How to make a metal with extraordinary property worthless?
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
In a RPG scenario, players will look for a MacGuffin Metal (aka MGM.), experiencing the farwest gold fever.
Short Story:
Context : Farwest(~1880), steam punk.
First encounter :
In a 3-5 minutes time frame, players will have to handle a MGM door.
Metal property : Lighter than aluminum, strong as steel, silverish.
Inspection method: pick it, move it, throw it, thrust into, punch bite and claw.MGM Discovery :
After the "MGM fever", the frenzy and chaos surrounding this quest for a incredible medal, only a bitter taste remains.
The MGM is an already known metal! Already discovered decades ago by Dr. MacGuffin, he judges it worthless. And he is right.
The veins is there near the Xyz town, the mine already exists but somehow the MGM is worthless.
Question :
How to make a metal with extraordinary property worthless?
The MGM has propertied that make it comparable to Titanium.
In-game restriction :
The game cannot accept any kind of Op MGM Armor, or gold like revenue.
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Things it can be used for: horsehoes, knives, things of small value such as spoons and frypans.
Out side restriction :
One of the players is an engineer in a metallurgy company.
He knows a lot about metals, and has the knowledge to bring industrial metal into the West if I allow him enough time to do so.
He starts his study/career because as a kid he was wondering what it will take to go from the bronze age to the steel age.
He is the real reason of my question because I'm afraid he could destroy the plot.
Possible answer I already have:
- It's magic. It's a precious metal revolutionary! ..Changed my mind it's worthless.
- You are the engineer, you tell me why it's worthless.
- Good question, your char ask that but the answer he got is too complex for him to understand.
The answer doesn't need to be hard science, just reasonable enough. You can judge the reasonable based on your own comprehension, Will it fool you?
The argument can include magic, curse, haunted. No hard science needed.
science western
|
show 14 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
In a RPG scenario, players will look for a MacGuffin Metal (aka MGM.), experiencing the farwest gold fever.
Short Story:
Context : Farwest(~1880), steam punk.
First encounter :
In a 3-5 minutes time frame, players will have to handle a MGM door.
Metal property : Lighter than aluminum, strong as steel, silverish.
Inspection method: pick it, move it, throw it, thrust into, punch bite and claw.MGM Discovery :
After the "MGM fever", the frenzy and chaos surrounding this quest for a incredible medal, only a bitter taste remains.
The MGM is an already known metal! Already discovered decades ago by Dr. MacGuffin, he judges it worthless. And he is right.
The veins is there near the Xyz town, the mine already exists but somehow the MGM is worthless.
Question :
How to make a metal with extraordinary property worthless?
The MGM has propertied that make it comparable to Titanium.
In-game restriction :
The game cannot accept any kind of Op MGM Armor, or gold like revenue.
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Things it can be used for: horsehoes, knives, things of small value such as spoons and frypans.
Out side restriction :
One of the players is an engineer in a metallurgy company.
He knows a lot about metals, and has the knowledge to bring industrial metal into the West if I allow him enough time to do so.
He starts his study/career because as a kid he was wondering what it will take to go from the bronze age to the steel age.
He is the real reason of my question because I'm afraid he could destroy the plot.
Possible answer I already have:
- It's magic. It's a precious metal revolutionary! ..Changed my mind it's worthless.
- You are the engineer, you tell me why it's worthless.
- Good question, your char ask that but the answer he got is too complex for him to understand.
The answer doesn't need to be hard science, just reasonable enough. You can judge the reasonable based on your own comprehension, Will it fool you?
The argument can include magic, curse, haunted. No hard science needed.
science western
5
Titanium would not have been very useful in the 19th century...
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 11:37
@AlexP, for the need of the story the medal must be noticable for a avg cowboy. It has to have extraordinary property. Ti is what I comes up with in my research of real life lighter stronger medal.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:17
3
You are aware that only gold and silver are found in their native state in any appreciable quantity? Everything else is smelted from ore, a.k.a. dirt. I seriously doubt that the average cowboy would recognize aluminum ore, or chromium ore, or even iron ore.
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 13:51
3
Make more of it. Done
– Carl Witthoft
Dec 4 at 14:11
@AlexP, they won't. And they don't have to. MGM is not real and it's not Ti, It's clause to what we call Ti. Because I need a base to start. But the Avg cowboy will clause a giant gate and will know it's light.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:38
|
show 14 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
In a RPG scenario, players will look for a MacGuffin Metal (aka MGM.), experiencing the farwest gold fever.
Short Story:
Context : Farwest(~1880), steam punk.
First encounter :
In a 3-5 minutes time frame, players will have to handle a MGM door.
Metal property : Lighter than aluminum, strong as steel, silverish.
Inspection method: pick it, move it, throw it, thrust into, punch bite and claw.MGM Discovery :
After the "MGM fever", the frenzy and chaos surrounding this quest for a incredible medal, only a bitter taste remains.
The MGM is an already known metal! Already discovered decades ago by Dr. MacGuffin, he judges it worthless. And he is right.
The veins is there near the Xyz town, the mine already exists but somehow the MGM is worthless.
Question :
How to make a metal with extraordinary property worthless?
The MGM has propertied that make it comparable to Titanium.
In-game restriction :
The game cannot accept any kind of Op MGM Armor, or gold like revenue.
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Things it can be used for: horsehoes, knives, things of small value such as spoons and frypans.
Out side restriction :
One of the players is an engineer in a metallurgy company.
He knows a lot about metals, and has the knowledge to bring industrial metal into the West if I allow him enough time to do so.
He starts his study/career because as a kid he was wondering what it will take to go from the bronze age to the steel age.
He is the real reason of my question because I'm afraid he could destroy the plot.
Possible answer I already have:
- It's magic. It's a precious metal revolutionary! ..Changed my mind it's worthless.
- You are the engineer, you tell me why it's worthless.
- Good question, your char ask that but the answer he got is too complex for him to understand.
The answer doesn't need to be hard science, just reasonable enough. You can judge the reasonable based on your own comprehension, Will it fool you?
The argument can include magic, curse, haunted. No hard science needed.
science western
In a RPG scenario, players will look for a MacGuffin Metal (aka MGM.), experiencing the farwest gold fever.
Short Story:
Context : Farwest(~1880), steam punk.
First encounter :
In a 3-5 minutes time frame, players will have to handle a MGM door.
Metal property : Lighter than aluminum, strong as steel, silverish.
Inspection method: pick it, move it, throw it, thrust into, punch bite and claw.MGM Discovery :
After the "MGM fever", the frenzy and chaos surrounding this quest for a incredible medal, only a bitter taste remains.
The MGM is an already known metal! Already discovered decades ago by Dr. MacGuffin, he judges it worthless. And he is right.
The veins is there near the Xyz town, the mine already exists but somehow the MGM is worthless.
Question :
How to make a metal with extraordinary property worthless?
The MGM has propertied that make it comparable to Titanium.
In-game restriction :
The game cannot accept any kind of Op MGM Armor, or gold like revenue.
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Things it can be used for: horsehoes, knives, things of small value such as spoons and frypans.
Out side restriction :
One of the players is an engineer in a metallurgy company.
He knows a lot about metals, and has the knowledge to bring industrial metal into the West if I allow him enough time to do so.
He starts his study/career because as a kid he was wondering what it will take to go from the bronze age to the steel age.
He is the real reason of my question because I'm afraid he could destroy the plot.
Possible answer I already have:
- It's magic. It's a precious metal revolutionary! ..Changed my mind it's worthless.
- You are the engineer, you tell me why it's worthless.
- Good question, your char ask that but the answer he got is too complex for him to understand.
The answer doesn't need to be hard science, just reasonable enough. You can judge the reasonable based on your own comprehension, Will it fool you?
The argument can include magic, curse, haunted. No hard science needed.
science western
science western
edited Dec 4 at 20:21
Renan
41.5k1194210
41.5k1194210
asked Dec 4 at 8:29
Drag and Drop
8642921
8642921
5
Titanium would not have been very useful in the 19th century...
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 11:37
@AlexP, for the need of the story the medal must be noticable for a avg cowboy. It has to have extraordinary property. Ti is what I comes up with in my research of real life lighter stronger medal.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:17
3
You are aware that only gold and silver are found in their native state in any appreciable quantity? Everything else is smelted from ore, a.k.a. dirt. I seriously doubt that the average cowboy would recognize aluminum ore, or chromium ore, or even iron ore.
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 13:51
3
Make more of it. Done
– Carl Witthoft
Dec 4 at 14:11
@AlexP, they won't. And they don't have to. MGM is not real and it's not Ti, It's clause to what we call Ti. Because I need a base to start. But the Avg cowboy will clause a giant gate and will know it's light.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:38
|
show 14 more comments
5
Titanium would not have been very useful in the 19th century...
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 11:37
@AlexP, for the need of the story the medal must be noticable for a avg cowboy. It has to have extraordinary property. Ti is what I comes up with in my research of real life lighter stronger medal.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:17
3
You are aware that only gold and silver are found in their native state in any appreciable quantity? Everything else is smelted from ore, a.k.a. dirt. I seriously doubt that the average cowboy would recognize aluminum ore, or chromium ore, or even iron ore.
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 13:51
3
Make more of it. Done
– Carl Witthoft
Dec 4 at 14:11
@AlexP, they won't. And they don't have to. MGM is not real and it's not Ti, It's clause to what we call Ti. Because I need a base to start. But the Avg cowboy will clause a giant gate and will know it's light.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:38
5
5
Titanium would not have been very useful in the 19th century...
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 11:37
Titanium would not have been very useful in the 19th century...
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 11:37
@AlexP, for the need of the story the medal must be noticable for a avg cowboy. It has to have extraordinary property. Ti is what I comes up with in my research of real life lighter stronger medal.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:17
@AlexP, for the need of the story the medal must be noticable for a avg cowboy. It has to have extraordinary property. Ti is what I comes up with in my research of real life lighter stronger medal.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:17
3
3
You are aware that only gold and silver are found in their native state in any appreciable quantity? Everything else is smelted from ore, a.k.a. dirt. I seriously doubt that the average cowboy would recognize aluminum ore, or chromium ore, or even iron ore.
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 13:51
You are aware that only gold and silver are found in their native state in any appreciable quantity? Everything else is smelted from ore, a.k.a. dirt. I seriously doubt that the average cowboy would recognize aluminum ore, or chromium ore, or even iron ore.
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 13:51
3
3
Make more of it. Done
– Carl Witthoft
Dec 4 at 14:11
Make more of it. Done
– Carl Witthoft
Dec 4 at 14:11
@AlexP, they won't. And they don't have to. MGM is not real and it's not Ti, It's clause to what we call Ti. Because I need a base to start. But the Avg cowboy will clause a giant gate and will know it's light.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:38
@AlexP, they won't. And they don't have to. MGM is not real and it's not Ti, It's clause to what we call Ti. Because I need a base to start. But the Avg cowboy will clause a giant gate and will know it's light.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:38
|
show 14 more comments
19 Answers
19
active
oldest
votes
up vote
96
down vote
It turns out to be radioactive.
It's light, it's beautiful, it's strong.
... but anyone who carries or wears the metal for more than a very short period of time eventually gets sick.
This wasn't known during the initial gold rush and the metal was used to make various things... but eventually the people who handled it most or wore or carried pieces got sick and died leaving behind a town full of the sick families of former prospectors.
Short exposure isn't an issue... but don't even think about carrying chunks in your pack for weeks.
And anyone foolish enough to try to toy with this metal unprepared?
1
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
2
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
3
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
6
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
4
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
79
down vote
Titanium is actually a fascinating example standing by itself, because it's not that hard to find (it was identified as an element before 1800, and is the ninth-most abundant element in Earth's crust) but it's very difficult to work.
Titanium can't be shaped simply by heating it and pouring or working it like you might do with iron, steel, brass, or the like. The reason is chemical: pure titanium metal melts at 1668 °C (3034 °F). However, at about 1,200 °C (2,190 °F), it reacts with oxygen to form a variety of oxides. (The most common, titanium dioxide, is a valuable product in its own right; it's a very strong, bright white pigment and has other industrial uses.) If you try working with titanium the same way you would steel, it will literally burn up.
So in order to work with titanium, you need to work it under an inert atmosphere. Normally pure nitrogen is the go-to for industrial uses... but titanium will burn in nitrogen, too. You need an atmosphere made up of a noble gas, like argon. In this time period this might just about have been possible in a lab, on a very small scale, but it's still the better part of a century from industrial applications.
The one caveat is that most cold shaping methods will still work on titanium once it's purified. If you have an ingot of titanium metal, you can stamp it, roll it, carve it, ream it, etc. and it'll work okay. So it might be hard to justify not allowing your players to cut up your miracle door for body armor or the like, but they'll have a very limited amount to work with, and no way to make more.
3
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
1
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
41
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
2
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
22
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
30
down vote
Absurdly strong metal! Well, in the current location/situation - for example, halfway up a snowy mountain.
Unfortunately, those properties change greatly with temperature - taking our "strong when cold" example, by 20°C it's soft, malleable, and can barely hold its own weight up. By 35°C it's completely melted. A good door for withstanding the elements in the cold, but no security against animals or hot weather.
(For reference: standard "room temperature" is about 18°C-22°C, and the Human Body temperature is typically around the 37°C mark)
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
3
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
1
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
It reacts with certain common substances. As an example look at aluminum and mercury: https://youtu.be/IrdYueB9pY4
Imagine this kind of thing happening with something more common, like a certain mixture of water, or an abundant chemical that enemies could easily fetch and use. Your armor might be supa-dupa but if it someone throws a chemical at you and your armor/weapon falls apart or worse kills you... You dont want to be using it.
Edit: as another example of metals reacting with stuff, think Sodium (natrium). It's a metal, it's got weird properties (in this case bad, like being soft enough to cut with a kitchen knife) and it reacts heavily with water. Throw enough in and it'll even explode. "Hold on guys I have to take off my supa-dupa armor and put it in a water-proof bag, it's about to rain" :D
Dont know how to work it yet:
Simply put, they dont know how to use it properly. Pure aluminum is light and strong but sheers easily due to its molecular structure. Add copper to the mix to get construction aluminum and the copper molecules prevent the sheering (if properly cooled), even though copper is counter-intuitively weaker than aluminum it strengthens it! The bits and pieces they found and used were natural deposits of good and bad mixtures. And the only way to work it to the knowledge so far is to chip it into shape, severely limiting what you can make depending on the size of natural material you found. A knife could work, but a full armor...?
Its hard to work it.
As mentioned, Tungsten for example is hard to work. Not only does it form oxides when heating it up, but due to the temperature needed to melt it theres virtually nothing you can heat and contain it in! Its one of the reasons we know much less about Tungsten than other materials. It doesnt need to be that restrictive, but it can be so restrictive that only a handful of top-notch master craftsmen can make something out of it and even then theres a high failure rate. So the limiting factor isnt the material, but the expertise to work it. Who cares if you've got 50 metric tons of the stuff if 10 kilo's is enough for a master craftsman to make several attempts and build one armor and practically no one can afford it? This makes it worthless to most people.
2
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
You have answer in your question:
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Thing it can be used for : horse thing, knife, small things with no impact from spoon to frypan
The metal is forgeable only in small sizes:
- It may be due to heat (very high temperature) it require to be shaped.
- it proprieties change with size, the more metal you have the more brittle/unstable it become
- Due to it's proprieties it react to much with it's surrounding. A revolver made with this metal don't allow bullets to leave the barrel. A shield reflect bullets but transfer kinetic energy multiplying it by the square size of shield. A canoe/boat/ship is attracted to the nearest large deposit of MGM rather than direction you want the ship to go.
And last thing. The "tool wear". In woodworking there are woods of different hardness. The hard ones are, well, the best but they wear the tools used to shape them. The saw are dull, chisel are made blunt.
Creating things from MGM destroy your tools. Using hammer and anvil on MGM is like using brass hammer on hard steel. The metal is not scarce, like gold, but creating usable things is not price reasonable. The jewellery made from that metal is costly but ONLY after the dozens of tools are destroyed in the process of making in. So the price comes from waste that was required to create MGM "thing" not from the MGM proprieties.
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
A lot of real-world metals are not intrinsically valuable (like gold is, due to its scarcity), but become valuable in the right context.
"Damascus steel" was once priceless, because it made the best swords, and most metalworkers had no idea how to produce it; but it was made from ordinary iron and carbon, so you wouldn't be rich just because you discovered the ore seams it was made from. The same is true of titanium and alumin(i)um, which can only be worked and/or refined with modern technology.
Conversely, many metals are scarce, but did not become valuable until people discovered uses for them (neodymium magnets, yttrium lasers, tantalum capacitors etc.). In 1870, an ingot of tantalum would certainly be expensive, but if you showed it to anyone their reaction would be "so what?"; today, the trade in tantalum fuels deadly conflict.
A fun idea might be if the MacGuffin metal was some kind of impressive alloy, but it melts at 36°C (perhaps it contains gallium). Getting to and from the town involves two days' travel through Death Valley, and because refrigeration doesn't exist, there's no way to stop the alloy melting on the way.
4
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
It's weak to copper*
MGM is great. Relatively abundant. Easy to work in its raw state. But after purified and tempered, it is as light as aluminum and stronger than steel or titanium.
The problem is it is weak to copper. A copper knife will go through it like a hot knife through warm butter. Heck, a copper coin will go through it as easily as a knife. It might be a great metal, but if one can cut through it wil pocket change, it's not terribly useful.
Now from a scientific standpoint it isn't 'weak' to copper. It is highly reactive with copper. If any copper comes in contact with it, it will immediately form Cu2MGM20, a dodecahedron of MGM atoms around two copper atoms. And the new compound won't react with anything else. It just flakes away as dust, leaving it looking like the copper cut through the MGM. And it's a pain in the neck to split the molecules up again. Since it is a 10 to 1 reaction, one pound of copper will destroy 10 pounds of MGM (assuming they have similar atomic mass), or a copper dagger will only lose a thin layer in cutting through a door, armor, or sword. Gold and silver, also being in the precious metals series, may have a similar or reduced reaction with MGM.
*You could choose a different metal (metal column) instead of copper. Cobalt, nickel, and zinc might work; they are just less likely to be commonly carried (copper being common for coins) and thus discovered as the weakness.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
The Titanium answer is a good one, but I'd like to offer some other possibilities: radioactively dangerous to be around.
A real world example is Mag-Thor, which is only slightly radioactive but still needs special handling. If the magic metal is fairly "hot" radioactive, it will cause visible injuries, sickness and death fairly quickly. That discourages people from trying to make bulletproof vests out of it.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
The properties aren't that much better
Sure, it's lighter than aluminium and stronger than steel. But it's only 20% lighter and 20% stronger.
The metal has some disadvantages too.
It's got, say, poor fatigue properties. Oh, you didn't notice when it was a door, but it you made a sword out of this you'd be replacing it constantly.
In the 17th century, the British Royal Navy found that ships with lead or copper plating would have iron bolts and nails disintegrate quickly. MGM is similar; if you make armour with an MGM sheet and steel rivets, it's very prone to corrosion.
And it's expensive to produce.
Aluminium is found in an ore called Bauxite which is very common - but expensive amounts of energy are needed to extract the aluminium from the ore, even with modern techniques. Back in 1845, before modern extraction techniques were invented, aluminium cost more than gold.
MGM is the same way. You've found the ore and that the refined it has these good properties, but it's going to cost a lot more than steel because of the amount of, say, potassium you need to extract the metal from the ore.
Difficult to make it consistent, too
For some reason, eight out of ten batches of the metal just don't perform well. And you don't figure that out until right at the end of the manufacturing process, when your armour just isn't as strong as it should be in certain places. Dr MacGuffin thinks the boron used in refining tends to clump together, even though it's the best anyone can make, or possibly that the horse urine was gathered too late in the day. Anyway, the science of the day hasn't been able to solve the problem.
Did I mention it's expensive to process?
If you get MGM red hot in a forge, it reacts with air and gets less strong. It ends up less strong than steel, in fact. For it to keep its strength you have to stop the air getting to it, by processing it in a bath of argon. So you can do it, but your world's existing blacksmiths generally can't work with it. They'd need new equipment which is very expensive.
Oh, and someone else has patented the only extraction process that works
Tycoon Tom has a patent on the only MGM extraction techniques that seem to work well, and he's got big investments in steel mills. He's not really looking to let anyone use his patents. And your setting has very strict intellectual property laws.
Plus it's classified
The government thinks MGM has such important military applications, it's a state secret. All details about it are born secret, even if you discover them without seeing anything secret yourself. The secret applications are mostly in large artillery shell casings, so the properties that make it militarily useful aren't helpful for making swords or anything.
All things considered, its advantages aren't big enough to outweigh the cost and problems.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
It never had any value to begin with.
It was a product where the marketing got ahead of the development.
Some smooth talking salesman found himself in possession of the stuff, silver-tongued his way through a huge sale by promising all sorts of valuable properties to the metal, and it caught on. The material started changing hands, shot up in value as a untested commodity because it's so shiny, it has to be great, right?
Large organizations (banks, corporations, government factions) caught wind of the hype and started "Go west, young man" campaigns to get cheap labor in on the ground floor. Promises of wealth and a solid career in the MGM industry brought lots of men and women out to seek their fortune. Soon warehouses all over the map were full of the stuff.
Then the metallurgists got a few samples. People were bringing in nuggets, ingots, anything they could get. All were asking for the miracle devices they were promised to be crafted. Weapons, armor, machine parts, the works.
It turns out it is only useful as an alloy to other metals, usually metals that are so scarce, large-scale practical uses are too far out of scope for the amount of materials any one person or organization can realistically possess. However, the metallic mix is close to 80% MGM and 20% Unobtainium.
Or the process of making the alloy is so time consuming or dangerous to not be worth the effort.
Either way, many small trinkets exist, horseshoes, ashtrays. Whispers exist of a family that has an entire cutlery set made from MGM and Unobtainium (Or just plain MGM if that's what you go for, if so, ignore the next paragraph).
Because of the scarcity of the Unobtainium, MGM values have plummeted to nil. Sure, some people still run mining ventures because the occasional investor can be duped into thinking that when Unobtainium becomes Scarce-but-still-possible-to-obtainium the future of MGM will blow through the roof.
As for now, the abundant surplus of MGM sits uselessly in warehouses, frequently in ghost towns. The value of the material is so low it's not worth paying a few laborers a day's work to move the stock.
The door the party encounters is clearly made of either masterfully crafted MGM or the 80/20 mix.
New contributor
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
What if the metal had an inherent, impossible to counteract, and nigh-impossible to slow, decay rate (non-radioactive). When it is in ore form, it is stable and prevented from decay; however, as soon as it is melted down and forged into any form, the decay begins. The larger the item it is forged into, the quicker the onset and severity of the decay, as well as taking a penalty due to the forginig process.
The Decay
This is a base template for the decay. Size differences will change these properties:
- Immediately after forgining it is unchanged, and retains its amazing properties
- After a few weeks, it has lost both durability and some minor bit of its stregth.
As time goes on, it continues the decaying process, which only accelerates with time.
- After three months some twenty percent of its initial strength and durability, therein bringing it closer (but still quite superior) to more attainable, and less questionable, materials
- By the time six months have passed, it is almost identical to the next-best material; the accelerated decay process has now taken over fifty percent of the properties that originally made it special
The Size Penalty
- For small items, the decay rate is as described above. This would include the aforementioned cutlery, horseshoes, hammer and axe heads, and cooking pots/pans
- For medium items, the decay rate is quadrupled (4 times as severe). This would mean that after three months, an item has lost eighty percent of its initial strength and durability due to decay. As well, as soon as the item was completed, it would take a five percent forging penalty. That would put them item at only fifteen percent of its initial state.
- For large items, the decay rate is octupled (8 times as severe). This would mean that before even two months, the item would already be destroyed by the decay alone. As soon as the item was completed, however, it would take an immediate twenty-five percent forging penalty. This would effectively mean that the item would last barely one month. This would include armor, shields, or any wearable item. This would also fit into the game rules that exclude such items from being generally made from MGM
The Forging Requirement
- The metal requires very high skill and a massive amount of heat to forge
While this is likely not a perfect solution, I think it is a servicible one from a pseudo-chemistry standpoint. This would make it so that only the most powerful and rich people would be wealthy enough to even consider using this material. As well, their use would come at great cost to themselves. Considering the difficulty, expense, and relative short-term use of the metal for any practical application, the metal would be untenable for use. While it is easily attained, and anyone could use it, why would they? The combined difficulty of melting down the metal and forming it, along with the decay and forging penalties, makes it something that would be very hard to find any use for overall.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
The extraordinary property has no practical use (yet).
Whatever the property is, it'd have to be immediately recognizable, even as an ore. A visual property seems the most likely. People find a metal with, say, a rainbow-colored sheen to it, even while sitting in the ground. Immediately people would assume they've found something special, and try to figure out how to make money off of it.
For a brief period, before any details surface, there's a "gold fever" where people try to grab as much as they can of it. Demand skyrockets, as does the price.
Eventually the metal gets into the hands of scientists, who begin to analyze it. and at the end of the day, they discover that it's essentially oddly-colored aluminum. Some impurities in the ground, combined with trace elements in the water, result in the odd coloring. It doesn't make the metal stronger or more ductile, just...prettier.
Aside from a small market for costume jewelry, some local tourist trinkets, and people who want to show off, there's no benefit to making anything out of the metal. So it's got a small customer base of rich people who don't know what to do with their money, but otherwise, it's not worth the extra trouble. It may only be available in this one vein, but there's a lot of it.
Now, if you want to go long-term, it could be discovered much later that the metal has a higher electrical conductivity, or exhibits odd reactions in a magnetic field, something that makes it useful for certain scientific or industrial implementations many decades later. So suddenly the vein has a use, but people dug quite a bit of it up to make oddly colored horseshoes for the mayor's dressage team, and all of a sudden those items are more valuable for their material than their age as an antique.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
That material should be Wolfraam aka tungsten.
Since it can be used for very small stuff, but for large stuff it's hard to use because it's brittle, making it worthless
then maybe add the option of making an alloy of say titanium + tungsten if you want to use it for small/bigger stuff :D
anyway, maybe just adding the option to make stuff out of alloys in your game would make it better, though it might be hard because making an alloy has like at least 3 parameters, the quantity of each metal you use for the alloy, the metal properties, the reactions some metals have on eachother, which can also depend on many other variables like pressure, heat... and from all that you would need to calculate a bunch of variables for the created alloy.
besides that, many alloys haven't really been tested, since there are many alloys possible.
Someone should make an api for this if it doesn't exist already :D, would be nice for an application, even though implementing all real life variables would be like mission impossible.
Anyway, you could keep the variables limited for your game.
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It's not waterproof
When it gets wet, it dissolves. This makes it useless for quite a lot of purposes. Armor? Weapons? Hope you never have to fight in the rain... or in the heat where you sweat a lot. Mechanics? Maybe, but only for indoor use. Tableware? Why does my soup taste so metallic and why does my bowl start to leak all of a sudden? Currency? Say goodbye to your wealth when you drop your coin purse into a puddle. Canoe? Maybe you can coat it with waterproof paint, but if the coat gets scratched, you better be a good swimmer. Arts and jewelry? Maybe for an avant-garde artist who wants to make a point about the transience of material possessions and the perishability of beauty.
It doesn't even need to dissolve immediately. If it is susceptible to long-term exposure to moisture then this drawback might not be immediately apparent, but still be enough to make it useless for a lot of purposes.
If you need a scientific explanation for why a metal would be soluble: It might actually be a salt and not a metal. Or it might react chemically with water, like sodium (technically a metal, although it's far too soft for any engineering purpose).
If you wonder how it is possible for a soluble mineral to be found naturally in the ground:
rock salt exists- It might exist in some form of ore which is waterproof until it gets refined
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
It got superseded!
(Inspired by / adapted from the answer of @Cadence)
The metal A was immensely valuable because it has good physical properties and is scarce and hard to extract. The metal T, while abundant, was not considered because nobody knew how to work it.
Then people (maybe not everybody!) discovered the trick to work T (cheaply, maybe in nitrogen), and suddenly A is totally worthless because it is much more scarce than T and its physical properties are significantly less interesting.
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The metal includes the souls of demons which gives it its useful properties however while this metal is great for almost every use it has one draw back. If you put enough of it together the power in the metal combines and a demon can come out of your item leaving it as a worthless rusted mess of whatever it was
No one wants to form large weapons or armor of this metal as the last thing you need is at an inopportune moment your offense or defense becomes a creature bent on eating your soul. Many once thought that if they only had a shield coated in this metal or a sword that was alloyed with another metal it would be fine, and it was until people found that hitting a partly demon metal shield with a partly demon metal sword pretty reliably destroyed both and summoned an imp
Now as this metal is still great for ax head and knives people still use it every day, but no one wants armor made from it as one poke from the wrong knife and your expensive magic armor is now a demon that is craving human souls
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Its so strong, it's not really forgeable, its really heat resistant, so its has no field of use
Edited away:
OPT2:
The market has so much it costs nothing => wothless
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you're going high-fantasy, the metal is useless outside of the region it's found, due to magic. Of note, this doesn't make it completely useless - just impossible to export. So, your shield, bullet proof vest, etc all work - up to a radius of 20 miles from the veins. This could produce a rather distinctive local culture in time, perhaps a seat of government if the metal is useful enough. Projecting force would be difficult, but it could serve effectively as a defensive deterrent.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Oh hey, you're in luck -- there are a bunch of interesting story options to make the metal useless!
As a general theme, a metal is useful if it can be processed into tools and uses where it is more cost-effective (or much more capable, which is really the same thing) than any competing solution. Therefore we are looking to make it very expensive, or have a surprise drawback as a tool (eg. toxicity).
Flaws in MAKING the Tools
We prevent the metal being useful by making it prohibitively expensive or hard to make the tools. One of:
hard to mine the ore
The ore could be incredibly durable (thus too hard to get in usable amounts), or the mines unstable, or filled with toxic vapours
hard to refine the ore
eg. Aluminium. Bauxite ore is hard to get aluminium out of, requiring electrolysis or tedious chemical processing. This is why Napolean's fanciest cutlery was aluminium, and his medium set was gold.
hard to forge the metal into shapes
eg. Diamond jewellery didn't really exist in the Roman empire because they couldn't cut the damn things (emeralds preferred). There are similar, boring examples around titanium alloys in modern metallury, or how the industrial revolution was facilitated by new casting techniques that allowed for bigger iron structures.
Flaws in USING the Tools
You have defined the metal as having some wonderful physical properties, so it is clearly desirable on that basis.
However, there is another option that makes the metal a useless tool -- chemical and biological effects. Therefore you could:
Make it chemically unstable
The metal rapidly oxidises into a rust that, like iron rust, has a very different crystal structure to the original metal. This means the rust falls off and continually exposes new metal that also rusts (the opposite of aluminium). Thus all tools are prohibitively short-lived
Make it Toxic I: Poisonous
Like Mercury or Beryllium, this metal has salts that are toxic and will kill you unpleasantly. Not toxic enough to be immediately obvious, but clear enough that Dr.Macguffin knows and long-term use of the metal is not viable. Bonus points if the metal salt is absorbed through human skin, or causes sterility.
Make it Toxic II: Radioactive
Similar to toxicity, there is a wide range of radioactivity that is not immediately obvious, but as users and miners have collapsing immune systems and generally shit themselves to death en-route to systematic organ failure within a few weeks or months, it becomes very clear this metal is BAD NEWS.
So in conclusion, pick and choose! There are lots of ways that the metal can be made useless, and lots of ways that you can make a very interesting story with those ways :).
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
add a comment |
protected by James♦ Dec 6 at 5:51
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
19 Answers
19
active
oldest
votes
19 Answers
19
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
96
down vote
It turns out to be radioactive.
It's light, it's beautiful, it's strong.
... but anyone who carries or wears the metal for more than a very short period of time eventually gets sick.
This wasn't known during the initial gold rush and the metal was used to make various things... but eventually the people who handled it most or wore or carried pieces got sick and died leaving behind a town full of the sick families of former prospectors.
Short exposure isn't an issue... but don't even think about carrying chunks in your pack for weeks.
And anyone foolish enough to try to toy with this metal unprepared?
1
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
2
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
3
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
6
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
4
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
96
down vote
It turns out to be radioactive.
It's light, it's beautiful, it's strong.
... but anyone who carries or wears the metal for more than a very short period of time eventually gets sick.
This wasn't known during the initial gold rush and the metal was used to make various things... but eventually the people who handled it most or wore or carried pieces got sick and died leaving behind a town full of the sick families of former prospectors.
Short exposure isn't an issue... but don't even think about carrying chunks in your pack for weeks.
And anyone foolish enough to try to toy with this metal unprepared?
1
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
2
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
3
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
6
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
4
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
96
down vote
up vote
96
down vote
It turns out to be radioactive.
It's light, it's beautiful, it's strong.
... but anyone who carries or wears the metal for more than a very short period of time eventually gets sick.
This wasn't known during the initial gold rush and the metal was used to make various things... but eventually the people who handled it most or wore or carried pieces got sick and died leaving behind a town full of the sick families of former prospectors.
Short exposure isn't an issue... but don't even think about carrying chunks in your pack for weeks.
And anyone foolish enough to try to toy with this metal unprepared?
It turns out to be radioactive.
It's light, it's beautiful, it's strong.
... but anyone who carries or wears the metal for more than a very short period of time eventually gets sick.
This wasn't known during the initial gold rush and the metal was used to make various things... but eventually the people who handled it most or wore or carried pieces got sick and died leaving behind a town full of the sick families of former prospectors.
Short exposure isn't an issue... but don't even think about carrying chunks in your pack for weeks.
And anyone foolish enough to try to toy with this metal unprepared?
edited Dec 5 at 1:18
fe_alice
31
31
answered Dec 4 at 13:56
Murphy
23.8k14687
23.8k14687
1
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
2
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
3
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
6
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
4
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
|
show 5 more comments
1
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
2
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
3
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
6
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
4
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
1
1
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
Well with animaginary ratio of 1 Gy per kg of MGM. We have mortality that range from 1Gy = 6-8 Week to 30+Gy=1-2 Day. source
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:50
2
2
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
Nice scare photograph. You're aware that the picture was taken 11 years after his experimental phase, and is not typical of his appearance even at the time? He was apparently doing something to himself (and various drugs come to mind), but radiation, not so much. Since he was diagnosed in about 2000 as paranoid schizophrenic and bipolar, I'd guess that he got off his meds and did something to himself.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:20
3
3
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
Yes, "it was suspected". Unless the authorities were entirely incompetent, though, (and I cannot rule it out), his belongings and dwelling would have been radiologically surveyed, and any evidence that he was up to his old tricks would have been made public knowledge. No such presentations were made, which suggests very strongly that whatever caused those sores was not radiation. Radiation burns don't appear after 11 years.
– WhatRoughBeast
Dec 4 at 15:33
6
6
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
+2 to cancer risk, eh?
– user3490
Dec 5 at 14:19
4
4
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
A real life, and rather painful example of this is the Goiania Incident. Spoiler: the shortest (lead lined) caskets always weigh the heaviest.
– Cort Ammon
Dec 5 at 22:04
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
79
down vote
Titanium is actually a fascinating example standing by itself, because it's not that hard to find (it was identified as an element before 1800, and is the ninth-most abundant element in Earth's crust) but it's very difficult to work.
Titanium can't be shaped simply by heating it and pouring or working it like you might do with iron, steel, brass, or the like. The reason is chemical: pure titanium metal melts at 1668 °C (3034 °F). However, at about 1,200 °C (2,190 °F), it reacts with oxygen to form a variety of oxides. (The most common, titanium dioxide, is a valuable product in its own right; it's a very strong, bright white pigment and has other industrial uses.) If you try working with titanium the same way you would steel, it will literally burn up.
So in order to work with titanium, you need to work it under an inert atmosphere. Normally pure nitrogen is the go-to for industrial uses... but titanium will burn in nitrogen, too. You need an atmosphere made up of a noble gas, like argon. In this time period this might just about have been possible in a lab, on a very small scale, but it's still the better part of a century from industrial applications.
The one caveat is that most cold shaping methods will still work on titanium once it's purified. If you have an ingot of titanium metal, you can stamp it, roll it, carve it, ream it, etc. and it'll work okay. So it might be hard to justify not allowing your players to cut up your miracle door for body armor or the like, but they'll have a very limited amount to work with, and no way to make more.
3
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
1
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
41
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
2
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
22
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
79
down vote
Titanium is actually a fascinating example standing by itself, because it's not that hard to find (it was identified as an element before 1800, and is the ninth-most abundant element in Earth's crust) but it's very difficult to work.
Titanium can't be shaped simply by heating it and pouring or working it like you might do with iron, steel, brass, or the like. The reason is chemical: pure titanium metal melts at 1668 °C (3034 °F). However, at about 1,200 °C (2,190 °F), it reacts with oxygen to form a variety of oxides. (The most common, titanium dioxide, is a valuable product in its own right; it's a very strong, bright white pigment and has other industrial uses.) If you try working with titanium the same way you would steel, it will literally burn up.
So in order to work with titanium, you need to work it under an inert atmosphere. Normally pure nitrogen is the go-to for industrial uses... but titanium will burn in nitrogen, too. You need an atmosphere made up of a noble gas, like argon. In this time period this might just about have been possible in a lab, on a very small scale, but it's still the better part of a century from industrial applications.
The one caveat is that most cold shaping methods will still work on titanium once it's purified. If you have an ingot of titanium metal, you can stamp it, roll it, carve it, ream it, etc. and it'll work okay. So it might be hard to justify not allowing your players to cut up your miracle door for body armor or the like, but they'll have a very limited amount to work with, and no way to make more.
3
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
1
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
41
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
2
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
22
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
79
down vote
up vote
79
down vote
Titanium is actually a fascinating example standing by itself, because it's not that hard to find (it was identified as an element before 1800, and is the ninth-most abundant element in Earth's crust) but it's very difficult to work.
Titanium can't be shaped simply by heating it and pouring or working it like you might do with iron, steel, brass, or the like. The reason is chemical: pure titanium metal melts at 1668 °C (3034 °F). However, at about 1,200 °C (2,190 °F), it reacts with oxygen to form a variety of oxides. (The most common, titanium dioxide, is a valuable product in its own right; it's a very strong, bright white pigment and has other industrial uses.) If you try working with titanium the same way you would steel, it will literally burn up.
So in order to work with titanium, you need to work it under an inert atmosphere. Normally pure nitrogen is the go-to for industrial uses... but titanium will burn in nitrogen, too. You need an atmosphere made up of a noble gas, like argon. In this time period this might just about have been possible in a lab, on a very small scale, but it's still the better part of a century from industrial applications.
The one caveat is that most cold shaping methods will still work on titanium once it's purified. If you have an ingot of titanium metal, you can stamp it, roll it, carve it, ream it, etc. and it'll work okay. So it might be hard to justify not allowing your players to cut up your miracle door for body armor or the like, but they'll have a very limited amount to work with, and no way to make more.
Titanium is actually a fascinating example standing by itself, because it's not that hard to find (it was identified as an element before 1800, and is the ninth-most abundant element in Earth's crust) but it's very difficult to work.
Titanium can't be shaped simply by heating it and pouring or working it like you might do with iron, steel, brass, or the like. The reason is chemical: pure titanium metal melts at 1668 °C (3034 °F). However, at about 1,200 °C (2,190 °F), it reacts with oxygen to form a variety of oxides. (The most common, titanium dioxide, is a valuable product in its own right; it's a very strong, bright white pigment and has other industrial uses.) If you try working with titanium the same way you would steel, it will literally burn up.
So in order to work with titanium, you need to work it under an inert atmosphere. Normally pure nitrogen is the go-to for industrial uses... but titanium will burn in nitrogen, too. You need an atmosphere made up of a noble gas, like argon. In this time period this might just about have been possible in a lab, on a very small scale, but it's still the better part of a century from industrial applications.
The one caveat is that most cold shaping methods will still work on titanium once it's purified. If you have an ingot of titanium metal, you can stamp it, roll it, carve it, ream it, etc. and it'll work okay. So it might be hard to justify not allowing your players to cut up your miracle door for body armor or the like, but they'll have a very limited amount to work with, and no way to make more.
answered Dec 4 at 12:15
Cadence
12.7k52546
12.7k52546
3
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
1
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
41
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
2
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
22
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
|
show 6 more comments
3
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
1
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
41
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
2
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
22
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
3
3
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
I was thinking along this exact line -- the MGM is titanium, which is worthless in 19th century tech for these exact reasons (mainly, burns before it melts, so can't be purified by 19th century methods). This was the time when aluminum cost more per ounce than gold -- and pure aluminum is almost as soft as pure copper.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 4 at 12:48
1
1
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
To stop people from stealing I had "Something" behind it. They willl close the door and make sure it's in good shape.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:23
41
41
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
Lab full of nitrogen is a dull but dangerous place - nothing will go boom excitingly, but it's possible to quietly become unconscious and die.
– pjc50
Dec 4 at 13:28
2
2
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
I like this answer because it also adds the possibility of artifacts from the ancient advanced tribe made of it.
– BillThePlatypus
Dec 4 at 15:36
22
22
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
Nitrogen compounds are volatile because of how badly they want to go back to being nitrogen gas. It's like a big rock at the top of a hill. But nitrogen gas itself is the same rock at the bottom of the hill: totally stable and having no desire to go anywhere.
– Cadence
Dec 4 at 17:20
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
30
down vote
Absurdly strong metal! Well, in the current location/situation - for example, halfway up a snowy mountain.
Unfortunately, those properties change greatly with temperature - taking our "strong when cold" example, by 20°C it's soft, malleable, and can barely hold its own weight up. By 35°C it's completely melted. A good door for withstanding the elements in the cold, but no security against animals or hot weather.
(For reference: standard "room temperature" is about 18°C-22°C, and the Human Body temperature is typically around the 37°C mark)
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
3
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
1
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
30
down vote
Absurdly strong metal! Well, in the current location/situation - for example, halfway up a snowy mountain.
Unfortunately, those properties change greatly with temperature - taking our "strong when cold" example, by 20°C it's soft, malleable, and can barely hold its own weight up. By 35°C it's completely melted. A good door for withstanding the elements in the cold, but no security against animals or hot weather.
(For reference: standard "room temperature" is about 18°C-22°C, and the Human Body temperature is typically around the 37°C mark)
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
3
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
1
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
30
down vote
up vote
30
down vote
Absurdly strong metal! Well, in the current location/situation - for example, halfway up a snowy mountain.
Unfortunately, those properties change greatly with temperature - taking our "strong when cold" example, by 20°C it's soft, malleable, and can barely hold its own weight up. By 35°C it's completely melted. A good door for withstanding the elements in the cold, but no security against animals or hot weather.
(For reference: standard "room temperature" is about 18°C-22°C, and the Human Body temperature is typically around the 37°C mark)
Absurdly strong metal! Well, in the current location/situation - for example, halfway up a snowy mountain.
Unfortunately, those properties change greatly with temperature - taking our "strong when cold" example, by 20°C it's soft, malleable, and can barely hold its own weight up. By 35°C it's completely melted. A good door for withstanding the elements in the cold, but no security against animals or hot weather.
(For reference: standard "room temperature" is about 18°C-22°C, and the Human Body temperature is typically around the 37°C mark)
answered Dec 4 at 10:17
Chronocidal
3,925522
3,925522
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
3
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
1
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
add a comment |
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
3
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
1
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
I suspect there would be an instant fad for putting vaults and manufacturies into cold climates.
– Richard
Dec 4 at 20:54
3
3
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
The reverse of this is true for tin. It is good when warm but crumbles into "tin pest" when cold.
– Willk
Dec 5 at 1:21
1
1
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Richard that might be true, but how hard would it be for a would-be robber to bring a portable heat source to melt their way through?
– Philbo
Dec 5 at 15:17
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
@Philbo - To be honest, given that this metal has properties similar to titanium, I'm really at a loss why you wouldn't just use titanium :-)
– Richard
Dec 5 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
It reacts with certain common substances. As an example look at aluminum and mercury: https://youtu.be/IrdYueB9pY4
Imagine this kind of thing happening with something more common, like a certain mixture of water, or an abundant chemical that enemies could easily fetch and use. Your armor might be supa-dupa but if it someone throws a chemical at you and your armor/weapon falls apart or worse kills you... You dont want to be using it.
Edit: as another example of metals reacting with stuff, think Sodium (natrium). It's a metal, it's got weird properties (in this case bad, like being soft enough to cut with a kitchen knife) and it reacts heavily with water. Throw enough in and it'll even explode. "Hold on guys I have to take off my supa-dupa armor and put it in a water-proof bag, it's about to rain" :D
Dont know how to work it yet:
Simply put, they dont know how to use it properly. Pure aluminum is light and strong but sheers easily due to its molecular structure. Add copper to the mix to get construction aluminum and the copper molecules prevent the sheering (if properly cooled), even though copper is counter-intuitively weaker than aluminum it strengthens it! The bits and pieces they found and used were natural deposits of good and bad mixtures. And the only way to work it to the knowledge so far is to chip it into shape, severely limiting what you can make depending on the size of natural material you found. A knife could work, but a full armor...?
Its hard to work it.
As mentioned, Tungsten for example is hard to work. Not only does it form oxides when heating it up, but due to the temperature needed to melt it theres virtually nothing you can heat and contain it in! Its one of the reasons we know much less about Tungsten than other materials. It doesnt need to be that restrictive, but it can be so restrictive that only a handful of top-notch master craftsmen can make something out of it and even then theres a high failure rate. So the limiting factor isnt the material, but the expertise to work it. Who cares if you've got 50 metric tons of the stuff if 10 kilo's is enough for a master craftsman to make several attempts and build one armor and practically no one can afford it? This makes it worthless to most people.
2
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
It reacts with certain common substances. As an example look at aluminum and mercury: https://youtu.be/IrdYueB9pY4
Imagine this kind of thing happening with something more common, like a certain mixture of water, or an abundant chemical that enemies could easily fetch and use. Your armor might be supa-dupa but if it someone throws a chemical at you and your armor/weapon falls apart or worse kills you... You dont want to be using it.
Edit: as another example of metals reacting with stuff, think Sodium (natrium). It's a metal, it's got weird properties (in this case bad, like being soft enough to cut with a kitchen knife) and it reacts heavily with water. Throw enough in and it'll even explode. "Hold on guys I have to take off my supa-dupa armor and put it in a water-proof bag, it's about to rain" :D
Dont know how to work it yet:
Simply put, they dont know how to use it properly. Pure aluminum is light and strong but sheers easily due to its molecular structure. Add copper to the mix to get construction aluminum and the copper molecules prevent the sheering (if properly cooled), even though copper is counter-intuitively weaker than aluminum it strengthens it! The bits and pieces they found and used were natural deposits of good and bad mixtures. And the only way to work it to the knowledge so far is to chip it into shape, severely limiting what you can make depending on the size of natural material you found. A knife could work, but a full armor...?
Its hard to work it.
As mentioned, Tungsten for example is hard to work. Not only does it form oxides when heating it up, but due to the temperature needed to melt it theres virtually nothing you can heat and contain it in! Its one of the reasons we know much less about Tungsten than other materials. It doesnt need to be that restrictive, but it can be so restrictive that only a handful of top-notch master craftsmen can make something out of it and even then theres a high failure rate. So the limiting factor isnt the material, but the expertise to work it. Who cares if you've got 50 metric tons of the stuff if 10 kilo's is enough for a master craftsman to make several attempts and build one armor and practically no one can afford it? This makes it worthless to most people.
2
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
up vote
19
down vote
It reacts with certain common substances. As an example look at aluminum and mercury: https://youtu.be/IrdYueB9pY4
Imagine this kind of thing happening with something more common, like a certain mixture of water, or an abundant chemical that enemies could easily fetch and use. Your armor might be supa-dupa but if it someone throws a chemical at you and your armor/weapon falls apart or worse kills you... You dont want to be using it.
Edit: as another example of metals reacting with stuff, think Sodium (natrium). It's a metal, it's got weird properties (in this case bad, like being soft enough to cut with a kitchen knife) and it reacts heavily with water. Throw enough in and it'll even explode. "Hold on guys I have to take off my supa-dupa armor and put it in a water-proof bag, it's about to rain" :D
Dont know how to work it yet:
Simply put, they dont know how to use it properly. Pure aluminum is light and strong but sheers easily due to its molecular structure. Add copper to the mix to get construction aluminum and the copper molecules prevent the sheering (if properly cooled), even though copper is counter-intuitively weaker than aluminum it strengthens it! The bits and pieces they found and used were natural deposits of good and bad mixtures. And the only way to work it to the knowledge so far is to chip it into shape, severely limiting what you can make depending on the size of natural material you found. A knife could work, but a full armor...?
Its hard to work it.
As mentioned, Tungsten for example is hard to work. Not only does it form oxides when heating it up, but due to the temperature needed to melt it theres virtually nothing you can heat and contain it in! Its one of the reasons we know much less about Tungsten than other materials. It doesnt need to be that restrictive, but it can be so restrictive that only a handful of top-notch master craftsmen can make something out of it and even then theres a high failure rate. So the limiting factor isnt the material, but the expertise to work it. Who cares if you've got 50 metric tons of the stuff if 10 kilo's is enough for a master craftsman to make several attempts and build one armor and practically no one can afford it? This makes it worthless to most people.
It reacts with certain common substances. As an example look at aluminum and mercury: https://youtu.be/IrdYueB9pY4
Imagine this kind of thing happening with something more common, like a certain mixture of water, or an abundant chemical that enemies could easily fetch and use. Your armor might be supa-dupa but if it someone throws a chemical at you and your armor/weapon falls apart or worse kills you... You dont want to be using it.
Edit: as another example of metals reacting with stuff, think Sodium (natrium). It's a metal, it's got weird properties (in this case bad, like being soft enough to cut with a kitchen knife) and it reacts heavily with water. Throw enough in and it'll even explode. "Hold on guys I have to take off my supa-dupa armor and put it in a water-proof bag, it's about to rain" :D
Dont know how to work it yet:
Simply put, they dont know how to use it properly. Pure aluminum is light and strong but sheers easily due to its molecular structure. Add copper to the mix to get construction aluminum and the copper molecules prevent the sheering (if properly cooled), even though copper is counter-intuitively weaker than aluminum it strengthens it! The bits and pieces they found and used were natural deposits of good and bad mixtures. And the only way to work it to the knowledge so far is to chip it into shape, severely limiting what you can make depending on the size of natural material you found. A knife could work, but a full armor...?
Its hard to work it.
As mentioned, Tungsten for example is hard to work. Not only does it form oxides when heating it up, but due to the temperature needed to melt it theres virtually nothing you can heat and contain it in! Its one of the reasons we know much less about Tungsten than other materials. It doesnt need to be that restrictive, but it can be so restrictive that only a handful of top-notch master craftsmen can make something out of it and even then theres a high failure rate. So the limiting factor isnt the material, but the expertise to work it. Who cares if you've got 50 metric tons of the stuff if 10 kilo's is enough for a master craftsman to make several attempts and build one armor and practically no one can afford it? This makes it worthless to most people.
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 4 at 12:42
Demigan
6,4561434
6,4561434
2
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
add a comment |
2
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
2
2
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
Cthulhu tentacle coming out of your plated armor while you get cooked it by the exothermic reaction.. Loved it!
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 13:04
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
You have answer in your question:
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Thing it can be used for : horse thing, knife, small things with no impact from spoon to frypan
The metal is forgeable only in small sizes:
- It may be due to heat (very high temperature) it require to be shaped.
- it proprieties change with size, the more metal you have the more brittle/unstable it become
- Due to it's proprieties it react to much with it's surrounding. A revolver made with this metal don't allow bullets to leave the barrel. A shield reflect bullets but transfer kinetic energy multiplying it by the square size of shield. A canoe/boat/ship is attracted to the nearest large deposit of MGM rather than direction you want the ship to go.
And last thing. The "tool wear". In woodworking there are woods of different hardness. The hard ones are, well, the best but they wear the tools used to shape them. The saw are dull, chisel are made blunt.
Creating things from MGM destroy your tools. Using hammer and anvil on MGM is like using brass hammer on hard steel. The metal is not scarce, like gold, but creating usable things is not price reasonable. The jewellery made from that metal is costly but ONLY after the dozens of tools are destroyed in the process of making in. So the price comes from waste that was required to create MGM "thing" not from the MGM proprieties.
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
You have answer in your question:
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Thing it can be used for : horse thing, knife, small things with no impact from spoon to frypan
The metal is forgeable only in small sizes:
- It may be due to heat (very high temperature) it require to be shaped.
- it proprieties change with size, the more metal you have the more brittle/unstable it become
- Due to it's proprieties it react to much with it's surrounding. A revolver made with this metal don't allow bullets to leave the barrel. A shield reflect bullets but transfer kinetic energy multiplying it by the square size of shield. A canoe/boat/ship is attracted to the nearest large deposit of MGM rather than direction you want the ship to go.
And last thing. The "tool wear". In woodworking there are woods of different hardness. The hard ones are, well, the best but they wear the tools used to shape them. The saw are dull, chisel are made blunt.
Creating things from MGM destroy your tools. Using hammer and anvil on MGM is like using brass hammer on hard steel. The metal is not scarce, like gold, but creating usable things is not price reasonable. The jewellery made from that metal is costly but ONLY after the dozens of tools are destroyed in the process of making in. So the price comes from waste that was required to create MGM "thing" not from the MGM proprieties.
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
up vote
16
down vote
You have answer in your question:
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Thing it can be used for : horse thing, knife, small things with no impact from spoon to frypan
The metal is forgeable only in small sizes:
- It may be due to heat (very high temperature) it require to be shaped.
- it proprieties change with size, the more metal you have the more brittle/unstable it become
- Due to it's proprieties it react to much with it's surrounding. A revolver made with this metal don't allow bullets to leave the barrel. A shield reflect bullets but transfer kinetic energy multiplying it by the square size of shield. A canoe/boat/ship is attracted to the nearest large deposit of MGM rather than direction you want the ship to go.
And last thing. The "tool wear". In woodworking there are woods of different hardness. The hard ones are, well, the best but they wear the tools used to shape them. The saw are dull, chisel are made blunt.
Creating things from MGM destroy your tools. Using hammer and anvil on MGM is like using brass hammer on hard steel. The metal is not scarce, like gold, but creating usable things is not price reasonable. The jewellery made from that metal is costly but ONLY after the dozens of tools are destroyed in the process of making in. So the price comes from waste that was required to create MGM "thing" not from the MGM proprieties.
You have answer in your question:
No full armor or bullet proof vest, light canoe, shield etc.
Thing it can be used for : horse thing, knife, small things with no impact from spoon to frypan
The metal is forgeable only in small sizes:
- It may be due to heat (very high temperature) it require to be shaped.
- it proprieties change with size, the more metal you have the more brittle/unstable it become
- Due to it's proprieties it react to much with it's surrounding. A revolver made with this metal don't allow bullets to leave the barrel. A shield reflect bullets but transfer kinetic energy multiplying it by the square size of shield. A canoe/boat/ship is attracted to the nearest large deposit of MGM rather than direction you want the ship to go.
And last thing. The "tool wear". In woodworking there are woods of different hardness. The hard ones are, well, the best but they wear the tools used to shape them. The saw are dull, chisel are made blunt.
Creating things from MGM destroy your tools. Using hammer and anvil on MGM is like using brass hammer on hard steel. The metal is not scarce, like gold, but creating usable things is not price reasonable. The jewellery made from that metal is costly but ONLY after the dozens of tools are destroyed in the process of making in. So the price comes from waste that was required to create MGM "thing" not from the MGM proprieties.
answered Dec 4 at 10:29
SZCZERZO KŁY
15.7k22347
15.7k22347
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
add a comment |
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
Is there some reason you couldn't make MGM tools first, then use those to make jewelry?
– Karen
Dec 6 at 20:26
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
@Karen I would say it's because of the third point. MGM on MGM react different than known metals. Maybe you need to work on heated MGM so they would fuse with MGM tools. Or the cool MGM tools are so hard they destroy MGM you're working on. Kind like forged tools on brass.
– SZCZERZO KŁY
Dec 7 at 8:40
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
A lot of real-world metals are not intrinsically valuable (like gold is, due to its scarcity), but become valuable in the right context.
"Damascus steel" was once priceless, because it made the best swords, and most metalworkers had no idea how to produce it; but it was made from ordinary iron and carbon, so you wouldn't be rich just because you discovered the ore seams it was made from. The same is true of titanium and alumin(i)um, which can only be worked and/or refined with modern technology.
Conversely, many metals are scarce, but did not become valuable until people discovered uses for them (neodymium magnets, yttrium lasers, tantalum capacitors etc.). In 1870, an ingot of tantalum would certainly be expensive, but if you showed it to anyone their reaction would be "so what?"; today, the trade in tantalum fuels deadly conflict.
A fun idea might be if the MacGuffin metal was some kind of impressive alloy, but it melts at 36°C (perhaps it contains gallium). Getting to and from the town involves two days' travel through Death Valley, and because refrigeration doesn't exist, there's no way to stop the alloy melting on the way.
4
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
A lot of real-world metals are not intrinsically valuable (like gold is, due to its scarcity), but become valuable in the right context.
"Damascus steel" was once priceless, because it made the best swords, and most metalworkers had no idea how to produce it; but it was made from ordinary iron and carbon, so you wouldn't be rich just because you discovered the ore seams it was made from. The same is true of titanium and alumin(i)um, which can only be worked and/or refined with modern technology.
Conversely, many metals are scarce, but did not become valuable until people discovered uses for them (neodymium magnets, yttrium lasers, tantalum capacitors etc.). In 1870, an ingot of tantalum would certainly be expensive, but if you showed it to anyone their reaction would be "so what?"; today, the trade in tantalum fuels deadly conflict.
A fun idea might be if the MacGuffin metal was some kind of impressive alloy, but it melts at 36°C (perhaps it contains gallium). Getting to and from the town involves two days' travel through Death Valley, and because refrigeration doesn't exist, there's no way to stop the alloy melting on the way.
4
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
A lot of real-world metals are not intrinsically valuable (like gold is, due to its scarcity), but become valuable in the right context.
"Damascus steel" was once priceless, because it made the best swords, and most metalworkers had no idea how to produce it; but it was made from ordinary iron and carbon, so you wouldn't be rich just because you discovered the ore seams it was made from. The same is true of titanium and alumin(i)um, which can only be worked and/or refined with modern technology.
Conversely, many metals are scarce, but did not become valuable until people discovered uses for them (neodymium magnets, yttrium lasers, tantalum capacitors etc.). In 1870, an ingot of tantalum would certainly be expensive, but if you showed it to anyone their reaction would be "so what?"; today, the trade in tantalum fuels deadly conflict.
A fun idea might be if the MacGuffin metal was some kind of impressive alloy, but it melts at 36°C (perhaps it contains gallium). Getting to and from the town involves two days' travel through Death Valley, and because refrigeration doesn't exist, there's no way to stop the alloy melting on the way.
A lot of real-world metals are not intrinsically valuable (like gold is, due to its scarcity), but become valuable in the right context.
"Damascus steel" was once priceless, because it made the best swords, and most metalworkers had no idea how to produce it; but it was made from ordinary iron and carbon, so you wouldn't be rich just because you discovered the ore seams it was made from. The same is true of titanium and alumin(i)um, which can only be worked and/or refined with modern technology.
Conversely, many metals are scarce, but did not become valuable until people discovered uses for them (neodymium magnets, yttrium lasers, tantalum capacitors etc.). In 1870, an ingot of tantalum would certainly be expensive, but if you showed it to anyone their reaction would be "so what?"; today, the trade in tantalum fuels deadly conflict.
A fun idea might be if the MacGuffin metal was some kind of impressive alloy, but it melts at 36°C (perhaps it contains gallium). Getting to and from the town involves two days' travel through Death Valley, and because refrigeration doesn't exist, there's no way to stop the alloy melting on the way.
answered Dec 4 at 13:38
bobtato
2,578515
2,578515
4
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
add a comment |
4
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
4
4
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
Interestingly enough, Damascus steel isn't actually better than modern steels - the layering just made it possible to use crappier steel stronger.
– Wayne Werner
Dec 4 at 15:03
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
It's weak to copper*
MGM is great. Relatively abundant. Easy to work in its raw state. But after purified and tempered, it is as light as aluminum and stronger than steel or titanium.
The problem is it is weak to copper. A copper knife will go through it like a hot knife through warm butter. Heck, a copper coin will go through it as easily as a knife. It might be a great metal, but if one can cut through it wil pocket change, it's not terribly useful.
Now from a scientific standpoint it isn't 'weak' to copper. It is highly reactive with copper. If any copper comes in contact with it, it will immediately form Cu2MGM20, a dodecahedron of MGM atoms around two copper atoms. And the new compound won't react with anything else. It just flakes away as dust, leaving it looking like the copper cut through the MGM. And it's a pain in the neck to split the molecules up again. Since it is a 10 to 1 reaction, one pound of copper will destroy 10 pounds of MGM (assuming they have similar atomic mass), or a copper dagger will only lose a thin layer in cutting through a door, armor, or sword. Gold and silver, also being in the precious metals series, may have a similar or reduced reaction with MGM.
*You could choose a different metal (metal column) instead of copper. Cobalt, nickel, and zinc might work; they are just less likely to be commonly carried (copper being common for coins) and thus discovered as the weakness.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
It's weak to copper*
MGM is great. Relatively abundant. Easy to work in its raw state. But after purified and tempered, it is as light as aluminum and stronger than steel or titanium.
The problem is it is weak to copper. A copper knife will go through it like a hot knife through warm butter. Heck, a copper coin will go through it as easily as a knife. It might be a great metal, but if one can cut through it wil pocket change, it's not terribly useful.
Now from a scientific standpoint it isn't 'weak' to copper. It is highly reactive with copper. If any copper comes in contact with it, it will immediately form Cu2MGM20, a dodecahedron of MGM atoms around two copper atoms. And the new compound won't react with anything else. It just flakes away as dust, leaving it looking like the copper cut through the MGM. And it's a pain in the neck to split the molecules up again. Since it is a 10 to 1 reaction, one pound of copper will destroy 10 pounds of MGM (assuming they have similar atomic mass), or a copper dagger will only lose a thin layer in cutting through a door, armor, or sword. Gold and silver, also being in the precious metals series, may have a similar or reduced reaction with MGM.
*You could choose a different metal (metal column) instead of copper. Cobalt, nickel, and zinc might work; they are just less likely to be commonly carried (copper being common for coins) and thus discovered as the weakness.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
It's weak to copper*
MGM is great. Relatively abundant. Easy to work in its raw state. But after purified and tempered, it is as light as aluminum and stronger than steel or titanium.
The problem is it is weak to copper. A copper knife will go through it like a hot knife through warm butter. Heck, a copper coin will go through it as easily as a knife. It might be a great metal, but if one can cut through it wil pocket change, it's not terribly useful.
Now from a scientific standpoint it isn't 'weak' to copper. It is highly reactive with copper. If any copper comes in contact with it, it will immediately form Cu2MGM20, a dodecahedron of MGM atoms around two copper atoms. And the new compound won't react with anything else. It just flakes away as dust, leaving it looking like the copper cut through the MGM. And it's a pain in the neck to split the molecules up again. Since it is a 10 to 1 reaction, one pound of copper will destroy 10 pounds of MGM (assuming they have similar atomic mass), or a copper dagger will only lose a thin layer in cutting through a door, armor, or sword. Gold and silver, also being in the precious metals series, may have a similar or reduced reaction with MGM.
*You could choose a different metal (metal column) instead of copper. Cobalt, nickel, and zinc might work; they are just less likely to be commonly carried (copper being common for coins) and thus discovered as the weakness.
It's weak to copper*
MGM is great. Relatively abundant. Easy to work in its raw state. But after purified and tempered, it is as light as aluminum and stronger than steel or titanium.
The problem is it is weak to copper. A copper knife will go through it like a hot knife through warm butter. Heck, a copper coin will go through it as easily as a knife. It might be a great metal, but if one can cut through it wil pocket change, it's not terribly useful.
Now from a scientific standpoint it isn't 'weak' to copper. It is highly reactive with copper. If any copper comes in contact with it, it will immediately form Cu2MGM20, a dodecahedron of MGM atoms around two copper atoms. And the new compound won't react with anything else. It just flakes away as dust, leaving it looking like the copper cut through the MGM. And it's a pain in the neck to split the molecules up again. Since it is a 10 to 1 reaction, one pound of copper will destroy 10 pounds of MGM (assuming they have similar atomic mass), or a copper dagger will only lose a thin layer in cutting through a door, armor, or sword. Gold and silver, also being in the precious metals series, may have a similar or reduced reaction with MGM.
*You could choose a different metal (metal column) instead of copper. Cobalt, nickel, and zinc might work; they are just less likely to be commonly carried (copper being common for coins) and thus discovered as the weakness.
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 6 at 0:39
Xavon_Wrentaile
3,263819
3,263819
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
The Titanium answer is a good one, but I'd like to offer some other possibilities: radioactively dangerous to be around.
A real world example is Mag-Thor, which is only slightly radioactive but still needs special handling. If the magic metal is fairly "hot" radioactive, it will cause visible injuries, sickness and death fairly quickly. That discourages people from trying to make bulletproof vests out of it.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
The Titanium answer is a good one, but I'd like to offer some other possibilities: radioactively dangerous to be around.
A real world example is Mag-Thor, which is only slightly radioactive but still needs special handling. If the magic metal is fairly "hot" radioactive, it will cause visible injuries, sickness and death fairly quickly. That discourages people from trying to make bulletproof vests out of it.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
The Titanium answer is a good one, but I'd like to offer some other possibilities: radioactively dangerous to be around.
A real world example is Mag-Thor, which is only slightly radioactive but still needs special handling. If the magic metal is fairly "hot" radioactive, it will cause visible injuries, sickness and death fairly quickly. That discourages people from trying to make bulletproof vests out of it.
The Titanium answer is a good one, but I'd like to offer some other possibilities: radioactively dangerous to be around.
A real world example is Mag-Thor, which is only slightly radioactive but still needs special handling. If the magic metal is fairly "hot" radioactive, it will cause visible injuries, sickness and death fairly quickly. That discourages people from trying to make bulletproof vests out of it.
answered Dec 4 at 13:54
pjc50
4,128723
4,128723
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
The properties aren't that much better
Sure, it's lighter than aluminium and stronger than steel. But it's only 20% lighter and 20% stronger.
The metal has some disadvantages too.
It's got, say, poor fatigue properties. Oh, you didn't notice when it was a door, but it you made a sword out of this you'd be replacing it constantly.
In the 17th century, the British Royal Navy found that ships with lead or copper plating would have iron bolts and nails disintegrate quickly. MGM is similar; if you make armour with an MGM sheet and steel rivets, it's very prone to corrosion.
And it's expensive to produce.
Aluminium is found in an ore called Bauxite which is very common - but expensive amounts of energy are needed to extract the aluminium from the ore, even with modern techniques. Back in 1845, before modern extraction techniques were invented, aluminium cost more than gold.
MGM is the same way. You've found the ore and that the refined it has these good properties, but it's going to cost a lot more than steel because of the amount of, say, potassium you need to extract the metal from the ore.
Difficult to make it consistent, too
For some reason, eight out of ten batches of the metal just don't perform well. And you don't figure that out until right at the end of the manufacturing process, when your armour just isn't as strong as it should be in certain places. Dr MacGuffin thinks the boron used in refining tends to clump together, even though it's the best anyone can make, or possibly that the horse urine was gathered too late in the day. Anyway, the science of the day hasn't been able to solve the problem.
Did I mention it's expensive to process?
If you get MGM red hot in a forge, it reacts with air and gets less strong. It ends up less strong than steel, in fact. For it to keep its strength you have to stop the air getting to it, by processing it in a bath of argon. So you can do it, but your world's existing blacksmiths generally can't work with it. They'd need new equipment which is very expensive.
Oh, and someone else has patented the only extraction process that works
Tycoon Tom has a patent on the only MGM extraction techniques that seem to work well, and he's got big investments in steel mills. He's not really looking to let anyone use his patents. And your setting has very strict intellectual property laws.
Plus it's classified
The government thinks MGM has such important military applications, it's a state secret. All details about it are born secret, even if you discover them without seeing anything secret yourself. The secret applications are mostly in large artillery shell casings, so the properties that make it militarily useful aren't helpful for making swords or anything.
All things considered, its advantages aren't big enough to outweigh the cost and problems.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
The properties aren't that much better
Sure, it's lighter than aluminium and stronger than steel. But it's only 20% lighter and 20% stronger.
The metal has some disadvantages too.
It's got, say, poor fatigue properties. Oh, you didn't notice when it was a door, but it you made a sword out of this you'd be replacing it constantly.
In the 17th century, the British Royal Navy found that ships with lead or copper plating would have iron bolts and nails disintegrate quickly. MGM is similar; if you make armour with an MGM sheet and steel rivets, it's very prone to corrosion.
And it's expensive to produce.
Aluminium is found in an ore called Bauxite which is very common - but expensive amounts of energy are needed to extract the aluminium from the ore, even with modern techniques. Back in 1845, before modern extraction techniques were invented, aluminium cost more than gold.
MGM is the same way. You've found the ore and that the refined it has these good properties, but it's going to cost a lot more than steel because of the amount of, say, potassium you need to extract the metal from the ore.
Difficult to make it consistent, too
For some reason, eight out of ten batches of the metal just don't perform well. And you don't figure that out until right at the end of the manufacturing process, when your armour just isn't as strong as it should be in certain places. Dr MacGuffin thinks the boron used in refining tends to clump together, even though it's the best anyone can make, or possibly that the horse urine was gathered too late in the day. Anyway, the science of the day hasn't been able to solve the problem.
Did I mention it's expensive to process?
If you get MGM red hot in a forge, it reacts with air and gets less strong. It ends up less strong than steel, in fact. For it to keep its strength you have to stop the air getting to it, by processing it in a bath of argon. So you can do it, but your world's existing blacksmiths generally can't work with it. They'd need new equipment which is very expensive.
Oh, and someone else has patented the only extraction process that works
Tycoon Tom has a patent on the only MGM extraction techniques that seem to work well, and he's got big investments in steel mills. He's not really looking to let anyone use his patents. And your setting has very strict intellectual property laws.
Plus it's classified
The government thinks MGM has such important military applications, it's a state secret. All details about it are born secret, even if you discover them without seeing anything secret yourself. The secret applications are mostly in large artillery shell casings, so the properties that make it militarily useful aren't helpful for making swords or anything.
All things considered, its advantages aren't big enough to outweigh the cost and problems.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
The properties aren't that much better
Sure, it's lighter than aluminium and stronger than steel. But it's only 20% lighter and 20% stronger.
The metal has some disadvantages too.
It's got, say, poor fatigue properties. Oh, you didn't notice when it was a door, but it you made a sword out of this you'd be replacing it constantly.
In the 17th century, the British Royal Navy found that ships with lead or copper plating would have iron bolts and nails disintegrate quickly. MGM is similar; if you make armour with an MGM sheet and steel rivets, it's very prone to corrosion.
And it's expensive to produce.
Aluminium is found in an ore called Bauxite which is very common - but expensive amounts of energy are needed to extract the aluminium from the ore, even with modern techniques. Back in 1845, before modern extraction techniques were invented, aluminium cost more than gold.
MGM is the same way. You've found the ore and that the refined it has these good properties, but it's going to cost a lot more than steel because of the amount of, say, potassium you need to extract the metal from the ore.
Difficult to make it consistent, too
For some reason, eight out of ten batches of the metal just don't perform well. And you don't figure that out until right at the end of the manufacturing process, when your armour just isn't as strong as it should be in certain places. Dr MacGuffin thinks the boron used in refining tends to clump together, even though it's the best anyone can make, or possibly that the horse urine was gathered too late in the day. Anyway, the science of the day hasn't been able to solve the problem.
Did I mention it's expensive to process?
If you get MGM red hot in a forge, it reacts with air and gets less strong. It ends up less strong than steel, in fact. For it to keep its strength you have to stop the air getting to it, by processing it in a bath of argon. So you can do it, but your world's existing blacksmiths generally can't work with it. They'd need new equipment which is very expensive.
Oh, and someone else has patented the only extraction process that works
Tycoon Tom has a patent on the only MGM extraction techniques that seem to work well, and he's got big investments in steel mills. He's not really looking to let anyone use his patents. And your setting has very strict intellectual property laws.
Plus it's classified
The government thinks MGM has such important military applications, it's a state secret. All details about it are born secret, even if you discover them without seeing anything secret yourself. The secret applications are mostly in large artillery shell casings, so the properties that make it militarily useful aren't helpful for making swords or anything.
All things considered, its advantages aren't big enough to outweigh the cost and problems.
The properties aren't that much better
Sure, it's lighter than aluminium and stronger than steel. But it's only 20% lighter and 20% stronger.
The metal has some disadvantages too.
It's got, say, poor fatigue properties. Oh, you didn't notice when it was a door, but it you made a sword out of this you'd be replacing it constantly.
In the 17th century, the British Royal Navy found that ships with lead or copper plating would have iron bolts and nails disintegrate quickly. MGM is similar; if you make armour with an MGM sheet and steel rivets, it's very prone to corrosion.
And it's expensive to produce.
Aluminium is found in an ore called Bauxite which is very common - but expensive amounts of energy are needed to extract the aluminium from the ore, even with modern techniques. Back in 1845, before modern extraction techniques were invented, aluminium cost more than gold.
MGM is the same way. You've found the ore and that the refined it has these good properties, but it's going to cost a lot more than steel because of the amount of, say, potassium you need to extract the metal from the ore.
Difficult to make it consistent, too
For some reason, eight out of ten batches of the metal just don't perform well. And you don't figure that out until right at the end of the manufacturing process, when your armour just isn't as strong as it should be in certain places. Dr MacGuffin thinks the boron used in refining tends to clump together, even though it's the best anyone can make, or possibly that the horse urine was gathered too late in the day. Anyway, the science of the day hasn't been able to solve the problem.
Did I mention it's expensive to process?
If you get MGM red hot in a forge, it reacts with air and gets less strong. It ends up less strong than steel, in fact. For it to keep its strength you have to stop the air getting to it, by processing it in a bath of argon. So you can do it, but your world's existing blacksmiths generally can't work with it. They'd need new equipment which is very expensive.
Oh, and someone else has patented the only extraction process that works
Tycoon Tom has a patent on the only MGM extraction techniques that seem to work well, and he's got big investments in steel mills. He's not really looking to let anyone use his patents. And your setting has very strict intellectual property laws.
Plus it's classified
The government thinks MGM has such important military applications, it's a state secret. All details about it are born secret, even if you discover them without seeing anything secret yourself. The secret applications are mostly in large artillery shell casings, so the properties that make it militarily useful aren't helpful for making swords or anything.
All things considered, its advantages aren't big enough to outweigh the cost and problems.
edited Dec 6 at 0:15
answered Dec 6 at 0:02
mjt
67945
67945
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
It never had any value to begin with.
It was a product where the marketing got ahead of the development.
Some smooth talking salesman found himself in possession of the stuff, silver-tongued his way through a huge sale by promising all sorts of valuable properties to the metal, and it caught on. The material started changing hands, shot up in value as a untested commodity because it's so shiny, it has to be great, right?
Large organizations (banks, corporations, government factions) caught wind of the hype and started "Go west, young man" campaigns to get cheap labor in on the ground floor. Promises of wealth and a solid career in the MGM industry brought lots of men and women out to seek their fortune. Soon warehouses all over the map were full of the stuff.
Then the metallurgists got a few samples. People were bringing in nuggets, ingots, anything they could get. All were asking for the miracle devices they were promised to be crafted. Weapons, armor, machine parts, the works.
It turns out it is only useful as an alloy to other metals, usually metals that are so scarce, large-scale practical uses are too far out of scope for the amount of materials any one person or organization can realistically possess. However, the metallic mix is close to 80% MGM and 20% Unobtainium.
Or the process of making the alloy is so time consuming or dangerous to not be worth the effort.
Either way, many small trinkets exist, horseshoes, ashtrays. Whispers exist of a family that has an entire cutlery set made from MGM and Unobtainium (Or just plain MGM if that's what you go for, if so, ignore the next paragraph).
Because of the scarcity of the Unobtainium, MGM values have plummeted to nil. Sure, some people still run mining ventures because the occasional investor can be duped into thinking that when Unobtainium becomes Scarce-but-still-possible-to-obtainium the future of MGM will blow through the roof.
As for now, the abundant surplus of MGM sits uselessly in warehouses, frequently in ghost towns. The value of the material is so low it's not worth paying a few laborers a day's work to move the stock.
The door the party encounters is clearly made of either masterfully crafted MGM or the 80/20 mix.
New contributor
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
It never had any value to begin with.
It was a product where the marketing got ahead of the development.
Some smooth talking salesman found himself in possession of the stuff, silver-tongued his way through a huge sale by promising all sorts of valuable properties to the metal, and it caught on. The material started changing hands, shot up in value as a untested commodity because it's so shiny, it has to be great, right?
Large organizations (banks, corporations, government factions) caught wind of the hype and started "Go west, young man" campaigns to get cheap labor in on the ground floor. Promises of wealth and a solid career in the MGM industry brought lots of men and women out to seek their fortune. Soon warehouses all over the map were full of the stuff.
Then the metallurgists got a few samples. People were bringing in nuggets, ingots, anything they could get. All were asking for the miracle devices they were promised to be crafted. Weapons, armor, machine parts, the works.
It turns out it is only useful as an alloy to other metals, usually metals that are so scarce, large-scale practical uses are too far out of scope for the amount of materials any one person or organization can realistically possess. However, the metallic mix is close to 80% MGM and 20% Unobtainium.
Or the process of making the alloy is so time consuming or dangerous to not be worth the effort.
Either way, many small trinkets exist, horseshoes, ashtrays. Whispers exist of a family that has an entire cutlery set made from MGM and Unobtainium (Or just plain MGM if that's what you go for, if so, ignore the next paragraph).
Because of the scarcity of the Unobtainium, MGM values have plummeted to nil. Sure, some people still run mining ventures because the occasional investor can be duped into thinking that when Unobtainium becomes Scarce-but-still-possible-to-obtainium the future of MGM will blow through the roof.
As for now, the abundant surplus of MGM sits uselessly in warehouses, frequently in ghost towns. The value of the material is so low it's not worth paying a few laborers a day's work to move the stock.
The door the party encounters is clearly made of either masterfully crafted MGM or the 80/20 mix.
New contributor
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
It never had any value to begin with.
It was a product where the marketing got ahead of the development.
Some smooth talking salesman found himself in possession of the stuff, silver-tongued his way through a huge sale by promising all sorts of valuable properties to the metal, and it caught on. The material started changing hands, shot up in value as a untested commodity because it's so shiny, it has to be great, right?
Large organizations (banks, corporations, government factions) caught wind of the hype and started "Go west, young man" campaigns to get cheap labor in on the ground floor. Promises of wealth and a solid career in the MGM industry brought lots of men and women out to seek their fortune. Soon warehouses all over the map were full of the stuff.
Then the metallurgists got a few samples. People were bringing in nuggets, ingots, anything they could get. All were asking for the miracle devices they were promised to be crafted. Weapons, armor, machine parts, the works.
It turns out it is only useful as an alloy to other metals, usually metals that are so scarce, large-scale practical uses are too far out of scope for the amount of materials any one person or organization can realistically possess. However, the metallic mix is close to 80% MGM and 20% Unobtainium.
Or the process of making the alloy is so time consuming or dangerous to not be worth the effort.
Either way, many small trinkets exist, horseshoes, ashtrays. Whispers exist of a family that has an entire cutlery set made from MGM and Unobtainium (Or just plain MGM if that's what you go for, if so, ignore the next paragraph).
Because of the scarcity of the Unobtainium, MGM values have plummeted to nil. Sure, some people still run mining ventures because the occasional investor can be duped into thinking that when Unobtainium becomes Scarce-but-still-possible-to-obtainium the future of MGM will blow through the roof.
As for now, the abundant surplus of MGM sits uselessly in warehouses, frequently in ghost towns. The value of the material is so low it's not worth paying a few laborers a day's work to move the stock.
The door the party encounters is clearly made of either masterfully crafted MGM or the 80/20 mix.
New contributor
It never had any value to begin with.
It was a product where the marketing got ahead of the development.
Some smooth talking salesman found himself in possession of the stuff, silver-tongued his way through a huge sale by promising all sorts of valuable properties to the metal, and it caught on. The material started changing hands, shot up in value as a untested commodity because it's so shiny, it has to be great, right?
Large organizations (banks, corporations, government factions) caught wind of the hype and started "Go west, young man" campaigns to get cheap labor in on the ground floor. Promises of wealth and a solid career in the MGM industry brought lots of men and women out to seek their fortune. Soon warehouses all over the map were full of the stuff.
Then the metallurgists got a few samples. People were bringing in nuggets, ingots, anything they could get. All were asking for the miracle devices they were promised to be crafted. Weapons, armor, machine parts, the works.
It turns out it is only useful as an alloy to other metals, usually metals that are so scarce, large-scale practical uses are too far out of scope for the amount of materials any one person or organization can realistically possess. However, the metallic mix is close to 80% MGM and 20% Unobtainium.
Or the process of making the alloy is so time consuming or dangerous to not be worth the effort.
Either way, many small trinkets exist, horseshoes, ashtrays. Whispers exist of a family that has an entire cutlery set made from MGM and Unobtainium (Or just plain MGM if that's what you go for, if so, ignore the next paragraph).
Because of the scarcity of the Unobtainium, MGM values have plummeted to nil. Sure, some people still run mining ventures because the occasional investor can be duped into thinking that when Unobtainium becomes Scarce-but-still-possible-to-obtainium the future of MGM will blow through the roof.
As for now, the abundant surplus of MGM sits uselessly in warehouses, frequently in ghost towns. The value of the material is so low it's not worth paying a few laborers a day's work to move the stock.
The door the party encounters is clearly made of either masterfully crafted MGM or the 80/20 mix.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Dec 4 at 22:57
Emmitt Nervend
511
511
New contributor
New contributor
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
add a comment |
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
In the first paragraph, I wasn't sure whether you talk directly about diamonds, or you use that approach to end up with a metal! De Beers - converting small amounts of hard dirt into large amounts of equally hard cash.
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:43
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
What if the metal had an inherent, impossible to counteract, and nigh-impossible to slow, decay rate (non-radioactive). When it is in ore form, it is stable and prevented from decay; however, as soon as it is melted down and forged into any form, the decay begins. The larger the item it is forged into, the quicker the onset and severity of the decay, as well as taking a penalty due to the forginig process.
The Decay
This is a base template for the decay. Size differences will change these properties:
- Immediately after forgining it is unchanged, and retains its amazing properties
- After a few weeks, it has lost both durability and some minor bit of its stregth.
As time goes on, it continues the decaying process, which only accelerates with time.
- After three months some twenty percent of its initial strength and durability, therein bringing it closer (but still quite superior) to more attainable, and less questionable, materials
- By the time six months have passed, it is almost identical to the next-best material; the accelerated decay process has now taken over fifty percent of the properties that originally made it special
The Size Penalty
- For small items, the decay rate is as described above. This would include the aforementioned cutlery, horseshoes, hammer and axe heads, and cooking pots/pans
- For medium items, the decay rate is quadrupled (4 times as severe). This would mean that after three months, an item has lost eighty percent of its initial strength and durability due to decay. As well, as soon as the item was completed, it would take a five percent forging penalty. That would put them item at only fifteen percent of its initial state.
- For large items, the decay rate is octupled (8 times as severe). This would mean that before even two months, the item would already be destroyed by the decay alone. As soon as the item was completed, however, it would take an immediate twenty-five percent forging penalty. This would effectively mean that the item would last barely one month. This would include armor, shields, or any wearable item. This would also fit into the game rules that exclude such items from being generally made from MGM
The Forging Requirement
- The metal requires very high skill and a massive amount of heat to forge
While this is likely not a perfect solution, I think it is a servicible one from a pseudo-chemistry standpoint. This would make it so that only the most powerful and rich people would be wealthy enough to even consider using this material. As well, their use would come at great cost to themselves. Considering the difficulty, expense, and relative short-term use of the metal for any practical application, the metal would be untenable for use. While it is easily attained, and anyone could use it, why would they? The combined difficulty of melting down the metal and forming it, along with the decay and forging penalties, makes it something that would be very hard to find any use for overall.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
What if the metal had an inherent, impossible to counteract, and nigh-impossible to slow, decay rate (non-radioactive). When it is in ore form, it is stable and prevented from decay; however, as soon as it is melted down and forged into any form, the decay begins. The larger the item it is forged into, the quicker the onset and severity of the decay, as well as taking a penalty due to the forginig process.
The Decay
This is a base template for the decay. Size differences will change these properties:
- Immediately after forgining it is unchanged, and retains its amazing properties
- After a few weeks, it has lost both durability and some minor bit of its stregth.
As time goes on, it continues the decaying process, which only accelerates with time.
- After three months some twenty percent of its initial strength and durability, therein bringing it closer (but still quite superior) to more attainable, and less questionable, materials
- By the time six months have passed, it is almost identical to the next-best material; the accelerated decay process has now taken over fifty percent of the properties that originally made it special
The Size Penalty
- For small items, the decay rate is as described above. This would include the aforementioned cutlery, horseshoes, hammer and axe heads, and cooking pots/pans
- For medium items, the decay rate is quadrupled (4 times as severe). This would mean that after three months, an item has lost eighty percent of its initial strength and durability due to decay. As well, as soon as the item was completed, it would take a five percent forging penalty. That would put them item at only fifteen percent of its initial state.
- For large items, the decay rate is octupled (8 times as severe). This would mean that before even two months, the item would already be destroyed by the decay alone. As soon as the item was completed, however, it would take an immediate twenty-five percent forging penalty. This would effectively mean that the item would last barely one month. This would include armor, shields, or any wearable item. This would also fit into the game rules that exclude such items from being generally made from MGM
The Forging Requirement
- The metal requires very high skill and a massive amount of heat to forge
While this is likely not a perfect solution, I think it is a servicible one from a pseudo-chemistry standpoint. This would make it so that only the most powerful and rich people would be wealthy enough to even consider using this material. As well, their use would come at great cost to themselves. Considering the difficulty, expense, and relative short-term use of the metal for any practical application, the metal would be untenable for use. While it is easily attained, and anyone could use it, why would they? The combined difficulty of melting down the metal and forming it, along with the decay and forging penalties, makes it something that would be very hard to find any use for overall.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
What if the metal had an inherent, impossible to counteract, and nigh-impossible to slow, decay rate (non-radioactive). When it is in ore form, it is stable and prevented from decay; however, as soon as it is melted down and forged into any form, the decay begins. The larger the item it is forged into, the quicker the onset and severity of the decay, as well as taking a penalty due to the forginig process.
The Decay
This is a base template for the decay. Size differences will change these properties:
- Immediately after forgining it is unchanged, and retains its amazing properties
- After a few weeks, it has lost both durability and some minor bit of its stregth.
As time goes on, it continues the decaying process, which only accelerates with time.
- After three months some twenty percent of its initial strength and durability, therein bringing it closer (but still quite superior) to more attainable, and less questionable, materials
- By the time six months have passed, it is almost identical to the next-best material; the accelerated decay process has now taken over fifty percent of the properties that originally made it special
The Size Penalty
- For small items, the decay rate is as described above. This would include the aforementioned cutlery, horseshoes, hammer and axe heads, and cooking pots/pans
- For medium items, the decay rate is quadrupled (4 times as severe). This would mean that after three months, an item has lost eighty percent of its initial strength and durability due to decay. As well, as soon as the item was completed, it would take a five percent forging penalty. That would put them item at only fifteen percent of its initial state.
- For large items, the decay rate is octupled (8 times as severe). This would mean that before even two months, the item would already be destroyed by the decay alone. As soon as the item was completed, however, it would take an immediate twenty-five percent forging penalty. This would effectively mean that the item would last barely one month. This would include armor, shields, or any wearable item. This would also fit into the game rules that exclude such items from being generally made from MGM
The Forging Requirement
- The metal requires very high skill and a massive amount of heat to forge
While this is likely not a perfect solution, I think it is a servicible one from a pseudo-chemistry standpoint. This would make it so that only the most powerful and rich people would be wealthy enough to even consider using this material. As well, their use would come at great cost to themselves. Considering the difficulty, expense, and relative short-term use of the metal for any practical application, the metal would be untenable for use. While it is easily attained, and anyone could use it, why would they? The combined difficulty of melting down the metal and forming it, along with the decay and forging penalties, makes it something that would be very hard to find any use for overall.
New contributor
What if the metal had an inherent, impossible to counteract, and nigh-impossible to slow, decay rate (non-radioactive). When it is in ore form, it is stable and prevented from decay; however, as soon as it is melted down and forged into any form, the decay begins. The larger the item it is forged into, the quicker the onset and severity of the decay, as well as taking a penalty due to the forginig process.
The Decay
This is a base template for the decay. Size differences will change these properties:
- Immediately after forgining it is unchanged, and retains its amazing properties
- After a few weeks, it has lost both durability and some minor bit of its stregth.
As time goes on, it continues the decaying process, which only accelerates with time.
- After three months some twenty percent of its initial strength and durability, therein bringing it closer (but still quite superior) to more attainable, and less questionable, materials
- By the time six months have passed, it is almost identical to the next-best material; the accelerated decay process has now taken over fifty percent of the properties that originally made it special
The Size Penalty
- For small items, the decay rate is as described above. This would include the aforementioned cutlery, horseshoes, hammer and axe heads, and cooking pots/pans
- For medium items, the decay rate is quadrupled (4 times as severe). This would mean that after three months, an item has lost eighty percent of its initial strength and durability due to decay. As well, as soon as the item was completed, it would take a five percent forging penalty. That would put them item at only fifteen percent of its initial state.
- For large items, the decay rate is octupled (8 times as severe). This would mean that before even two months, the item would already be destroyed by the decay alone. As soon as the item was completed, however, it would take an immediate twenty-five percent forging penalty. This would effectively mean that the item would last barely one month. This would include armor, shields, or any wearable item. This would also fit into the game rules that exclude such items from being generally made from MGM
The Forging Requirement
- The metal requires very high skill and a massive amount of heat to forge
While this is likely not a perfect solution, I think it is a servicible one from a pseudo-chemistry standpoint. This would make it so that only the most powerful and rich people would be wealthy enough to even consider using this material. As well, their use would come at great cost to themselves. Considering the difficulty, expense, and relative short-term use of the metal for any practical application, the metal would be untenable for use. While it is easily attained, and anyone could use it, why would they? The combined difficulty of melting down the metal and forming it, along with the decay and forging penalties, makes it something that would be very hard to find any use for overall.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Dec 5 at 17:19
Paul Beverage
1313
1313
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
The extraordinary property has no practical use (yet).
Whatever the property is, it'd have to be immediately recognizable, even as an ore. A visual property seems the most likely. People find a metal with, say, a rainbow-colored sheen to it, even while sitting in the ground. Immediately people would assume they've found something special, and try to figure out how to make money off of it.
For a brief period, before any details surface, there's a "gold fever" where people try to grab as much as they can of it. Demand skyrockets, as does the price.
Eventually the metal gets into the hands of scientists, who begin to analyze it. and at the end of the day, they discover that it's essentially oddly-colored aluminum. Some impurities in the ground, combined with trace elements in the water, result in the odd coloring. It doesn't make the metal stronger or more ductile, just...prettier.
Aside from a small market for costume jewelry, some local tourist trinkets, and people who want to show off, there's no benefit to making anything out of the metal. So it's got a small customer base of rich people who don't know what to do with their money, but otherwise, it's not worth the extra trouble. It may only be available in this one vein, but there's a lot of it.
Now, if you want to go long-term, it could be discovered much later that the metal has a higher electrical conductivity, or exhibits odd reactions in a magnetic field, something that makes it useful for certain scientific or industrial implementations many decades later. So suddenly the vein has a use, but people dug quite a bit of it up to make oddly colored horseshoes for the mayor's dressage team, and all of a sudden those items are more valuable for their material than their age as an antique.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
The extraordinary property has no practical use (yet).
Whatever the property is, it'd have to be immediately recognizable, even as an ore. A visual property seems the most likely. People find a metal with, say, a rainbow-colored sheen to it, even while sitting in the ground. Immediately people would assume they've found something special, and try to figure out how to make money off of it.
For a brief period, before any details surface, there's a "gold fever" where people try to grab as much as they can of it. Demand skyrockets, as does the price.
Eventually the metal gets into the hands of scientists, who begin to analyze it. and at the end of the day, they discover that it's essentially oddly-colored aluminum. Some impurities in the ground, combined with trace elements in the water, result in the odd coloring. It doesn't make the metal stronger or more ductile, just...prettier.
Aside from a small market for costume jewelry, some local tourist trinkets, and people who want to show off, there's no benefit to making anything out of the metal. So it's got a small customer base of rich people who don't know what to do with their money, but otherwise, it's not worth the extra trouble. It may only be available in this one vein, but there's a lot of it.
Now, if you want to go long-term, it could be discovered much later that the metal has a higher electrical conductivity, or exhibits odd reactions in a magnetic field, something that makes it useful for certain scientific or industrial implementations many decades later. So suddenly the vein has a use, but people dug quite a bit of it up to make oddly colored horseshoes for the mayor's dressage team, and all of a sudden those items are more valuable for their material than their age as an antique.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
The extraordinary property has no practical use (yet).
Whatever the property is, it'd have to be immediately recognizable, even as an ore. A visual property seems the most likely. People find a metal with, say, a rainbow-colored sheen to it, even while sitting in the ground. Immediately people would assume they've found something special, and try to figure out how to make money off of it.
For a brief period, before any details surface, there's a "gold fever" where people try to grab as much as they can of it. Demand skyrockets, as does the price.
Eventually the metal gets into the hands of scientists, who begin to analyze it. and at the end of the day, they discover that it's essentially oddly-colored aluminum. Some impurities in the ground, combined with trace elements in the water, result in the odd coloring. It doesn't make the metal stronger or more ductile, just...prettier.
Aside from a small market for costume jewelry, some local tourist trinkets, and people who want to show off, there's no benefit to making anything out of the metal. So it's got a small customer base of rich people who don't know what to do with their money, but otherwise, it's not worth the extra trouble. It may only be available in this one vein, but there's a lot of it.
Now, if you want to go long-term, it could be discovered much later that the metal has a higher electrical conductivity, or exhibits odd reactions in a magnetic field, something that makes it useful for certain scientific or industrial implementations many decades later. So suddenly the vein has a use, but people dug quite a bit of it up to make oddly colored horseshoes for the mayor's dressage team, and all of a sudden those items are more valuable for their material than their age as an antique.
The extraordinary property has no practical use (yet).
Whatever the property is, it'd have to be immediately recognizable, even as an ore. A visual property seems the most likely. People find a metal with, say, a rainbow-colored sheen to it, even while sitting in the ground. Immediately people would assume they've found something special, and try to figure out how to make money off of it.
For a brief period, before any details surface, there's a "gold fever" where people try to grab as much as they can of it. Demand skyrockets, as does the price.
Eventually the metal gets into the hands of scientists, who begin to analyze it. and at the end of the day, they discover that it's essentially oddly-colored aluminum. Some impurities in the ground, combined with trace elements in the water, result in the odd coloring. It doesn't make the metal stronger or more ductile, just...prettier.
Aside from a small market for costume jewelry, some local tourist trinkets, and people who want to show off, there's no benefit to making anything out of the metal. So it's got a small customer base of rich people who don't know what to do with their money, but otherwise, it's not worth the extra trouble. It may only be available in this one vein, but there's a lot of it.
Now, if you want to go long-term, it could be discovered much later that the metal has a higher electrical conductivity, or exhibits odd reactions in a magnetic field, something that makes it useful for certain scientific or industrial implementations many decades later. So suddenly the vein has a use, but people dug quite a bit of it up to make oddly colored horseshoes for the mayor's dressage team, and all of a sudden those items are more valuable for their material than their age as an antique.
answered Dec 6 at 19:39
VBartilucci
2,064111
2,064111
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
That material should be Wolfraam aka tungsten.
Since it can be used for very small stuff, but for large stuff it's hard to use because it's brittle, making it worthless
then maybe add the option of making an alloy of say titanium + tungsten if you want to use it for small/bigger stuff :D
anyway, maybe just adding the option to make stuff out of alloys in your game would make it better, though it might be hard because making an alloy has like at least 3 parameters, the quantity of each metal you use for the alloy, the metal properties, the reactions some metals have on eachother, which can also depend on many other variables like pressure, heat... and from all that you would need to calculate a bunch of variables for the created alloy.
besides that, many alloys haven't really been tested, since there are many alloys possible.
Someone should make an api for this if it doesn't exist already :D, would be nice for an application, even though implementing all real life variables would be like mission impossible.
Anyway, you could keep the variables limited for your game.
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
That material should be Wolfraam aka tungsten.
Since it can be used for very small stuff, but for large stuff it's hard to use because it's brittle, making it worthless
then maybe add the option of making an alloy of say titanium + tungsten if you want to use it for small/bigger stuff :D
anyway, maybe just adding the option to make stuff out of alloys in your game would make it better, though it might be hard because making an alloy has like at least 3 parameters, the quantity of each metal you use for the alloy, the metal properties, the reactions some metals have on eachother, which can also depend on many other variables like pressure, heat... and from all that you would need to calculate a bunch of variables for the created alloy.
besides that, many alloys haven't really been tested, since there are many alloys possible.
Someone should make an api for this if it doesn't exist already :D, would be nice for an application, even though implementing all real life variables would be like mission impossible.
Anyway, you could keep the variables limited for your game.
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
That material should be Wolfraam aka tungsten.
Since it can be used for very small stuff, but for large stuff it's hard to use because it's brittle, making it worthless
then maybe add the option of making an alloy of say titanium + tungsten if you want to use it for small/bigger stuff :D
anyway, maybe just adding the option to make stuff out of alloys in your game would make it better, though it might be hard because making an alloy has like at least 3 parameters, the quantity of each metal you use for the alloy, the metal properties, the reactions some metals have on eachother, which can also depend on many other variables like pressure, heat... and from all that you would need to calculate a bunch of variables for the created alloy.
besides that, many alloys haven't really been tested, since there are many alloys possible.
Someone should make an api for this if it doesn't exist already :D, would be nice for an application, even though implementing all real life variables would be like mission impossible.
Anyway, you could keep the variables limited for your game.
That material should be Wolfraam aka tungsten.
Since it can be used for very small stuff, but for large stuff it's hard to use because it's brittle, making it worthless
then maybe add the option of making an alloy of say titanium + tungsten if you want to use it for small/bigger stuff :D
anyway, maybe just adding the option to make stuff out of alloys in your game would make it better, though it might be hard because making an alloy has like at least 3 parameters, the quantity of each metal you use for the alloy, the metal properties, the reactions some metals have on eachother, which can also depend on many other variables like pressure, heat... and from all that you would need to calculate a bunch of variables for the created alloy.
besides that, many alloys haven't really been tested, since there are many alloys possible.
Someone should make an api for this if it doesn't exist already :D, would be nice for an application, even though implementing all real life variables would be like mission impossible.
Anyway, you could keep the variables limited for your game.
edited Dec 8 at 9:54
answered Dec 4 at 19:49
Noob
314
314
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
Simulating unknown alloys? Fascinating idea! One could use genetic algorithms to find unusual alloys... I'm sure it takes just too much computing cycles to work... I mean, really too much. I think it would need simulation on quantum mechanics level... but it could find alloys useful in ways we did not even know!
– Volker Siegel
Dec 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It's not waterproof
When it gets wet, it dissolves. This makes it useless for quite a lot of purposes. Armor? Weapons? Hope you never have to fight in the rain... or in the heat where you sweat a lot. Mechanics? Maybe, but only for indoor use. Tableware? Why does my soup taste so metallic and why does my bowl start to leak all of a sudden? Currency? Say goodbye to your wealth when you drop your coin purse into a puddle. Canoe? Maybe you can coat it with waterproof paint, but if the coat gets scratched, you better be a good swimmer. Arts and jewelry? Maybe for an avant-garde artist who wants to make a point about the transience of material possessions and the perishability of beauty.
It doesn't even need to dissolve immediately. If it is susceptible to long-term exposure to moisture then this drawback might not be immediately apparent, but still be enough to make it useless for a lot of purposes.
If you need a scientific explanation for why a metal would be soluble: It might actually be a salt and not a metal. Or it might react chemically with water, like sodium (technically a metal, although it's far too soft for any engineering purpose).
If you wonder how it is possible for a soluble mineral to be found naturally in the ground:
rock salt exists- It might exist in some form of ore which is waterproof until it gets refined
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It's not waterproof
When it gets wet, it dissolves. This makes it useless for quite a lot of purposes. Armor? Weapons? Hope you never have to fight in the rain... or in the heat where you sweat a lot. Mechanics? Maybe, but only for indoor use. Tableware? Why does my soup taste so metallic and why does my bowl start to leak all of a sudden? Currency? Say goodbye to your wealth when you drop your coin purse into a puddle. Canoe? Maybe you can coat it with waterproof paint, but if the coat gets scratched, you better be a good swimmer. Arts and jewelry? Maybe for an avant-garde artist who wants to make a point about the transience of material possessions and the perishability of beauty.
It doesn't even need to dissolve immediately. If it is susceptible to long-term exposure to moisture then this drawback might not be immediately apparent, but still be enough to make it useless for a lot of purposes.
If you need a scientific explanation for why a metal would be soluble: It might actually be a salt and not a metal. Or it might react chemically with water, like sodium (technically a metal, although it's far too soft for any engineering purpose).
If you wonder how it is possible for a soluble mineral to be found naturally in the ground:
rock salt exists- It might exist in some form of ore which is waterproof until it gets refined
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
It's not waterproof
When it gets wet, it dissolves. This makes it useless for quite a lot of purposes. Armor? Weapons? Hope you never have to fight in the rain... or in the heat where you sweat a lot. Mechanics? Maybe, but only for indoor use. Tableware? Why does my soup taste so metallic and why does my bowl start to leak all of a sudden? Currency? Say goodbye to your wealth when you drop your coin purse into a puddle. Canoe? Maybe you can coat it with waterproof paint, but if the coat gets scratched, you better be a good swimmer. Arts and jewelry? Maybe for an avant-garde artist who wants to make a point about the transience of material possessions and the perishability of beauty.
It doesn't even need to dissolve immediately. If it is susceptible to long-term exposure to moisture then this drawback might not be immediately apparent, but still be enough to make it useless for a lot of purposes.
If you need a scientific explanation for why a metal would be soluble: It might actually be a salt and not a metal. Or it might react chemically with water, like sodium (technically a metal, although it's far too soft for any engineering purpose).
If you wonder how it is possible for a soluble mineral to be found naturally in the ground:
rock salt exists- It might exist in some form of ore which is waterproof until it gets refined
It's not waterproof
When it gets wet, it dissolves. This makes it useless for quite a lot of purposes. Armor? Weapons? Hope you never have to fight in the rain... or in the heat where you sweat a lot. Mechanics? Maybe, but only for indoor use. Tableware? Why does my soup taste so metallic and why does my bowl start to leak all of a sudden? Currency? Say goodbye to your wealth when you drop your coin purse into a puddle. Canoe? Maybe you can coat it with waterproof paint, but if the coat gets scratched, you better be a good swimmer. Arts and jewelry? Maybe for an avant-garde artist who wants to make a point about the transience of material possessions and the perishability of beauty.
It doesn't even need to dissolve immediately. If it is susceptible to long-term exposure to moisture then this drawback might not be immediately apparent, but still be enough to make it useless for a lot of purposes.
If you need a scientific explanation for why a metal would be soluble: It might actually be a salt and not a metal. Or it might react chemically with water, like sodium (technically a metal, although it's far too soft for any engineering purpose).
If you wonder how it is possible for a soluble mineral to be found naturally in the ground:
rock salt exists- It might exist in some form of ore which is waterproof until it gets refined
edited Dec 8 at 11:52
answered Dec 6 at 16:54
Philipp
30.2k1262114
30.2k1262114
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
It got superseded!
(Inspired by / adapted from the answer of @Cadence)
The metal A was immensely valuable because it has good physical properties and is scarce and hard to extract. The metal T, while abundant, was not considered because nobody knew how to work it.
Then people (maybe not everybody!) discovered the trick to work T (cheaply, maybe in nitrogen), and suddenly A is totally worthless because it is much more scarce than T and its physical properties are significantly less interesting.
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
It got superseded!
(Inspired by / adapted from the answer of @Cadence)
The metal A was immensely valuable because it has good physical properties and is scarce and hard to extract. The metal T, while abundant, was not considered because nobody knew how to work it.
Then people (maybe not everybody!) discovered the trick to work T (cheaply, maybe in nitrogen), and suddenly A is totally worthless because it is much more scarce than T and its physical properties are significantly less interesting.
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
It got superseded!
(Inspired by / adapted from the answer of @Cadence)
The metal A was immensely valuable because it has good physical properties and is scarce and hard to extract. The metal T, while abundant, was not considered because nobody knew how to work it.
Then people (maybe not everybody!) discovered the trick to work T (cheaply, maybe in nitrogen), and suddenly A is totally worthless because it is much more scarce than T and its physical properties are significantly less interesting.
It got superseded!
(Inspired by / adapted from the answer of @Cadence)
The metal A was immensely valuable because it has good physical properties and is scarce and hard to extract. The metal T, while abundant, was not considered because nobody knew how to work it.
Then people (maybe not everybody!) discovered the trick to work T (cheaply, maybe in nitrogen), and suddenly A is totally worthless because it is much more scarce than T and its physical properties are significantly less interesting.
answered Dec 5 at 16:57
Law29
21114
21114
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
add a comment |
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
The solution to "Don't allow a metal to make super armor"(a deduction from in game restriction) can't be an other metal for hyper armor..
– Drag and Drop
Dec 6 at 12:40
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The metal includes the souls of demons which gives it its useful properties however while this metal is great for almost every use it has one draw back. If you put enough of it together the power in the metal combines and a demon can come out of your item leaving it as a worthless rusted mess of whatever it was
No one wants to form large weapons or armor of this metal as the last thing you need is at an inopportune moment your offense or defense becomes a creature bent on eating your soul. Many once thought that if they only had a shield coated in this metal or a sword that was alloyed with another metal it would be fine, and it was until people found that hitting a partly demon metal shield with a partly demon metal sword pretty reliably destroyed both and summoned an imp
Now as this metal is still great for ax head and knives people still use it every day, but no one wants armor made from it as one poke from the wrong knife and your expensive magic armor is now a demon that is craving human souls
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The metal includes the souls of demons which gives it its useful properties however while this metal is great for almost every use it has one draw back. If you put enough of it together the power in the metal combines and a demon can come out of your item leaving it as a worthless rusted mess of whatever it was
No one wants to form large weapons or armor of this metal as the last thing you need is at an inopportune moment your offense or defense becomes a creature bent on eating your soul. Many once thought that if they only had a shield coated in this metal or a sword that was alloyed with another metal it would be fine, and it was until people found that hitting a partly demon metal shield with a partly demon metal sword pretty reliably destroyed both and summoned an imp
Now as this metal is still great for ax head and knives people still use it every day, but no one wants armor made from it as one poke from the wrong knife and your expensive magic armor is now a demon that is craving human souls
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The metal includes the souls of demons which gives it its useful properties however while this metal is great for almost every use it has one draw back. If you put enough of it together the power in the metal combines and a demon can come out of your item leaving it as a worthless rusted mess of whatever it was
No one wants to form large weapons or armor of this metal as the last thing you need is at an inopportune moment your offense or defense becomes a creature bent on eating your soul. Many once thought that if they only had a shield coated in this metal or a sword that was alloyed with another metal it would be fine, and it was until people found that hitting a partly demon metal shield with a partly demon metal sword pretty reliably destroyed both and summoned an imp
Now as this metal is still great for ax head and knives people still use it every day, but no one wants armor made from it as one poke from the wrong knife and your expensive magic armor is now a demon that is craving human souls
The metal includes the souls of demons which gives it its useful properties however while this metal is great for almost every use it has one draw back. If you put enough of it together the power in the metal combines and a demon can come out of your item leaving it as a worthless rusted mess of whatever it was
No one wants to form large weapons or armor of this metal as the last thing you need is at an inopportune moment your offense or defense becomes a creature bent on eating your soul. Many once thought that if they only had a shield coated in this metal or a sword that was alloyed with another metal it would be fine, and it was until people found that hitting a partly demon metal shield with a partly demon metal sword pretty reliably destroyed both and summoned an imp
Now as this metal is still great for ax head and knives people still use it every day, but no one wants armor made from it as one poke from the wrong knife and your expensive magic armor is now a demon that is craving human souls
answered Dec 6 at 5:21
SilverShadow
741211
741211
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Its so strong, it's not really forgeable, its really heat resistant, so its has no field of use
Edited away:
OPT2:
The market has so much it costs nothing => wothless
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Its so strong, it's not really forgeable, its really heat resistant, so its has no field of use
Edited away:
OPT2:
The market has so much it costs nothing => wothless
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Its so strong, it's not really forgeable, its really heat resistant, so its has no field of use
Edited away:
OPT2:
The market has so much it costs nothing => wothless
Its so strong, it's not really forgeable, its really heat resistant, so its has no field of use
Edited away:
OPT2:
The market has so much it costs nothing => wothless
edited Dec 4 at 12:45
answered Dec 4 at 9:28
Jannis
99216
99216
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
add a comment |
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
"The market has so much" it's a discover.. There can't be no known market
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:14
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
@DragandDrop haven't seem that in your question ... i'm sorry
– Jannis
Dec 4 at 12:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you're going high-fantasy, the metal is useless outside of the region it's found, due to magic. Of note, this doesn't make it completely useless - just impossible to export. So, your shield, bullet proof vest, etc all work - up to a radius of 20 miles from the veins. This could produce a rather distinctive local culture in time, perhaps a seat of government if the metal is useful enough. Projecting force would be difficult, but it could serve effectively as a defensive deterrent.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you're going high-fantasy, the metal is useless outside of the region it's found, due to magic. Of note, this doesn't make it completely useless - just impossible to export. So, your shield, bullet proof vest, etc all work - up to a radius of 20 miles from the veins. This could produce a rather distinctive local culture in time, perhaps a seat of government if the metal is useful enough. Projecting force would be difficult, but it could serve effectively as a defensive deterrent.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you're going high-fantasy, the metal is useless outside of the region it's found, due to magic. Of note, this doesn't make it completely useless - just impossible to export. So, your shield, bullet proof vest, etc all work - up to a radius of 20 miles from the veins. This could produce a rather distinctive local culture in time, perhaps a seat of government if the metal is useful enough. Projecting force would be difficult, but it could serve effectively as a defensive deterrent.
If you're going high-fantasy, the metal is useless outside of the region it's found, due to magic. Of note, this doesn't make it completely useless - just impossible to export. So, your shield, bullet proof vest, etc all work - up to a radius of 20 miles from the veins. This could produce a rather distinctive local culture in time, perhaps a seat of government if the metal is useful enough. Projecting force would be difficult, but it could serve effectively as a defensive deterrent.
answered Dec 5 at 21:56
Iiridayn
1115
1115
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Oh hey, you're in luck -- there are a bunch of interesting story options to make the metal useless!
As a general theme, a metal is useful if it can be processed into tools and uses where it is more cost-effective (or much more capable, which is really the same thing) than any competing solution. Therefore we are looking to make it very expensive, or have a surprise drawback as a tool (eg. toxicity).
Flaws in MAKING the Tools
We prevent the metal being useful by making it prohibitively expensive or hard to make the tools. One of:
hard to mine the ore
The ore could be incredibly durable (thus too hard to get in usable amounts), or the mines unstable, or filled with toxic vapours
hard to refine the ore
eg. Aluminium. Bauxite ore is hard to get aluminium out of, requiring electrolysis or tedious chemical processing. This is why Napolean's fanciest cutlery was aluminium, and his medium set was gold.
hard to forge the metal into shapes
eg. Diamond jewellery didn't really exist in the Roman empire because they couldn't cut the damn things (emeralds preferred). There are similar, boring examples around titanium alloys in modern metallury, or how the industrial revolution was facilitated by new casting techniques that allowed for bigger iron structures.
Flaws in USING the Tools
You have defined the metal as having some wonderful physical properties, so it is clearly desirable on that basis.
However, there is another option that makes the metal a useless tool -- chemical and biological effects. Therefore you could:
Make it chemically unstable
The metal rapidly oxidises into a rust that, like iron rust, has a very different crystal structure to the original metal. This means the rust falls off and continually exposes new metal that also rusts (the opposite of aluminium). Thus all tools are prohibitively short-lived
Make it Toxic I: Poisonous
Like Mercury or Beryllium, this metal has salts that are toxic and will kill you unpleasantly. Not toxic enough to be immediately obvious, but clear enough that Dr.Macguffin knows and long-term use of the metal is not viable. Bonus points if the metal salt is absorbed through human skin, or causes sterility.
Make it Toxic II: Radioactive
Similar to toxicity, there is a wide range of radioactivity that is not immediately obvious, but as users and miners have collapsing immune systems and generally shit themselves to death en-route to systematic organ failure within a few weeks or months, it becomes very clear this metal is BAD NEWS.
So in conclusion, pick and choose! There are lots of ways that the metal can be made useless, and lots of ways that you can make a very interesting story with those ways :).
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Oh hey, you're in luck -- there are a bunch of interesting story options to make the metal useless!
As a general theme, a metal is useful if it can be processed into tools and uses where it is more cost-effective (or much more capable, which is really the same thing) than any competing solution. Therefore we are looking to make it very expensive, or have a surprise drawback as a tool (eg. toxicity).
Flaws in MAKING the Tools
We prevent the metal being useful by making it prohibitively expensive or hard to make the tools. One of:
hard to mine the ore
The ore could be incredibly durable (thus too hard to get in usable amounts), or the mines unstable, or filled with toxic vapours
hard to refine the ore
eg. Aluminium. Bauxite ore is hard to get aluminium out of, requiring electrolysis or tedious chemical processing. This is why Napolean's fanciest cutlery was aluminium, and his medium set was gold.
hard to forge the metal into shapes
eg. Diamond jewellery didn't really exist in the Roman empire because they couldn't cut the damn things (emeralds preferred). There are similar, boring examples around titanium alloys in modern metallury, or how the industrial revolution was facilitated by new casting techniques that allowed for bigger iron structures.
Flaws in USING the Tools
You have defined the metal as having some wonderful physical properties, so it is clearly desirable on that basis.
However, there is another option that makes the metal a useless tool -- chemical and biological effects. Therefore you could:
Make it chemically unstable
The metal rapidly oxidises into a rust that, like iron rust, has a very different crystal structure to the original metal. This means the rust falls off and continually exposes new metal that also rusts (the opposite of aluminium). Thus all tools are prohibitively short-lived
Make it Toxic I: Poisonous
Like Mercury or Beryllium, this metal has salts that are toxic and will kill you unpleasantly. Not toxic enough to be immediately obvious, but clear enough that Dr.Macguffin knows and long-term use of the metal is not viable. Bonus points if the metal salt is absorbed through human skin, or causes sterility.
Make it Toxic II: Radioactive
Similar to toxicity, there is a wide range of radioactivity that is not immediately obvious, but as users and miners have collapsing immune systems and generally shit themselves to death en-route to systematic organ failure within a few weeks or months, it becomes very clear this metal is BAD NEWS.
So in conclusion, pick and choose! There are lots of ways that the metal can be made useless, and lots of ways that you can make a very interesting story with those ways :).
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Oh hey, you're in luck -- there are a bunch of interesting story options to make the metal useless!
As a general theme, a metal is useful if it can be processed into tools and uses where it is more cost-effective (or much more capable, which is really the same thing) than any competing solution. Therefore we are looking to make it very expensive, or have a surprise drawback as a tool (eg. toxicity).
Flaws in MAKING the Tools
We prevent the metal being useful by making it prohibitively expensive or hard to make the tools. One of:
hard to mine the ore
The ore could be incredibly durable (thus too hard to get in usable amounts), or the mines unstable, or filled with toxic vapours
hard to refine the ore
eg. Aluminium. Bauxite ore is hard to get aluminium out of, requiring electrolysis or tedious chemical processing. This is why Napolean's fanciest cutlery was aluminium, and his medium set was gold.
hard to forge the metal into shapes
eg. Diamond jewellery didn't really exist in the Roman empire because they couldn't cut the damn things (emeralds preferred). There are similar, boring examples around titanium alloys in modern metallury, or how the industrial revolution was facilitated by new casting techniques that allowed for bigger iron structures.
Flaws in USING the Tools
You have defined the metal as having some wonderful physical properties, so it is clearly desirable on that basis.
However, there is another option that makes the metal a useless tool -- chemical and biological effects. Therefore you could:
Make it chemically unstable
The metal rapidly oxidises into a rust that, like iron rust, has a very different crystal structure to the original metal. This means the rust falls off and continually exposes new metal that also rusts (the opposite of aluminium). Thus all tools are prohibitively short-lived
Make it Toxic I: Poisonous
Like Mercury or Beryllium, this metal has salts that are toxic and will kill you unpleasantly. Not toxic enough to be immediately obvious, but clear enough that Dr.Macguffin knows and long-term use of the metal is not viable. Bonus points if the metal salt is absorbed through human skin, or causes sterility.
Make it Toxic II: Radioactive
Similar to toxicity, there is a wide range of radioactivity that is not immediately obvious, but as users and miners have collapsing immune systems and generally shit themselves to death en-route to systematic organ failure within a few weeks or months, it becomes very clear this metal is BAD NEWS.
So in conclusion, pick and choose! There are lots of ways that the metal can be made useless, and lots of ways that you can make a very interesting story with those ways :).
Oh hey, you're in luck -- there are a bunch of interesting story options to make the metal useless!
As a general theme, a metal is useful if it can be processed into tools and uses where it is more cost-effective (or much more capable, which is really the same thing) than any competing solution. Therefore we are looking to make it very expensive, or have a surprise drawback as a tool (eg. toxicity).
Flaws in MAKING the Tools
We prevent the metal being useful by making it prohibitively expensive or hard to make the tools. One of:
hard to mine the ore
The ore could be incredibly durable (thus too hard to get in usable amounts), or the mines unstable, or filled with toxic vapours
hard to refine the ore
eg. Aluminium. Bauxite ore is hard to get aluminium out of, requiring electrolysis or tedious chemical processing. This is why Napolean's fanciest cutlery was aluminium, and his medium set was gold.
hard to forge the metal into shapes
eg. Diamond jewellery didn't really exist in the Roman empire because they couldn't cut the damn things (emeralds preferred). There are similar, boring examples around titanium alloys in modern metallury, or how the industrial revolution was facilitated by new casting techniques that allowed for bigger iron structures.
Flaws in USING the Tools
You have defined the metal as having some wonderful physical properties, so it is clearly desirable on that basis.
However, there is another option that makes the metal a useless tool -- chemical and biological effects. Therefore you could:
Make it chemically unstable
The metal rapidly oxidises into a rust that, like iron rust, has a very different crystal structure to the original metal. This means the rust falls off and continually exposes new metal that also rusts (the opposite of aluminium). Thus all tools are prohibitively short-lived
Make it Toxic I: Poisonous
Like Mercury or Beryllium, this metal has salts that are toxic and will kill you unpleasantly. Not toxic enough to be immediately obvious, but clear enough that Dr.Macguffin knows and long-term use of the metal is not viable. Bonus points if the metal salt is absorbed through human skin, or causes sterility.
Make it Toxic II: Radioactive
Similar to toxicity, there is a wide range of radioactivity that is not immediately obvious, but as users and miners have collapsing immune systems and generally shit themselves to death en-route to systematic organ failure within a few weeks or months, it becomes very clear this metal is BAD NEWS.
So in conclusion, pick and choose! There are lots of ways that the metal can be made useless, and lots of ways that you can make a very interesting story with those ways :).
answered Dec 7 at 16:17
Mark_Anderson
1,145410
1,145410
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
add a comment |
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
Beryllium was my first thought on reading the question. Lighter than aluminum, but far harder and stiffer, makes strong alloys that have excellent working properties, etc. If it weren't for the fact that even tiny quantities of beryllium-containing dust are a severe health hazard, it'd be an incredibly useful metal. (As it is, it has properties that make it worth using in some applications in spite of the hazards.)
– Christopher James Huff
2 days ago
add a comment |
protected by James♦ Dec 6 at 5:51
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5
Titanium would not have been very useful in the 19th century...
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 11:37
@AlexP, for the need of the story the medal must be noticable for a avg cowboy. It has to have extraordinary property. Ti is what I comes up with in my research of real life lighter stronger medal.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 12:17
3
You are aware that only gold and silver are found in their native state in any appreciable quantity? Everything else is smelted from ore, a.k.a. dirt. I seriously doubt that the average cowboy would recognize aluminum ore, or chromium ore, or even iron ore.
– AlexP
Dec 4 at 13:51
3
Make more of it. Done
– Carl Witthoft
Dec 4 at 14:11
@AlexP, they won't. And they don't have to. MGM is not real and it's not Ti, It's clause to what we call Ti. Because I need a base to start. But the Avg cowboy will clause a giant gate and will know it's light.
– Drag and Drop
Dec 4 at 14:38