Issue with Data Load and Index Rebuild in SQL Server 2016
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
0
Data load for one of the table in SQL Server is taking around 22-24 hrs and index rebuild is taking 4-6 hrs. Below are some additional details about the size and data load process.
- Table Size: 800 GB
- Total No.Of Indexes: 11
- No.Of Partitions on the Table :50
- Frequency of Data Load: Monthly Once
- Data Load Pattern: Truncate and Load.Disable all Index and then rebuild post data load
- Source System: Teradata
- Target System: SQL SERVER 2016
- ETL Tool: AB-Initio
Please suggest any optimizations options available such that we can reduce the time for data load and index rebuild process.
sql-server teradata sql-server-2016 ab-initio asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
add a comment |
0
Data load for one of the table in SQL Server is taking around 22-24 hrs and index rebuild is taking 4-6 hrs. Below are some additional details about the size and data load process.
- Table Size: 800 GB
- Total No.Of Indexes: 11
- No.Of Partitions on the Table :50
- Frequency of Data Load: Monthly Once
- Data Load Pattern: Truncate and Load.Disable all Index and then rebuild post data load
- Source System: Teradata
- Target System: SQL SERVER 2016
- ETL Tool: AB-Initio
Please suggest any optimizations options available such that we can reduce the time for data load and index rebuild process.
sql-server teradata sql-server-2016 ab-initio asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
1
Keep the table on Teradata :-)
– dnoeth
Nov 22 '18 at 8:58
Don't Truncate and load. Only load new data.
– Nick.McDermaid
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
New data load is not possible as we dont know which records are getting affected
– user1941025
Nov 22 '18 at 12:07
Please let me know if there is any optimal approach to handle this load process..
– user1941025
Nov 28 '18 at 8:41
add a comment |
0
0
0
Data load for one of the table in SQL Server is taking around 22-24 hrs and index rebuild is taking 4-6 hrs. Below are some additional details about the size and data load process.
- Table Size: 800 GB
- Total No.Of Indexes: 11
- No.Of Partitions on the Table :50
- Frequency of Data Load: Monthly Once
- Data Load Pattern: Truncate and Load.Disable all Index and then rebuild post data load
- Source System: Teradata
- Target System: SQL SERVER 2016
- ETL Tool: AB-Initio
Please suggest any optimizations options available such that we can reduce the time for data load and index rebuild process.
sql-server teradata sql-server-2016 ab-initio asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
Data load for one of the table in SQL Server is taking around 22-24 hrs and index rebuild is taking 4-6 hrs. Below are some additional details about the size and data load process.
- Table Size: 800 GB
- Total No.Of Indexes: 11
- No.Of Partitions on the Table :50
- Frequency of Data Load: Monthly Once
- Data Load Pattern: Truncate and Load.Disable all Index and then rebuild post data load
- Source System: Teradata
- Target System: SQL SERVER 2016
- ETL Tool: AB-Initio
Please suggest any optimizations options available such that we can reduce the time for data load and index rebuild process.
sql-server teradata sql-server-2016 ab-initio sql-server teradata sql-server-2016 ab-initio asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33
user1941025user1941025
659
659
1
Keep the table on Teradata :-)
– dnoeth
Nov 22 '18 at 8:58
Don't Truncate and load. Only load new data.
– Nick.McDermaid
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
New data load is not possible as we dont know which records are getting affected
– user1941025
Nov 22 '18 at 12:07
Please let me know if there is any optimal approach to handle this load process..
– user1941025
Nov 28 '18 at 8:41
add a comment |
1
Keep the table on Teradata :-)
– dnoeth
Nov 22 '18 at 8:58
Don't Truncate and load. Only load new data.
– Nick.McDermaid
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
New data load is not possible as we dont know which records are getting affected
– user1941025
Nov 22 '18 at 12:07
Please let me know if there is any optimal approach to handle this load process..
– user1941025
Nov 28 '18 at 8:41
1
1
Keep the table on Teradata :-)
– dnoeth
Nov 22 '18 at 8:58
Keep the table on Teradata :-)
– dnoeth
Nov 22 '18 at 8:58
Don't Truncate and load. Only load new data.
– Nick.McDermaid
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
Don't Truncate and load. Only load new data.
– Nick.McDermaid
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
New data load is not possible as we dont know which records are getting affected
– user1941025
Nov 22 '18 at 12:07
New data load is not possible as we dont know which records are getting affected
– user1941025
Nov 22 '18 at 12:07
Please let me know if there is any optimal approach to handle this load process..
– user1941025
Nov 28 '18 at 8:41
Please let me know if there is any optimal approach to handle this load process..
– user1941025
Nov 28 '18 at 8:41
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426748%2fissue-with-data-load-and-index-rebuild-in-sql-server-2016%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426748%2fissue-with-data-load-and-index-rebuild-in-sql-server-2016%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Keep the table on Teradata :-)
– dnoeth
Nov 22 '18 at 8:58
Don't Truncate and load. Only load new data.
– Nick.McDermaid
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
New data load is not possible as we dont know which records are getting affected
– user1941025
Nov 22 '18 at 12:07
Please let me know if there is any optimal approach to handle this load process..
– user1941025
Nov 28 '18 at 8:41