Azure DB/MSSQL 2017 query performance regression












0















I have this pretty simple table with 17m records in it:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]


Query to the table with additional join works fine, if there is no ProtocolId in it:



select top 1
ln.LineDescriptionId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=rJV34gvR7



But when I try to add ProtocolId to the field list, query time grows dramatically:



select top 1
ln.ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:02:19.6464843


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=SkG-hyDCQ



Also, this works smooth:



select top 1
(select ProtocolId from LineNumbers where LineNumbers.Id = ln.Id) as ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Tried this queries and variations on Azure DB and local MSSQL 2017. Results are the same. As long as I keep ProtocolId out of the field list everything is fine.



Is there some mistake in my data scheme (everything was created via migrations of Entity Framework)?






CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC,
[Value] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[ProtocolId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId] FOREIGN KEY([LineDescriptionId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LineDescriptions] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId] FOREIGN KEY([ProtocolId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Protocols] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId]
GO












share|improve this question

























  • It might be something with statistics. Two questions to consider: 1. do you have any ORDER BYs in your queries? 2. have you tried with some index hints?

    – dee zg
    Nov 23 '18 at 19:45











  • 1. I'm not using any ORDER BY in this queries (the field ProtocolId is mentioned only in field list of SELECT query, no any additional filters, etc). 2. there wasn't any index hint while I tried this queries, but finally I resolved it by adding index LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId include ProtocolId.

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 11:26













  • yes, that makes sense to have an index on the column you perform join on and then include ProtocolId into that index since that way you avoid going to table but getting that column from index directly.

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 13:40











  • Understand. It is also means that I have to include Value column to this new index if I want to retrieve Value like ProtocolId (because it works also slow without include for Value to index). In other words, I have to include all columns from select list of target table to index when I do SELECT + JOIN?

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:41











  • oh, i've just realized you have TOP 1. check this out: geekswithblogs.net/Martinez/archive/2013/01/30/… you might want to use HASH JOIN. please test and let us know the results here!

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:46
















0















I have this pretty simple table with 17m records in it:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]


Query to the table with additional join works fine, if there is no ProtocolId in it:



select top 1
ln.LineDescriptionId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=rJV34gvR7



But when I try to add ProtocolId to the field list, query time grows dramatically:



select top 1
ln.ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:02:19.6464843


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=SkG-hyDCQ



Also, this works smooth:



select top 1
(select ProtocolId from LineNumbers where LineNumbers.Id = ln.Id) as ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Tried this queries and variations on Azure DB and local MSSQL 2017. Results are the same. As long as I keep ProtocolId out of the field list everything is fine.



Is there some mistake in my data scheme (everything was created via migrations of Entity Framework)?






CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC,
[Value] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[ProtocolId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId] FOREIGN KEY([LineDescriptionId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LineDescriptions] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId] FOREIGN KEY([ProtocolId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Protocols] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId]
GO












share|improve this question

























  • It might be something with statistics. Two questions to consider: 1. do you have any ORDER BYs in your queries? 2. have you tried with some index hints?

    – dee zg
    Nov 23 '18 at 19:45











  • 1. I'm not using any ORDER BY in this queries (the field ProtocolId is mentioned only in field list of SELECT query, no any additional filters, etc). 2. there wasn't any index hint while I tried this queries, but finally I resolved it by adding index LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId include ProtocolId.

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 11:26













  • yes, that makes sense to have an index on the column you perform join on and then include ProtocolId into that index since that way you avoid going to table but getting that column from index directly.

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 13:40











  • Understand. It is also means that I have to include Value column to this new index if I want to retrieve Value like ProtocolId (because it works also slow without include for Value to index). In other words, I have to include all columns from select list of target table to index when I do SELECT + JOIN?

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:41











  • oh, i've just realized you have TOP 1. check this out: geekswithblogs.net/Martinez/archive/2013/01/30/… you might want to use HASH JOIN. please test and let us know the results here!

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:46














0












0








0


1






I have this pretty simple table with 17m records in it:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]


Query to the table with additional join works fine, if there is no ProtocolId in it:



select top 1
ln.LineDescriptionId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=rJV34gvR7



But when I try to add ProtocolId to the field list, query time grows dramatically:



select top 1
ln.ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:02:19.6464843


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=SkG-hyDCQ



Also, this works smooth:



select top 1
(select ProtocolId from LineNumbers where LineNumbers.Id = ln.Id) as ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Tried this queries and variations on Azure DB and local MSSQL 2017. Results are the same. As long as I keep ProtocolId out of the field list everything is fine.



Is there some mistake in my data scheme (everything was created via migrations of Entity Framework)?






CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC,
[Value] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[ProtocolId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId] FOREIGN KEY([LineDescriptionId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LineDescriptions] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId] FOREIGN KEY([ProtocolId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Protocols] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId]
GO












share|improve this question
















I have this pretty simple table with 17m records in it:



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]


Query to the table with additional join works fine, if there is no ProtocolId in it:



select top 1
ln.LineDescriptionId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=rJV34gvR7



But when I try to add ProtocolId to the field list, query time grows dramatically:



select top 1
ln.ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:02:19.6464843


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=SkG-hyDCQ



Also, this works smooth:



select top 1
(select ProtocolId from LineNumbers where LineNumbers.Id = ln.Id) as ProtocolId
from LineNumbers ln
join LineDescriptions ld on ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId and ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1718750


Tried this queries and variations on Azure DB and local MSSQL 2017. Results are the same. As long as I keep ProtocolId out of the field list everything is fine.



Is there some mistake in my data scheme (everything was created via migrations of Entity Framework)?






CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC,
[Value] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[ProtocolId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId] FOREIGN KEY([LineDescriptionId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LineDescriptions] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId] FOREIGN KEY([ProtocolId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Protocols] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId]
GO








CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC,
[Value] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[ProtocolId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId] FOREIGN KEY([LineDescriptionId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LineDescriptions] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId] FOREIGN KEY([ProtocolId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Protocols] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId]
GO





CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers](
[Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[LineDescriptionId] [int] NOT NULL,
[ProtocolId] [int] NULL,
[Value] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LineNumbers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_Value] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[LineDescriptionId] ASC,
[Value] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
/****** Object: Index [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] Script Date: 21.11.2018 10:47:09 ******/
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_ProtocolId] ON [dbo].[LineNumbers]
(
[ProtocolId] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId] FOREIGN KEY([LineDescriptionId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LineDescriptions] ([Id])
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_LineDescriptions_LineDescriptionId]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId] FOREIGN KEY([ProtocolId])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Protocols] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LineNumbers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LineNumbers_Protocols_ProtocolId]
GO






sql sql-server database azure






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 24 '18 at 15:57







Artem Baikuzin

















asked Nov 21 '18 at 8:31









Artem BaikuzinArtem Baikuzin

112




112













  • It might be something with statistics. Two questions to consider: 1. do you have any ORDER BYs in your queries? 2. have you tried with some index hints?

    – dee zg
    Nov 23 '18 at 19:45











  • 1. I'm not using any ORDER BY in this queries (the field ProtocolId is mentioned only in field list of SELECT query, no any additional filters, etc). 2. there wasn't any index hint while I tried this queries, but finally I resolved it by adding index LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId include ProtocolId.

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 11:26













  • yes, that makes sense to have an index on the column you perform join on and then include ProtocolId into that index since that way you avoid going to table but getting that column from index directly.

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 13:40











  • Understand. It is also means that I have to include Value column to this new index if I want to retrieve Value like ProtocolId (because it works also slow without include for Value to index). In other words, I have to include all columns from select list of target table to index when I do SELECT + JOIN?

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:41











  • oh, i've just realized you have TOP 1. check this out: geekswithblogs.net/Martinez/archive/2013/01/30/… you might want to use HASH JOIN. please test and let us know the results here!

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:46



















  • It might be something with statistics. Two questions to consider: 1. do you have any ORDER BYs in your queries? 2. have you tried with some index hints?

    – dee zg
    Nov 23 '18 at 19:45











  • 1. I'm not using any ORDER BY in this queries (the field ProtocolId is mentioned only in field list of SELECT query, no any additional filters, etc). 2. there wasn't any index hint while I tried this queries, but finally I resolved it by adding index LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId include ProtocolId.

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 11:26













  • yes, that makes sense to have an index on the column you perform join on and then include ProtocolId into that index since that way you avoid going to table but getting that column from index directly.

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 13:40











  • Understand. It is also means that I have to include Value column to this new index if I want to retrieve Value like ProtocolId (because it works also slow without include for Value to index). In other words, I have to include all columns from select list of target table to index when I do SELECT + JOIN?

    – Artem Baikuzin
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:41











  • oh, i've just realized you have TOP 1. check this out: geekswithblogs.net/Martinez/archive/2013/01/30/… you might want to use HASH JOIN. please test and let us know the results here!

    – dee zg
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:46

















It might be something with statistics. Two questions to consider: 1. do you have any ORDER BYs in your queries? 2. have you tried with some index hints?

– dee zg
Nov 23 '18 at 19:45





It might be something with statistics. Two questions to consider: 1. do you have any ORDER BYs in your queries? 2. have you tried with some index hints?

– dee zg
Nov 23 '18 at 19:45













1. I'm not using any ORDER BY in this queries (the field ProtocolId is mentioned only in field list of SELECT query, no any additional filters, etc). 2. there wasn't any index hint while I tried this queries, but finally I resolved it by adding index LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId include ProtocolId.

– Artem Baikuzin
Nov 24 '18 at 11:26







1. I'm not using any ORDER BY in this queries (the field ProtocolId is mentioned only in field list of SELECT query, no any additional filters, etc). 2. there wasn't any index hint while I tried this queries, but finally I resolved it by adding index LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId include ProtocolId.

– Artem Baikuzin
Nov 24 '18 at 11:26















yes, that makes sense to have an index on the column you perform join on and then include ProtocolId into that index since that way you avoid going to table but getting that column from index directly.

– dee zg
Nov 24 '18 at 13:40





yes, that makes sense to have an index on the column you perform join on and then include ProtocolId into that index since that way you avoid going to table but getting that column from index directly.

– dee zg
Nov 24 '18 at 13:40













Understand. It is also means that I have to include Value column to this new index if I want to retrieve Value like ProtocolId (because it works also slow without include for Value to index). In other words, I have to include all columns from select list of target table to index when I do SELECT + JOIN?

– Artem Baikuzin
Nov 24 '18 at 15:41





Understand. It is also means that I have to include Value column to this new index if I want to retrieve Value like ProtocolId (because it works also slow without include for Value to index). In other words, I have to include all columns from select list of target table to index when I do SELECT + JOIN?

– Artem Baikuzin
Nov 24 '18 at 15:41













oh, i've just realized you have TOP 1. check this out: geekswithblogs.net/Martinez/archive/2013/01/30/… you might want to use HASH JOIN. please test and let us know the results here!

– dee zg
Nov 24 '18 at 15:46





oh, i've just realized you have TOP 1. check this out: geekswithblogs.net/Martinez/archive/2013/01/30/… you might want to use HASH JOIN. please test and let us know the results here!

– dee zg
Nov 24 '18 at 15:46












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Eventually, I solved it by adding nonclustered index on field LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId with inclusion of LineNumbers.ProtocolId



CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_ProtocolId] ON
[dbo].[LineNumbers]([LineDescriptionId] ASC)

INCLUDE ([ProtocolId])

WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF,
ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)


Result:



SELECT TOP 1
ln.ProtocolId
FROM LineNumbers ln
JOIN LineDescriptions ld ON ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId AND ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

-- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1403155


Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=Syywn1wRQ



Why does it work that way?



For example, if I'd do similar use case with PostgreSQL then there is no need in any additional indexes at all (beside obvious FK indexes on ProtocolId and LineDescriptionId fields).






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53407962%2fazure-db-mssql-2017-query-performance-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Eventually, I solved it by adding nonclustered index on field LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId with inclusion of LineNumbers.ProtocolId



    CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_ProtocolId] ON
    [dbo].[LineNumbers]([LineDescriptionId] ASC)

    INCLUDE ([ProtocolId])

    WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
    SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF,
    ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)


    Result:



    SELECT TOP 1
    ln.ProtocolId
    FROM LineNumbers ln
    JOIN LineDescriptions ld ON ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId AND ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

    -- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1403155


    Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=Syywn1wRQ



    Why does it work that way?



    For example, if I'd do similar use case with PostgreSQL then there is no need in any additional indexes at all (beside obvious FK indexes on ProtocolId and LineDescriptionId fields).






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      Eventually, I solved it by adding nonclustered index on field LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId with inclusion of LineNumbers.ProtocolId



      CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_ProtocolId] ON
      [dbo].[LineNumbers]([LineDescriptionId] ASC)

      INCLUDE ([ProtocolId])

      WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
      SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF,
      ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)


      Result:



      SELECT TOP 1
      ln.ProtocolId
      FROM LineNumbers ln
      JOIN LineDescriptions ld ON ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId AND ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

      -- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1403155


      Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=Syywn1wRQ



      Why does it work that way?



      For example, if I'd do similar use case with PostgreSQL then there is no need in any additional indexes at all (beside obvious FK indexes on ProtocolId and LineDescriptionId fields).






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        Eventually, I solved it by adding nonclustered index on field LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId with inclusion of LineNumbers.ProtocolId



        CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_ProtocolId] ON
        [dbo].[LineNumbers]([LineDescriptionId] ASC)

        INCLUDE ([ProtocolId])

        WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
        SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF,
        ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)


        Result:



        SELECT TOP 1
        ln.ProtocolId
        FROM LineNumbers ln
        JOIN LineDescriptions ld ON ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId AND ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

        -- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1403155


        Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=Syywn1wRQ



        Why does it work that way?



        For example, if I'd do similar use case with PostgreSQL then there is no need in any additional indexes at all (beside obvious FK indexes on ProtocolId and LineDescriptionId fields).






        share|improve this answer















        Eventually, I solved it by adding nonclustered index on field LineNumbers.LineDescriptionId with inclusion of LineNumbers.ProtocolId



        CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LineNumbers_LineDescriptionId_ProtocolId] ON
        [dbo].[LineNumbers]([LineDescriptionId] ASC)

        INCLUDE ([ProtocolId])

        WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
        SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF,
        ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)


        Result:



        SELECT TOP 1
        ln.ProtocolId
        FROM LineNumbers ln
        JOIN LineDescriptions ld ON ld.Id = ln.LineDescriptionId AND ld.ProtocolSetId = 25

        -- Elapsed time: 00:00:00.1403155


        Execution plan: https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=Syywn1wRQ



        Why does it work that way?



        For example, if I'd do similar use case with PostgreSQL then there is no need in any additional indexes at all (beside obvious FK indexes on ProtocolId and LineDescriptionId fields).







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 24 '18 at 15:58

























        answered Nov 23 '18 at 19:26









        Artem BaikuzinArtem Baikuzin

        112




        112
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53407962%2fazure-db-mssql-2017-query-performance-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?