About dependency of random variables
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am always considering non-discrete/non-finite probability spaces $Omega$. For everything that follows feel free to assume $Omega = mathbb{R}^n$.
Say you have 2 random variables $X_1,X_2 :Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Now an event based definition of $X_1$ and $X_2$ being ``independent" is as follows : "$X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent random variables if for all $x,y in mathbb{R}$ we have that $mathbb{P}((X_1 leq x)cap(X_2 leq y)) = mathbb{P}(X_1 leq x)mathbb{P}(X_2 leq y)$" (Am I right?)
Are there natural examples of pairs of independent random variables whose descriptions can be given as maps $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ ?
Is the above setup enough to ensure that there exists a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$? If yes, how?
When would one prefer to use a joint-distribution based definition of ``independence" as opposed to such an event based defition and vice-versa?
probability stochastic-processes independence
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am always considering non-discrete/non-finite probability spaces $Omega$. For everything that follows feel free to assume $Omega = mathbb{R}^n$.
Say you have 2 random variables $X_1,X_2 :Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Now an event based definition of $X_1$ and $X_2$ being ``independent" is as follows : "$X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent random variables if for all $x,y in mathbb{R}$ we have that $mathbb{P}((X_1 leq x)cap(X_2 leq y)) = mathbb{P}(X_1 leq x)mathbb{P}(X_2 leq y)$" (Am I right?)
Are there natural examples of pairs of independent random variables whose descriptions can be given as maps $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ ?
Is the above setup enough to ensure that there exists a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$? If yes, how?
When would one prefer to use a joint-distribution based definition of ``independence" as opposed to such an event based defition and vice-versa?
probability stochastic-processes independence
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am always considering non-discrete/non-finite probability spaces $Omega$. For everything that follows feel free to assume $Omega = mathbb{R}^n$.
Say you have 2 random variables $X_1,X_2 :Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Now an event based definition of $X_1$ and $X_2$ being ``independent" is as follows : "$X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent random variables if for all $x,y in mathbb{R}$ we have that $mathbb{P}((X_1 leq x)cap(X_2 leq y)) = mathbb{P}(X_1 leq x)mathbb{P}(X_2 leq y)$" (Am I right?)
Are there natural examples of pairs of independent random variables whose descriptions can be given as maps $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ ?
Is the above setup enough to ensure that there exists a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$? If yes, how?
When would one prefer to use a joint-distribution based definition of ``independence" as opposed to such an event based defition and vice-versa?
probability stochastic-processes independence
I am always considering non-discrete/non-finite probability spaces $Omega$. For everything that follows feel free to assume $Omega = mathbb{R}^n$.
Say you have 2 random variables $X_1,X_2 :Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Now an event based definition of $X_1$ and $X_2$ being ``independent" is as follows : "$X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent random variables if for all $x,y in mathbb{R}$ we have that $mathbb{P}((X_1 leq x)cap(X_2 leq y)) = mathbb{P}(X_1 leq x)mathbb{P}(X_2 leq y)$" (Am I right?)
Are there natural examples of pairs of independent random variables whose descriptions can be given as maps $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ ?
Is the above setup enough to ensure that there exists a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$? If yes, how?
When would one prefer to use a joint-distribution based definition of ``independence" as opposed to such an event based defition and vice-versa?
probability stochastic-processes independence
probability stochastic-processes independence
edited Nov 19 at 8:11
asked Nov 19 at 8:04
gradstudent
18517
18517
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
On $(0,1)$ if you define $X_n(omega)$ as the n-th coefficient in the expansion of $omega$ to base $2$ then the random variables $X_1,X_2,cdots$ are independent. The statement $P{Xleq x,Yleq y}=P{Xleq x}P{Yleq y}$ for all $x,y$ is equivalent to the statement $P(Xin A, Y in B)=P(Xin A)P( Y in B)$ for all Borel sets $A$ and $B$ in $mathbb R$. (I suppose this is what you mean by event based definition of independence).
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
On $(0,1)$ if you define $X_n(omega)$ as the n-th coefficient in the expansion of $omega$ to base $2$ then the random variables $X_1,X_2,cdots$ are independent. The statement $P{Xleq x,Yleq y}=P{Xleq x}P{Yleq y}$ for all $x,y$ is equivalent to the statement $P(Xin A, Y in B)=P(Xin A)P( Y in B)$ for all Borel sets $A$ and $B$ in $mathbb R$. (I suppose this is what you mean by event based definition of independence).
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
On $(0,1)$ if you define $X_n(omega)$ as the n-th coefficient in the expansion of $omega$ to base $2$ then the random variables $X_1,X_2,cdots$ are independent. The statement $P{Xleq x,Yleq y}=P{Xleq x}P{Yleq y}$ for all $x,y$ is equivalent to the statement $P(Xin A, Y in B)=P(Xin A)P( Y in B)$ for all Borel sets $A$ and $B$ in $mathbb R$. (I suppose this is what you mean by event based definition of independence).
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
On $(0,1)$ if you define $X_n(omega)$ as the n-th coefficient in the expansion of $omega$ to base $2$ then the random variables $X_1,X_2,cdots$ are independent. The statement $P{Xleq x,Yleq y}=P{Xleq x}P{Yleq y}$ for all $x,y$ is equivalent to the statement $P(Xin A, Y in B)=P(Xin A)P( Y in B)$ for all Borel sets $A$ and $B$ in $mathbb R$. (I suppose this is what you mean by event based definition of independence).
On $(0,1)$ if you define $X_n(omega)$ as the n-th coefficient in the expansion of $omega$ to base $2$ then the random variables $X_1,X_2,cdots$ are independent. The statement $P{Xleq x,Yleq y}=P{Xleq x}P{Yleq y}$ for all $x,y$ is equivalent to the statement $P(Xin A, Y in B)=P(Xin A)P( Y in B)$ for all Borel sets $A$ and $B$ in $mathbb R$. (I suppose this is what you mean by event based definition of independence).
answered Nov 19 at 8:10
Kavi Rama Murthy
45.9k31854
45.9k31854
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
Thanks for your reply! (1) I was looking for "natural" example of independent random variables which can be described as such $Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$. Could you kindly provides some? Say some examples in terms of random variables with commonly used distributions like Gaussian, chi^2 etc.. (2) I agree that the definition I gave in the question is the event based definition. I wanted to know when can one give a joint distribution based definition and when is it more or less useful. (In my setup is a joint-distribution of $X_1$ and $X_2$ guaranteed to exist?)
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:39
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
On $(0,1)times (0,1)$ the coordinate functions $(x,y) to x$ and $(x,y) to y$ are independent random variables.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:42
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Well, the $X_1$ and $X_2$ that you gave are not random variables with very "standard" distributions. Thats what makes them "unnatural" in my view. I am looking for situations which can be specified as maps and the distributions of the two random variables is something "nice" like Gaussian etc.
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:46
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
Both have uniform distribution on $(0,1)$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 19 at 8:47
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
hmm. Can one lets say give examples of $X_1$ and $X_2$ maps n this form such that the joint distribution of $(X_1,X_2)$ is the 2-dimensional standard Gaussian?
– gradstudent
Nov 19 at 8:53
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004638%2fabout-dependency-of-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown