Word norm in compact subsets of finitely generated groups











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?







abstract-algebra group-theory topological-groups geometric-group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago

























asked 10 hours ago









user404944

735211




735211












  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago


















  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago
















Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
– uniquesolution
9 hours ago




Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
– uniquesolution
9 hours ago












I edited the question
– user404944
9 hours ago




I edited the question
– user404944
9 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995339%2fword-norm-in-compact-subsets-of-finitely-generated-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest
































1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer












If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









user120527

1,631211




1,631211












  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago


















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago
















Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
– user404944
8 hours ago




Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
– user404944
8 hours ago












It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
– user120527
8 hours ago




It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
– user120527
8 hours ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995339%2fword-norm-in-compact-subsets-of-finitely-generated-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?