Improving performance of page in wicket 1.3











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am using wicket-1.3 in my application and a page is divided in 2 parts, 1st is having categorySelector wicket id which is shown dropdown and based on the dropdown value category wicket id will be changed by application. see below code



<div wicket:id="categorySelector" >Category selection controls</div>
<div wicket:id="category" >Category Data</div>


I have select 1 value from categorySelector dropdown value and category panel will show data in Propertylistview and data size is around 4k but its taking time around 4-5 minutes to page load.



I want to know why its taking too much time and is there any other alternative approach to implement the functionality for load huge data.



I have seen pagination concept also but i think it will not help me also.










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am using wicket-1.3 in my application and a page is divided in 2 parts, 1st is having categorySelector wicket id which is shown dropdown and based on the dropdown value category wicket id will be changed by application. see below code



    <div wicket:id="categorySelector" >Category selection controls</div>
    <div wicket:id="category" >Category Data</div>


    I have select 1 value from categorySelector dropdown value and category panel will show data in Propertylistview and data size is around 4k but its taking time around 4-5 minutes to page load.



    I want to know why its taking too much time and is there any other alternative approach to implement the functionality for load huge data.



    I have seen pagination concept also but i think it will not help me also.










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am using wicket-1.3 in my application and a page is divided in 2 parts, 1st is having categorySelector wicket id which is shown dropdown and based on the dropdown value category wicket id will be changed by application. see below code



      <div wicket:id="categorySelector" >Category selection controls</div>
      <div wicket:id="category" >Category Data</div>


      I have select 1 value from categorySelector dropdown value and category panel will show data in Propertylistview and data size is around 4k but its taking time around 4-5 minutes to page load.



      I want to know why its taking too much time and is there any other alternative approach to implement the functionality for load huge data.



      I have seen pagination concept also but i think it will not help me also.










      share|improve this question













      I am using wicket-1.3 in my application and a page is divided in 2 parts, 1st is having categorySelector wicket id which is shown dropdown and based on the dropdown value category wicket id will be changed by application. see below code



      <div wicket:id="categorySelector" >Category selection controls</div>
      <div wicket:id="category" >Category Data</div>


      I have select 1 value from categorySelector dropdown value and category panel will show data in Propertylistview and data size is around 4k but its taking time around 4-5 minutes to page load.



      I want to know why its taking too much time and is there any other alternative approach to implement the functionality for load huge data.



      I have seen pagination concept also but i think it will not help me also.







      java wicket wicket-1.5






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 14 at 8:19









      Nitin

      348




      348
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Pagination should help you because you will load only slices of the data, not everything at once.



          In addition the browser will have less HTML elements to render!






          share|improve this answer





















          • let me implement this way functionality.
            – Nitin
            Nov 15 at 6:08











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53295710%2fimproving-performance-of-page-in-wicket-1-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Pagination should help you because you will load only slices of the data, not everything at once.



          In addition the browser will have less HTML elements to render!






          share|improve this answer





















          • let me implement this way functionality.
            – Nitin
            Nov 15 at 6:08















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Pagination should help you because you will load only slices of the data, not everything at once.



          In addition the browser will have less HTML elements to render!






          share|improve this answer





















          • let me implement this way functionality.
            – Nitin
            Nov 15 at 6:08













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Pagination should help you because you will load only slices of the data, not everything at once.



          In addition the browser will have less HTML elements to render!






          share|improve this answer












          Pagination should help you because you will load only slices of the data, not everything at once.



          In addition the browser will have less HTML elements to render!







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 14 at 8:35









          martin-g

          11.9k1825




          11.9k1825












          • let me implement this way functionality.
            – Nitin
            Nov 15 at 6:08


















          • let me implement this way functionality.
            – Nitin
            Nov 15 at 6:08
















          let me implement this way functionality.
          – Nitin
          Nov 15 at 6:08




          let me implement this way functionality.
          – Nitin
          Nov 15 at 6:08


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53295710%2fimproving-performance-of-page-in-wicket-1-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents