Mounting a new hard drive (sda1) to my existing filesystem
0
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
add a comment |
0
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
Do you have a GUI?
– dan08
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
add a comment |
0
0
0
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
I tried to read some posts regarding mounting a new hard drive, but I am facing some problem. My new hard drive is sda1. The output of sudo fdisk -l is:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 999.7 GB, 999653638144 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121534 cylinders, total 1952448512 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00016485
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 1935822847 967910400 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 1935824894 1952446463 8310785 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 1935824896 1952446463 8310784 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x78dbcdc1
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 1953521663 976759808 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
What should be done to add this new sda1 hard drive on booting up? What should be added in the /etc/fstab file? I have not performed any partition on the new sda1 drive. I need help on how to proceed from scratch and can't afford to take any risk.
Please help!
partitioning mount
partitioning mount
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:23
Jacob Vlijm
63.6k9124218
63.6k9124218
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
asked Jun 4 '14 at 20:19
shank22
1112
1112
Do you have a GUI?
– dan08
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
add a comment |
Do you have a GUI?
– dan08
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
Do you have a GUI?
– dan08
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
Do you have a GUI?
– dan08
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
0
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmountis entered in Terminal,fstabentries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstabentries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f476924%2fmounting-a-new-hard-drive-sda1-to-my-existing-filesystem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
0
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmountis entered in Terminal,fstabentries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstabentries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
0
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmountis entered in Terminal,fstabentries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstabentries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
0
0
0
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
A possible recommendation, which will mount sda1 at system startup with read-write permissions for you and your group, and read-only permissions for others, might be adding this line to /etc/fstab:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ntfs defaults,auto,nls=utf8,uid=1000,gid=1000,dmask=002,fmask=113 0 0
And if you don't have any plans for a shared use of this drive with Windows, you can prefer using EXT4 format and then add this line instead:
UUID=<ID-NO-OF-SDA1> /media/<Your-User-Name>/<Label-Of-SDA1> ext4 nodev,nosuid 0 2
Note: You can get the UUID and Label of SDA1 using GParted.
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
edited Jun 7 '14 at 10:23
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
answered Jun 5 '14 at 15:30
Sadi
8,74543848
8,74543848
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmountis entered in Terminal,fstabentries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstabentries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The commandmountis entered in Terminal,fstabentries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. viafstabentries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.
– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
No need to enter any command to mount?
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:01
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
I have important data that I would not like to lose, also I have an existing NFS mount, which got unmounted the last time I tried something like this!
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 17:07
The command
mount is entered in Terminal, fstab entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. via fstab entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
The command
mount is entered in Terminal, fstab entries like this is another way achieving the same result. AFAIK mounting partitions in this way, i.e. via fstab entries (especially using UUIDs instead of Labels) should not normally interfere with each other, and should not cause any data loss other than gaining full or restricted or no access to this or that device. In any case you might also use Clonezilla to backup a partition in a matter of minutes before trying.– Sadi
Jun 5 '14 at 18:52
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
Why ntfs? Like Jacob suggested above, should it be ext4?
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:56
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
@shank22 : 1) I assumed that you're happy with the existing format of sda1 and would not want to re-format it unless you have a good reason to do so, in which case you should of course use other options for fstab, 2) the existing NTFS format of your sda1 might be more convenient if you intend to use this disk drive from a non-Linux operating system like Windows now or in the future. Otherwise you can of course prefer EXT4 format and perhaps just stick with the defaults in the fstab options.
– Sadi
Jun 7 '14 at 10:13
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f476924%2fmounting-a-new-hard-drive-sda1-to-my-existing-filesystem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you have a GUI?
– dan08
Jun 4 '14 at 20:27
1
What type will it be? ext4? ntfs?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 4 '14 at 21:04
Yes I do have a gui! I don't know if it should be ext4 or ntfs as well.
– shank22
Jun 5 '14 at 16:54
Don't forget to ping in a comment (@someone) ext4 is linux, ntfs is used by windows. should windows be able to read the disk?
– Jacob Vlijm
Jun 5 '14 at 18:09
@Jacob: No, I have not dual booted the machine, so only have Ubuntu running on my box.
– shank22
Jun 6 '14 at 23:57