model theory - completeness of a theory












0












$begingroup$



For an $L$-structure $mathcal{A}$, the $L$-theory of $mathcal{A}$ is the set of $L$-sentences:
$$
mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A) = {sigma : mathcal A models sigma}
$$



Prove that $mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A)$ is complete.




Whys is this true? Why can't there be an $L$-sentence such that it is neither true or false?






logic model-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    For an $L$-structure $mathcal{A}$, the $L$-theory of $mathcal{A}$ is the set of $L$-sentences:
    $$
    mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A) = {sigma : mathcal A models sigma}
    $$



    Prove that $mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A)$ is complete.




    Whys is this true? Why can't there be an $L$-sentence such that it is neither true or false?






    logic model-theory







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      For an $L$-structure $mathcal{A}$, the $L$-theory of $mathcal{A}$ is the set of $L$-sentences:
      $$
      mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A) = {sigma : mathcal A models sigma}
      $$



      Prove that $mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A)$ is complete.




      Whys is this true? Why can't there be an $L$-sentence such that it is neither true or false?






      logic model-theory







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      For an $L$-structure $mathcal{A}$, the $L$-theory of $mathcal{A}$ is the set of $L$-sentences:
      $$
      mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A) = {sigma : mathcal A models sigma}
      $$



      Prove that $mathrm{Th}_L(mathcal A)$ is complete.




      Whys is this true? Why can't there be an $L$-sentence such that it is neither true or false?






      logic model-theory




      logic model-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 8 '18 at 16:20









      bofbof

      152




      152






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Assume there's an $L$-sentence $sigma$ that's neither true nor false. Then we have that $mathcal{A}nvDashsigma$ and $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$. But this is a contradiction since $mathcal{A}vDashsigma$ if and only if $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$, and vice versa, by definition of what a structure is.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
            $endgroup$
            – quanticbolt
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:39








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:40










          • $begingroup$
            @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Kruckman
            Dec 8 '18 at 18:34










          • $begingroup$
            thank you everyone
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 19:27











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031303%2fmodel-theory-completeness-of-a-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Assume there's an $L$-sentence $sigma$ that's neither true nor false. Then we have that $mathcal{A}nvDashsigma$ and $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$. But this is a contradiction since $mathcal{A}vDashsigma$ if and only if $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$, and vice versa, by definition of what a structure is.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
            $endgroup$
            – quanticbolt
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:39








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:40










          • $begingroup$
            @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Kruckman
            Dec 8 '18 at 18:34










          • $begingroup$
            thank you everyone
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 19:27
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Assume there's an $L$-sentence $sigma$ that's neither true nor false. Then we have that $mathcal{A}nvDashsigma$ and $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$. But this is a contradiction since $mathcal{A}vDashsigma$ if and only if $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$, and vice versa, by definition of what a structure is.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
            $endgroup$
            – quanticbolt
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:39








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:40










          • $begingroup$
            @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Kruckman
            Dec 8 '18 at 18:34










          • $begingroup$
            thank you everyone
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 19:27














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Assume there's an $L$-sentence $sigma$ that's neither true nor false. Then we have that $mathcal{A}nvDashsigma$ and $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$. But this is a contradiction since $mathcal{A}vDashsigma$ if and only if $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$, and vice versa, by definition of what a structure is.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Assume there's an $L$-sentence $sigma$ that's neither true nor false. Then we have that $mathcal{A}nvDashsigma$ and $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$. But this is a contradiction since $mathcal{A}vDashsigma$ if and only if $mathcal{A}nvDashnegsigma$, and vice versa, by definition of what a structure is.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 8 '18 at 16:24









          quanticboltquanticbolt

          769514




          769514












          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
            $endgroup$
            – quanticbolt
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:39








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:40










          • $begingroup$
            @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Kruckman
            Dec 8 '18 at 18:34










          • $begingroup$
            thank you everyone
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 19:27


















          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
            $endgroup$
            – quanticbolt
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:39








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 8 '18 at 16:40










          • $begingroup$
            @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Kruckman
            Dec 8 '18 at 18:34










          • $begingroup$
            thank you everyone
            $endgroup$
            – bof
            Dec 8 '18 at 19:27
















          $begingroup$
          I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – bof
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:26




          $begingroup$
          I'm sorry if this is a really basic question but why is it that you can construct such sentence that is neither true nor false under Godel's incompleteness theorem but not here? Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – bof
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:26












          $begingroup$
          For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
          $endgroup$
          – quanticbolt
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:39






          $begingroup$
          For a detailed explanation, see here. But basically, Godel's incompleteness theorem is not a negation of Godel's completeness theorem. Also, here we are dealing with a structure, not a set of sentences (which is what Godel's incompleteness theorem talks about).
          $endgroup$
          – quanticbolt
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:39






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
          $endgroup$
          – Noah Schweber
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:40




          $begingroup$
          @bof That's an incorrect statement of Godel's incompleteness theorem. There is a distinction between truth in a model/structure (fixing a structure $M$, everything is either true in $M$ or false in $M$) and provability from a theory (= truth in every model of that theory; since a given theory might have many disagreeing models, there are in general independent sentences, and this is what Godel's incompleteness theorem is about).
          $endgroup$
          – Noah Schweber
          Dec 8 '18 at 16:40












          $begingroup$
          @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex Kruckman
          Dec 8 '18 at 18:34




          $begingroup$
          @bof For any sentence $varphi$ and any structure $A$ the definition of $Amodels lnot varphi$ is that $Anotmodels varphi$. It immediately follows that either $Amodels varphi$ or $Amodels lnot varphi$.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex Kruckman
          Dec 8 '18 at 18:34












          $begingroup$
          thank you everyone
          $endgroup$
          – bof
          Dec 8 '18 at 19:27




          $begingroup$
          thank you everyone
          $endgroup$
          – bof
          Dec 8 '18 at 19:27


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031303%2fmodel-theory-completeness-of-a-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Image
          3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
          Read more

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

          Image
          up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
          Read more

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Image
          0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
          Read more