Creating an alias for a git repository
Got a git repository which has out-grown its original scope so that the repo name no longer represent the content.
Can I create an 'alias repository' which will point to the existing one, but with a better name, while keeping the old name working to avoid updating existing checkouts, CI systems, etc.?
I vision here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
git atlassian-sourcetree bitbucket-server
add a comment |
Got a git repository which has out-grown its original scope so that the repo name no longer represent the content.
Can I create an 'alias repository' which will point to the existing one, but with a better name, while keeping the old name working to avoid updating existing checkouts, CI systems, etc.?
I vision here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
git atlassian-sourcetree bitbucket-server
How do you see this working? I could see it being a remote. You probably should avoid using “pull”.
– evolutionxbox
Nov 20 '18 at 2:23
add a comment |
Got a git repository which has out-grown its original scope so that the repo name no longer represent the content.
Can I create an 'alias repository' which will point to the existing one, but with a better name, while keeping the old name working to avoid updating existing checkouts, CI systems, etc.?
I vision here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
git atlassian-sourcetree bitbucket-server
Got a git repository which has out-grown its original scope so that the repo name no longer represent the content.
Can I create an 'alias repository' which will point to the existing one, but with a better name, while keeping the old name working to avoid updating existing checkouts, CI systems, etc.?
I vision here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
git atlassian-sourcetree bitbucket-server
git atlassian-sourcetree bitbucket-server
edited Nov 20 '18 at 11:59
Uri Cohen
asked Nov 19 '18 at 22:21
Uri CohenUri Cohen
2,3532235
2,3532235
How do you see this working? I could see it being a remote. You probably should avoid using “pull”.
– evolutionxbox
Nov 20 '18 at 2:23
add a comment |
How do you see this working? I could see it being a remote. You probably should avoid using “pull”.
– evolutionxbox
Nov 20 '18 at 2:23
How do you see this working? I could see it being a remote. You probably should avoid using “pull”.
– evolutionxbox
Nov 20 '18 at 2:23
How do you see this working? I could see it being a remote. You probably should avoid using “pull”.
– evolutionxbox
Nov 20 '18 at 2:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can try and:
- clone the repo
- rename your current BitBucket repo
- create a new one, re-using the name of the original repo
- reset your local clone to the right SHA1 (loosing the part of the recent history that does not interest you)
- pushing the local repo to the newly created one.
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53383493%2fcreating-an-alias-for-a-git-repository%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can try and:
- clone the repo
- rename your current BitBucket repo
- create a new one, re-using the name of the original repo
- reset your local clone to the right SHA1 (loosing the part of the recent history that does not interest you)
- pushing the local repo to the newly created one.
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
You can try and:
- clone the repo
- rename your current BitBucket repo
- create a new one, re-using the name of the original repo
- reset your local clone to the right SHA1 (loosing the part of the recent history that does not interest you)
- pushing the local repo to the newly created one.
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
You can try and:
- clone the repo
- rename your current BitBucket repo
- create a new one, re-using the name of the original repo
- reset your local clone to the right SHA1 (loosing the part of the recent history that does not interest you)
- pushing the local repo to the newly created one.
You can try and:
- clone the repo
- rename your current BitBucket repo
- create a new one, re-using the name of the original repo
- reset your local clone to the right SHA1 (loosing the part of the recent history that does not interest you)
- pushing the local repo to the newly created one.
edited Nov 20 '18 at 11:57
Uri Cohen
2,3532235
2,3532235
answered Nov 20 '18 at 6:00
VonCVonC
838k29426523193
838k29426523193
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
I visioned here two repo names, but a single repo state which is available under both names.
– Uri Cohen
Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
@UriCohen I don't know of two names for one repo. I am more familiar with two different repos (since the repo hosting server will know how to avoid duplication of common SHA1s)
– VonC
Nov 20 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53383493%2fcreating-an-alias-for-a-git-repository%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
How do you see this working? I could see it being a remote. You probably should avoid using “pull”.
– evolutionxbox
Nov 20 '18 at 2:23