Notation in Category Theory, related to total categories, colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$
$begingroup$
A definition says:
Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
$F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.
If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.
Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.
What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?
category-theory notation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A definition says:
Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
$F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.
If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.
Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.
What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?
category-theory notation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A definition says:
Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
$F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.
If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.
Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.
What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?
category-theory notation
$endgroup$
A definition says:
Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
$F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.
If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.
Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.
What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?
category-theory notation
category-theory notation
edited Dec 28 '18 at 19:48
Mariah
asked Dec 28 '18 at 18:17
MariahMariah
2,1471718
2,1471718
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.
Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
$$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.
Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$
Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$
You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055160%2fnotation-in-category-theory-related-to-total-categories-colimit-x-in-c-z-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.
Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
$$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.
Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$
Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$
You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.
Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
$$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.
Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$
Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$
You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.
Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
$$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.
Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$
Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$
You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.
$endgroup$
The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.
Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
$$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.
Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$
Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
$$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$
You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 19:59
Clive NewsteadClive Newstead
52.1k474137
52.1k474137
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055160%2fnotation-in-category-theory-related-to-total-categories-colimit-x-in-c-z-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown