Minimal Makefile for pdflatex bibtex with output-directory
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
|
show 1 more comment
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
Why don't you usearara
orlatexmk
?
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
1
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
2
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally Irm *.aux
and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.
– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
|
show 1 more comment
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
bibtex pdftex makefile
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1354
1354
Why don't you usearara
orlatexmk
?
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
1
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
2
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally Irm *.aux
and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.
– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
|
show 1 more comment
Why don't you usearara
orlatexmk
?
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
1
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
2
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally Irm *.aux
and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.
– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
Why don't you use
arara
or latexmk
?– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
Why don't you use
arara
or latexmk
?– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
1
1
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
2
2
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally I
rm *.aux
and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally I
rm *.aux
and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468980%2fminimal-makefile-for-pdflatex-bibtex-with-output-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468980%2fminimal-makefile-for-pdflatex-bibtex-with-output-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why don't you use
arara
orlatexmk
?– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
1
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
2
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally I
rm *.aux
and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08