Symbolic dynamics in continue dynamical system
$begingroup$
Do you know a good and studied example of symbolic dynamics applied to a continue dynamical system? I mean, if there is an example of a continue dynamical system for which there is a Poincaré map for which there is an invariant set conjugated to the space of $N$ symbols with the shift operator.
And, if there is, one or more books where i can find it.
dynamical-systems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you know a good and studied example of symbolic dynamics applied to a continue dynamical system? I mean, if there is an example of a continue dynamical system for which there is a Poincaré map for which there is an invariant set conjugated to the space of $N$ symbols with the shift operator.
And, if there is, one or more books where i can find it.
dynamical-systems
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great starting point: projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485890097
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Thank you, but this is too much difficult for me (I mean, objects used in that paper, like for example Fuchsian groups, which i have never heard about, doesn't allow me to read and understand this without before reading lot of literature concerning other field of mathematics and other definitions). I found the "strange attractor" in the Lorenz system can be what i was looking for; in Robert Devaney, Morris W. Hirsch - "Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos" it seems that it's explained with basic calculus facts and without any new definition. Thanks anyway
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
I understand, I didn't know your background. A minor word of caution, if I may: the Lorenz system has associated a hyperbolic system with singularities, which is not really what you want, at least from your question. This corresponds to the fact that in Figure 14.10 in that book (by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney) the two parts of the graph are not onto. Without exaggeration, this makes the situation atypical from the usual one, and you may be studying a different thing from what you want to study.
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 17:54
$begingroup$
yes i know, it's not exactly what I wanted, but the chaotic nature was the main thing i was looking for, not necessary with cantor sets or symbolic dynamics. Maybe I express myself a little wrong before. Thanks a lot for the advice, have a nice day:)
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 18:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you know a good and studied example of symbolic dynamics applied to a continue dynamical system? I mean, if there is an example of a continue dynamical system for which there is a Poincaré map for which there is an invariant set conjugated to the space of $N$ symbols with the shift operator.
And, if there is, one or more books where i can find it.
dynamical-systems
$endgroup$
Do you know a good and studied example of symbolic dynamics applied to a continue dynamical system? I mean, if there is an example of a continue dynamical system for which there is a Poincaré map for which there is an invariant set conjugated to the space of $N$ symbols with the shift operator.
And, if there is, one or more books where i can find it.
dynamical-systems
dynamical-systems
edited Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
John B
12.2k51840
12.2k51840
asked Nov 27 '18 at 15:19
tommycauterotommycautero
867
867
$begingroup$
Great starting point: projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485890097
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Thank you, but this is too much difficult for me (I mean, objects used in that paper, like for example Fuchsian groups, which i have never heard about, doesn't allow me to read and understand this without before reading lot of literature concerning other field of mathematics and other definitions). I found the "strange attractor" in the Lorenz system can be what i was looking for; in Robert Devaney, Morris W. Hirsch - "Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos" it seems that it's explained with basic calculus facts and without any new definition. Thanks anyway
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
I understand, I didn't know your background. A minor word of caution, if I may: the Lorenz system has associated a hyperbolic system with singularities, which is not really what you want, at least from your question. This corresponds to the fact that in Figure 14.10 in that book (by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney) the two parts of the graph are not onto. Without exaggeration, this makes the situation atypical from the usual one, and you may be studying a different thing from what you want to study.
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 17:54
$begingroup$
yes i know, it's not exactly what I wanted, but the chaotic nature was the main thing i was looking for, not necessary with cantor sets or symbolic dynamics. Maybe I express myself a little wrong before. Thanks a lot for the advice, have a nice day:)
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 18:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Great starting point: projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485890097
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Thank you, but this is too much difficult for me (I mean, objects used in that paper, like for example Fuchsian groups, which i have never heard about, doesn't allow me to read and understand this without before reading lot of literature concerning other field of mathematics and other definitions). I found the "strange attractor" in the Lorenz system can be what i was looking for; in Robert Devaney, Morris W. Hirsch - "Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos" it seems that it's explained with basic calculus facts and without any new definition. Thanks anyway
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
I understand, I didn't know your background. A minor word of caution, if I may: the Lorenz system has associated a hyperbolic system with singularities, which is not really what you want, at least from your question. This corresponds to the fact that in Figure 14.10 in that book (by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney) the two parts of the graph are not onto. Without exaggeration, this makes the situation atypical from the usual one, and you may be studying a different thing from what you want to study.
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 17:54
$begingroup$
yes i know, it's not exactly what I wanted, but the chaotic nature was the main thing i was looking for, not necessary with cantor sets or symbolic dynamics. Maybe I express myself a little wrong before. Thanks a lot for the advice, have a nice day:)
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 18:01
$begingroup$
Great starting point: projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485890097
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Great starting point: projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485890097
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Thank you, but this is too much difficult for me (I mean, objects used in that paper, like for example Fuchsian groups, which i have never heard about, doesn't allow me to read and understand this without before reading lot of literature concerning other field of mathematics and other definitions). I found the "strange attractor" in the Lorenz system can be what i was looking for; in Robert Devaney, Morris W. Hirsch - "Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos" it seems that it's explained with basic calculus facts and without any new definition. Thanks anyway
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
Thank you, but this is too much difficult for me (I mean, objects used in that paper, like for example Fuchsian groups, which i have never heard about, doesn't allow me to read and understand this without before reading lot of literature concerning other field of mathematics and other definitions). I found the "strange attractor" in the Lorenz system can be what i was looking for; in Robert Devaney, Morris W. Hirsch - "Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos" it seems that it's explained with basic calculus facts and without any new definition. Thanks anyway
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
I understand, I didn't know your background. A minor word of caution, if I may: the Lorenz system has associated a hyperbolic system with singularities, which is not really what you want, at least from your question. This corresponds to the fact that in Figure 14.10 in that book (by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney) the two parts of the graph are not onto. Without exaggeration, this makes the situation atypical from the usual one, and you may be studying a different thing from what you want to study.
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 17:54
$begingroup$
I understand, I didn't know your background. A minor word of caution, if I may: the Lorenz system has associated a hyperbolic system with singularities, which is not really what you want, at least from your question. This corresponds to the fact that in Figure 14.10 in that book (by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney) the two parts of the graph are not onto. Without exaggeration, this makes the situation atypical from the usual one, and you may be studying a different thing from what you want to study.
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 17:54
$begingroup$
yes i know, it's not exactly what I wanted, but the chaotic nature was the main thing i was looking for, not necessary with cantor sets or symbolic dynamics. Maybe I express myself a little wrong before. Thanks a lot for the advice, have a nice day:)
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 18:01
$begingroup$
yes i know, it's not exactly what I wanted, but the chaotic nature was the main thing i was looking for, not necessary with cantor sets or symbolic dynamics. Maybe I express myself a little wrong before. Thanks a lot for the advice, have a nice day:)
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 18:01
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015891%2fsymbolic-dynamics-in-continue-dynamical-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015891%2fsymbolic-dynamics-in-continue-dynamical-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Great starting point: projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485890097
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Thank you, but this is too much difficult for me (I mean, objects used in that paper, like for example Fuchsian groups, which i have never heard about, doesn't allow me to read and understand this without before reading lot of literature concerning other field of mathematics and other definitions). I found the "strange attractor" in the Lorenz system can be what i was looking for; in Robert Devaney, Morris W. Hirsch - "Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos" it seems that it's explained with basic calculus facts and without any new definition. Thanks anyway
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 17:35
$begingroup$
I understand, I didn't know your background. A minor word of caution, if I may: the Lorenz system has associated a hyperbolic system with singularities, which is not really what you want, at least from your question. This corresponds to the fact that in Figure 14.10 in that book (by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney) the two parts of the graph are not onto. Without exaggeration, this makes the situation atypical from the usual one, and you may be studying a different thing from what you want to study.
$endgroup$
– John B
Nov 27 '18 at 17:54
$begingroup$
yes i know, it's not exactly what I wanted, but the chaotic nature was the main thing i was looking for, not necessary with cantor sets or symbolic dynamics. Maybe I express myself a little wrong before. Thanks a lot for the advice, have a nice day:)
$endgroup$
– tommycautero
Nov 27 '18 at 18:01