Multiple Line Text Box
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the many similar questions on TeX.SE, my desired answer may be somewhere else on this site, but I have not been able to find it -- apologies if this is a duplicate!
I am writing the following in my document.
In this section, we introduce the concept of textit{information percolation}, as introduced by Lubetzky and Sly.
The rough idea will be to separate the state space in `clusters', which will then be coloured RED, BLUE or GREEN (at time $t$) according to the following (rough) conditions:
smallskip
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the RED clusters will be the vertices whose states depend on the initial configuration;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the BLUE clusters will be singletons with votes that are iid $Unif([q])$ random variables;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the GREEN clusters will be independent of the initial state, but have highly nontrivial dependencies inside the clusters -- it is the green clusters that embody the complicated correlation-nature of the voting model.}
smallskip
A formal definition is forthcoming.
Here bcdot
is simply ensuremath{bm{cdot}}
, using the 'bold maths' package bm
.
This gives the following output.
This is in essence my version of an itemise
, use with spacing that I prefer. However, as you may have noticed, there are a few issues:
- the spacing between the second and third lines is too small;
- (most importantly) the bullet is in the centre of the three lines (horizontally), instead of inline with the top one.
How can I fix these two? -- namely, get the spacing unified and get the bullet on the top line?
spacing horizontal-alignment vertical-alignment itemize alignment
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the many similar questions on TeX.SE, my desired answer may be somewhere else on this site, but I have not been able to find it -- apologies if this is a duplicate!
I am writing the following in my document.
In this section, we introduce the concept of textit{information percolation}, as introduced by Lubetzky and Sly.
The rough idea will be to separate the state space in `clusters', which will then be coloured RED, BLUE or GREEN (at time $t$) according to the following (rough) conditions:
smallskip
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the RED clusters will be the vertices whose states depend on the initial configuration;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the BLUE clusters will be singletons with votes that are iid $Unif([q])$ random variables;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the GREEN clusters will be independent of the initial state, but have highly nontrivial dependencies inside the clusters -- it is the green clusters that embody the complicated correlation-nature of the voting model.}
smallskip
A formal definition is forthcoming.
Here bcdot
is simply ensuremath{bm{cdot}}
, using the 'bold maths' package bm
.
This gives the following output.
This is in essence my version of an itemise
, use with spacing that I prefer. However, as you may have noticed, there are a few issues:
- the spacing between the second and third lines is too small;
- (most importantly) the bullet is in the centre of the three lines (horizontally), instead of inline with the top one.
How can I fix these two? -- namely, get the spacing unified and get the bullet on the top line?
spacing horizontal-alignment vertical-alignment itemize alignment
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the many similar questions on TeX.SE, my desired answer may be somewhere else on this site, but I have not been able to find it -- apologies if this is a duplicate!
I am writing the following in my document.
In this section, we introduce the concept of textit{information percolation}, as introduced by Lubetzky and Sly.
The rough idea will be to separate the state space in `clusters', which will then be coloured RED, BLUE or GREEN (at time $t$) according to the following (rough) conditions:
smallskip
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the RED clusters will be the vertices whose states depend on the initial configuration;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the BLUE clusters will be singletons with votes that are iid $Unif([q])$ random variables;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the GREEN clusters will be independent of the initial state, but have highly nontrivial dependencies inside the clusters -- it is the green clusters that embody the complicated correlation-nature of the voting model.}
smallskip
A formal definition is forthcoming.
Here bcdot
is simply ensuremath{bm{cdot}}
, using the 'bold maths' package bm
.
This gives the following output.
This is in essence my version of an itemise
, use with spacing that I prefer. However, as you may have noticed, there are a few issues:
- the spacing between the second and third lines is too small;
- (most importantly) the bullet is in the centre of the three lines (horizontally), instead of inline with the top one.
How can I fix these two? -- namely, get the spacing unified and get the bullet on the top line?
spacing horizontal-alignment vertical-alignment itemize alignment
Given the many similar questions on TeX.SE, my desired answer may be somewhere else on this site, but I have not been able to find it -- apologies if this is a duplicate!
I am writing the following in my document.
In this section, we introduce the concept of textit{information percolation}, as introduced by Lubetzky and Sly.
The rough idea will be to separate the state space in `clusters', which will then be coloured RED, BLUE or GREEN (at time $t$) according to the following (rough) conditions:
smallskip
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the RED clusters will be the vertices whose states depend on the initial configuration;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the BLUE clusters will be singletons with votes that are iid $Unif([q])$ random variables;}
noindent%
parbox{2em}{raggedleftbcdot,}
parbox{linewidth-2em}{%
the GREEN clusters will be independent of the initial state, but have highly nontrivial dependencies inside the clusters -- it is the green clusters that embody the complicated correlation-nature of the voting model.}
smallskip
A formal definition is forthcoming.
Here bcdot
is simply ensuremath{bm{cdot}}
, using the 'bold maths' package bm
.
This gives the following output.
This is in essence my version of an itemise
, use with spacing that I prefer. However, as you may have noticed, there are a few issues:
- the spacing between the second and third lines is too small;
- (most importantly) the bullet is in the centre of the three lines (horizontally), instead of inline with the top one.
How can I fix these two? -- namely, get the spacing unified and get the bullet on the top line?
spacing horizontal-alignment vertical-alignment itemize alignment
spacing horizontal-alignment vertical-alignment itemize alignment
edited Nov 21 at 18:47
Bernard
162k767192
162k767192
asked Nov 21 at 17:11
Sam T
334110
334110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I was actually able to solve my own question by using the enumitem
package. The following is a MWE for this.
Since I used this on a number of occasions throughout my paper, I made a new environment for it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{enumitem}
newenvironment{itemise}%
{begin{itemize}[noitemsep,topsep=smallskipamount,label={textnormal{CUSTOM}}]}
{end{itemize}}
begin{document}
begin{itemise}
item item 1
item item 2
end{itemise}
end{document}
Of course, one can change the label to be whatever is desired.
This TeX.SE question is helpful for understanding enumitem
: topsep, itemsep, partopsep and parsep - what does each of them mean (and what about the bottom)?.
1
You can just use the optionlabel={bcdot}
instead of usingrenewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE includingdocumentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.
– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
Ah, usinglabel={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used therenewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!
– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I was actually able to solve my own question by using the enumitem
package. The following is a MWE for this.
Since I used this on a number of occasions throughout my paper, I made a new environment for it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{enumitem}
newenvironment{itemise}%
{begin{itemize}[noitemsep,topsep=smallskipamount,label={textnormal{CUSTOM}}]}
{end{itemize}}
begin{document}
begin{itemise}
item item 1
item item 2
end{itemise}
end{document}
Of course, one can change the label to be whatever is desired.
This TeX.SE question is helpful for understanding enumitem
: topsep, itemsep, partopsep and parsep - what does each of them mean (and what about the bottom)?.
1
You can just use the optionlabel={bcdot}
instead of usingrenewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE includingdocumentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.
– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
Ah, usinglabel={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used therenewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!
– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I was actually able to solve my own question by using the enumitem
package. The following is a MWE for this.
Since I used this on a number of occasions throughout my paper, I made a new environment for it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{enumitem}
newenvironment{itemise}%
{begin{itemize}[noitemsep,topsep=smallskipamount,label={textnormal{CUSTOM}}]}
{end{itemize}}
begin{document}
begin{itemise}
item item 1
item item 2
end{itemise}
end{document}
Of course, one can change the label to be whatever is desired.
This TeX.SE question is helpful for understanding enumitem
: topsep, itemsep, partopsep and parsep - what does each of them mean (and what about the bottom)?.
1
You can just use the optionlabel={bcdot}
instead of usingrenewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE includingdocumentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.
– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
Ah, usinglabel={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used therenewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!
– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I was actually able to solve my own question by using the enumitem
package. The following is a MWE for this.
Since I used this on a number of occasions throughout my paper, I made a new environment for it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{enumitem}
newenvironment{itemise}%
{begin{itemize}[noitemsep,topsep=smallskipamount,label={textnormal{CUSTOM}}]}
{end{itemize}}
begin{document}
begin{itemise}
item item 1
item item 2
end{itemise}
end{document}
Of course, one can change the label to be whatever is desired.
This TeX.SE question is helpful for understanding enumitem
: topsep, itemsep, partopsep and parsep - what does each of them mean (and what about the bottom)?.
I was actually able to solve my own question by using the enumitem
package. The following is a MWE for this.
Since I used this on a number of occasions throughout my paper, I made a new environment for it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{enumitem}
newenvironment{itemise}%
{begin{itemize}[noitemsep,topsep=smallskipamount,label={textnormal{CUSTOM}}]}
{end{itemize}}
begin{document}
begin{itemise}
item item 1
item item 2
end{itemise}
end{document}
Of course, one can change the label to be whatever is desired.
This TeX.SE question is helpful for understanding enumitem
: topsep, itemsep, partopsep and parsep - what does each of them mean (and what about the bottom)?.
edited Nov 21 at 19:35
answered Nov 21 at 18:18
Sam T
334110
334110
1
You can just use the optionlabel={bcdot}
instead of usingrenewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE includingdocumentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.
– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
Ah, usinglabel={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used therenewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!
– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
add a comment |
1
You can just use the optionlabel={bcdot}
instead of usingrenewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE includingdocumentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.
– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
Ah, usinglabel={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used therenewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!
– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
1
1
You can just use the option
label={bcdot}
instead of using renewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE including documentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
You can just use the option
label={bcdot}
instead of using renewcommand
. Also, for future reference, it is best to always provide a complete MWE including documentclass
and the appropriate packages in questions and answers.– Peter Grill
Nov 21 at 19:07
Ah, using
label={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used the renewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
Ah, using
label={bcdot}
is far preferable! I tried something similar but it didn't work, so just used the renewcommand
. Also, I've just changed it to be in the form of a MWE. Thanks!– Sam T
Nov 21 at 19:33
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461163%2fmultiple-line-text-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown