Show that the $L^{p}$ norm $|f|_{L^{p}} := big( int^{b}_{a} |f(x)|^pbig)^{1/p}$ is not induced by a scalar...












8












$begingroup$



On $X = C^0big([a,b]big)$, for any $p in mathbb{R}$, $p>1$, we define the $L^p$ norm by,
$$|f|_{L^{p}}:=big(int^{b}_{a}|f(x)|^{p}dx big)^{1/p}.$$



Show that for $pneq 2$, this norm is not induced by a scalar product.




My method of trying to prove this was to prove a contradiction to the parallelogram rule,



$$ |f+g|^{2}_{p} + |f-g|^{2}_{p} = 2|f|^{2}_{p} + 2|g|^{2}_{p}, tag{$1$}$$



where $f,g in C^{0}([a,b])$.



So I defined the following functions;



$$f(x):=frac{a+b}{2}-x$$



$$g(x) := begin{cases}frac{a+b}{2}-x, for a leq x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
x-frac{a+b}{2}, for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



which gives



$$f(x)+g(x) = begin{cases} a+b-2x, & for ale x le frac{a+b}{2}. \ 0, & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le bend{cases}$$



$$f(x)-g(x) = begin{cases} 0, & for a le x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
2x - (a+b), & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



Then I proceeded to calculate each term of the parallelogram rule,



$$|f+g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a}|a+b-2x|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} $$



$$ |f-g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int_{frac{a+b}{2}}^{b}|2x- (a+b)|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}}$$



$$2|f|^{2}_{p} = 2 bigg( int^{b}_{a}| frac{a+b}{2}-x|^{p} dx bigg)^{2/p} = 2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} $$



$$begin{align}2 |g|^{2}_{p} & = 2 bigg(int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a} |frac{a+b}{2} - x|^{p} dx + int^{b}_{frac{a+b}{2}}|x- frac{a+b}{2}|^{p} dxbigg)^{2/p} \ & =2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} end{align}$$



Plugging into $(1)$ we then get
$$2 cdot frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} = 4 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}}$$
which simplifies quite nicely to



$$2^{p} = 4.$$



So the equality only holds for $p = 2$.



Is what i've done correct? is there another way of proving the question which is better?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    8












    $begingroup$



    On $X = C^0big([a,b]big)$, for any $p in mathbb{R}$, $p>1$, we define the $L^p$ norm by,
    $$|f|_{L^{p}}:=big(int^{b}_{a}|f(x)|^{p}dx big)^{1/p}.$$



    Show that for $pneq 2$, this norm is not induced by a scalar product.




    My method of trying to prove this was to prove a contradiction to the parallelogram rule,



    $$ |f+g|^{2}_{p} + |f-g|^{2}_{p} = 2|f|^{2}_{p} + 2|g|^{2}_{p}, tag{$1$}$$



    where $f,g in C^{0}([a,b])$.



    So I defined the following functions;



    $$f(x):=frac{a+b}{2}-x$$



    $$g(x) := begin{cases}frac{a+b}{2}-x, for a leq x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
    x-frac{a+b}{2}, for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



    which gives



    $$f(x)+g(x) = begin{cases} a+b-2x, & for ale x le frac{a+b}{2}. \ 0, & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le bend{cases}$$



    $$f(x)-g(x) = begin{cases} 0, & for a le x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
    2x - (a+b), & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



    Then I proceeded to calculate each term of the parallelogram rule,



    $$|f+g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a}|a+b-2x|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} $$



    $$ |f-g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int_{frac{a+b}{2}}^{b}|2x- (a+b)|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}}$$



    $$2|f|^{2}_{p} = 2 bigg( int^{b}_{a}| frac{a+b}{2}-x|^{p} dx bigg)^{2/p} = 2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} $$



    $$begin{align}2 |g|^{2}_{p} & = 2 bigg(int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a} |frac{a+b}{2} - x|^{p} dx + int^{b}_{frac{a+b}{2}}|x- frac{a+b}{2}|^{p} dxbigg)^{2/p} \ & =2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} end{align}$$



    Plugging into $(1)$ we then get
    $$2 cdot frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} = 4 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}}$$
    which simplifies quite nicely to



    $$2^{p} = 4.$$



    So the equality only holds for $p = 2$.



    Is what i've done correct? is there another way of proving the question which is better?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      8












      8








      8


      2



      $begingroup$



      On $X = C^0big([a,b]big)$, for any $p in mathbb{R}$, $p>1$, we define the $L^p$ norm by,
      $$|f|_{L^{p}}:=big(int^{b}_{a}|f(x)|^{p}dx big)^{1/p}.$$



      Show that for $pneq 2$, this norm is not induced by a scalar product.




      My method of trying to prove this was to prove a contradiction to the parallelogram rule,



      $$ |f+g|^{2}_{p} + |f-g|^{2}_{p} = 2|f|^{2}_{p} + 2|g|^{2}_{p}, tag{$1$}$$



      where $f,g in C^{0}([a,b])$.



      So I defined the following functions;



      $$f(x):=frac{a+b}{2}-x$$



      $$g(x) := begin{cases}frac{a+b}{2}-x, for a leq x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
      x-frac{a+b}{2}, for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



      which gives



      $$f(x)+g(x) = begin{cases} a+b-2x, & for ale x le frac{a+b}{2}. \ 0, & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le bend{cases}$$



      $$f(x)-g(x) = begin{cases} 0, & for a le x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
      2x - (a+b), & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



      Then I proceeded to calculate each term of the parallelogram rule,



      $$|f+g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a}|a+b-2x|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} $$



      $$ |f-g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int_{frac{a+b}{2}}^{b}|2x- (a+b)|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}}$$



      $$2|f|^{2}_{p} = 2 bigg( int^{b}_{a}| frac{a+b}{2}-x|^{p} dx bigg)^{2/p} = 2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} $$



      $$begin{align}2 |g|^{2}_{p} & = 2 bigg(int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a} |frac{a+b}{2} - x|^{p} dx + int^{b}_{frac{a+b}{2}}|x- frac{a+b}{2}|^{p} dxbigg)^{2/p} \ & =2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} end{align}$$



      Plugging into $(1)$ we then get
      $$2 cdot frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} = 4 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}}$$
      which simplifies quite nicely to



      $$2^{p} = 4.$$



      So the equality only holds for $p = 2$.



      Is what i've done correct? is there another way of proving the question which is better?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      On $X = C^0big([a,b]big)$, for any $p in mathbb{R}$, $p>1$, we define the $L^p$ norm by,
      $$|f|_{L^{p}}:=big(int^{b}_{a}|f(x)|^{p}dx big)^{1/p}.$$



      Show that for $pneq 2$, this norm is not induced by a scalar product.




      My method of trying to prove this was to prove a contradiction to the parallelogram rule,



      $$ |f+g|^{2}_{p} + |f-g|^{2}_{p} = 2|f|^{2}_{p} + 2|g|^{2}_{p}, tag{$1$}$$



      where $f,g in C^{0}([a,b])$.



      So I defined the following functions;



      $$f(x):=frac{a+b}{2}-x$$



      $$g(x) := begin{cases}frac{a+b}{2}-x, for a leq x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
      x-frac{a+b}{2}, for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



      which gives



      $$f(x)+g(x) = begin{cases} a+b-2x, & for ale x le frac{a+b}{2}. \ 0, & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le bend{cases}$$



      $$f(x)-g(x) = begin{cases} 0, & for a le x le frac{a+b}{2}. \
      2x - (a+b), & for frac{a+b}{2} < x le b end{cases}$$



      Then I proceeded to calculate each term of the parallelogram rule,



      $$|f+g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a}|a+b-2x|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} $$



      $$ |f-g|^{2}_{p} = bigg( int_{frac{a+b}{2}}^{b}|2x- (a+b)|^{p}bigg)^{2/p} = frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}}$$



      $$2|f|^{2}_{p} = 2 bigg( int^{b}_{a}| frac{a+b}{2}-x|^{p} dx bigg)^{2/p} = 2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} $$



      $$begin{align}2 |g|^{2}_{p} & = 2 bigg(int^{frac{a+b}{2}}_{a} |frac{a+b}{2} - x|^{p} dx + int^{b}_{frac{a+b}{2}}|x- frac{a+b}{2}|^{p} dxbigg)^{2/p} \ & =2 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}} end{align}$$



      Plugging into $(1)$ we then get
      $$2 cdot frac{(b-a)^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(2(p+1))^{2/p}} = 4 cdot frac{2^{2/p}(frac{b-a}{2})^{frac{2(p+1)}{p}}}{(p+1)^{2/p}}$$
      which simplifies quite nicely to



      $$2^{p} = 4.$$



      So the equality only holds for $p = 2$.



      Is what i've done correct? is there another way of proving the question which is better?







      functional-analysis proof-verification norm lp-spaces inner-product-space






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 14 '18 at 22:10









      mechanodroid

      28.9k62648




      28.9k62648










      asked Dec 14 '18 at 20:50









      seraphimkseraphimk

      1429




      1429






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Your idea looks fine. However, here's a simpler approach: Let $f = chi_A$ and $g = chi_B$ be the indicator functions of two disjoint sets*. Then



          $$|f + g|_p^2 + |f - g|_p^2 = 2 (|A| + |B|)^{2/p}$$



          by a direct calculation. On the other hand,



          $$2 |f|_p^2 + 2|g|_p^2 = 2 (|A|^{2/p} + |B|^{2/p}).$$



          This would imply that for all real numbers $a, b ge 0$ we have



          $$(a + b)^{2/p} = a^{2/p} + b^{2/p}.$$



          For any $a, b$ which are both positive, this implies $p = 2$ as a consequence of Jensen's inequality. For a specific example, $a = b = 1$ implies $2^{2/p} = 2$, so $p = 2$.





          *The point of this answer is that many integral inequalities can be studied purely from the point of view of testing against sets. Although $chi_A$ and $chi_B$ aren't continuous, they can be approximated arbitrarily well in $L^p$ by smooth functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
            $endgroup$
            – seraphimk
            Dec 14 '18 at 21:41



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Here is a similar idea with simpler computation. Define
          $$f(x) = begin{cases} left(frac{a+b}2-xright)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
          0,&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
          end{cases}$$



          $$g(x) = begin{cases} 0,&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
          left(x-frac{a+b}2right)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
          end{cases}$$



          Notice that $f$ and $g$ have disjoint supports so $$f(x)+g(x) = left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$ and $$f(x)-g(x) = operatorname{sign}left(frac{a+b}2-xright)left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$



          We get
          $$|f|_p^2 = left(int_{left[a, frac{a+b}2right]} left(frac{a+b}2-xright),dxright)^{2/p} = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$
          Similarly we also see $|g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$, $|f+g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p}$ and $|f-g|_p^2 = 0$.



          Therefore
          $$left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p} = |f+g|_p^2 = 4|f_p|^2 = 4left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$



          or $2 = 4^{p/2}$. This implies $p=2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039866%2fshow-that-the-lp-norm-f-lp-big-intb-a-fxp-big1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Your idea looks fine. However, here's a simpler approach: Let $f = chi_A$ and $g = chi_B$ be the indicator functions of two disjoint sets*. Then



            $$|f + g|_p^2 + |f - g|_p^2 = 2 (|A| + |B|)^{2/p}$$



            by a direct calculation. On the other hand,



            $$2 |f|_p^2 + 2|g|_p^2 = 2 (|A|^{2/p} + |B|^{2/p}).$$



            This would imply that for all real numbers $a, b ge 0$ we have



            $$(a + b)^{2/p} = a^{2/p} + b^{2/p}.$$



            For any $a, b$ which are both positive, this implies $p = 2$ as a consequence of Jensen's inequality. For a specific example, $a = b = 1$ implies $2^{2/p} = 2$, so $p = 2$.





            *The point of this answer is that many integral inequalities can be studied purely from the point of view of testing against sets. Although $chi_A$ and $chi_B$ aren't continuous, they can be approximated arbitrarily well in $L^p$ by smooth functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
              $endgroup$
              – seraphimk
              Dec 14 '18 at 21:41
















            3












            $begingroup$

            Your idea looks fine. However, here's a simpler approach: Let $f = chi_A$ and $g = chi_B$ be the indicator functions of two disjoint sets*. Then



            $$|f + g|_p^2 + |f - g|_p^2 = 2 (|A| + |B|)^{2/p}$$



            by a direct calculation. On the other hand,



            $$2 |f|_p^2 + 2|g|_p^2 = 2 (|A|^{2/p} + |B|^{2/p}).$$



            This would imply that for all real numbers $a, b ge 0$ we have



            $$(a + b)^{2/p} = a^{2/p} + b^{2/p}.$$



            For any $a, b$ which are both positive, this implies $p = 2$ as a consequence of Jensen's inequality. For a specific example, $a = b = 1$ implies $2^{2/p} = 2$, so $p = 2$.





            *The point of this answer is that many integral inequalities can be studied purely from the point of view of testing against sets. Although $chi_A$ and $chi_B$ aren't continuous, they can be approximated arbitrarily well in $L^p$ by smooth functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
              $endgroup$
              – seraphimk
              Dec 14 '18 at 21:41














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Your idea looks fine. However, here's a simpler approach: Let $f = chi_A$ and $g = chi_B$ be the indicator functions of two disjoint sets*. Then



            $$|f + g|_p^2 + |f - g|_p^2 = 2 (|A| + |B|)^{2/p}$$



            by a direct calculation. On the other hand,



            $$2 |f|_p^2 + 2|g|_p^2 = 2 (|A|^{2/p} + |B|^{2/p}).$$



            This would imply that for all real numbers $a, b ge 0$ we have



            $$(a + b)^{2/p} = a^{2/p} + b^{2/p}.$$



            For any $a, b$ which are both positive, this implies $p = 2$ as a consequence of Jensen's inequality. For a specific example, $a = b = 1$ implies $2^{2/p} = 2$, so $p = 2$.





            *The point of this answer is that many integral inequalities can be studied purely from the point of view of testing against sets. Although $chi_A$ and $chi_B$ aren't continuous, they can be approximated arbitrarily well in $L^p$ by smooth functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Your idea looks fine. However, here's a simpler approach: Let $f = chi_A$ and $g = chi_B$ be the indicator functions of two disjoint sets*. Then



            $$|f + g|_p^2 + |f - g|_p^2 = 2 (|A| + |B|)^{2/p}$$



            by a direct calculation. On the other hand,



            $$2 |f|_p^2 + 2|g|_p^2 = 2 (|A|^{2/p} + |B|^{2/p}).$$



            This would imply that for all real numbers $a, b ge 0$ we have



            $$(a + b)^{2/p} = a^{2/p} + b^{2/p}.$$



            For any $a, b$ which are both positive, this implies $p = 2$ as a consequence of Jensen's inequality. For a specific example, $a = b = 1$ implies $2^{2/p} = 2$, so $p = 2$.





            *The point of this answer is that many integral inequalities can be studied purely from the point of view of testing against sets. Although $chi_A$ and $chi_B$ aren't continuous, they can be approximated arbitrarily well in $L^p$ by smooth functions.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 14 '18 at 21:14









            T. BongersT. Bongers

            23.5k54762




            23.5k54762












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
              $endgroup$
              – seraphimk
              Dec 14 '18 at 21:41


















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
              $endgroup$
              – seraphimk
              Dec 14 '18 at 21:41
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
            $endgroup$
            – seraphimk
            Dec 14 '18 at 21:41




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for your comment, It didn't even cross my mind to look at indicator functions!
            $endgroup$
            – seraphimk
            Dec 14 '18 at 21:41











            1












            $begingroup$

            Here is a similar idea with simpler computation. Define
            $$f(x) = begin{cases} left(frac{a+b}2-xright)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
            0,&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
            end{cases}$$



            $$g(x) = begin{cases} 0,&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
            left(x-frac{a+b}2right)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
            end{cases}$$



            Notice that $f$ and $g$ have disjoint supports so $$f(x)+g(x) = left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$ and $$f(x)-g(x) = operatorname{sign}left(frac{a+b}2-xright)left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$



            We get
            $$|f|_p^2 = left(int_{left[a, frac{a+b}2right]} left(frac{a+b}2-xright),dxright)^{2/p} = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$
            Similarly we also see $|g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$, $|f+g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p}$ and $|f-g|_p^2 = 0$.



            Therefore
            $$left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p} = |f+g|_p^2 = 4|f_p|^2 = 4left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$



            or $2 = 4^{p/2}$. This implies $p=2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Here is a similar idea with simpler computation. Define
              $$f(x) = begin{cases} left(frac{a+b}2-xright)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
              0,&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
              end{cases}$$



              $$g(x) = begin{cases} 0,&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
              left(x-frac{a+b}2right)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
              end{cases}$$



              Notice that $f$ and $g$ have disjoint supports so $$f(x)+g(x) = left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$ and $$f(x)-g(x) = operatorname{sign}left(frac{a+b}2-xright)left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$



              We get
              $$|f|_p^2 = left(int_{left[a, frac{a+b}2right]} left(frac{a+b}2-xright),dxright)^{2/p} = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$
              Similarly we also see $|g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$, $|f+g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p}$ and $|f-g|_p^2 = 0$.



              Therefore
              $$left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p} = |f+g|_p^2 = 4|f_p|^2 = 4left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$



              or $2 = 4^{p/2}$. This implies $p=2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Here is a similar idea with simpler computation. Define
                $$f(x) = begin{cases} left(frac{a+b}2-xright)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
                0,&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
                end{cases}$$



                $$g(x) = begin{cases} 0,&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
                left(x-frac{a+b}2right)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
                end{cases}$$



                Notice that $f$ and $g$ have disjoint supports so $$f(x)+g(x) = left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$ and $$f(x)-g(x) = operatorname{sign}left(frac{a+b}2-xright)left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$



                We get
                $$|f|_p^2 = left(int_{left[a, frac{a+b}2right]} left(frac{a+b}2-xright),dxright)^{2/p} = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$
                Similarly we also see $|g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$, $|f+g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p}$ and $|f-g|_p^2 = 0$.



                Therefore
                $$left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p} = |f+g|_p^2 = 4|f_p|^2 = 4left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$



                or $2 = 4^{p/2}$. This implies $p=2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Here is a similar idea with simpler computation. Define
                $$f(x) = begin{cases} left(frac{a+b}2-xright)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
                0,&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
                end{cases}$$



                $$g(x) = begin{cases} 0,&text{ if } x in left[a, frac{a+b}2right] \
                left(x-frac{a+b}2right)^{1/p},&text{ if } x in left[frac{a+b}2,bright]
                end{cases}$$



                Notice that $f$ and $g$ have disjoint supports so $$f(x)+g(x) = left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$ and $$f(x)-g(x) = operatorname{sign}left(frac{a+b}2-xright)left|frac{a+b}2-xright|^{1/p}$$



                We get
                $$|f|_p^2 = left(int_{left[a, frac{a+b}2right]} left(frac{a+b}2-xright),dxright)^{2/p} = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$
                Similarly we also see $|g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$, $|f+g|_p^2 = left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p}$ and $|f-g|_p^2 = 0$.



                Therefore
                $$left[frac{(b-a)^2}4right]^{2/p} = |f+g|_p^2 = 4|f_p|^2 = 4left[frac{(b-a)^2}8right]^{2/p}$$



                or $2 = 4^{p/2}$. This implies $p=2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 14 '18 at 22:08









                mechanodroidmechanodroid

                28.9k62648




                28.9k62648






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039866%2fshow-that-the-lp-norm-f-lp-big-intb-a-fxp-big1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?