Improving a TikZ picture, which is based on a GeoGebra file
I want to do a little graphical illustration of fixed points of the cubic function. Hence, I made a GeoGebra file that looks like: 
Based on that I would like to get a TikZ picture, so GeoGebra created the following code:
documentclass[10pt]{article}
usepackage{pgf,tikz,pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usetikzlibrary{arrows}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
definecolor{uuuuuu}{rgb}{0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666}
begin{tikzpicture}[line cap=round,line join=round,>=triangle 45,x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm, scale = 0.9, transform shape]
begin{axis}[
x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm,
axis lines=middle,
xmin=-1.3734914110429448,
xmax=1.62708588957055,
ymin=-1.1911483659319086,
ymax=1.353890101224171,
xtick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},
ytick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},]
clip(-1.5734914110429448,-1.1911483659319086) rectangle (2.162708588957055,3.353890101224171);
draw[line width=0.8pt,smooth,samples=100,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(x)^(3.0)});
draw [line width=0.8pt,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(-0.--1.*x)/1.});
draw (-1.3945119631901841,-0.6566295470542595) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = -1$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (-1.1269670132777865,-0.8093097675291255) -- (-1.0267447347382272,-0.9581246659666529);
draw (1.1573010736196316,0.8952972509370971) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 1$};
draw (0.162066871165644,-0.20714781299805446) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 0$};
draw (1.3389923312883434,1.3508530624805482) node[anchor=north west] {$y = x $};
draw (0.5803595092024538,1.3417419462496791) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x) = x^3$};
draw (0.01834095092024525,1.36300121745504) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x)$};
draw (1.5159338957055212,0.14514868126221436) node[anchor=north west] {$x$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (0.1593550613496931,-0.23144412294703853) -- (0.02376457055214709,-0.027962527124297032);
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (1.1491656441717788,0.843667592295506) -- (1.0298460122699384,0.9742602582712953);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (-1.,-1.)-- (-1.,0.);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (1.,1.)-- (1.,0.);
begin{scriptsize}
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (1.,1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (-1.,-1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (0.,0.) circle (2.0pt);
end{scriptsize}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
That results in

which looks almost like I want it to look like apart from the texts (fixed point at …).
How can I improve the code in order to position the texts (fixed point at …) like in Figure 1 (including the linebreak after "at")? I tried a few little things but nothing seems to work.
tikz-pgf geogebra
add a comment |
I want to do a little graphical illustration of fixed points of the cubic function. Hence, I made a GeoGebra file that looks like: 
Based on that I would like to get a TikZ picture, so GeoGebra created the following code:
documentclass[10pt]{article}
usepackage{pgf,tikz,pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usetikzlibrary{arrows}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
definecolor{uuuuuu}{rgb}{0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666}
begin{tikzpicture}[line cap=round,line join=round,>=triangle 45,x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm, scale = 0.9, transform shape]
begin{axis}[
x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm,
axis lines=middle,
xmin=-1.3734914110429448,
xmax=1.62708588957055,
ymin=-1.1911483659319086,
ymax=1.353890101224171,
xtick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},
ytick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},]
clip(-1.5734914110429448,-1.1911483659319086) rectangle (2.162708588957055,3.353890101224171);
draw[line width=0.8pt,smooth,samples=100,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(x)^(3.0)});
draw [line width=0.8pt,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(-0.--1.*x)/1.});
draw (-1.3945119631901841,-0.6566295470542595) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = -1$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (-1.1269670132777865,-0.8093097675291255) -- (-1.0267447347382272,-0.9581246659666529);
draw (1.1573010736196316,0.8952972509370971) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 1$};
draw (0.162066871165644,-0.20714781299805446) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 0$};
draw (1.3389923312883434,1.3508530624805482) node[anchor=north west] {$y = x $};
draw (0.5803595092024538,1.3417419462496791) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x) = x^3$};
draw (0.01834095092024525,1.36300121745504) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x)$};
draw (1.5159338957055212,0.14514868126221436) node[anchor=north west] {$x$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (0.1593550613496931,-0.23144412294703853) -- (0.02376457055214709,-0.027962527124297032);
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (1.1491656441717788,0.843667592295506) -- (1.0298460122699384,0.9742602582712953);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (-1.,-1.)-- (-1.,0.);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (1.,1.)-- (1.,0.);
begin{scriptsize}
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (1.,1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (-1.,-1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (0.,0.) circle (2.0pt);
end{scriptsize}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
That results in

which looks almost like I want it to look like apart from the texts (fixed point at …).
How can I improve the code in order to position the texts (fixed point at …) like in Figure 1 (including the linebreak after "at")? I tried a few little things but nothing seems to work.
tikz-pgf geogebra
I would take that! I know it's certainly not the shortest or simplest way to do things like that, but it's the only way I can do it at the moment …
– offline
Apr 1 at 10:19
add a comment |
I want to do a little graphical illustration of fixed points of the cubic function. Hence, I made a GeoGebra file that looks like: 
Based on that I would like to get a TikZ picture, so GeoGebra created the following code:
documentclass[10pt]{article}
usepackage{pgf,tikz,pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usetikzlibrary{arrows}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
definecolor{uuuuuu}{rgb}{0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666}
begin{tikzpicture}[line cap=round,line join=round,>=triangle 45,x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm, scale = 0.9, transform shape]
begin{axis}[
x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm,
axis lines=middle,
xmin=-1.3734914110429448,
xmax=1.62708588957055,
ymin=-1.1911483659319086,
ymax=1.353890101224171,
xtick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},
ytick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},]
clip(-1.5734914110429448,-1.1911483659319086) rectangle (2.162708588957055,3.353890101224171);
draw[line width=0.8pt,smooth,samples=100,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(x)^(3.0)});
draw [line width=0.8pt,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(-0.--1.*x)/1.});
draw (-1.3945119631901841,-0.6566295470542595) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = -1$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (-1.1269670132777865,-0.8093097675291255) -- (-1.0267447347382272,-0.9581246659666529);
draw (1.1573010736196316,0.8952972509370971) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 1$};
draw (0.162066871165644,-0.20714781299805446) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 0$};
draw (1.3389923312883434,1.3508530624805482) node[anchor=north west] {$y = x $};
draw (0.5803595092024538,1.3417419462496791) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x) = x^3$};
draw (0.01834095092024525,1.36300121745504) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x)$};
draw (1.5159338957055212,0.14514868126221436) node[anchor=north west] {$x$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (0.1593550613496931,-0.23144412294703853) -- (0.02376457055214709,-0.027962527124297032);
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (1.1491656441717788,0.843667592295506) -- (1.0298460122699384,0.9742602582712953);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (-1.,-1.)-- (-1.,0.);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (1.,1.)-- (1.,0.);
begin{scriptsize}
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (1.,1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (-1.,-1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (0.,0.) circle (2.0pt);
end{scriptsize}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
That results in

which looks almost like I want it to look like apart from the texts (fixed point at …).
How can I improve the code in order to position the texts (fixed point at …) like in Figure 1 (including the linebreak after "at")? I tried a few little things but nothing seems to work.
tikz-pgf geogebra
I want to do a little graphical illustration of fixed points of the cubic function. Hence, I made a GeoGebra file that looks like: 
Based on that I would like to get a TikZ picture, so GeoGebra created the following code:
documentclass[10pt]{article}
usepackage{pgf,tikz,pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usetikzlibrary{arrows}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
definecolor{uuuuuu}{rgb}{0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666,0.26666666666666666}
begin{tikzpicture}[line cap=round,line join=round,>=triangle 45,x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm, scale = 0.9, transform shape]
begin{axis}[
x=3.393473219840507cm,y=3.1433709561724212cm,
axis lines=middle,
xmin=-1.3734914110429448,
xmax=1.62708588957055,
ymin=-1.1911483659319086,
ymax=1.353890101224171,
xtick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},
ytick={-1.0,0.0,1.0},]
clip(-1.5734914110429448,-1.1911483659319086) rectangle (2.162708588957055,3.353890101224171);
draw[line width=0.8pt,smooth,samples=100,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(x)^(3.0)});
draw [line width=0.8pt,domain=-1.5734914110429448:1.962708588957055] plot(x,{(-0.--1.*x)/1.});
draw (-1.3945119631901841,-0.6566295470542595) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = -1$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (-1.1269670132777865,-0.8093097675291255) -- (-1.0267447347382272,-0.9581246659666529);
draw (1.1573010736196316,0.8952972509370971) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 1$};
draw (0.162066871165644,-0.20714781299805446) node[anchor=north west] {fixed point at $x = 0$};
draw (1.3389923312883434,1.3508530624805482) node[anchor=north west] {$y = x $};
draw (0.5803595092024538,1.3417419462496791) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x) = x^3$};
draw (0.01834095092024525,1.36300121745504) node[anchor=north west] {$f(x)$};
draw (1.5159338957055212,0.14514868126221436) node[anchor=north west] {$x$};
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (0.1593550613496931,-0.23144412294703853) -- (0.02376457055214709,-0.027962527124297032);
draw [->,line width=0.4pt] (1.1491656441717788,0.843667592295506) -- (1.0298460122699384,0.9742602582712953);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (-1.,-1.)-- (-1.,0.);
draw [line width=0.8pt,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1pt] (1.,1.)-- (1.,0.);
begin{scriptsize}
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (1.,1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (-1.,-1.) circle (2.0pt);
draw [fill=uuuuuu] (0.,0.) circle (2.0pt);
end{scriptsize}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
That results in

which looks almost like I want it to look like apart from the texts (fixed point at …).
How can I improve the code in order to position the texts (fixed point at …) like in Figure 1 (including the linebreak after "at")? I tried a few little things but nothing seems to work.
tikz-pgf geogebra
tikz-pgf geogebra
edited Apr 1 at 10:28
offline
asked Apr 1 at 10:15
offlineoffline
545
545
I would take that! I know it's certainly not the shortest or simplest way to do things like that, but it's the only way I can do it at the moment …
– offline
Apr 1 at 10:19
add a comment |
I would take that! I know it's certainly not the shortest or simplest way to do things like that, but it's the only way I can do it at the moment …
– offline
Apr 1 at 10:19
I would take that! I know it's certainly not the shortest or simplest way to do things like that, but it's the only way I can do it at the moment …
– offline
Apr 1 at 10:19
I would take that! I know it's certainly not the shortest or simplest way to do things like that, but it's the only way I can do it at the moment …
– offline
Apr 1 at 10:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is a proposal.
documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth,scale=3]
draw[->] (0,-1.2)--(0,1.4) node[below right] {$f(x)$};
draw[->] (-1.6,0)--(2,0) node[above left] {$x$};
draw[thick] plot[samples=2,domain=-1.2:1.4] (x,x);
draw[thick] plot[smooth,samples=500,domain=-1.06:1.12] (x,x^3);
fill (-1,-1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (a) (0,0) circle (.5pt) coordinate (b) (1,1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (c);
draw[dashed] (-1,-1)--(-1,0) (1,0)--(1,1);
draw (-1,-.03) node[below] {$-1$}--(-1,.03) (1,-.03) node[below] {$1$}--(1,.03);
draw (-.03,-1) node[left] {$-1$}--(.03,-1) (-.03,1) node[left] {$1$}--(.03,1);
draw (1.1,{1.1^3}) node[left] {$f(x)=x^3$};
draw (1.3,1.3) node[below right] {$y=x$};
draw[<-] ($(a)+(150:.05)$)--++(150:.2) node[above left,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=-1$};
draw[<-] ($(b)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=0$};
draw[<-] ($(c)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Some notes:
draw plothelps us draw plot even withoutpgfplots.- Library
calchelps us calculate coordinates. Read more here
- Nodes can be multi-line, however you need to add alignment option (
align=...) and/ortext widthoption. Read more here.
@Kpym Yes, one can usedraw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I usedplotso that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpymsamples=1is enough :) I just edited my answer.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value ofsamplesis indeed25.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@JouleV In this case I continue :[smooth,samples=500]is overfilling forx^3and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for[smooth,samples=500]is 13k,[samples=500]is 6k and[smooth]is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.
– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482555%2fimproving-a-tikz-picture-which-is-based-on-a-geogebra-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a proposal.
documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth,scale=3]
draw[->] (0,-1.2)--(0,1.4) node[below right] {$f(x)$};
draw[->] (-1.6,0)--(2,0) node[above left] {$x$};
draw[thick] plot[samples=2,domain=-1.2:1.4] (x,x);
draw[thick] plot[smooth,samples=500,domain=-1.06:1.12] (x,x^3);
fill (-1,-1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (a) (0,0) circle (.5pt) coordinate (b) (1,1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (c);
draw[dashed] (-1,-1)--(-1,0) (1,0)--(1,1);
draw (-1,-.03) node[below] {$-1$}--(-1,.03) (1,-.03) node[below] {$1$}--(1,.03);
draw (-.03,-1) node[left] {$-1$}--(.03,-1) (-.03,1) node[left] {$1$}--(.03,1);
draw (1.1,{1.1^3}) node[left] {$f(x)=x^3$};
draw (1.3,1.3) node[below right] {$y=x$};
draw[<-] ($(a)+(150:.05)$)--++(150:.2) node[above left,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=-1$};
draw[<-] ($(b)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=0$};
draw[<-] ($(c)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Some notes:
draw plothelps us draw plot even withoutpgfplots.- Library
calchelps us calculate coordinates. Read more here
- Nodes can be multi-line, however you need to add alignment option (
align=...) and/ortext widthoption. Read more here.
@Kpym Yes, one can usedraw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I usedplotso that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpymsamples=1is enough :) I just edited my answer.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value ofsamplesis indeed25.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@JouleV In this case I continue :[smooth,samples=500]is overfilling forx^3and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for[smooth,samples=500]is 13k,[samples=500]is 6k and[smooth]is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.
– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
add a comment |
This is a proposal.
documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth,scale=3]
draw[->] (0,-1.2)--(0,1.4) node[below right] {$f(x)$};
draw[->] (-1.6,0)--(2,0) node[above left] {$x$};
draw[thick] plot[samples=2,domain=-1.2:1.4] (x,x);
draw[thick] plot[smooth,samples=500,domain=-1.06:1.12] (x,x^3);
fill (-1,-1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (a) (0,0) circle (.5pt) coordinate (b) (1,1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (c);
draw[dashed] (-1,-1)--(-1,0) (1,0)--(1,1);
draw (-1,-.03) node[below] {$-1$}--(-1,.03) (1,-.03) node[below] {$1$}--(1,.03);
draw (-.03,-1) node[left] {$-1$}--(.03,-1) (-.03,1) node[left] {$1$}--(.03,1);
draw (1.1,{1.1^3}) node[left] {$f(x)=x^3$};
draw (1.3,1.3) node[below right] {$y=x$};
draw[<-] ($(a)+(150:.05)$)--++(150:.2) node[above left,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=-1$};
draw[<-] ($(b)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=0$};
draw[<-] ($(c)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Some notes:
draw plothelps us draw plot even withoutpgfplots.- Library
calchelps us calculate coordinates. Read more here
- Nodes can be multi-line, however you need to add alignment option (
align=...) and/ortext widthoption. Read more here.
@Kpym Yes, one can usedraw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I usedplotso that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpymsamples=1is enough :) I just edited my answer.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value ofsamplesis indeed25.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@JouleV In this case I continue :[smooth,samples=500]is overfilling forx^3and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for[smooth,samples=500]is 13k,[samples=500]is 6k and[smooth]is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.
– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
add a comment |
This is a proposal.
documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth,scale=3]
draw[->] (0,-1.2)--(0,1.4) node[below right] {$f(x)$};
draw[->] (-1.6,0)--(2,0) node[above left] {$x$};
draw[thick] plot[samples=2,domain=-1.2:1.4] (x,x);
draw[thick] plot[smooth,samples=500,domain=-1.06:1.12] (x,x^3);
fill (-1,-1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (a) (0,0) circle (.5pt) coordinate (b) (1,1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (c);
draw[dashed] (-1,-1)--(-1,0) (1,0)--(1,1);
draw (-1,-.03) node[below] {$-1$}--(-1,.03) (1,-.03) node[below] {$1$}--(1,.03);
draw (-.03,-1) node[left] {$-1$}--(.03,-1) (-.03,1) node[left] {$1$}--(.03,1);
draw (1.1,{1.1^3}) node[left] {$f(x)=x^3$};
draw (1.3,1.3) node[below right] {$y=x$};
draw[<-] ($(a)+(150:.05)$)--++(150:.2) node[above left,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=-1$};
draw[<-] ($(b)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=0$};
draw[<-] ($(c)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Some notes:
draw plothelps us draw plot even withoutpgfplots.- Library
calchelps us calculate coordinates. Read more here
- Nodes can be multi-line, however you need to add alignment option (
align=...) and/ortext widthoption. Read more here.
This is a proposal.
documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth,scale=3]
draw[->] (0,-1.2)--(0,1.4) node[below right] {$f(x)$};
draw[->] (-1.6,0)--(2,0) node[above left] {$x$};
draw[thick] plot[samples=2,domain=-1.2:1.4] (x,x);
draw[thick] plot[smooth,samples=500,domain=-1.06:1.12] (x,x^3);
fill (-1,-1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (a) (0,0) circle (.5pt) coordinate (b) (1,1) circle (.5pt) coordinate (c);
draw[dashed] (-1,-1)--(-1,0) (1,0)--(1,1);
draw (-1,-.03) node[below] {$-1$}--(-1,.03) (1,-.03) node[below] {$1$}--(1,.03);
draw (-.03,-1) node[left] {$-1$}--(.03,-1) (-.03,1) node[left] {$1$}--(.03,1);
draw (1.1,{1.1^3}) node[left] {$f(x)=x^3$};
draw (1.3,1.3) node[below right] {$y=x$};
draw[<-] ($(a)+(150:.05)$)--++(150:.2) node[above left,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=-1$};
draw[<-] ($(b)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=0$};
draw[<-] ($(c)+(-30:.05)$)--++(-30:.2) node[below right,align=left] {fixed point\at $x=1$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Some notes:
draw plothelps us draw plot even withoutpgfplots.- Library
calchelps us calculate coordinates. Read more here
- Nodes can be multi-line, however you need to add alignment option (
align=...) and/ortext widthoption. Read more here.
edited Apr 2 at 13:26
answered Apr 1 at 10:33
JouleVJouleV
12.3k22663
12.3k22663
@Kpym Yes, one can usedraw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I usedplotso that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpymsamples=1is enough :) I just edited my answer.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value ofsamplesis indeed25.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@JouleV In this case I continue :[smooth,samples=500]is overfilling forx^3and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for[smooth,samples=500]is 13k,[samples=500]is 6k and[smooth]is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.
– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
add a comment |
@Kpym Yes, one can usedraw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I usedplotso that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpymsamples=1is enough :) I just edited my answer.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value ofsamplesis indeed25.
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@JouleV In this case I continue :[smooth,samples=500]is overfilling forx^3and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for[smooth,samples=500]is 13k,[samples=500]is 6k and[smooth]is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.
– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
@Kpym Yes, one can use
draw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I used plot so that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpym Yes, one can use
draw[thick] (-1.2,-1.2) -- (1.4,1.4). I used plot so that the OP could understand how to draw a plot, with two examples. Anyway with pdfLaTeX the compilation process is still very quick.– JouleV
Apr 2 at 3:54
@Kpym
samples=1 is enough :) I just edited my answer.– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym
samples=1 is enough :) I just edited my answer.– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:21
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym Thanks. You taught me something today :))
– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:26
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value of
samples is indeed 25.– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@Kpym I never consider a comment from a 18k rep user as a stupid comment. Thanks again - I just had a check on page 337 of the manual, and the initial value of
samples is indeed 25.– JouleV
Apr 2 at 13:29
@JouleV In this case I continue :
[smooth,samples=500] is overfilling for x^3 and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for [smooth,samples=500] is 13k, [samples=500] is 6k and [smooth] is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
@JouleV In this case I continue :
[smooth,samples=500] is overfilling for x^3 and even in general. A pdf with only this curve for [smooth,samples=500] is 13k, [samples=500] is 6k and [smooth] is 2k. And you can't see the difference between this 3 curves.– Kpym
Apr 2 at 13:40
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482555%2fimproving-a-tikz-picture-which-is-based-on-a-geogebra-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I would take that! I know it's certainly not the shortest or simplest way to do things like that, but it's the only way I can do it at the moment …
– offline
Apr 1 at 10:19