Why is the solution to the equation $ln(x)+ln(3x+1) = 0$ not $x=frac{-1}{4}$?












-1












$begingroup$


Wouldn't you just move the $ln(x)$ to the other side, then raise both sides to the power of $e$? And then you have the same bases equal to each other, so you get $3x + 1 = x$? From where you'd get $x =frac{ -1}{4}$? Is there something wrong with this process?



This question was on a calculus exam so it does seem overly simple...any help is appreciated.






calculus algebra-precalculus







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the solution to $3x + 1 = x$ is $x = -1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 7 '18 at 23:55


















-1












$begingroup$


Wouldn't you just move the $ln(x)$ to the other side, then raise both sides to the power of $e$? And then you have the same bases equal to each other, so you get $3x + 1 = x$? From where you'd get $x =frac{ -1}{4}$? Is there something wrong with this process?



This question was on a calculus exam so it does seem overly simple...any help is appreciated.






calculus algebra-precalculus







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the solution to $3x + 1 = x$ is $x = -1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 7 '18 at 23:55
















-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


Wouldn't you just move the $ln(x)$ to the other side, then raise both sides to the power of $e$? And then you have the same bases equal to each other, so you get $3x + 1 = x$? From where you'd get $x =frac{ -1}{4}$? Is there something wrong with this process?



This question was on a calculus exam so it does seem overly simple...any help is appreciated.






calculus algebra-precalculus







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Wouldn't you just move the $ln(x)$ to the other side, then raise both sides to the power of $e$? And then you have the same bases equal to each other, so you get $3x + 1 = x$? From where you'd get $x =frac{ -1}{4}$? Is there something wrong with this process?



This question was on a calculus exam so it does seem overly simple...any help is appreciated.






calculus algebra-precalculus




calculus algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 '18 at 7:54









gimusi

93k84594




93k84594










asked Dec 7 '18 at 23:48









James RonaldJames Ronald

1807




1807








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the solution to $3x + 1 = x$ is $x = -1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 7 '18 at 23:55
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the solution to $3x + 1 = x$ is $x = -1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 7 '18 at 23:55










1




1




$begingroup$
FYI, the solution to $3x + 1 = x$ is $x = -1/2$.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Dec 7 '18 at 23:55






$begingroup$
FYI, the solution to $3x + 1 = x$ is $x = -1/2$.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Dec 7 '18 at 23:55












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

We don't need to use esponential, indeed by $log A+ log B = log (AB)$ with the conditions $x>0 implies 3x+1>0$, we have that



$$ln x + ln(3x+1)=ln (3x^2+x)=0 iff 3x^2+x=1 iff 3x^2+x-1=0$$



then



$$x=frac{-1pm sqrt{1+12}}{6} implies x=frac{-1+ sqrt{13}}{6}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, there is and no, that's not the first thing you do. You should first impose the condition that both $x$ and $3x+1$ are elements of the domain of $ln$, and then do any algebra you desire.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      I think you made a mistake of signs when you moved the $ln x$ to the other side. It should be $ln(3x+1)=-ln(x)$.



      Now you exponentiate both sides, and get $3x+1=frac1x$.



      After you're done solving that equation, remember to check that those solutions still work with the original equation; logarithms do not like negative inputs. Or you can do what the other answer says and keep track of which values of $x$ are valid as you go, and check your solutions against that at the end.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        1












        $begingroup$

        If you do that you get $ln x = -ln (3x+1)$



        and when you use both sides as powers of $e$ to get



        $e^{ln x} = e^{-ln (3x+1)} = frac 1{e^{3x+1}}$ so that your first mistake. Because one side negative you will get a reciprical.



        $x =frac 1{3x+1}$ so



        $x(3x+1) = 1$



        $3x^2 + x -1=0$



        So $x = frac {-1 pm sqrt{13}}6$ but $x > 0$ as logarithms of non-positives are not defined.



        So $x = frac {-1 + sqrt{13}}6$



        Alternatively you could have combined to get



        $ln x + ln(x+3) = 0$



        $ln x(x+3) = 0$ so



        $x(x+3) = 1$ and etc.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          The solutions are wrong
          $endgroup$
          – AryanSonwatikar
          Dec 8 '18 at 0:53










        • $begingroup$
          Knew something was weird.....
          $endgroup$
          – fleablood
          Dec 8 '18 at 1:18










        • $begingroup$
          @fleablood Now its fine.
          $endgroup$
          – gimusi
          Dec 8 '18 at 7:10











        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030513%2fwhy-is-the-solution-to-the-equation-lnx-ln3x1-0-not-x-frac-14%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5












        $begingroup$

        We don't need to use esponential, indeed by $log A+ log B = log (AB)$ with the conditions $x>0 implies 3x+1>0$, we have that



        $$ln x + ln(3x+1)=ln (3x^2+x)=0 iff 3x^2+x=1 iff 3x^2+x-1=0$$



        then



        $$x=frac{-1pm sqrt{1+12}}{6} implies x=frac{-1+ sqrt{13}}{6}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          5












          $begingroup$

          We don't need to use esponential, indeed by $log A+ log B = log (AB)$ with the conditions $x>0 implies 3x+1>0$, we have that



          $$ln x + ln(3x+1)=ln (3x^2+x)=0 iff 3x^2+x=1 iff 3x^2+x-1=0$$



          then



          $$x=frac{-1pm sqrt{1+12}}{6} implies x=frac{-1+ sqrt{13}}{6}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            We don't need to use esponential, indeed by $log A+ log B = log (AB)$ with the conditions $x>0 implies 3x+1>0$, we have that



            $$ln x + ln(3x+1)=ln (3x^2+x)=0 iff 3x^2+x=1 iff 3x^2+x-1=0$$



            then



            $$x=frac{-1pm sqrt{1+12}}{6} implies x=frac{-1+ sqrt{13}}{6}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            We don't need to use esponential, indeed by $log A+ log B = log (AB)$ with the conditions $x>0 implies 3x+1>0$, we have that



            $$ln x + ln(3x+1)=ln (3x^2+x)=0 iff 3x^2+x=1 iff 3x^2+x-1=0$$



            then



            $$x=frac{-1pm sqrt{1+12}}{6} implies x=frac{-1+ sqrt{13}}{6}$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 8 '18 at 0:06

























            answered Dec 8 '18 at 0:00









            gimusigimusi

            93k84594




            93k84594























                1












                $begingroup$

                Yes, there is and no, that's not the first thing you do. You should first impose the condition that both $x$ and $3x+1$ are elements of the domain of $ln$, and then do any algebra you desire.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, there is and no, that's not the first thing you do. You should first impose the condition that both $x$ and $3x+1$ are elements of the domain of $ln$, and then do any algebra you desire.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Yes, there is and no, that's not the first thing you do. You should first impose the condition that both $x$ and $3x+1$ are elements of the domain of $ln$, and then do any algebra you desire.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Yes, there is and no, that's not the first thing you do. You should first impose the condition that both $x$ and $3x+1$ are elements of the domain of $ln$, and then do any algebra you desire.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 7 '18 at 23:50









                    Saucy O'PathSaucy O'Path

                    6,1641627




                    6,1641627























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        I think you made a mistake of signs when you moved the $ln x$ to the other side. It should be $ln(3x+1)=-ln(x)$.



                        Now you exponentiate both sides, and get $3x+1=frac1x$.



                        After you're done solving that equation, remember to check that those solutions still work with the original equation; logarithms do not like negative inputs. Or you can do what the other answer says and keep track of which values of $x$ are valid as you go, and check your solutions against that at the end.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          I think you made a mistake of signs when you moved the $ln x$ to the other side. It should be $ln(3x+1)=-ln(x)$.



                          Now you exponentiate both sides, and get $3x+1=frac1x$.



                          After you're done solving that equation, remember to check that those solutions still work with the original equation; logarithms do not like negative inputs. Or you can do what the other answer says and keep track of which values of $x$ are valid as you go, and check your solutions against that at the end.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            I think you made a mistake of signs when you moved the $ln x$ to the other side. It should be $ln(3x+1)=-ln(x)$.



                            Now you exponentiate both sides, and get $3x+1=frac1x$.



                            After you're done solving that equation, remember to check that those solutions still work with the original equation; logarithms do not like negative inputs. Or you can do what the other answer says and keep track of which values of $x$ are valid as you go, and check your solutions against that at the end.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            I think you made a mistake of signs when you moved the $ln x$ to the other side. It should be $ln(3x+1)=-ln(x)$.



                            Now you exponentiate both sides, and get $3x+1=frac1x$.



                            After you're done solving that equation, remember to check that those solutions still work with the original equation; logarithms do not like negative inputs. Or you can do what the other answer says and keep track of which values of $x$ are valid as you go, and check your solutions against that at the end.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 7 '18 at 23:54









                            ArthurArthur

                            118k7117200




                            118k7117200























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                If you do that you get $ln x = -ln (3x+1)$



                                and when you use both sides as powers of $e$ to get



                                $e^{ln x} = e^{-ln (3x+1)} = frac 1{e^{3x+1}}$ so that your first mistake. Because one side negative you will get a reciprical.



                                $x =frac 1{3x+1}$ so



                                $x(3x+1) = 1$



                                $3x^2 + x -1=0$



                                So $x = frac {-1 pm sqrt{13}}6$ but $x > 0$ as logarithms of non-positives are not defined.



                                So $x = frac {-1 + sqrt{13}}6$



                                Alternatively you could have combined to get



                                $ln x + ln(x+3) = 0$



                                $ln x(x+3) = 0$ so



                                $x(x+3) = 1$ and etc.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  The solutions are wrong
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – AryanSonwatikar
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 0:53










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Knew something was weird.....
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – fleablood
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 1:18










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @fleablood Now its fine.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – gimusi
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 7:10
















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                If you do that you get $ln x = -ln (3x+1)$



                                and when you use both sides as powers of $e$ to get



                                $e^{ln x} = e^{-ln (3x+1)} = frac 1{e^{3x+1}}$ so that your first mistake. Because one side negative you will get a reciprical.



                                $x =frac 1{3x+1}$ so



                                $x(3x+1) = 1$



                                $3x^2 + x -1=0$



                                So $x = frac {-1 pm sqrt{13}}6$ but $x > 0$ as logarithms of non-positives are not defined.



                                So $x = frac {-1 + sqrt{13}}6$



                                Alternatively you could have combined to get



                                $ln x + ln(x+3) = 0$



                                $ln x(x+3) = 0$ so



                                $x(x+3) = 1$ and etc.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  The solutions are wrong
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – AryanSonwatikar
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 0:53










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Knew something was weird.....
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – fleablood
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 1:18










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @fleablood Now its fine.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – gimusi
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 7:10














                                1












                                1








                                1





                                $begingroup$

                                If you do that you get $ln x = -ln (3x+1)$



                                and when you use both sides as powers of $e$ to get



                                $e^{ln x} = e^{-ln (3x+1)} = frac 1{e^{3x+1}}$ so that your first mistake. Because one side negative you will get a reciprical.



                                $x =frac 1{3x+1}$ so



                                $x(3x+1) = 1$



                                $3x^2 + x -1=0$



                                So $x = frac {-1 pm sqrt{13}}6$ but $x > 0$ as logarithms of non-positives are not defined.



                                So $x = frac {-1 + sqrt{13}}6$



                                Alternatively you could have combined to get



                                $ln x + ln(x+3) = 0$



                                $ln x(x+3) = 0$ so



                                $x(x+3) = 1$ and etc.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$



                                If you do that you get $ln x = -ln (3x+1)$



                                and when you use both sides as powers of $e$ to get



                                $e^{ln x} = e^{-ln (3x+1)} = frac 1{e^{3x+1}}$ so that your first mistake. Because one side negative you will get a reciprical.



                                $x =frac 1{3x+1}$ so



                                $x(3x+1) = 1$



                                $3x^2 + x -1=0$



                                So $x = frac {-1 pm sqrt{13}}6$ but $x > 0$ as logarithms of non-positives are not defined.



                                So $x = frac {-1 + sqrt{13}}6$



                                Alternatively you could have combined to get



                                $ln x + ln(x+3) = 0$



                                $ln x(x+3) = 0$ so



                                $x(x+3) = 1$ and etc.







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited Dec 8 '18 at 7:09









                                gimusi

                                93k84594




                                93k84594










                                answered Dec 8 '18 at 0:14









                                fleabloodfleablood

                                72.3k22687




                                72.3k22687












                                • $begingroup$
                                  The solutions are wrong
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – AryanSonwatikar
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 0:53










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Knew something was weird.....
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – fleablood
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 1:18










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @fleablood Now its fine.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – gimusi
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 7:10


















                                • $begingroup$
                                  The solutions are wrong
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – AryanSonwatikar
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 0:53










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Knew something was weird.....
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – fleablood
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 1:18










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @fleablood Now its fine.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – gimusi
                                  Dec 8 '18 at 7:10
















                                $begingroup$
                                The solutions are wrong
                                $endgroup$
                                – AryanSonwatikar
                                Dec 8 '18 at 0:53




                                $begingroup$
                                The solutions are wrong
                                $endgroup$
                                – AryanSonwatikar
                                Dec 8 '18 at 0:53












                                $begingroup$
                                Knew something was weird.....
                                $endgroup$
                                – fleablood
                                Dec 8 '18 at 1:18




                                $begingroup$
                                Knew something was weird.....
                                $endgroup$
                                – fleablood
                                Dec 8 '18 at 1:18












                                $begingroup$
                                @fleablood Now its fine.
                                $endgroup$
                                – gimusi
                                Dec 8 '18 at 7:10




                                $begingroup$
                                @fleablood Now its fine.
                                $endgroup$
                                – gimusi
                                Dec 8 '18 at 7:10


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030513%2fwhy-is-the-solution-to-the-equation-lnx-ln3x1-0-not-x-frac-14%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                -

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                                Image
                                3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
                                Read more

                                Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

                                Image
                                0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
                                Read more

                                Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

                                Image
                                up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
                                Read more