Use excess RAM as cache for Samba?
I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.
Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)
Thank you!
server samba ram cache nas
add a comment |
I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.
Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)
Thank you!
server samba ram cache nas
add a comment |
I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.
Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)
Thank you!
server samba ram cache nas
I have a older workstation with 32gb of RAM that I've repurposed as a server running Ubuntu Server 18.04. Since 32gb is way more than necessary given the limited use (mainly just file sharing and backups), I'm wondering if it's possible to use the remaining RAM as some sort of cache for Samba file sharing (similar to bcache but using RAM instead of SSD). Ramdisk isn't quite what I'm after since I would like the contents in the cache to change based on what is being accessed more frequently.
Is this possible? And if so, could anyone point me towards some resources on how to do it? (Googling thus far has brought me nothing unfortunately)
Thank you!
server samba ram cache nas
server samba ram cache nas
asked Jan 15 at 18:18
WuubbWuubb
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110022%2fuse-excess-ram-as-cache-for-samba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
add a comment |
The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
add a comment |
The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding
The requirements for Ubuntu 18.04 minimum advisable for the Desktop version is 2GB. I ran a Samba on an Ubuntu 18.04 with that memory (server version) and I have 12-15 users working continuously. You can quietly use only 2-4 GB. 8 GB, it's already a lot to my understanding
answered Jan 15 at 18:46
Carlos DagorretCarlos Dagorret
509214
509214
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
add a comment |
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
Yes, but the question was how to benefit from the other 30 GB of free RAM the OP has in his machine.
– PerlDuck
Jan 15 at 19:04
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
No. See "write cache size (S)" in samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/…
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 15 at 23:42
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
Is there a similar parameter for caching reads instead of writes?
– Wuubb
Jan 17 at 5:26
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
The notes I have are extensive to share here. I have taken it by analyzing the Samba code from the source code. I have never had to compile the code. As it comes in Ubuntu 18.04, with 4GB of RAM, it is enough for me to have 20 users, 10 hours a day, writing and reading documents, videos, backup, and even applications. Everything depends on what you want it for. In addition to the server, the network connection and the type of OS are determining factors. Those 20 users are in a 10G network and they are Windows 10.
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
To see fine paragraphs of some parameters you can read the following article: arm-blog.com/samba-finetuning-for-better-transfer-speeds
– Carlos Dagorret
Jan 18 at 2:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110022%2fuse-excess-ram-as-cache-for-samba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown