called independent if $f(xi, phi) = f_{1}(xi)f_{2}(phi)$, where $f_{1}(xi)$, $f_{2}(phi)$ are density functions.



I'd like to prove the "if" part. The most obvious way is to separate the variables, assuming $log f = u(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)$, though two quesions immidiately arise:




  1. Is it possible, that there are other solutions, that can't be represented in the form of $X(x)Y(y)$?

  2. Are there any simpler methods that don't use PDE technique? Kendall & Stuart is a statistics texbook, after all, so it's rather suspicious that it requires the knowledge of PDEs.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Using a PDE is not that weird, is it? It measures the rate of change of one variable when another one changes. Which is more or less measuring dependence.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Lindqvist
    Dec 28 '18 at 21:24














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The following problem is taken from "The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Kendall & Stuart, Volume 1, Second Edition, excercise 1.17:



Let $f(x,y)$ be a probability density function. Prove that the linear transformation, that transforms variables to the independent ones, exists if and only if $f(x,y)$ satisfies the following equation:



$$
left( A frac{ partial^2 }{partial x^2} +
2 H frac{ partial^2 }{partial x partial y} +
B frac{ partial^2 }{partial y^2} right) log f = 0,
$$

where $A$, $H$ and $B$ are some constants.



Variables $xi$, $phi$ are called independent if $f(xi, phi) = f_{1}(xi)f_{2}(phi)$, where $f_{1}(xi)$, $f_{2}(phi)$ are density functions.



I'd like to prove the "if" part. The most obvious way is to separate the variables, assuming $log f = u(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)$, though two quesions immidiately arise:




  1. Is it possible, that there are other solutions, that can't be represented in the form of $X(x)Y(y)$?

  2. Are there any simpler methods that don't use PDE technique? Kendall & Stuart is a statistics texbook, after all, so it's rather suspicious that it requires the knowledge of PDEs.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The following problem is taken from "The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Kendall & Stuart, Volume 1, Second Edition, excercise 1.17:



Let $f(x,y)$ be a probability density function. Prove that the linear transformation, that transforms variables to the independent ones, exists if and only if $f(x,y)$ satisfies the following equation:



$$
left( A frac{ partial^2 }{partial x^2} +
2 H frac{ partial^2 }{partial x partial y} +
B frac{ partial^2 }{partial y^2} right) log f = 0,
$$

where $A$, $H$ and $B$ are some constants.



Variables $xi$, $phi$ are called independent if $f(xi, phi) = f_{1}(xi)f_{2}(phi)$, where $f_{1}(xi)$, $f_{2}(phi)$ are density functions.



I'd like to prove the "if" part. The most obvious way is to separate the variables, assuming $log f = u(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)$, though two quesions immidiately arise:




  1. Is it possible, that there are other solutions, that can't be represented in the form of $X(x)Y(y)$?

  2. Are there any simpler methods that don't use PDE technique? Kendall & Stuart is a statistics texbook, after all, so it's rather suspicious that it requires the knowledge of PDEs.







analysis statistics pde linear-transformations density-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '18 at 22:16







Simeon Y.

















asked Dec 28 '18 at 21:10









Simeon Y.Simeon Y.

184




184








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Using a PDE is not that weird, is it? It measures the rate of change of one variable when another one changes. Which is more or less measuring dependence.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Lindqvist
    Dec 28 '18 at 21:24














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Using a PDE is not that weird, is it? It measures the rate of change of one variable when another one changes. Which is more or less measuring dependence.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Lindqvist
    Dec 28 '18 at 21:24








1




1




$begingroup$
Using a PDE is not that weird, is it? It measures the rate of change of one variable when another one changes. Which is more or less measuring dependence.
$endgroup$
– Benjamin Lindqvist
Dec 28 '18 at 21:24




$begingroup$
Using a PDE is not that weird, is it? It measures the rate of change of one variable when another one changes. Which is more or less measuring dependence.
$endgroup$
– Benjamin Lindqvist
Dec 28 '18 at 21:24










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055284%2fprove-that-that-pdf-can-be-factorized-if-its-log-satisfies-a-homogeneous-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055284%2fprove-that-that-pdf-can-be-factorized-if-its-log-satisfies-a-homogeneous-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?