Overriding style that already has !important
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
0
If I want to override some css from my component child, I just use:
:host ::ng-deep .y {
x: !important;
}
but how to override a style that already has !important? The above example in this case won't work
angular edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
add a comment |
0
If I want to override some css from my component child, I just use:
:host ::ng-deep .y {
x: !important;
}
but how to override a style that already has !important? The above example in this case won't work
angular edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
3
You would have to make the CSS selector more specific. Can you show the HTML markup of the element and the context around it? If you could make a stackblitz showing the problem, that would be even better.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
The original style: .sortable-container .sortable-list .active I tried: body .sortable-container .sortable-list li.active
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:40
add a comment |
0
0
0
If I want to override some css from my component child, I just use:
:host ::ng-deep .y {
x: !important;
}
but how to override a style that already has !important? The above example in this case won't work
angular edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
If I want to override some css from my component child, I just use:
:host ::ng-deep .y {
x: !important;
}
but how to override a style that already has !important? The above example in this case won't work
angular angular edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
edited Nov 22 '18 at 14:21
marc_s
585k13011251272
585k13011251272
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:15
Kamil KamilKamil Kamil
184
184
3
You would have to make the CSS selector more specific. Can you show the HTML markup of the element and the context around it? If you could make a stackblitz showing the problem, that would be even better.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
The original style: .sortable-container .sortable-list .active I tried: body .sortable-container .sortable-list li.active
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:40
add a comment |
3
You would have to make the CSS selector more specific. Can you show the HTML markup of the element and the context around it? If you could make a stackblitz showing the problem, that would be even better.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
The original style: .sortable-container .sortable-list .active I tried: body .sortable-container .sortable-list li.active
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:40
3
3
You would have to make the CSS selector more specific. Can you show the HTML markup of the element and the context around it? If you could make a stackblitz showing the problem, that would be even better.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
You would have to make the CSS selector more specific. Can you show the HTML markup of the element and the context around it? If you could make a stackblitz showing the problem, that would be even better.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
The original style: .sortable-container .sortable-list .active I tried: body .sortable-container .sortable-list li.active
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:40
The original style: .sortable-container .sortable-list .active I tried: body .sortable-container .sortable-list li.active
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:40
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
1
Try this
:host /deep/ .y
instead of
:host ::ng-deep .y
I use :host /deep/ .y in my Angular application and works perfectly
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
2
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
add a comment |
0
Going from your comment about the original code this should probably work:
:host ::ng-deep .sortable-container .sortable-list ul .active {
x: value !important;
}
This assumes you're in a 'ul' but it could be ol or dl and replaced just as easily.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
Don't forget theliinli.active.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53432895%2foverriding-style-that-already-has-important%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
Try this
:host /deep/ .y
instead of
:host ::ng-deep .y
I use :host /deep/ .y in my Angular application and works perfectly
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
2
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
add a comment |
1
Try this
:host /deep/ .y
instead of
:host ::ng-deep .y
I use :host /deep/ .y in my Angular application and works perfectly
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
2
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
add a comment |
1
1
1
Try this
:host /deep/ .y
instead of
:host ::ng-deep .y
I use :host /deep/ .y in my Angular application and works perfectly
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
Try this
:host /deep/ .y
instead of
:host ::ng-deep .y
I use :host /deep/ .y in my Angular application and works perfectly
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:23
Mile MijatovicMile Mijatovic
1,1591225
1,1591225
2
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
add a comment |
2
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
2
2
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
::ng-deep, /deep/ and >>> are deprecated.
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:28
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
angular.io/guide/component-styles#deprecated-deep--and-ng-deep
– Jai
Nov 22 '18 at 14:31
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
This doesnt help :(
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:36
add a comment |
0
Going from your comment about the original code this should probably work:
:host ::ng-deep .sortable-container .sortable-list ul .active {
x: value !important;
}
This assumes you're in a 'ul' but it could be ol or dl and replaced just as easily.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
Don't forget theliinli.active.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
0
Going from your comment about the original code this should probably work:
:host ::ng-deep .sortable-container .sortable-list ul .active {
x: value !important;
}
This assumes you're in a 'ul' but it could be ol or dl and replaced just as easily.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
Don't forget theliinli.active.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
0
0
0
Going from your comment about the original code this should probably work:
:host ::ng-deep .sortable-container .sortable-list ul .active {
x: value !important;
}
This assumes you're in a 'ul' but it could be ol or dl and replaced just as easily.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
Going from your comment about the original code this should probably work:
:host ::ng-deep .sortable-container .sortable-list ul .active {
x: value !important;
}
This assumes you're in a 'ul' but it could be ol or dl and replaced just as easily.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:20
rrdrrd
3,16431825
3,16431825
Don't forget theliinli.active.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Don't forget theliinli.active.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
Don't forget the
li in li.active.– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
Don't forget the
li in li.active.– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
He shouldn't need it. The ul is an inserted element above the .active so it is more specific.
– rrd
Nov 22 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53432895%2foverriding-style-that-already-has-important%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
You would have to make the CSS selector more specific. Can you show the HTML markup of the element and the context around it? If you could make a stackblitz showing the problem, that would be even better.
– ConnorsFan
Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
The original style: .sortable-container .sortable-list .active I tried: body .sortable-container .sortable-list li.active
– Kamil Kamil
Nov 22 '18 at 14:40