Left inverse of a matrix $3 times 2$ in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$












1












$begingroup$


Do you know a method to calculate inverse matrix in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$?



I want to calculate left inverse the following matrix of $3 times 2$ in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$



begin{bmatrix}
x^2+1 & x-1 \
3(x-3)(x+3) & x-2 \
5(x-1)(x+1) & 2x-3
end{bmatrix}






matrices polynomials finite-fields inverse vector-fields







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you checked the invariant factors of the matrix? IIRC you need both of them to be equal to one for the one sided inverse to exist. I also suspect that from the Smith normal form you can cook up a recipe for finding one, but I don't hve the time to think it through now.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:50


















1












$begingroup$


Do you know a method to calculate inverse matrix in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$?



I want to calculate left inverse the following matrix of $3 times 2$ in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$



begin{bmatrix}
x^2+1 & x-1 \
3(x-3)(x+3) & x-2 \
5(x-1)(x+1) & 2x-3
end{bmatrix}






matrices polynomials finite-fields inverse vector-fields







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you checked the invariant factors of the matrix? IIRC you need both of them to be equal to one for the one sided inverse to exist. I also suspect that from the Smith normal form you can cook up a recipe for finding one, but I don't hve the time to think it through now.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:50
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Do you know a method to calculate inverse matrix in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$?



I want to calculate left inverse the following matrix of $3 times 2$ in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$



begin{bmatrix}
x^2+1 & x-1 \
3(x-3)(x+3) & x-2 \
5(x-1)(x+1) & 2x-3
end{bmatrix}






matrices polynomials finite-fields inverse vector-fields







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Do you know a method to calculate inverse matrix in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$?



I want to calculate left inverse the following matrix of $3 times 2$ in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$



begin{bmatrix}
x^2+1 & x-1 \
3(x-3)(x+3) & x-2 \
5(x-1)(x+1) & 2x-3
end{bmatrix}






matrices polynomials finite-fields inverse vector-fields




matrices polynomials finite-fields inverse vector-fields






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 4 '18 at 3:43









Batominovski

33.1k33293




33.1k33293










asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:27









Tom RyddleTom Ryddle

828




828












  • $begingroup$
    Have you checked the invariant factors of the matrix? IIRC you need both of them to be equal to one for the one sided inverse to exist. I also suspect that from the Smith normal form you can cook up a recipe for finding one, but I don't hve the time to think it through now.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:50




















  • $begingroup$
    Have you checked the invariant factors of the matrix? IIRC you need both of them to be equal to one for the one sided inverse to exist. I also suspect that from the Smith normal form you can cook up a recipe for finding one, but I don't hve the time to think it through now.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:50


















$begingroup$
Have you checked the invariant factors of the matrix? IIRC you need both of them to be equal to one for the one sided inverse to exist. I also suspect that from the Smith normal form you can cook up a recipe for finding one, but I don't hve the time to think it through now.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 4 '18 at 4:50






$begingroup$
Have you checked the invariant factors of the matrix? IIRC you need both of them to be equal to one for the one sided inverse to exist. I also suspect that from the Smith normal form you can cook up a recipe for finding one, but I don't hve the time to think it through now.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 4 '18 at 4:50












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

For this specific case, I would make an Ansatz that a left inverse of
$$X:=begin{bmatrix}x^2+1&x-1\3x^2-27&x-2\5x^2-5&2x-3end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}vert&vert\X_1&X_2\vert&vertend{bmatrix}$$
is of the form
$$L=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}x+c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}=Bx+C,,$$
where $B:=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ and $C:=begin{bmatrix}c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ for some $b_{i,j},c_{i,j}inmathbb{F}_7$. I guess you can also try to find a left inverse of $X$ in the field $mathbb{F}_7(x)$ and see how you can modify the calculations to get something in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$.



For my approach, the first row $C_1$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(-1,-2,-3)$. This means $C_1$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix}$. Since $C_1X_1$ should have the constant term $1$, we conclude that
$$C_1=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix},.$$
The second row $C_2$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,-27,-5)=(1,1,2)$. Thus, $C_2$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. As $C_2X_2$ should have the constant term $1$, we obtain
$$C_2=begin{bmatrix}-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},,$$
making
$$C=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$



Note that $$CX=begin{bmatrix}1&x\0&1end{bmatrix},.$$ Therefore, we need that $$BX=begin{bmatrix}0&-1\0&0end{bmatrix},.$$
The first row $B_1$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,1,2)$, but $B_1X_2=-1$. Thus, $B_1=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. The second row $B_2$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$, $(1,1,2)$, and $(-1,-2,-3)$, so $B_2=begin{bmatrix}0&0&0end{bmatrix}$. Consequently,
$$B=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2\0&0&0end{bmatrix}$$ and so
$$L=Bx+C=begin{bmatrix}x+1&3x-2&-2x+1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025045%2fleft-inverse-of-a-matrix-3-times-2-in-mathbbf-7x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    For this specific case, I would make an Ansatz that a left inverse of
    $$X:=begin{bmatrix}x^2+1&x-1\3x^2-27&x-2\5x^2-5&2x-3end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}vert&vert\X_1&X_2\vert&vertend{bmatrix}$$
    is of the form
    $$L=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}x+c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}=Bx+C,,$$
    where $B:=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ and $C:=begin{bmatrix}c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ for some $b_{i,j},c_{i,j}inmathbb{F}_7$. I guess you can also try to find a left inverse of $X$ in the field $mathbb{F}_7(x)$ and see how you can modify the calculations to get something in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$.



    For my approach, the first row $C_1$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(-1,-2,-3)$. This means $C_1$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix}$. Since $C_1X_1$ should have the constant term $1$, we conclude that
    $$C_1=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix},.$$
    The second row $C_2$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,-27,-5)=(1,1,2)$. Thus, $C_2$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. As $C_2X_2$ should have the constant term $1$, we obtain
    $$C_2=begin{bmatrix}-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},,$$
    making
    $$C=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$



    Note that $$CX=begin{bmatrix}1&x\0&1end{bmatrix},.$$ Therefore, we need that $$BX=begin{bmatrix}0&-1\0&0end{bmatrix},.$$
    The first row $B_1$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,1,2)$, but $B_1X_2=-1$. Thus, $B_1=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. The second row $B_2$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$, $(1,1,2)$, and $(-1,-2,-3)$, so $B_2=begin{bmatrix}0&0&0end{bmatrix}$. Consequently,
    $$B=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2\0&0&0end{bmatrix}$$ and so
    $$L=Bx+C=begin{bmatrix}x+1&3x-2&-2x+1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      For this specific case, I would make an Ansatz that a left inverse of
      $$X:=begin{bmatrix}x^2+1&x-1\3x^2-27&x-2\5x^2-5&2x-3end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}vert&vert\X_1&X_2\vert&vertend{bmatrix}$$
      is of the form
      $$L=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}x+c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}=Bx+C,,$$
      where $B:=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ and $C:=begin{bmatrix}c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ for some $b_{i,j},c_{i,j}inmathbb{F}_7$. I guess you can also try to find a left inverse of $X$ in the field $mathbb{F}_7(x)$ and see how you can modify the calculations to get something in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$.



      For my approach, the first row $C_1$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(-1,-2,-3)$. This means $C_1$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix}$. Since $C_1X_1$ should have the constant term $1$, we conclude that
      $$C_1=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix},.$$
      The second row $C_2$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,-27,-5)=(1,1,2)$. Thus, $C_2$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. As $C_2X_2$ should have the constant term $1$, we obtain
      $$C_2=begin{bmatrix}-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},,$$
      making
      $$C=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$



      Note that $$CX=begin{bmatrix}1&x\0&1end{bmatrix},.$$ Therefore, we need that $$BX=begin{bmatrix}0&-1\0&0end{bmatrix},.$$
      The first row $B_1$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,1,2)$, but $B_1X_2=-1$. Thus, $B_1=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. The second row $B_2$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$, $(1,1,2)$, and $(-1,-2,-3)$, so $B_2=begin{bmatrix}0&0&0end{bmatrix}$. Consequently,
      $$B=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2\0&0&0end{bmatrix}$$ and so
      $$L=Bx+C=begin{bmatrix}x+1&3x-2&-2x+1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        For this specific case, I would make an Ansatz that a left inverse of
        $$X:=begin{bmatrix}x^2+1&x-1\3x^2-27&x-2\5x^2-5&2x-3end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}vert&vert\X_1&X_2\vert&vertend{bmatrix}$$
        is of the form
        $$L=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}x+c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}=Bx+C,,$$
        where $B:=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ and $C:=begin{bmatrix}c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ for some $b_{i,j},c_{i,j}inmathbb{F}_7$. I guess you can also try to find a left inverse of $X$ in the field $mathbb{F}_7(x)$ and see how you can modify the calculations to get something in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$.



        For my approach, the first row $C_1$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(-1,-2,-3)$. This means $C_1$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix}$. Since $C_1X_1$ should have the constant term $1$, we conclude that
        $$C_1=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix},.$$
        The second row $C_2$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,-27,-5)=(1,1,2)$. Thus, $C_2$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. As $C_2X_2$ should have the constant term $1$, we obtain
        $$C_2=begin{bmatrix}-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},,$$
        making
        $$C=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$



        Note that $$CX=begin{bmatrix}1&x\0&1end{bmatrix},.$$ Therefore, we need that $$BX=begin{bmatrix}0&-1\0&0end{bmatrix},.$$
        The first row $B_1$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,1,2)$, but $B_1X_2=-1$. Thus, $B_1=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. The second row $B_2$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$, $(1,1,2)$, and $(-1,-2,-3)$, so $B_2=begin{bmatrix}0&0&0end{bmatrix}$. Consequently,
        $$B=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2\0&0&0end{bmatrix}$$ and so
        $$L=Bx+C=begin{bmatrix}x+1&3x-2&-2x+1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For this specific case, I would make an Ansatz that a left inverse of
        $$X:=begin{bmatrix}x^2+1&x-1\3x^2-27&x-2\5x^2-5&2x-3end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}vert&vert\X_1&X_2\vert&vertend{bmatrix}$$
        is of the form
        $$L=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}x+c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}=Bx+C,,$$
        where $B:=begin{bmatrix}b_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ and $C:=begin{bmatrix}c_{i,j}end{bmatrix}_{iin{1,2},jin{1,2,3}}$ for some $b_{i,j},c_{i,j}inmathbb{F}_7$. I guess you can also try to find a left inverse of $X$ in the field $mathbb{F}_7(x)$ and see how you can modify the calculations to get something in $mathbb{F}_7[x]$.



        For my approach, the first row $C_1$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(-1,-2,-3)$. This means $C_1$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix}$. Since $C_1X_1$ should have the constant term $1$, we conclude that
        $$C_1=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1end{bmatrix},.$$
        The second row $C_2$ of $C$ should annihilate the coefficient vectors $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,-27,-5)=(1,1,2)$. Thus, $C_2$ is proportional to $begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. As $C_2X_2$ should have the constant term $1$, we obtain
        $$C_2=begin{bmatrix}-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},,$$
        making
        $$C=begin{bmatrix}1&-2&1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$



        Note that $$CX=begin{bmatrix}1&x\0&1end{bmatrix},.$$ Therefore, we need that $$BX=begin{bmatrix}0&-1\0&0end{bmatrix},.$$
        The first row $B_1$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$ and $(1,1,2)$, but $B_1X_2=-1$. Thus, $B_1=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2end{bmatrix}$. The second row $B_2$ of $B$ should annihilate $(1,3,5)$, $(1,1,2)$, and $(-1,-2,-3)$, so $B_2=begin{bmatrix}0&0&0end{bmatrix}$. Consequently,
        $$B=begin{bmatrix}1&3&-2\0&0&0end{bmatrix}$$ and so
        $$L=Bx+C=begin{bmatrix}x+1&3x-2&-2x+1\-1&-3&2end{bmatrix},.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 4 '18 at 13:18

























        answered Dec 4 '18 at 3:35









        BatominovskiBatominovski

        33.1k33293




        33.1k33293






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025045%2fleft-inverse-of-a-matrix-3-times-2-in-mathbbf-7x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Image
            3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
            Read more

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Image
            up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
            Read more

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Image
            0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
            Read more