Use excess RAM as cache for Samba?












0















I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.



Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)



Thank you!










share|improve this question



























    0















    I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.



    Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)



    Thank you!










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.



      Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)



      Thank you!










      share|improve this question














      I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.



      Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)



      Thank you!







      server samba ram cache nas






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 15 at 18:18









      WuubbWuubb

      12




      12






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding






          share|improve this answer
























          • Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

            – PerlDuck
            Jan 15 at 19:04











          • No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 15 at 23:42











          • Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

            – Wuubb
            Jan 17 at 5:26











          • The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51











          • To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110022%2fuse-excess-ram-as-cache-for-samba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding






          share|improve this answer
























          • Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

            – PerlDuck
            Jan 15 at 19:04











          • No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 15 at 23:42











          • Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

            – Wuubb
            Jan 17 at 5:26











          • The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51











          • To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51
















          0














          The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding






          share|improve this answer
























          • Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

            – PerlDuck
            Jan 15 at 19:04











          • No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 15 at 23:42











          • Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

            – Wuubb
            Jan 17 at 5:26











          • The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51











          • To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51














          0












          0








          0







          The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding






          share|improve this answer













          The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 15 at 18:46









          Carlos DagorretCarlos Dagorret

          509214




          509214













          • Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

            – PerlDuck
            Jan 15 at 19:04











          • No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 15 at 23:42











          • Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

            – Wuubb
            Jan 17 at 5:26











          • The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51











          • To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51



















          • Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

            – PerlDuck
            Jan 15 at 19:04











          • No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 15 at 23:42











          • Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

            – Wuubb
            Jan 17 at 5:26











          • The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51











          • To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

            – Carlos Dagorret
            Jan 18 at 2:51

















          Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

          – PerlDuck
          Jan 15 at 19:04





          Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.

          – PerlDuck
          Jan 15 at 19:04













          No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

          – Carlos Dagorret
          Jan 15 at 23:42





          No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…

          – Carlos Dagorret
          Jan 15 at 23:42













          Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

          – Wuubb
          Jan 17 at 5:26





          Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?

          – Wuubb
          Jan 17 at 5:26













          The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

          – Carlos Dagorret
          Jan 18 at 2:51





          The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.

          – Carlos Dagorret
          Jan 18 at 2:51













          To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

          – Carlos Dagorret
          Jan 18 at 2:51





          To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds

          – Carlos Dagorret
          Jan 18 at 2:51


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110022%2fuse-excess-ram-as-cache-for-samba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents