What is this shape that looks like a rectangle with rounded ends called?
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?
I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.
There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?
shapes terminology
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?
I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.
There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?
shapes terminology
2
I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday
Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday
1
I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday
Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday
2
This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?
I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.
There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?
shapes terminology
This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?
I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.
There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?
shapes terminology
shapes terminology
edited 4 hours ago
Glorfindel
1873515
1873515
asked yesterday
Abhimanyu
2541312
2541312
2
I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday
Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday
1
I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday
Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday
2
This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
2
I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday
Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday
1
I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday
Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday
2
This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday
2
2
I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday
I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday
Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday
Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday
1
1
I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday
I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday
Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday
Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday
2
2
This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday
This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Stadium Shape
As a geometric figure.
A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.
Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com
Capsule Shape
Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape
2
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
1
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
1
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.
1
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.
On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.
But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.
Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.
See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
1
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Ok, we need to clarify a few things.
While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.
You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.
From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.
Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:
To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.
To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
1
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
2
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Stadium Shape
As a geometric figure.
A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.
Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com
Capsule Shape
Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape
2
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
1
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
1
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Stadium Shape
As a geometric figure.
A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.
Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com
Capsule Shape
Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape
2
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
1
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
1
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Stadium Shape
As a geometric figure.
A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.
Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com
Capsule Shape
Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape
Stadium Shape
As a geometric figure.
A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.
Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com
Capsule Shape
Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Danielillo
17.7k12665
17.7k12665
2
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
1
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
1
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
1
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
1
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
2
2
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
– Rafael
yesterday
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
– tgm1024
22 hours ago
1
1
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
– GerardFalla
15 hours ago
1
1
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
– whatsisname
7 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.
1
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.
1
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
up vote
23
down vote
While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.
While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.
answered yesterday
Scott
142k14195403
142k14195403
1
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
add a comment |
1
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
1
1
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
– btown
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.
On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.
But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.
On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.
But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.
On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.
But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.
For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.
On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.
But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.
answered yesterday
Rafael
21.9k12254
21.9k12254
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.
Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.
Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.
Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.
Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.
Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.
answered 19 hours ago
Pete Kirkham
1413
1413
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.
See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
1
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.
See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
1
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.
See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong
A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.
See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong
answered yesterday
David Horizonef
345
345
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
1
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
add a comment |
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
1
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
– miroxlav
21 hours ago
1
1
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
@miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
– Pete Kirkham
19 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
– Rafael
18 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
@PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
– miroxlav
16 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
– David Horizonef
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Ok, we need to clarify a few things.
While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.
You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.
From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.
Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:
To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.
To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
1
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
2
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Ok, we need to clarify a few things.
While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.
You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.
From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.
Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:
To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.
To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
1
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
2
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
up vote
-3
down vote
Ok, we need to clarify a few things.
While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.
You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.
From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.
Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:
To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.
To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.
New contributor
Ok, we need to clarify a few things.
While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.
You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.
From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.
Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:
To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.
To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.
New contributor
edited 20 hours ago
Ovaryraptor
4,23211028
4,23211028
New contributor
answered 22 hours ago
tgm1024
1112
1112
New contributor
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
1
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
2
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
add a comment |
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
1
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
2
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
1
1
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
– Danielillo
20 hours ago
2
2
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
– PieBie
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117005%2fwhat-is-this-shape-that-looks-like-a-rectangle-with-rounded-ends-called%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday
Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday
1
I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday
Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday
2
This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday