Is it possible to write a aggregation query in Dev Tools of Kibana and then store the result?
I have a field in elastic search loaded that has information in it as:
message: Requesting 30 containers
message: Requesting 40 containers
.
.
.
message: Requesting 50 containers
I want to get a total of all containers used in the job. (30+40+50=120, in this case).
Is it more efficient to extract these values in a field in logstash and then use aggregation queries in elasticsearch or given the message above everything is possible in elasticsearch?
Also, if I write a aggregation query in Dev Tools of Kibana, then is it possible to store the result to be used for visualization?
elasticsearch logstash kibana
add a comment |
I have a field in elastic search loaded that has information in it as:
message: Requesting 30 containers
message: Requesting 40 containers
.
.
.
message: Requesting 50 containers
I want to get a total of all containers used in the job. (30+40+50=120, in this case).
Is it more efficient to extract these values in a field in logstash and then use aggregation queries in elasticsearch or given the message above everything is possible in elasticsearch?
Also, if I write a aggregation query in Dev Tools of Kibana, then is it possible to store the result to be used for visualization?
elasticsearch logstash kibana
add a comment |
I have a field in elastic search loaded that has information in it as:
message: Requesting 30 containers
message: Requesting 40 containers
.
.
.
message: Requesting 50 containers
I want to get a total of all containers used in the job. (30+40+50=120, in this case).
Is it more efficient to extract these values in a field in logstash and then use aggregation queries in elasticsearch or given the message above everything is possible in elasticsearch?
Also, if I write a aggregation query in Dev Tools of Kibana, then is it possible to store the result to be used for visualization?
elasticsearch logstash kibana
I have a field in elastic search loaded that has information in it as:
message: Requesting 30 containers
message: Requesting 40 containers
.
.
.
message: Requesting 50 containers
I want to get a total of all containers used in the job. (30+40+50=120, in this case).
Is it more efficient to extract these values in a field in logstash and then use aggregation queries in elasticsearch or given the message above everything is possible in elasticsearch?
Also, if I write a aggregation query in Dev Tools of Kibana, then is it possible to store the result to be used for visualization?
elasticsearch logstash kibana
elasticsearch logstash kibana
asked Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
RajRaj
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is better and is the solution to extract the number in logstash and then use it in aggregations
No , You cant use a string in sum aggregation , Everything is never possible
You dont need you write aggregation query in dev tools if you are using kibana , in kibana you can do aggregations without writing queries
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53400569%2fis-it-possible-to-write-a-aggregation-query-in-dev-tools-of-kibana-and-then-stor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is better and is the solution to extract the number in logstash and then use it in aggregations
No , You cant use a string in sum aggregation , Everything is never possible
You dont need you write aggregation query in dev tools if you are using kibana , in kibana you can do aggregations without writing queries
add a comment |
It is better and is the solution to extract the number in logstash and then use it in aggregations
No , You cant use a string in sum aggregation , Everything is never possible
You dont need you write aggregation query in dev tools if you are using kibana , in kibana you can do aggregations without writing queries
add a comment |
It is better and is the solution to extract the number in logstash and then use it in aggregations
No , You cant use a string in sum aggregation , Everything is never possible
You dont need you write aggregation query in dev tools if you are using kibana , in kibana you can do aggregations without writing queries
It is better and is the solution to extract the number in logstash and then use it in aggregations
No , You cant use a string in sum aggregation , Everything is never possible
You dont need you write aggregation query in dev tools if you are using kibana , in kibana you can do aggregations without writing queries
answered Nov 20 '18 at 22:22
Ijaz Ahmad KhanIjaz Ahmad Khan
3,31711425
3,31711425
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53400569%2fis-it-possible-to-write-a-aggregation-query-in-dev-tools-of-kibana-and-then-stor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown