Uniqueness of set where subset exactly sums to 1












1














Let $A = {a_1, a_2, ldots, a_I}$ be a set of real numbers, where for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$, $0<a_ile1$ and $sum_{j ne i} a_j ge 1$.



I am interested in the set (or sets) $A$ satisfying the following condition:




For every subset $S subset {1,2,ldots,I}$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, there exists a subset $S' subseteq S$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$, i.e. that exactly sums to 1.




Is it true that the only set $A$ satisfying this condition is the one where, for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$:
$$a_i = a quadlandquad frac{1}{a} text{ is an integer}$$










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Could you please give an example of what you're looking for?
    – MJD
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:03










  • @MJD: $A=left{frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ satisfies the condition, while $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ doesn't since the sum of $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$ does not exactly equal 1.
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:14










  • But for that second example, $A$ doesn't satisfy the $forall iin {1,ldots,I}: sum_{jneq i} a_j geq 1$?
    – Henrik
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:16












  • Sorry. Let the second example be $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ and $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:20


















1














Let $A = {a_1, a_2, ldots, a_I}$ be a set of real numbers, where for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$, $0<a_ile1$ and $sum_{j ne i} a_j ge 1$.



I am interested in the set (or sets) $A$ satisfying the following condition:




For every subset $S subset {1,2,ldots,I}$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, there exists a subset $S' subseteq S$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$, i.e. that exactly sums to 1.




Is it true that the only set $A$ satisfying this condition is the one where, for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$:
$$a_i = a quadlandquad frac{1}{a} text{ is an integer}$$










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Could you please give an example of what you're looking for?
    – MJD
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:03










  • @MJD: $A=left{frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ satisfies the condition, while $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ doesn't since the sum of $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$ does not exactly equal 1.
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:14










  • But for that second example, $A$ doesn't satisfy the $forall iin {1,ldots,I}: sum_{jneq i} a_j geq 1$?
    – Henrik
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:16












  • Sorry. Let the second example be $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ and $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:20
















1












1








1







Let $A = {a_1, a_2, ldots, a_I}$ be a set of real numbers, where for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$, $0<a_ile1$ and $sum_{j ne i} a_j ge 1$.



I am interested in the set (or sets) $A$ satisfying the following condition:




For every subset $S subset {1,2,ldots,I}$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, there exists a subset $S' subseteq S$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$, i.e. that exactly sums to 1.




Is it true that the only set $A$ satisfying this condition is the one where, for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$:
$$a_i = a quadlandquad frac{1}{a} text{ is an integer}$$










share|cite|improve this question













Let $A = {a_1, a_2, ldots, a_I}$ be a set of real numbers, where for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$, $0<a_ile1$ and $sum_{j ne i} a_j ge 1$.



I am interested in the set (or sets) $A$ satisfying the following condition:




For every subset $S subset {1,2,ldots,I}$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, there exists a subset $S' subseteq S$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$, i.e. that exactly sums to 1.




Is it true that the only set $A$ satisfying this condition is the one where, for all $i in {1,2,ldots,I}$:
$$a_i = a quadlandquad frac{1}{a} text{ is an integer}$$







proof-verification integers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 23 '18 at 13:58









bonnabonna

858




858












  • Could you please give an example of what you're looking for?
    – MJD
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:03










  • @MJD: $A=left{frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ satisfies the condition, while $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ doesn't since the sum of $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$ does not exactly equal 1.
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:14










  • But for that second example, $A$ doesn't satisfy the $forall iin {1,ldots,I}: sum_{jneq i} a_j geq 1$?
    – Henrik
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:16












  • Sorry. Let the second example be $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ and $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:20




















  • Could you please give an example of what you're looking for?
    – MJD
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:03










  • @MJD: $A=left{frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ satisfies the condition, while $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ doesn't since the sum of $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$ does not exactly equal 1.
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:14










  • But for that second example, $A$ doesn't satisfy the $forall iin {1,ldots,I}: sum_{jneq i} a_j geq 1$?
    – Henrik
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:16












  • Sorry. Let the second example be $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ and $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$
    – bonna
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:20


















Could you please give an example of what you're looking for?
– MJD
Nov 23 '18 at 14:03




Could you please give an example of what you're looking for?
– MJD
Nov 23 '18 at 14:03












@MJD: $A=left{frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ satisfies the condition, while $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ doesn't since the sum of $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$ does not exactly equal 1.
– bonna
Nov 23 '18 at 14:14




@MJD: $A=left{frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ satisfies the condition, while $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ doesn't since the sum of $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$ does not exactly equal 1.
– bonna
Nov 23 '18 at 14:14












But for that second example, $A$ doesn't satisfy the $forall iin {1,ldots,I}: sum_{jneq i} a_j geq 1$?
– Henrik
Nov 23 '18 at 14:16






But for that second example, $A$ doesn't satisfy the $forall iin {1,ldots,I}: sum_{jneq i} a_j geq 1$?
– Henrik
Nov 23 '18 at 14:16














Sorry. Let the second example be $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ and $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$
– bonna
Nov 23 '18 at 14:20






Sorry. Let the second example be $A=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}, frac{1}{2}right}$ and $S'=left{frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{3}, frac{1}{2}right}$
– bonna
Nov 23 '18 at 14:20












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














No, it is not true. Consider the following counter-example where $a_i ne a, forall i$:



$$A = {a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4}, text{ where } a_1 = a_2 = frac{1}{4} text{ and } a_3 = a_4 = frac{1}{2}$$



This satisfies the condition that all the subsets $$S = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}, {a_1, a_3, a_4}, {a_2, a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, have subsets $$S' = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010394%2funiqueness-of-set-where-subset-exactly-sums-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    No, it is not true. Consider the following counter-example where $a_i ne a, forall i$:



    $$A = {a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4}, text{ where } a_1 = a_2 = frac{1}{4} text{ and } a_3 = a_4 = frac{1}{2}$$



    This satisfies the condition that all the subsets $$S = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}, {a_1, a_3, a_4}, {a_2, a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, have subsets $$S' = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      No, it is not true. Consider the following counter-example where $a_i ne a, forall i$:



      $$A = {a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4}, text{ where } a_1 = a_2 = frac{1}{4} text{ and } a_3 = a_4 = frac{1}{2}$$



      This satisfies the condition that all the subsets $$S = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}, {a_1, a_3, a_4}, {a_2, a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, have subsets $$S' = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        No, it is not true. Consider the following counter-example where $a_i ne a, forall i$:



        $$A = {a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4}, text{ where } a_1 = a_2 = frac{1}{4} text{ and } a_3 = a_4 = frac{1}{2}$$



        This satisfies the condition that all the subsets $$S = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}, {a_1, a_3, a_4}, {a_2, a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, have subsets $$S' = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        No, it is not true. Consider the following counter-example where $a_i ne a, forall i$:



        $$A = {a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4}, text{ where } a_1 = a_2 = frac{1}{4} text{ and } a_3 = a_4 = frac{1}{2}$$



        This satisfies the condition that all the subsets $$S = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}, {a_1, a_3, a_4}, {a_2, a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S} a_i ge 1$, have subsets $$S' = {a_1, a_2, a_3}, {a_1, a_2, a_4}, {a_3, a_4}$$ where $sum_{i in S'} a_i = 1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:12









        bonnabonna

        858




        858






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010394%2funiqueness-of-set-where-subset-exactly-sums-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents