How to approach this sequence? (elementary number theory)












4












$begingroup$


Given is the following sequence: $a_1 = 1$ and $a_n$ equals the biggest prime divisor of $1+ a_1*dots*a_{n-1}$ .
It is then claimed: $11$ does not occur in this sequence.



How can one approach this problem? I first thought about trying a proof by contradiction.
Let's then be $a_m$ the first occurrence of $11$ in this sequence. Then there exist $a,b,c,d, e in mathbb{N_0}$ such that:
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c * 7^d * 11^e = 1+ a_1*dots*a_{m-1}$ .



From there however, it looks me like a dead end. It seems like I am missing a key observation. I would be happy, if anyone with more knowledge could offer an advice/suggestion how to begin here.



EDIT: Related: Euclid Mullin Sequence










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am not a number theory specialist, but this does not look “elementary” to me. There are some references in oeis.org/A000946, oeis.org/A216227, and Euclid–Mullin sequence. – Where did you encounter the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    It's from a previous exam preparing for the IMO - so it should be solvable within maybe 1 hour and not require university level mathematics. I tried finding more values of the sequence with a python script, but the values become too big way for the program to handle.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: it's easy to see that no prime can appear twice in the sequence. As to $11$, and the other missing primes, the wiki article gives a reference for the claim
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu, if this is true, this says indeed a lot and probably just nails the problem. I will look into that. EDIT: Ok the wiki article spoilers quite a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:50








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Cox and van der Poorten had a short paper in 1967 that solves this in a fairly elementary way. doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700006236
    $endgroup$
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:59
















4












$begingroup$


Given is the following sequence: $a_1 = 1$ and $a_n$ equals the biggest prime divisor of $1+ a_1*dots*a_{n-1}$ .
It is then claimed: $11$ does not occur in this sequence.



How can one approach this problem? I first thought about trying a proof by contradiction.
Let's then be $a_m$ the first occurrence of $11$ in this sequence. Then there exist $a,b,c,d, e in mathbb{N_0}$ such that:
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c * 7^d * 11^e = 1+ a_1*dots*a_{m-1}$ .



From there however, it looks me like a dead end. It seems like I am missing a key observation. I would be happy, if anyone with more knowledge could offer an advice/suggestion how to begin here.



EDIT: Related: Euclid Mullin Sequence










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am not a number theory specialist, but this does not look “elementary” to me. There are some references in oeis.org/A000946, oeis.org/A216227, and Euclid–Mullin sequence. – Where did you encounter the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    It's from a previous exam preparing for the IMO - so it should be solvable within maybe 1 hour and not require university level mathematics. I tried finding more values of the sequence with a python script, but the values become too big way for the program to handle.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: it's easy to see that no prime can appear twice in the sequence. As to $11$, and the other missing primes, the wiki article gives a reference for the claim
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu, if this is true, this says indeed a lot and probably just nails the problem. I will look into that. EDIT: Ok the wiki article spoilers quite a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:50








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Cox and van der Poorten had a short paper in 1967 that solves this in a fairly elementary way. doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700006236
    $endgroup$
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:59














4












4








4


3



$begingroup$


Given is the following sequence: $a_1 = 1$ and $a_n$ equals the biggest prime divisor of $1+ a_1*dots*a_{n-1}$ .
It is then claimed: $11$ does not occur in this sequence.



How can one approach this problem? I first thought about trying a proof by contradiction.
Let's then be $a_m$ the first occurrence of $11$ in this sequence. Then there exist $a,b,c,d, e in mathbb{N_0}$ such that:
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c * 7^d * 11^e = 1+ a_1*dots*a_{m-1}$ .



From there however, it looks me like a dead end. It seems like I am missing a key observation. I would be happy, if anyone with more knowledge could offer an advice/suggestion how to begin here.



EDIT: Related: Euclid Mullin Sequence










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Given is the following sequence: $a_1 = 1$ and $a_n$ equals the biggest prime divisor of $1+ a_1*dots*a_{n-1}$ .
It is then claimed: $11$ does not occur in this sequence.



How can one approach this problem? I first thought about trying a proof by contradiction.
Let's then be $a_m$ the first occurrence of $11$ in this sequence. Then there exist $a,b,c,d, e in mathbb{N_0}$ such that:
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c * 7^d * 11^e = 1+ a_1*dots*a_{m-1}$ .



From there however, it looks me like a dead end. It seems like I am missing a key observation. I would be happy, if anyone with more knowledge could offer an advice/suggestion how to begin here.



EDIT: Related: Euclid Mullin Sequence







sequences-and-series elementary-number-theory prime-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 28 '18 at 14:08







Imago

















asked Nov 25 '18 at 21:21









ImagoImago

1,27411019




1,27411019












  • $begingroup$
    I am not a number theory specialist, but this does not look “elementary” to me. There are some references in oeis.org/A000946, oeis.org/A216227, and Euclid–Mullin sequence. – Where did you encounter the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    It's from a previous exam preparing for the IMO - so it should be solvable within maybe 1 hour and not require university level mathematics. I tried finding more values of the sequence with a python script, but the values become too big way for the program to handle.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: it's easy to see that no prime can appear twice in the sequence. As to $11$, and the other missing primes, the wiki article gives a reference for the claim
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu, if this is true, this says indeed a lot and probably just nails the problem. I will look into that. EDIT: Ok the wiki article spoilers quite a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:50








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Cox and van der Poorten had a short paper in 1967 that solves this in a fairly elementary way. doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700006236
    $endgroup$
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:59


















  • $begingroup$
    I am not a number theory specialist, but this does not look “elementary” to me. There are some references in oeis.org/A000946, oeis.org/A216227, and Euclid–Mullin sequence. – Where did you encounter the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    It's from a previous exam preparing for the IMO - so it should be solvable within maybe 1 hour and not require university level mathematics. I tried finding more values of the sequence with a python script, but the values become too big way for the program to handle.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: it's easy to see that no prime can appear twice in the sequence. As to $11$, and the other missing primes, the wiki article gives a reference for the claim
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:46










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu, if this is true, this says indeed a lot and probably just nails the problem. I will look into that. EDIT: Ok the wiki article spoilers quite a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:50








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Cox and van der Poorten had a short paper in 1967 that solves this in a fairly elementary way. doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700006236
    $endgroup$
    – B. Goddard
    Nov 25 '18 at 21:59
















$begingroup$
I am not a number theory specialist, but this does not look “elementary” to me. There are some references in oeis.org/A000946, oeis.org/A216227, and Euclid–Mullin sequence. – Where did you encounter the problem?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 25 '18 at 21:43






$begingroup$
I am not a number theory specialist, but this does not look “elementary” to me. There are some references in oeis.org/A000946, oeis.org/A216227, and Euclid–Mullin sequence. – Where did you encounter the problem?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Nov 25 '18 at 21:43














$begingroup$
It's from a previous exam preparing for the IMO - so it should be solvable within maybe 1 hour and not require university level mathematics. I tried finding more values of the sequence with a python script, but the values become too big way for the program to handle.
$endgroup$
– Imago
Nov 25 '18 at 21:46






$begingroup$
It's from a previous exam preparing for the IMO - so it should be solvable within maybe 1 hour and not require university level mathematics. I tried finding more values of the sequence with a python script, but the values become too big way for the program to handle.
$endgroup$
– Imago
Nov 25 '18 at 21:46






1




1




$begingroup$
Note: it's easy to see that no prime can appear twice in the sequence. As to $11$, and the other missing primes, the wiki article gives a reference for the claim
$endgroup$
– lulu
Nov 25 '18 at 21:46




$begingroup$
Note: it's easy to see that no prime can appear twice in the sequence. As to $11$, and the other missing primes, the wiki article gives a reference for the claim
$endgroup$
– lulu
Nov 25 '18 at 21:46












$begingroup$
@lulu, if this is true, this says indeed a lot and probably just nails the problem. I will look into that. EDIT: Ok the wiki article spoilers quite a lot.
$endgroup$
– Imago
Nov 25 '18 at 21:50






$begingroup$
@lulu, if this is true, this says indeed a lot and probably just nails the problem. I will look into that. EDIT: Ok the wiki article spoilers quite a lot.
$endgroup$
– Imago
Nov 25 '18 at 21:50






2




2




$begingroup$
Cox and van der Poorten had a short paper in 1967 that solves this in a fairly elementary way. doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700006236
$endgroup$
– B. Goddard
Nov 25 '18 at 21:59




$begingroup$
Cox and van der Poorten had a short paper in 1967 that solves this in a fairly elementary way. doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700006236
$endgroup$
– B. Goddard
Nov 25 '18 at 21:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Note: Personally, I find my solution too short and "too easy" to be a solution to this problem. Therefore, feel free to make a note or comment, when there is an error.



I would "solve" this specific problem stated above like this:



The first elements of the sequence can be computed fairly quickly:
$a_1 = 1, a_2 = 2, a_3 = 7, a_4 = 43, a_5 = 139$



Now following lulu's advice, we show that a prime number occurs at most twice in this sequence.



Given that $a_n = 1+a_1 * dots * a_{n-1}$ it follows that $a_n equiv 1pmod {a_i} $ for $1 le i le n-1$, thus there is no $a_i$ with $a_i| a_n$ $Rightarrow a_i neq a_n
forall i$
with: $ 1le i le n-1$



Now: Let $a_n = 11$ and $b_n = 1+ a_1* dots * a_{n-1}$ then by definition $11|b_n$ and if $k|b_n$ and $k neq 11$, then $k = 1 lor k= 5$, in particular: $2,3,7 nmid b_n$
$Rightarrow b_n le 55$, but: $frac{b_n}{55} ge frac{a_1 * dots * a_5 +1}{55} gt 1 Rightarrow$ $b_n$ has at least one prime factor greater than $11$, thus: $11$ can't occur in this sequence.



EDIT: Proving that does not occur in the sequence can be doen quickly:
If 5 occurred, then we had for some $b_n = 2^a * 3^b * 5^c = 1+2* dots * a_{n-1} $.



$a,b$ must be equal to $0$. If they weren't, then
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c equiv 0 pmod {2,3} $, but $b_n equiv 1 pmod {2,3} $



Thus $b_n$ would be of the form: $b_n = 5^c$ for some $c$ however:
$5^c - 1 equiv 0 pmod 4 forall c in mathbb{N}$ and $a_1* dots * a_{n-1} equiv 2 pmod 4 $



Thus $5$ cannot occur in the sequence.



However there is still some way to go to prove $11$ does not occur and I actually don't see how one would do that. The same argument/trick, used for $5$, doesn't seem work.



EDIT2 : $5^a * 11 ^b equiv 3 pmod 4$ as $2 | a_1 * dots* a_{n-1} $
$Rightarrow 1^a * 3^b equiv 3 pmod 4 Rightarrow b$ is odd.



$3 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-1)^a *(-11)^b equiv (-1)^{a+b} -1 equiv 0 pmod 3 Rightarrow a+b $ even$ Rightarrow a$ is also odd.



Then: $7 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-2)^a * 4^b equiv (-2)^{a+2*b} equiv 1 pmod 7 $



This however is only the case: if $a+2*b$ is a multiple of $6$ (Little Fermat), which can't be the case. Hence: $11$ cannot occur in the series and we are done. Quite a journey over the past few days, but I believe the proof is now complete.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
    $endgroup$
    – Empy2
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:27












  • $begingroup$
    Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:40











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013416%2fhow-to-approach-this-sequence-elementary-number-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Note: Personally, I find my solution too short and "too easy" to be a solution to this problem. Therefore, feel free to make a note or comment, when there is an error.



I would "solve" this specific problem stated above like this:



The first elements of the sequence can be computed fairly quickly:
$a_1 = 1, a_2 = 2, a_3 = 7, a_4 = 43, a_5 = 139$



Now following lulu's advice, we show that a prime number occurs at most twice in this sequence.



Given that $a_n = 1+a_1 * dots * a_{n-1}$ it follows that $a_n equiv 1pmod {a_i} $ for $1 le i le n-1$, thus there is no $a_i$ with $a_i| a_n$ $Rightarrow a_i neq a_n
forall i$
with: $ 1le i le n-1$



Now: Let $a_n = 11$ and $b_n = 1+ a_1* dots * a_{n-1}$ then by definition $11|b_n$ and if $k|b_n$ and $k neq 11$, then $k = 1 lor k= 5$, in particular: $2,3,7 nmid b_n$
$Rightarrow b_n le 55$, but: $frac{b_n}{55} ge frac{a_1 * dots * a_5 +1}{55} gt 1 Rightarrow$ $b_n$ has at least one prime factor greater than $11$, thus: $11$ can't occur in this sequence.



EDIT: Proving that does not occur in the sequence can be doen quickly:
If 5 occurred, then we had for some $b_n = 2^a * 3^b * 5^c = 1+2* dots * a_{n-1} $.



$a,b$ must be equal to $0$. If they weren't, then
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c equiv 0 pmod {2,3} $, but $b_n equiv 1 pmod {2,3} $



Thus $b_n$ would be of the form: $b_n = 5^c$ for some $c$ however:
$5^c - 1 equiv 0 pmod 4 forall c in mathbb{N}$ and $a_1* dots * a_{n-1} equiv 2 pmod 4 $



Thus $5$ cannot occur in the sequence.



However there is still some way to go to prove $11$ does not occur and I actually don't see how one would do that. The same argument/trick, used for $5$, doesn't seem work.



EDIT2 : $5^a * 11 ^b equiv 3 pmod 4$ as $2 | a_1 * dots* a_{n-1} $
$Rightarrow 1^a * 3^b equiv 3 pmod 4 Rightarrow b$ is odd.



$3 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-1)^a *(-11)^b equiv (-1)^{a+b} -1 equiv 0 pmod 3 Rightarrow a+b $ even$ Rightarrow a$ is also odd.



Then: $7 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-2)^a * 4^b equiv (-2)^{a+2*b} equiv 1 pmod 7 $



This however is only the case: if $a+2*b$ is a multiple of $6$ (Little Fermat), which can't be the case. Hence: $11$ cannot occur in the series and we are done. Quite a journey over the past few days, but I believe the proof is now complete.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
    $endgroup$
    – Empy2
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:27












  • $begingroup$
    Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:40
















0












$begingroup$

Note: Personally, I find my solution too short and "too easy" to be a solution to this problem. Therefore, feel free to make a note or comment, when there is an error.



I would "solve" this specific problem stated above like this:



The first elements of the sequence can be computed fairly quickly:
$a_1 = 1, a_2 = 2, a_3 = 7, a_4 = 43, a_5 = 139$



Now following lulu's advice, we show that a prime number occurs at most twice in this sequence.



Given that $a_n = 1+a_1 * dots * a_{n-1}$ it follows that $a_n equiv 1pmod {a_i} $ for $1 le i le n-1$, thus there is no $a_i$ with $a_i| a_n$ $Rightarrow a_i neq a_n
forall i$
with: $ 1le i le n-1$



Now: Let $a_n = 11$ and $b_n = 1+ a_1* dots * a_{n-1}$ then by definition $11|b_n$ and if $k|b_n$ and $k neq 11$, then $k = 1 lor k= 5$, in particular: $2,3,7 nmid b_n$
$Rightarrow b_n le 55$, but: $frac{b_n}{55} ge frac{a_1 * dots * a_5 +1}{55} gt 1 Rightarrow$ $b_n$ has at least one prime factor greater than $11$, thus: $11$ can't occur in this sequence.



EDIT: Proving that does not occur in the sequence can be doen quickly:
If 5 occurred, then we had for some $b_n = 2^a * 3^b * 5^c = 1+2* dots * a_{n-1} $.



$a,b$ must be equal to $0$. If they weren't, then
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c equiv 0 pmod {2,3} $, but $b_n equiv 1 pmod {2,3} $



Thus $b_n$ would be of the form: $b_n = 5^c$ for some $c$ however:
$5^c - 1 equiv 0 pmod 4 forall c in mathbb{N}$ and $a_1* dots * a_{n-1} equiv 2 pmod 4 $



Thus $5$ cannot occur in the sequence.



However there is still some way to go to prove $11$ does not occur and I actually don't see how one would do that. The same argument/trick, used for $5$, doesn't seem work.



EDIT2 : $5^a * 11 ^b equiv 3 pmod 4$ as $2 | a_1 * dots* a_{n-1} $
$Rightarrow 1^a * 3^b equiv 3 pmod 4 Rightarrow b$ is odd.



$3 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-1)^a *(-11)^b equiv (-1)^{a+b} -1 equiv 0 pmod 3 Rightarrow a+b $ even$ Rightarrow a$ is also odd.



Then: $7 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-2)^a * 4^b equiv (-2)^{a+2*b} equiv 1 pmod 7 $



This however is only the case: if $a+2*b$ is a multiple of $6$ (Little Fermat), which can't be the case. Hence: $11$ cannot occur in the series and we are done. Quite a journey over the past few days, but I believe the proof is now complete.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
    $endgroup$
    – Empy2
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:27












  • $begingroup$
    Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:40














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Note: Personally, I find my solution too short and "too easy" to be a solution to this problem. Therefore, feel free to make a note or comment, when there is an error.



I would "solve" this specific problem stated above like this:



The first elements of the sequence can be computed fairly quickly:
$a_1 = 1, a_2 = 2, a_3 = 7, a_4 = 43, a_5 = 139$



Now following lulu's advice, we show that a prime number occurs at most twice in this sequence.



Given that $a_n = 1+a_1 * dots * a_{n-1}$ it follows that $a_n equiv 1pmod {a_i} $ for $1 le i le n-1$, thus there is no $a_i$ with $a_i| a_n$ $Rightarrow a_i neq a_n
forall i$
with: $ 1le i le n-1$



Now: Let $a_n = 11$ and $b_n = 1+ a_1* dots * a_{n-1}$ then by definition $11|b_n$ and if $k|b_n$ and $k neq 11$, then $k = 1 lor k= 5$, in particular: $2,3,7 nmid b_n$
$Rightarrow b_n le 55$, but: $frac{b_n}{55} ge frac{a_1 * dots * a_5 +1}{55} gt 1 Rightarrow$ $b_n$ has at least one prime factor greater than $11$, thus: $11$ can't occur in this sequence.



EDIT: Proving that does not occur in the sequence can be doen quickly:
If 5 occurred, then we had for some $b_n = 2^a * 3^b * 5^c = 1+2* dots * a_{n-1} $.



$a,b$ must be equal to $0$. If they weren't, then
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c equiv 0 pmod {2,3} $, but $b_n equiv 1 pmod {2,3} $



Thus $b_n$ would be of the form: $b_n = 5^c$ for some $c$ however:
$5^c - 1 equiv 0 pmod 4 forall c in mathbb{N}$ and $a_1* dots * a_{n-1} equiv 2 pmod 4 $



Thus $5$ cannot occur in the sequence.



However there is still some way to go to prove $11$ does not occur and I actually don't see how one would do that. The same argument/trick, used for $5$, doesn't seem work.



EDIT2 : $5^a * 11 ^b equiv 3 pmod 4$ as $2 | a_1 * dots* a_{n-1} $
$Rightarrow 1^a * 3^b equiv 3 pmod 4 Rightarrow b$ is odd.



$3 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-1)^a *(-11)^b equiv (-1)^{a+b} -1 equiv 0 pmod 3 Rightarrow a+b $ even$ Rightarrow a$ is also odd.



Then: $7 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-2)^a * 4^b equiv (-2)^{a+2*b} equiv 1 pmod 7 $



This however is only the case: if $a+2*b$ is a multiple of $6$ (Little Fermat), which can't be the case. Hence: $11$ cannot occur in the series and we are done. Quite a journey over the past few days, but I believe the proof is now complete.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Note: Personally, I find my solution too short and "too easy" to be a solution to this problem. Therefore, feel free to make a note or comment, when there is an error.



I would "solve" this specific problem stated above like this:



The first elements of the sequence can be computed fairly quickly:
$a_1 = 1, a_2 = 2, a_3 = 7, a_4 = 43, a_5 = 139$



Now following lulu's advice, we show that a prime number occurs at most twice in this sequence.



Given that $a_n = 1+a_1 * dots * a_{n-1}$ it follows that $a_n equiv 1pmod {a_i} $ for $1 le i le n-1$, thus there is no $a_i$ with $a_i| a_n$ $Rightarrow a_i neq a_n
forall i$
with: $ 1le i le n-1$



Now: Let $a_n = 11$ and $b_n = 1+ a_1* dots * a_{n-1}$ then by definition $11|b_n$ and if $k|b_n$ and $k neq 11$, then $k = 1 lor k= 5$, in particular: $2,3,7 nmid b_n$
$Rightarrow b_n le 55$, but: $frac{b_n}{55} ge frac{a_1 * dots * a_5 +1}{55} gt 1 Rightarrow$ $b_n$ has at least one prime factor greater than $11$, thus: $11$ can't occur in this sequence.



EDIT: Proving that does not occur in the sequence can be doen quickly:
If 5 occurred, then we had for some $b_n = 2^a * 3^b * 5^c = 1+2* dots * a_{n-1} $.



$a,b$ must be equal to $0$. If they weren't, then
$2^a * 3^b * 5^c equiv 0 pmod {2,3} $, but $b_n equiv 1 pmod {2,3} $



Thus $b_n$ would be of the form: $b_n = 5^c$ for some $c$ however:
$5^c - 1 equiv 0 pmod 4 forall c in mathbb{N}$ and $a_1* dots * a_{n-1} equiv 2 pmod 4 $



Thus $5$ cannot occur in the sequence.



However there is still some way to go to prove $11$ does not occur and I actually don't see how one would do that. The same argument/trick, used for $5$, doesn't seem work.



EDIT2 : $5^a * 11 ^b equiv 3 pmod 4$ as $2 | a_1 * dots* a_{n-1} $
$Rightarrow 1^a * 3^b equiv 3 pmod 4 Rightarrow b$ is odd.



$3 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-1)^a *(-11)^b equiv (-1)^{a+b} -1 equiv 0 pmod 3 Rightarrow a+b $ even$ Rightarrow a$ is also odd.



Then: $7 | 5^a * 11^b -1 Rightarrow (-2)^a * 4^b equiv (-2)^{a+2*b} equiv 1 pmod 7 $



This however is only the case: if $a+2*b$ is a multiple of $6$ (Little Fermat), which can't be the case. Hence: $11$ cannot occur in the series and we are done. Quite a journey over the past few days, but I believe the proof is now complete.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 1 '18 at 19:32

























answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:10









ImagoImago

1,27411019




1,27411019








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
    $endgroup$
    – Empy2
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:27












  • $begingroup$
    Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:40














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
    $endgroup$
    – Empy2
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:27












  • $begingroup$
    Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
    $endgroup$
    – Imago
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:40








1




1




$begingroup$
$b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Nov 26 '18 at 14:27






$begingroup$
$b_n$ might be $5^y11^z$ for integers $y,z$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Nov 26 '18 at 14:27














$begingroup$
Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
$endgroup$
– Imago
Nov 26 '18 at 14:40




$begingroup$
Valid point. I need more time to think about it.
$endgroup$
– Imago
Nov 26 '18 at 14:40


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013416%2fhow-to-approach-this-sequence-elementary-number-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?