Does Cayley Hamilton Theorem apply for non-diagonalizable matrices as well?












2












$begingroup$


Cayley Hamilton Theorem says that a matrix $A$ satisfies its characteristic equation. My professor proved this for diagonalizable matrices. What happens if $A$ is not diagonalizable? Does the C-H Theorem still hold? Can you give a proof why it holds or why it does not?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It does indeed hold in general
    $endgroup$
    – RhythmInk
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it still holds. One way to see this is to use the fact that diagonalizable matrices are dense in all matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @QiaochuYuan, can you please elaborate?
    $endgroup$
    – Nagabhushan S N
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:43
















2












$begingroup$


Cayley Hamilton Theorem says that a matrix $A$ satisfies its characteristic equation. My professor proved this for diagonalizable matrices. What happens if $A$ is not diagonalizable? Does the C-H Theorem still hold? Can you give a proof why it holds or why it does not?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It does indeed hold in general
    $endgroup$
    – RhythmInk
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it still holds. One way to see this is to use the fact that diagonalizable matrices are dense in all matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @QiaochuYuan, can you please elaborate?
    $endgroup$
    – Nagabhushan S N
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:43














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Cayley Hamilton Theorem says that a matrix $A$ satisfies its characteristic equation. My professor proved this for diagonalizable matrices. What happens if $A$ is not diagonalizable? Does the C-H Theorem still hold? Can you give a proof why it holds or why it does not?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Cayley Hamilton Theorem says that a matrix $A$ satisfies its characteristic equation. My professor proved this for diagonalizable matrices. What happens if $A$ is not diagonalizable? Does the C-H Theorem still hold? Can you give a proof why it holds or why it does not?



Thanks!







linear-algebra matrices characteristic-functions cayley-hamilton






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 2 '18 at 2:21









Nagabhushan S NNagabhushan S N

260214




260214












  • $begingroup$
    It does indeed hold in general
    $endgroup$
    – RhythmInk
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it still holds. One way to see this is to use the fact that diagonalizable matrices are dense in all matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @QiaochuYuan, can you please elaborate?
    $endgroup$
    – Nagabhushan S N
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:43


















  • $begingroup$
    It does indeed hold in general
    $endgroup$
    – RhythmInk
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it still holds. One way to see this is to use the fact that diagonalizable matrices are dense in all matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @QiaochuYuan, can you please elaborate?
    $endgroup$
    – Nagabhushan S N
    Nov 2 '18 at 2:43
















$begingroup$
It does indeed hold in general
$endgroup$
– RhythmInk
Nov 2 '18 at 2:22




$begingroup$
It does indeed hold in general
$endgroup$
– RhythmInk
Nov 2 '18 at 2:22




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, it still holds. One way to see this is to use the fact that diagonalizable matrices are dense in all matrices.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 2 '18 at 2:22




$begingroup$
Yes, it still holds. One way to see this is to use the fact that diagonalizable matrices are dense in all matrices.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 2 '18 at 2:22












$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan, can you please elaborate?
$endgroup$
– Nagabhushan S N
Nov 2 '18 at 2:43




$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan, can you please elaborate?
$endgroup$
– Nagabhushan S N
Nov 2 '18 at 2:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

It holds in general. Also the proof can be found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley%E2%80%93Hamilton_theorem






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981250%2fdoes-cayley-hamilton-theorem-apply-for-non-diagonalizable-matrices-as-well%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    It holds in general. Also the proof can be found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley%E2%80%93Hamilton_theorem






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      It holds in general. Also the proof can be found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley%E2%80%93Hamilton_theorem






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        It holds in general. Also the proof can be found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley%E2%80%93Hamilton_theorem






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It holds in general. Also the proof can be found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley%E2%80%93Hamilton_theorem







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 24 '18 at 17:08









        Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

        15.3k3939




        15.3k3939






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981250%2fdoes-cayley-hamilton-theorem-apply-for-non-diagonalizable-matrices-as-well%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?