Isomorphism between the Clifford group and the quaternions
How do I find an explicit isomorphism between the elements of the Clifford group and some 24 quaternions?
The easy part:
The multiplication of matrices should correspond to multiplication of quaternions.
The identity matrix $I$ should be mapped to the quaternion $1$.
The hard part:
To what should the other elements of the Clifford group be mapped? Since the following to elements generate the entire group, mapping these will be sufficient:
$$H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&-1end{bmatrix}text{ and }P=begin{bmatrix}1&0\0&iend{bmatrix}$$
Can anybody help?
clifford-group
add a comment |
How do I find an explicit isomorphism between the elements of the Clifford group and some 24 quaternions?
The easy part:
The multiplication of matrices should correspond to multiplication of quaternions.
The identity matrix $I$ should be mapped to the quaternion $1$.
The hard part:
To what should the other elements of the Clifford group be mapped? Since the following to elements generate the entire group, mapping these will be sufficient:
$$H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&-1end{bmatrix}text{ and }P=begin{bmatrix}1&0\0&iend{bmatrix}$$
Can anybody help?
clifford-group
add a comment |
How do I find an explicit isomorphism between the elements of the Clifford group and some 24 quaternions?
The easy part:
The multiplication of matrices should correspond to multiplication of quaternions.
The identity matrix $I$ should be mapped to the quaternion $1$.
The hard part:
To what should the other elements of the Clifford group be mapped? Since the following to elements generate the entire group, mapping these will be sufficient:
$$H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&-1end{bmatrix}text{ and }P=begin{bmatrix}1&0\0&iend{bmatrix}$$
Can anybody help?
clifford-group
How do I find an explicit isomorphism between the elements of the Clifford group and some 24 quaternions?
The easy part:
The multiplication of matrices should correspond to multiplication of quaternions.
The identity matrix $I$ should be mapped to the quaternion $1$.
The hard part:
To what should the other elements of the Clifford group be mapped? Since the following to elements generate the entire group, mapping these will be sufficient:
$$H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&-1end{bmatrix}text{ and }P=begin{bmatrix}1&0\0&iend{bmatrix}$$
Can anybody help?
clifford-group
clifford-group
asked Dec 11 '18 at 13:46
Knot Log
434
434
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The quaternions are represented faithfully in two dimensions by the unit matrix and the Pauli matrices multiplied by the imaginary unit: $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$ and $k = sqrt{-1} Z$ respectively, thus you only need to write $H$ and $P$ the linear combinations: $H = -frac{sqrt{-1} }{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P = frac{1+sqrt{-1}}{2}(1-k)$
However, this is not an isomorphism between the Clifford group and the quaternions, because here we use the quaternions as an algebra not a group. What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra.
The term Quaternion group is reserved to another subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra consisting of $pm 1$, $pm (-iX = R_x(pi))$, $pm (-iY = R_y(pi))$ and $pm (-iZ = R_z(pi))$. This group is called the quaternion group. This group can be generated by $pi$ rotations around two major axes. However, the order-8 quaternion group is not isomorphic to the order-24 Clifford group, which can be generated by $frac{pi}{2}$ rotations around two major axes. The Clifford group is in a certain sense the square root of the quaternion group.
Clarifications
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points:
1) The quaternions imaginary units should be represented as $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$, $k = sqrt{-1} Z$, as they have to square to $-1$ (I have corrected that in the main text) .
2) I forgot to mention that we need to work with the quaternion algebra over the complex field, i.e., we need to distinguish between the complex imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$ and the quaternion $i$, (I hope you took care of that in your analysis – in any case I have added the explicit expressions of $H$ and $P$ to the main text. In addition, it is correct that global phases are not important when you use the elements as quantum gates, and you correctly took equivalence classes.
However, Please see the article by Michel Planat , where in section 2.2. he mentions that the group generated by $H$ and $P$ should be of order 192, such that only when you remove a $mathbb{Z}_8$ center you reach the 24 element Clifford group (I haven't done the work myself).
Moreover, it is possible to generate the $24$ element group directly without additional phases (Please see the lecture notes by Michel Devoret if you start with generators of unit determinant (for example, $R_x(frac{pi}{2})$ and $R_z(frac{pi}{2})$), because the Clifford group is geometric, as it is isomorphic to the octahedral group, the group of symmetries of the cube or the octahedron and all of its elements are rotations, i.e., with a unit determinant.
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
1
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f4910%2fisomorphism-between-the-clifford-group-and-the-quaternions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The quaternions are represented faithfully in two dimensions by the unit matrix and the Pauli matrices multiplied by the imaginary unit: $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$ and $k = sqrt{-1} Z$ respectively, thus you only need to write $H$ and $P$ the linear combinations: $H = -frac{sqrt{-1} }{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P = frac{1+sqrt{-1}}{2}(1-k)$
However, this is not an isomorphism between the Clifford group and the quaternions, because here we use the quaternions as an algebra not a group. What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra.
The term Quaternion group is reserved to another subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra consisting of $pm 1$, $pm (-iX = R_x(pi))$, $pm (-iY = R_y(pi))$ and $pm (-iZ = R_z(pi))$. This group is called the quaternion group. This group can be generated by $pi$ rotations around two major axes. However, the order-8 quaternion group is not isomorphic to the order-24 Clifford group, which can be generated by $frac{pi}{2}$ rotations around two major axes. The Clifford group is in a certain sense the square root of the quaternion group.
Clarifications
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points:
1) The quaternions imaginary units should be represented as $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$, $k = sqrt{-1} Z$, as they have to square to $-1$ (I have corrected that in the main text) .
2) I forgot to mention that we need to work with the quaternion algebra over the complex field, i.e., we need to distinguish between the complex imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$ and the quaternion $i$, (I hope you took care of that in your analysis – in any case I have added the explicit expressions of $H$ and $P$ to the main text. In addition, it is correct that global phases are not important when you use the elements as quantum gates, and you correctly took equivalence classes.
However, Please see the article by Michel Planat , where in section 2.2. he mentions that the group generated by $H$ and $P$ should be of order 192, such that only when you remove a $mathbb{Z}_8$ center you reach the 24 element Clifford group (I haven't done the work myself).
Moreover, it is possible to generate the $24$ element group directly without additional phases (Please see the lecture notes by Michel Devoret if you start with generators of unit determinant (for example, $R_x(frac{pi}{2})$ and $R_z(frac{pi}{2})$), because the Clifford group is geometric, as it is isomorphic to the octahedral group, the group of symmetries of the cube or the octahedron and all of its elements are rotations, i.e., with a unit determinant.
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
1
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
add a comment |
The quaternions are represented faithfully in two dimensions by the unit matrix and the Pauli matrices multiplied by the imaginary unit: $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$ and $k = sqrt{-1} Z$ respectively, thus you only need to write $H$ and $P$ the linear combinations: $H = -frac{sqrt{-1} }{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P = frac{1+sqrt{-1}}{2}(1-k)$
However, this is not an isomorphism between the Clifford group and the quaternions, because here we use the quaternions as an algebra not a group. What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra.
The term Quaternion group is reserved to another subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra consisting of $pm 1$, $pm (-iX = R_x(pi))$, $pm (-iY = R_y(pi))$ and $pm (-iZ = R_z(pi))$. This group is called the quaternion group. This group can be generated by $pi$ rotations around two major axes. However, the order-8 quaternion group is not isomorphic to the order-24 Clifford group, which can be generated by $frac{pi}{2}$ rotations around two major axes. The Clifford group is in a certain sense the square root of the quaternion group.
Clarifications
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points:
1) The quaternions imaginary units should be represented as $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$, $k = sqrt{-1} Z$, as they have to square to $-1$ (I have corrected that in the main text) .
2) I forgot to mention that we need to work with the quaternion algebra over the complex field, i.e., we need to distinguish between the complex imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$ and the quaternion $i$, (I hope you took care of that in your analysis – in any case I have added the explicit expressions of $H$ and $P$ to the main text. In addition, it is correct that global phases are not important when you use the elements as quantum gates, and you correctly took equivalence classes.
However, Please see the article by Michel Planat , where in section 2.2. he mentions that the group generated by $H$ and $P$ should be of order 192, such that only when you remove a $mathbb{Z}_8$ center you reach the 24 element Clifford group (I haven't done the work myself).
Moreover, it is possible to generate the $24$ element group directly without additional phases (Please see the lecture notes by Michel Devoret if you start with generators of unit determinant (for example, $R_x(frac{pi}{2})$ and $R_z(frac{pi}{2})$), because the Clifford group is geometric, as it is isomorphic to the octahedral group, the group of symmetries of the cube or the octahedron and all of its elements are rotations, i.e., with a unit determinant.
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
1
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
add a comment |
The quaternions are represented faithfully in two dimensions by the unit matrix and the Pauli matrices multiplied by the imaginary unit: $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$ and $k = sqrt{-1} Z$ respectively, thus you only need to write $H$ and $P$ the linear combinations: $H = -frac{sqrt{-1} }{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P = frac{1+sqrt{-1}}{2}(1-k)$
However, this is not an isomorphism between the Clifford group and the quaternions, because here we use the quaternions as an algebra not a group. What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra.
The term Quaternion group is reserved to another subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra consisting of $pm 1$, $pm (-iX = R_x(pi))$, $pm (-iY = R_y(pi))$ and $pm (-iZ = R_z(pi))$. This group is called the quaternion group. This group can be generated by $pi$ rotations around two major axes. However, the order-8 quaternion group is not isomorphic to the order-24 Clifford group, which can be generated by $frac{pi}{2}$ rotations around two major axes. The Clifford group is in a certain sense the square root of the quaternion group.
Clarifications
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points:
1) The quaternions imaginary units should be represented as $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$, $k = sqrt{-1} Z$, as they have to square to $-1$ (I have corrected that in the main text) .
2) I forgot to mention that we need to work with the quaternion algebra over the complex field, i.e., we need to distinguish between the complex imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$ and the quaternion $i$, (I hope you took care of that in your analysis – in any case I have added the explicit expressions of $H$ and $P$ to the main text. In addition, it is correct that global phases are not important when you use the elements as quantum gates, and you correctly took equivalence classes.
However, Please see the article by Michel Planat , where in section 2.2. he mentions that the group generated by $H$ and $P$ should be of order 192, such that only when you remove a $mathbb{Z}_8$ center you reach the 24 element Clifford group (I haven't done the work myself).
Moreover, it is possible to generate the $24$ element group directly without additional phases (Please see the lecture notes by Michel Devoret if you start with generators of unit determinant (for example, $R_x(frac{pi}{2})$ and $R_z(frac{pi}{2})$), because the Clifford group is geometric, as it is isomorphic to the octahedral group, the group of symmetries of the cube or the octahedron and all of its elements are rotations, i.e., with a unit determinant.
The quaternions are represented faithfully in two dimensions by the unit matrix and the Pauli matrices multiplied by the imaginary unit: $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$ and $k = sqrt{-1} Z$ respectively, thus you only need to write $H$ and $P$ the linear combinations: $H = -frac{sqrt{-1} }{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P = frac{1+sqrt{-1}}{2}(1-k)$
However, this is not an isomorphism between the Clifford group and the quaternions, because here we use the quaternions as an algebra not a group. What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra.
The term Quaternion group is reserved to another subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra consisting of $pm 1$, $pm (-iX = R_x(pi))$, $pm (-iY = R_y(pi))$ and $pm (-iZ = R_z(pi))$. This group is called the quaternion group. This group can be generated by $pi$ rotations around two major axes. However, the order-8 quaternion group is not isomorphic to the order-24 Clifford group, which can be generated by $frac{pi}{2}$ rotations around two major axes. The Clifford group is in a certain sense the square root of the quaternion group.
Clarifications
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points:
1) The quaternions imaginary units should be represented as $i = sqrt{-1} X$, $j = sqrt{-1} Y$, $k = sqrt{-1} Z$, as they have to square to $-1$ (I have corrected that in the main text) .
2) I forgot to mention that we need to work with the quaternion algebra over the complex field, i.e., we need to distinguish between the complex imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$ and the quaternion $i$, (I hope you took care of that in your analysis – in any case I have added the explicit expressions of $H$ and $P$ to the main text. In addition, it is correct that global phases are not important when you use the elements as quantum gates, and you correctly took equivalence classes.
However, Please see the article by Michel Planat , where in section 2.2. he mentions that the group generated by $H$ and $P$ should be of order 192, such that only when you remove a $mathbb{Z}_8$ center you reach the 24 element Clifford group (I haven't done the work myself).
Moreover, it is possible to generate the $24$ element group directly without additional phases (Please see the lecture notes by Michel Devoret if you start with generators of unit determinant (for example, $R_x(frac{pi}{2})$ and $R_z(frac{pi}{2})$), because the Clifford group is geometric, as it is isomorphic to the octahedral group, the group of symmetries of the cube or the octahedron and all of its elements are rotations, i.e., with a unit determinant.
edited Dec 12 '18 at 10:10
Carucel
1154
1154
answered Dec 11 '18 at 16:34
David Bar Moshe
1,0647
1,0647
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
1
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
add a comment |
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
1
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Thank you for your clarification on the Clifford group / Clifford algebra / quaternions / quaternion group. You stated my question as "What can be said that the Clifford group is isomorphic to a subgroup of invertible elements of the quaternion algebra." Do you have an idea of how to determine these quaternions?
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 17:04
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
Yes, for example, you can write, by inspection: $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(X+Z)$, then you can use the quaternion notation if you wish and write $H = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$, you can do a similar exercise and express $P$ as a linear combination of $1$ and $Z$.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 11 '18 at 17:31
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
I think this is not correct. If I write $H=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(i+k)$ and $P=frac{1+i}{2}+frac{1-i}{2}k$, these two elements 'generate' 48 different quaternions, which does not correspond to the 24 elements of the Clifford group.
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 21:53
1
1
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
You are correct. If after obtaining these 48 quaternions, you consider equivalence classes disregarding the minus sign, then there is an isomorphism with the 24 elements of the Clifford group. Thank you!
– Knot Log
Dec 11 '18 at 22:03
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
@Knot Log, Sorry I have misled you on two points, I have added a clarification in an update.
– David Bar Moshe
Dec 12 '18 at 7:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f4910%2fisomorphism-between-the-clifford-group-and-the-quaternions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown