Divisor on cubic curve $y^2z=x^3-xz^2$












1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be the nonsingular cubic curve $y^2z=x^3-xz^2$. Let $P_0=(0,1,0)$. Then the line bundle associated to $3P_0$ is $O_X(1)$. I already know that $3P_0$ is produced by cut the curve with $z=0$. But why this is enough to get it is $O_X(1)$.






algebraic-geometry divisors-algebraic-geometry line-bundles







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In general you would get that the associated line bundle $mathscr{L}$ is isomorphic to $varphi^*(O_{mathbb{P}^n}(1))$ where $varphi: X to mathbb{P}^n$ is defined by the global sections of $mathscr{L}$. But in this case the divisor $3 P_0$ was used to embed $X$ into projective space in the first place (hence the nice Weierstrass equation), so $varphi$ is just the inclusion map $iota: X to mathbb{P}^2$. I think this means that $mathscr{L} cong iota^*(O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)) cong O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:05












  • $begingroup$
    @André3000 Thank you for your solution. However, I am not quite familiar with the Weierstrass equation. I try to argue it as every divisor in $mathbb{P}^2$ restricts to a divisor on $X$, and $z=0$ is a divisor associated to $O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ (as we have an obvious embedding of this curve to projective space). Thus it should also give a divisor corresponding to $O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Liu
    Dec 1 '18 at 23:03


















1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be the nonsingular cubic curve $y^2z=x^3-xz^2$. Let $P_0=(0,1,0)$. Then the line bundle associated to $3P_0$ is $O_X(1)$. I already know that $3P_0$ is produced by cut the curve with $z=0$. But why this is enough to get it is $O_X(1)$.






algebraic-geometry divisors-algebraic-geometry line-bundles







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In general you would get that the associated line bundle $mathscr{L}$ is isomorphic to $varphi^*(O_{mathbb{P}^n}(1))$ where $varphi: X to mathbb{P}^n$ is defined by the global sections of $mathscr{L}$. But in this case the divisor $3 P_0$ was used to embed $X$ into projective space in the first place (hence the nice Weierstrass equation), so $varphi$ is just the inclusion map $iota: X to mathbb{P}^2$. I think this means that $mathscr{L} cong iota^*(O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)) cong O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:05












  • $begingroup$
    @André3000 Thank you for your solution. However, I am not quite familiar with the Weierstrass equation. I try to argue it as every divisor in $mathbb{P}^2$ restricts to a divisor on $X$, and $z=0$ is a divisor associated to $O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ (as we have an obvious embedding of this curve to projective space). Thus it should also give a divisor corresponding to $O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Liu
    Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $X$ be the nonsingular cubic curve $y^2z=x^3-xz^2$. Let $P_0=(0,1,0)$. Then the line bundle associated to $3P_0$ is $O_X(1)$. I already know that $3P_0$ is produced by cut the curve with $z=0$. But why this is enough to get it is $O_X(1)$.






algebraic-geometry divisors-algebraic-geometry line-bundles







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $X$ be the nonsingular cubic curve $y^2z=x^3-xz^2$. Let $P_0=(0,1,0)$. Then the line bundle associated to $3P_0$ is $O_X(1)$. I already know that $3P_0$ is produced by cut the curve with $z=0$. But why this is enough to get it is $O_X(1)$.






algebraic-geometry divisors-algebraic-geometry line-bundles




algebraic-geometry divisors-algebraic-geometry line-bundles






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '18 at 22:21









Peter LiuPeter Liu

305114




305114












  • $begingroup$
    In general you would get that the associated line bundle $mathscr{L}$ is isomorphic to $varphi^*(O_{mathbb{P}^n}(1))$ where $varphi: X to mathbb{P}^n$ is defined by the global sections of $mathscr{L}$. But in this case the divisor $3 P_0$ was used to embed $X$ into projective space in the first place (hence the nice Weierstrass equation), so $varphi$ is just the inclusion map $iota: X to mathbb{P}^2$. I think this means that $mathscr{L} cong iota^*(O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)) cong O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:05












  • $begingroup$
    @André3000 Thank you for your solution. However, I am not quite familiar with the Weierstrass equation. I try to argue it as every divisor in $mathbb{P}^2$ restricts to a divisor on $X$, and $z=0$ is a divisor associated to $O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ (as we have an obvious embedding of this curve to projective space). Thus it should also give a divisor corresponding to $O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Liu
    Dec 1 '18 at 23:03




















  • $begingroup$
    In general you would get that the associated line bundle $mathscr{L}$ is isomorphic to $varphi^*(O_{mathbb{P}^n}(1))$ where $varphi: X to mathbb{P}^n$ is defined by the global sections of $mathscr{L}$. But in this case the divisor $3 P_0$ was used to embed $X$ into projective space in the first place (hence the nice Weierstrass equation), so $varphi$ is just the inclusion map $iota: X to mathbb{P}^2$. I think this means that $mathscr{L} cong iota^*(O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)) cong O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – André 3000
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:05












  • $begingroup$
    @André3000 Thank you for your solution. However, I am not quite familiar with the Weierstrass equation. I try to argue it as every divisor in $mathbb{P}^2$ restricts to a divisor on $X$, and $z=0$ is a divisor associated to $O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ (as we have an obvious embedding of this curve to projective space). Thus it should also give a divisor corresponding to $O_X(1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Liu
    Dec 1 '18 at 23:03


















$begingroup$
In general you would get that the associated line bundle $mathscr{L}$ is isomorphic to $varphi^*(O_{mathbb{P}^n}(1))$ where $varphi: X to mathbb{P}^n$ is defined by the global sections of $mathscr{L}$. But in this case the divisor $3 P_0$ was used to embed $X$ into projective space in the first place (hence the nice Weierstrass equation), so $varphi$ is just the inclusion map $iota: X to mathbb{P}^2$. I think this means that $mathscr{L} cong iota^*(O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)) cong O_X(1)$.
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 1 '18 at 20:05






$begingroup$
In general you would get that the associated line bundle $mathscr{L}$ is isomorphic to $varphi^*(O_{mathbb{P}^n}(1))$ where $varphi: X to mathbb{P}^n$ is defined by the global sections of $mathscr{L}$. But in this case the divisor $3 P_0$ was used to embed $X$ into projective space in the first place (hence the nice Weierstrass equation), so $varphi$ is just the inclusion map $iota: X to mathbb{P}^2$. I think this means that $mathscr{L} cong iota^*(O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)) cong O_X(1)$.
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 1 '18 at 20:05














$begingroup$
@André3000 Thank you for your solution. However, I am not quite familiar with the Weierstrass equation. I try to argue it as every divisor in $mathbb{P}^2$ restricts to a divisor on $X$, and $z=0$ is a divisor associated to $O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ (as we have an obvious embedding of this curve to projective space). Thus it should also give a divisor corresponding to $O_X(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Peter Liu
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03






$begingroup$
@André3000 Thank you for your solution. However, I am not quite familiar with the Weierstrass equation. I try to argue it as every divisor in $mathbb{P}^2$ restricts to a divisor on $X$, and $z=0$ is a divisor associated to $O_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ (as we have an obvious embedding of this curve to projective space). Thus it should also give a divisor corresponding to $O_X(1)$.
$endgroup$
– Peter Liu
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your approach is correct. One nice thing about the divisor and line bundle correspondence is that the divisor is the divisor of any rational section. Sections of $mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ pullback to sections of $mathcal{O}_X(1)$, and the associated divisor of a pulled-back section gives you a divisor $D$ such that $mathcal{O}_X(D)=mathcal{O}_X(1)$. You did this computation and everything works!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020727%2fdivisor-on-cubic-curve-y2z-x3-xz2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Your approach is correct. One nice thing about the divisor and line bundle correspondence is that the divisor is the divisor of any rational section. Sections of $mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ pullback to sections of $mathcal{O}_X(1)$, and the associated divisor of a pulled-back section gives you a divisor $D$ such that $mathcal{O}_X(D)=mathcal{O}_X(1)$. You did this computation and everything works!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Your approach is correct. One nice thing about the divisor and line bundle correspondence is that the divisor is the divisor of any rational section. Sections of $mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ pullback to sections of $mathcal{O}_X(1)$, and the associated divisor of a pulled-back section gives you a divisor $D$ such that $mathcal{O}_X(D)=mathcal{O}_X(1)$. You did this computation and everything works!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Your approach is correct. One nice thing about the divisor and line bundle correspondence is that the divisor is the divisor of any rational section. Sections of $mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ pullback to sections of $mathcal{O}_X(1)$, and the associated divisor of a pulled-back section gives you a divisor $D$ such that $mathcal{O}_X(D)=mathcal{O}_X(1)$. You did this computation and everything works!






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your approach is correct. One nice thing about the divisor and line bundle correspondence is that the divisor is the divisor of any rational section. Sections of $mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ pullback to sections of $mathcal{O}_X(1)$, and the associated divisor of a pulled-back section gives you a divisor $D$ such that $mathcal{O}_X(D)=mathcal{O}_X(1)$. You did this computation and everything works!







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:16









        Samir CanningSamir Canning

        46539




        46539






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020727%2fdivisor-on-cubic-curve-y2z-x3-xz2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Image
            3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question ...
            Read more

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Image
            0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"...
            Read more

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Image
            up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx...
            Read more