Even numbers of circ causes weird spacing












7















I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?



Example:



documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $

2 circ: $circ circ $

3 circ: $circ circ circ$

4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $

7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $

end{document}


example rendered










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    One way is to make circ not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}

    – Sigur
    Jan 16 at 21:44











  • ... red circ, blue circ. :-)

    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 16 at 23:57
















7















I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?



Example:



documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $

2 circ: $circ circ $

3 circ: $circ circ circ$

4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $

7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $

end{document}


example rendered










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    One way is to make circ not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}

    – Sigur
    Jan 16 at 21:44











  • ... red circ, blue circ. :-)

    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 16 at 23:57














7












7








7


1






I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?



Example:



documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $

2 circ: $circ circ $

3 circ: $circ circ circ$

4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $

7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $

end{document}


example rendered










share|improve this question
















I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?



Example:



documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $

2 circ: $circ circ $

3 circ: $circ circ circ$

4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $

7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $

end{document}


example rendered







math-mode spacing






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 16 at 22:16







Mark Omo

















asked Jan 16 at 21:41









Mark OmoMark Omo

1385




1385








  • 1





    One way is to make circ not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}

    – Sigur
    Jan 16 at 21:44











  • ... red circ, blue circ. :-)

    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 16 at 23:57














  • 1





    One way is to make circ not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}

    – Sigur
    Jan 16 at 21:44











  • ... red circ, blue circ. :-)

    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 16 at 23:57








1




1





One way is to make circ not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}

– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44





One way is to make circ not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}

– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44













... red circ, blue circ. :-)

– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57





... red circ, blue circ. :-)

– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13














From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)




Exercise 19.7

B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)’ and ‘eqno(**)’,
and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
eqno(***)’ and got a surprise. What was it?



When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
* to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’, the
binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)’ remains of type Bin.
So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
type ‘eqno(*{*}*)’; or you can change mathcode`*, if you never use
* as a binary operation.




It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ is a binary operation symbol just like *, you get the same.



If you want evenly spaced circ symbols you can use



{circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}


Even better, define a suitable command:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}

ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
{
ensuremath
{{
{circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
}}
}
ExplSyntaxOff

begin{document}

$circs{1}$

$circs{2}$

$circs{3}$

$circs{4}$

$circs{5}$

$circs{6}$

$circs{7}$

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Great explanation (and excercise too)!

    – manooooh
    Jan 16 at 22:09






  • 1





    @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

    – egreg
    Jan 16 at 22:09



















10














When you issue showcirc you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2 denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circs show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circs):



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

1 circ: $circ$

2 circ: $circ circ$

2 circ: $circ circ {}$

3 circ: $circ circ circ$

4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$

5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$

6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$

7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$

end{document}


If you just want to list a number of circs with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circs. Alternatively, use {circ} or mathord{circ} to avoid the surrounding space; mathord turns its argument into a math ordinal.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470447%2feven-numbers-of-circ-causes-weird-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13














    From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)




    Exercise 19.7

    B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)’ and ‘eqno(**)’,
    and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
    ‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
    ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
    eqno(***)’ and got a surprise. What was it?



    When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
    * to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’, the
    binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
    a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)’ remains of type Bin.
    So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
    type ‘eqno(*{*}*)’; or you can change mathcode`*, if you never use
    * as a binary operation.




    It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ is a binary operation symbol just like *, you get the same.



    If you want evenly spaced circ symbols you can use



    {circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}


    Even better, define a suitable command:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{xparse}

    ExplSyntaxOn
    NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
    {
    ensuremath
    {{
    {circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
    }}
    }
    ExplSyntaxOff

    begin{document}

    $circs{1}$

    $circs{2}$

    $circs{3}$

    $circs{4}$

    $circs{5}$

    $circs{6}$

    $circs{7}$

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























    • Great explanation (and excercise too)!

      – manooooh
      Jan 16 at 22:09






    • 1





      @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

      – egreg
      Jan 16 at 22:09
















    13














    From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)




    Exercise 19.7

    B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)’ and ‘eqno(**)’,
    and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
    ‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
    ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
    eqno(***)’ and got a surprise. What was it?



    When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
    * to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’, the
    binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
    a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)’ remains of type Bin.
    So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
    type ‘eqno(*{*}*)’; or you can change mathcode`*, if you never use
    * as a binary operation.




    It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ is a binary operation symbol just like *, you get the same.



    If you want evenly spaced circ symbols you can use



    {circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}


    Even better, define a suitable command:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{xparse}

    ExplSyntaxOn
    NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
    {
    ensuremath
    {{
    {circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
    }}
    }
    ExplSyntaxOff

    begin{document}

    $circs{1}$

    $circs{2}$

    $circs{3}$

    $circs{4}$

    $circs{5}$

    $circs{6}$

    $circs{7}$

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























    • Great explanation (and excercise too)!

      – manooooh
      Jan 16 at 22:09






    • 1





      @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

      – egreg
      Jan 16 at 22:09














    13












    13








    13







    From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)




    Exercise 19.7

    B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)’ and ‘eqno(**)’,
    and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
    ‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
    ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
    eqno(***)’ and got a surprise. What was it?



    When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
    * to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’, the
    binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
    a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)’ remains of type Bin.
    So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
    type ‘eqno(*{*}*)’; or you can change mathcode`*, if you never use
    * as a binary operation.




    It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ is a binary operation symbol just like *, you get the same.



    If you want evenly spaced circ symbols you can use



    {circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}


    Even better, define a suitable command:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{xparse}

    ExplSyntaxOn
    NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
    {
    ensuremath
    {{
    {circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
    }}
    }
    ExplSyntaxOff

    begin{document}

    $circs{1}$

    $circs{2}$

    $circs{3}$

    $circs{4}$

    $circs{5}$

    $circs{6}$

    $circs{7}$

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)




    Exercise 19.7

    B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)’ and ‘eqno(**)’,
    and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
    ‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
    ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
    eqno(***)’ and got a surprise. What was it?



    When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
    * to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’, the
    binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
    a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)’ remains of type Bin.
    So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
    type ‘eqno(*{*}*)’; or you can change mathcode`*, if you never use
    * as a binary operation.




    It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ is a binary operation symbol just like *, you get the same.



    If you want evenly spaced circ symbols you can use



    {circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}


    Even better, define a suitable command:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{xparse}

    ExplSyntaxOn
    NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
    {
    ensuremath
    {{
    {circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
    }}
    }
    ExplSyntaxOff

    begin{document}

    $circs{1}$

    $circs{2}$

    $circs{3}$

    $circs{4}$

    $circs{5}$

    $circs{6}$

    $circs{7}$

    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 16 at 22:14

























    answered Jan 16 at 22:07









    egregegreg

    715k8618983185




    715k8618983185













    • Great explanation (and excercise too)!

      – manooooh
      Jan 16 at 22:09






    • 1





      @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

      – egreg
      Jan 16 at 22:09



















    • Great explanation (and excercise too)!

      – manooooh
      Jan 16 at 22:09






    • 1





      @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

      – egreg
      Jan 16 at 22:09

















    Great explanation (and excercise too)!

    – manooooh
    Jan 16 at 22:09





    Great explanation (and excercise too)!

    – manooooh
    Jan 16 at 22:09




    1




    1





    @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

    – egreg
    Jan 16 at 22:09





    @manooooh That's due to Knuth. ;-)

    – egreg
    Jan 16 at 22:09











    10














    When you issue showcirc you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2 denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circs show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circs):



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    begin{document}

    1 circ: $circ$

    2 circ: $circ circ$

    2 circ: $circ circ {}$

    3 circ: $circ circ circ$

    4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

    4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$

    5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

    6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$

    6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$

    7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$

    end{document}


    If you just want to list a number of circs with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circs. Alternatively, use {circ} or mathord{circ} to avoid the surrounding space; mathord turns its argument into a math ordinal.






    share|improve this answer




























      10














      When you issue showcirc you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2 denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circs show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circs):



      enter image description here



      documentclass{article}

      begin{document}

      1 circ: $circ$

      2 circ: $circ circ$

      2 circ: $circ circ {}$

      3 circ: $circ circ circ$

      4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

      4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$

      5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

      6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$

      6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$

      7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$

      end{document}


      If you just want to list a number of circs with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circs. Alternatively, use {circ} or mathord{circ} to avoid the surrounding space; mathord turns its argument into a math ordinal.






      share|improve this answer


























        10












        10








        10







        When you issue showcirc you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2 denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circs show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circs):



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}

        begin{document}

        1 circ: $circ$

        2 circ: $circ circ$

        2 circ: $circ circ {}$

        3 circ: $circ circ circ$

        4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

        4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$

        5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

        6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$

        6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$

        7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$

        end{document}


        If you just want to list a number of circs with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circs. Alternatively, use {circ} or mathord{circ} to avoid the surrounding space; mathord turns its argument into a math ordinal.






        share|improve this answer













        When you issue showcirc you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2 denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circs show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circs):



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}

        begin{document}

        1 circ: $circ$

        2 circ: $circ circ$

        2 circ: $circ circ {}$

        3 circ: $circ circ circ$

        4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$

        4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$

        5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $

        6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$

        6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$

        7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$

        end{document}


        If you just want to list a number of circs with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circs. Alternatively, use {circ} or mathord{circ} to avoid the surrounding space; mathord turns its argument into a math ordinal.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 16 at 21:54









        WernerWerner

        441k679721665




        441k679721665






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470447%2feven-numbers-of-circ-causes-weird-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?