Fit a table into one page
I have a table that is very wide. Now I want to force it into one landscape page. I already set the page orientation to landscape but now I don't know how to force it into one page with scaling. Any hints?
tables
add a comment |
I have a table that is very wide. Now I want to force it into one landscape page. I already set the page orientation to landscape but now I don't know how to force it into one page with scaling. Any hints?
tables
See also How to define a figure size so that it consumes the rest of a page?.
– Martin Scharrer♦
Jun 13 '12 at 8:52
add a comment |
I have a table that is very wide. Now I want to force it into one landscape page. I already set the page orientation to landscape but now I don't know how to force it into one page with scaling. Any hints?
tables
I have a table that is very wide. Now I want to force it into one landscape page. I already set the page orientation to landscape but now I don't know how to force it into one page with scaling. Any hints?
tables
tables
asked Sep 22 '11 at 14:52
RoflcoptrExceptionRoflcoptrException
5,200185986
5,200185986
See also How to define a figure size so that it consumes the rest of a page?.
– Martin Scharrer♦
Jun 13 '12 at 8:52
add a comment |
See also How to define a figure size so that it consumes the rest of a page?.
– Martin Scharrer♦
Jun 13 '12 at 8:52
See also How to define a figure size so that it consumes the rest of a page?.
– Martin Scharrer♦
Jun 13 '12 at 8:52
See also How to define a figure size so that it consumes the rest of a page?.
– Martin Scharrer♦
Jun 13 '12 at 8:52
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can use the adjustbox
package with:
begin{adjustbox}{width=textwidth,totalheight=textheight,keepaspectratio}
% your table
end{adjustbox}
You can also use the graphicx
package with:
setkeys{Gin}{keepaspectratio}
resizebox*{textwidth}{textheight}{your table}
but adjustbox
is more recommended. It doesn't read the whole table as an argument.
You can also add rotatebox{90}{..}
or the angle=90
option to the adjustbox
environment to implement the rotation.
You might need to exchange textwidth
and textheight
because of the landscape mode. Also you should use an approximate font size first, e.g. try tiny
or scriptsize
and let the rest be done by scaling. You shouldn't scale the normal font size to a very small size. Many fonts are differently designed in different sizes, so using the closest possible size yields the best results.
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success usingenlargethispage
andenlargethispage*
, negative and positivevspace
(s) before and after the table/figure,Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
@NikosAlexandris: You can usedimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of onlytextheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).
– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just usecaptionof
and forget floating?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
|
show 1 more comment
I assume you want to scale down just the contents of the tabular environment, while leaving the fontsize of the caption unchanged. If you use the rotating
package, you can avail yourself of its sidewaystable
environment, which automatically rotates its contents by 90 degrees. (Internally, the package relies on the graphics/x
package.) With this environment, you needn't keep track of whether textheight
and textwidth
need to be interchanged or not.
begin{sideswaystable}
caption{A very wide table}label{tab:verywide}
centering
scriptsize %% or tiny -- see remark below
begin{tabul...
...
end{tabul...
end{sidewaystable}
Remark: If the tabular material has so many columns that it won't fit on a rotated page even if the fontsize has been set to either scriptsize
or tiny
, you may want to consider seriously breaking up the table into two subtables and displaying them separately. Realistically, very few readers are going to bother reading something in a font size smaller than 5 or 6pt. Hence, if you have to use both the tiny
fontsize instruction as well as the adjustbox
command with a shrinkage factor of well below 1, chances that anyone is going to read your carefully designed tabular material are, well, smaller than tiny.
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29195%2ffit-a-table-into-one-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use the adjustbox
package with:
begin{adjustbox}{width=textwidth,totalheight=textheight,keepaspectratio}
% your table
end{adjustbox}
You can also use the graphicx
package with:
setkeys{Gin}{keepaspectratio}
resizebox*{textwidth}{textheight}{your table}
but adjustbox
is more recommended. It doesn't read the whole table as an argument.
You can also add rotatebox{90}{..}
or the angle=90
option to the adjustbox
environment to implement the rotation.
You might need to exchange textwidth
and textheight
because of the landscape mode. Also you should use an approximate font size first, e.g. try tiny
or scriptsize
and let the rest be done by scaling. You shouldn't scale the normal font size to a very small size. Many fonts are differently designed in different sizes, so using the closest possible size yields the best results.
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success usingenlargethispage
andenlargethispage*
, negative and positivevspace
(s) before and after the table/figure,Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
@NikosAlexandris: You can usedimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of onlytextheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).
– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just usecaptionof
and forget floating?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
|
show 1 more comment
You can use the adjustbox
package with:
begin{adjustbox}{width=textwidth,totalheight=textheight,keepaspectratio}
% your table
end{adjustbox}
You can also use the graphicx
package with:
setkeys{Gin}{keepaspectratio}
resizebox*{textwidth}{textheight}{your table}
but adjustbox
is more recommended. It doesn't read the whole table as an argument.
You can also add rotatebox{90}{..}
or the angle=90
option to the adjustbox
environment to implement the rotation.
You might need to exchange textwidth
and textheight
because of the landscape mode. Also you should use an approximate font size first, e.g. try tiny
or scriptsize
and let the rest be done by scaling. You shouldn't scale the normal font size to a very small size. Many fonts are differently designed in different sizes, so using the closest possible size yields the best results.
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success usingenlargethispage
andenlargethispage*
, negative and positivevspace
(s) before and after the table/figure,Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
@NikosAlexandris: You can usedimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of onlytextheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).
– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just usecaptionof
and forget floating?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
|
show 1 more comment
You can use the adjustbox
package with:
begin{adjustbox}{width=textwidth,totalheight=textheight,keepaspectratio}
% your table
end{adjustbox}
You can also use the graphicx
package with:
setkeys{Gin}{keepaspectratio}
resizebox*{textwidth}{textheight}{your table}
but adjustbox
is more recommended. It doesn't read the whole table as an argument.
You can also add rotatebox{90}{..}
or the angle=90
option to the adjustbox
environment to implement the rotation.
You might need to exchange textwidth
and textheight
because of the landscape mode. Also you should use an approximate font size first, e.g. try tiny
or scriptsize
and let the rest be done by scaling. You shouldn't scale the normal font size to a very small size. Many fonts are differently designed in different sizes, so using the closest possible size yields the best results.
You can use the adjustbox
package with:
begin{adjustbox}{width=textwidth,totalheight=textheight,keepaspectratio}
% your table
end{adjustbox}
You can also use the graphicx
package with:
setkeys{Gin}{keepaspectratio}
resizebox*{textwidth}{textheight}{your table}
but adjustbox
is more recommended. It doesn't read the whole table as an argument.
You can also add rotatebox{90}{..}
or the angle=90
option to the adjustbox
environment to implement the rotation.
You might need to exchange textwidth
and textheight
because of the landscape mode. Also you should use an approximate font size first, e.g. try tiny
or scriptsize
and let the rest be done by scaling. You shouldn't scale the normal font size to a very small size. Many fonts are differently designed in different sizes, so using the closest possible size yields the best results.
answered Sep 22 '11 at 14:56
Martin Scharrer♦Martin Scharrer
204k47653826
204k47653826
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success usingenlargethispage
andenlargethispage*
, negative and positivevspace
(s) before and after the table/figure,Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
@NikosAlexandris: You can usedimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of onlytextheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).
– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just usecaptionof
and forget floating?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success usingenlargethispage
andenlargethispage*
, negative and positivevspace
(s) before and after the table/figure,Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
@NikosAlexandris: You can usedimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of onlytextheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).
– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just usecaptionof
and forget floating?
– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Thanks the adjustbox solution works. I just exchanged textwidth and textheight. But I don't know why but I had to use width = 0.9999 * textheight to avoid an empty page before the table.
– RoflcoptrException
Sep 22 '11 at 15:12
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
Maybe you have a hidden space somewhere?
– Martin Scharrer♦
Sep 22 '11 at 15:27
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success using
enlargethispage
and enlargethispage*
, negative and positive vspace
(s) before and after the table/figure, Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
What about fitting a table/figure (outside of a float) in a page along with the Section or Sub-Section title? I can see no success using
enlargethispage
and enlargethispage*
, negative and positive vspace
(s) before and after the table/figure, Needspace*{}
and others. Is it possible to just subtract the "vertical space" occupied by the Section title and automatically scale the table/figure to the remaining height (by keeping, of course, its aspect ratio intact)?– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 8 '11 at 11:41
@NikosAlexandris: You can use
dimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of only textheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@NikosAlexandris: You can use
dimexprtextheight-2baselineskiprelax
instead of only textheight
to reduce the height by about two lines (or any other length).– Martin Scharrer♦
Dec 8 '11 at 11:50
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just use
captionof
and forget floating?– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
@MartinScharrer: The desired effect concerning the size of the table(s), for example, is achieved. Visually my two (sub-)tables within one (rotated) float seem to fit along with the Section title. However, pdflatex prefers to push the tables in the next page leaving a body-less heading. Also, the rotated caption of the figure-float is as long as the textheight! Should I just use
captionof
and forget floating?– Nikos Alexandris
Dec 9 '11 at 12:20
|
show 1 more comment
I assume you want to scale down just the contents of the tabular environment, while leaving the fontsize of the caption unchanged. If you use the rotating
package, you can avail yourself of its sidewaystable
environment, which automatically rotates its contents by 90 degrees. (Internally, the package relies on the graphics/x
package.) With this environment, you needn't keep track of whether textheight
and textwidth
need to be interchanged or not.
begin{sideswaystable}
caption{A very wide table}label{tab:verywide}
centering
scriptsize %% or tiny -- see remark below
begin{tabul...
...
end{tabul...
end{sidewaystable}
Remark: If the tabular material has so many columns that it won't fit on a rotated page even if the fontsize has been set to either scriptsize
or tiny
, you may want to consider seriously breaking up the table into two subtables and displaying them separately. Realistically, very few readers are going to bother reading something in a font size smaller than 5 or 6pt. Hence, if you have to use both the tiny
fontsize instruction as well as the adjustbox
command with a shrinkage factor of well below 1, chances that anyone is going to read your carefully designed tabular material are, well, smaller than tiny.
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
add a comment |
I assume you want to scale down just the contents of the tabular environment, while leaving the fontsize of the caption unchanged. If you use the rotating
package, you can avail yourself of its sidewaystable
environment, which automatically rotates its contents by 90 degrees. (Internally, the package relies on the graphics/x
package.) With this environment, you needn't keep track of whether textheight
and textwidth
need to be interchanged or not.
begin{sideswaystable}
caption{A very wide table}label{tab:verywide}
centering
scriptsize %% or tiny -- see remark below
begin{tabul...
...
end{tabul...
end{sidewaystable}
Remark: If the tabular material has so many columns that it won't fit on a rotated page even if the fontsize has been set to either scriptsize
or tiny
, you may want to consider seriously breaking up the table into two subtables and displaying them separately. Realistically, very few readers are going to bother reading something in a font size smaller than 5 or 6pt. Hence, if you have to use both the tiny
fontsize instruction as well as the adjustbox
command with a shrinkage factor of well below 1, chances that anyone is going to read your carefully designed tabular material are, well, smaller than tiny.
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
add a comment |
I assume you want to scale down just the contents of the tabular environment, while leaving the fontsize of the caption unchanged. If you use the rotating
package, you can avail yourself of its sidewaystable
environment, which automatically rotates its contents by 90 degrees. (Internally, the package relies on the graphics/x
package.) With this environment, you needn't keep track of whether textheight
and textwidth
need to be interchanged or not.
begin{sideswaystable}
caption{A very wide table}label{tab:verywide}
centering
scriptsize %% or tiny -- see remark below
begin{tabul...
...
end{tabul...
end{sidewaystable}
Remark: If the tabular material has so many columns that it won't fit on a rotated page even if the fontsize has been set to either scriptsize
or tiny
, you may want to consider seriously breaking up the table into two subtables and displaying them separately. Realistically, very few readers are going to bother reading something in a font size smaller than 5 or 6pt. Hence, if you have to use both the tiny
fontsize instruction as well as the adjustbox
command with a shrinkage factor of well below 1, chances that anyone is going to read your carefully designed tabular material are, well, smaller than tiny.
I assume you want to scale down just the contents of the tabular environment, while leaving the fontsize of the caption unchanged. If you use the rotating
package, you can avail yourself of its sidewaystable
environment, which automatically rotates its contents by 90 degrees. (Internally, the package relies on the graphics/x
package.) With this environment, you needn't keep track of whether textheight
and textwidth
need to be interchanged or not.
begin{sideswaystable}
caption{A very wide table}label{tab:verywide}
centering
scriptsize %% or tiny -- see remark below
begin{tabul...
...
end{tabul...
end{sidewaystable}
Remark: If the tabular material has so many columns that it won't fit on a rotated page even if the fontsize has been set to either scriptsize
or tiny
, you may want to consider seriously breaking up the table into two subtables and displaying them separately. Realistically, very few readers are going to bother reading something in a font size smaller than 5 or 6pt. Hence, if you have to use both the tiny
fontsize instruction as well as the adjustbox
command with a shrinkage factor of well below 1, chances that anyone is going to read your carefully designed tabular material are, well, smaller than tiny.
answered Sep 22 '11 at 18:13
MicoMico
285k31388778
285k31388778
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
add a comment |
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
great post, do you also know how to fit a sidewaystable exacly on a page, by scaling down the fontsize (and/or any other parameters)?
– user3032689
Apr 29 '17 at 15:47
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
@user3032689 - Scaling down the font size in order to make a table fit inside the text block is almost always a dreadful idea, typographically speaking. Really. Don't do it unless you want to signal to your readers that you disdain them and couldn't care less if they'll actually bother to read what's in the table. (Even if that's not your explicit intent, do rest assured that that's exactly what your readers will think your intent is.) The advisability and suitability of other adjustment possibilities depends strongly on the material being typeset. Please post a new query with your table.
– Mico
Apr 29 '17 at 16:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29195%2ffit-a-table-into-one-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
See also How to define a figure size so that it consumes the rest of a page?.
– Martin Scharrer♦
Jun 13 '12 at 8:52