Gaussian variable on $l^2$ (Exercise 3.5 from Hairer's lecture notes).












1












$begingroup$


Let's take a sequence ${ a_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ in $l^2$, in other words assume that $sum_{i = 0}^{infty} a_i^2 < infty$.
If ${ xi_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ are i.i.d. $N(0,1)$, we know from Martingale theory that $sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i xi$ converges a.s. Said that, I'd like to understand better the behavior of the squared sum.



What can we say about the sequence $ S_n = sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i^2 xi_i^2$?



How can we prove or disprove its a.s. convergence?



The motivation is given from exercise 3.5, page 8, from these lecture notes (http://hairer.org/notes/SPDEs.pdf). If I understood correctly, we are basically asked to prove that $S_n$ converges almost surely, too, but my attempts failed. I tried with other Martingale strategies and direct inequalities, but I suspect the statement to be false and that I misunderstood the exercise. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let's take a sequence ${ a_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ in $l^2$, in other words assume that $sum_{i = 0}^{infty} a_i^2 < infty$.
    If ${ xi_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ are i.i.d. $N(0,1)$, we know from Martingale theory that $sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i xi$ converges a.s. Said that, I'd like to understand better the behavior of the squared sum.



    What can we say about the sequence $ S_n = sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i^2 xi_i^2$?



    How can we prove or disprove its a.s. convergence?



    The motivation is given from exercise 3.5, page 8, from these lecture notes (http://hairer.org/notes/SPDEs.pdf). If I understood correctly, we are basically asked to prove that $S_n$ converges almost surely, too, but my attempts failed. I tried with other Martingale strategies and direct inequalities, but I suspect the statement to be false and that I misunderstood the exercise. Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let's take a sequence ${ a_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ in $l^2$, in other words assume that $sum_{i = 0}^{infty} a_i^2 < infty$.
      If ${ xi_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ are i.i.d. $N(0,1)$, we know from Martingale theory that $sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i xi$ converges a.s. Said that, I'd like to understand better the behavior of the squared sum.



      What can we say about the sequence $ S_n = sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i^2 xi_i^2$?



      How can we prove or disprove its a.s. convergence?



      The motivation is given from exercise 3.5, page 8, from these lecture notes (http://hairer.org/notes/SPDEs.pdf). If I understood correctly, we are basically asked to prove that $S_n$ converges almost surely, too, but my attempts failed. I tried with other Martingale strategies and direct inequalities, but I suspect the statement to be false and that I misunderstood the exercise. Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let's take a sequence ${ a_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ in $l^2$, in other words assume that $sum_{i = 0}^{infty} a_i^2 < infty$.
      If ${ xi_n }_{ n in mathbb{N} }$ are i.i.d. $N(0,1)$, we know from Martingale theory that $sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i xi$ converges a.s. Said that, I'd like to understand better the behavior of the squared sum.



      What can we say about the sequence $ S_n = sum_{i = 0}^{n} a_i^2 xi_i^2$?



      How can we prove or disprove its a.s. convergence?



      The motivation is given from exercise 3.5, page 8, from these lecture notes (http://hairer.org/notes/SPDEs.pdf). If I understood correctly, we are basically asked to prove that $S_n$ converges almost surely, too, but my attempts failed. I tried with other Martingale strategies and direct inequalities, but I suspect the statement to be false and that I misunderstood the exercise. Thanks in advance.







      sequences-and-series probability-theory convergence normal-distribution






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 15 '18 at 14:56









      Davide Giraudo

      128k17156268




      128k17156268










      asked Dec 14 '18 at 20:32









      user233650user233650

      48629




      48629






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $S_n:=sum_{i=0}^na_i^2xi_i^2$. Then for $m,ngeqslant 0$,
          $$
          mathbb Eleftlvert S_{m+n}-S_nrightrvert=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2mathbb Eleft[xi_i^2right]=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2
          $$

          and consequently, the sequence $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is Cauchy in $mathbb L^1$. This sequence converges to a random variable $S$ in probability, and since $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is non-decreasing, it also converges almost surely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:13










          • $begingroup$
            I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
            $endgroup$
            – Davide Giraudo
            Dec 15 '18 at 9:33










          • $begingroup$
            Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 14:54












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039850%2fgaussian-variable-on-l2-exercise-3-5-from-hairers-lecture-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $S_n:=sum_{i=0}^na_i^2xi_i^2$. Then for $m,ngeqslant 0$,
          $$
          mathbb Eleftlvert S_{m+n}-S_nrightrvert=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2mathbb Eleft[xi_i^2right]=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2
          $$

          and consequently, the sequence $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is Cauchy in $mathbb L^1$. This sequence converges to a random variable $S$ in probability, and since $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is non-decreasing, it also converges almost surely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:13










          • $begingroup$
            I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
            $endgroup$
            – Davide Giraudo
            Dec 15 '18 at 9:33










          • $begingroup$
            Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 14:54
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $S_n:=sum_{i=0}^na_i^2xi_i^2$. Then for $m,ngeqslant 0$,
          $$
          mathbb Eleftlvert S_{m+n}-S_nrightrvert=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2mathbb Eleft[xi_i^2right]=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2
          $$

          and consequently, the sequence $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is Cauchy in $mathbb L^1$. This sequence converges to a random variable $S$ in probability, and since $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is non-decreasing, it also converges almost surely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:13










          • $begingroup$
            I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
            $endgroup$
            – Davide Giraudo
            Dec 15 '18 at 9:33










          • $begingroup$
            Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 14:54














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Let $S_n:=sum_{i=0}^na_i^2xi_i^2$. Then for $m,ngeqslant 0$,
          $$
          mathbb Eleftlvert S_{m+n}-S_nrightrvert=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2mathbb Eleft[xi_i^2right]=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2
          $$

          and consequently, the sequence $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is Cauchy in $mathbb L^1$. This sequence converges to a random variable $S$ in probability, and since $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is non-decreasing, it also converges almost surely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $S_n:=sum_{i=0}^na_i^2xi_i^2$. Then for $m,ngeqslant 0$,
          $$
          mathbb Eleftlvert S_{m+n}-S_nrightrvert=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2mathbb Eleft[xi_i^2right]=sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}a_i^2
          $$

          and consequently, the sequence $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is Cauchy in $mathbb L^1$. This sequence converges to a random variable $S$ in probability, and since $left(S_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is non-decreasing, it also converges almost surely.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 15 '18 at 9:33

























          answered Dec 14 '18 at 21:26









          Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo

          128k17156268




          128k17156268












          • $begingroup$
            Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:13










          • $begingroup$
            I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
            $endgroup$
            – Davide Giraudo
            Dec 15 '18 at 9:33










          • $begingroup$
            Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 14:54


















          • $begingroup$
            Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:13










          • $begingroup$
            I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
            $endgroup$
            – Davide Giraudo
            Dec 15 '18 at 9:33










          • $begingroup$
            Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
            $endgroup$
            – user233650
            Dec 15 '18 at 14:54
















          $begingroup$
          Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
          $endgroup$
          – user233650
          Dec 15 '18 at 7:13




          $begingroup$
          Hello Davide, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, $L^1$ convergence is not enough for solving the exercise. Rather, I am required to prove a.s. convergence for the full sequence $S_n$.
          $endgroup$
          – user233650
          Dec 15 '18 at 7:13












          $begingroup$
          I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
          $endgroup$
          – Davide Giraudo
          Dec 15 '18 at 9:33




          $begingroup$
          I have edited in order to address the almost sure convergence
          $endgroup$
          – Davide Giraudo
          Dec 15 '18 at 9:33












          $begingroup$
          Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
          $endgroup$
          – user233650
          Dec 15 '18 at 14:54




          $begingroup$
          Monotonicity! Yes, that was the piece I was missing. Thanks so much and have a nice weekend!
          $endgroup$
          – user233650
          Dec 15 '18 at 14:54


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039850%2fgaussian-variable-on-l2-exercise-3-5-from-hairers-lecture-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?