Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

I need to find an image, say ABC.jpg, that I know will have been programmatically placed into a directory named ABC_MPSC. I've tried:

cd /

find . -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg"

But that doesn't return anything (I actually know where the particular one I'm searching for is, so I know it exists). Is there a find command that could allow me not have to search manually?

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

Very similar: unix.stackexchange.com/q/342392/117549; also: unix.stackexchange.com/q/352844/117549

– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 29 at 18:31

2

You can also find it using locate, which should be significantly faster, but only works if the file already existed when updatedb was last run.

– Simon Richter
Mar 29 at 20:01

add a comment |

I need to find an image, say ABC.jpg, that I know will have been programmatically placed into a directory named ABC_MPSC. I've tried:

cd /

find . -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg"

But that doesn't return anything (I actually know where the particular one I'm searching for is, so I know it exists). Is there a find command that could allow me not have to search manually?

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

Very similar: unix.stackexchange.com/q/342392/117549; also: unix.stackexchange.com/q/352844/117549

– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 29 at 18:31

2

You can also find it using locate, which should be significantly faster, but only works if the file already existed when updatedb was last run.

– Simon Richter
Mar 29 at 20:01

add a comment |

I need to find an image, say ABC.jpg, that I know will have been programmatically placed into a directory named ABC_MPSC. I've tried:

cd /

find . -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg"

But that doesn't return anything (I actually know where the particular one I'm searching for is, so I know it exists). Is there a find command that could allow me not have to search manually?

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

I need to find an image, say ABC.jpg, that I know will have been programmatically placed into a directory named ABC_MPSC. I've tried:

cd /

find . -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg"

But that doesn't return anything (I actually know where the particular one I'm searching for is, so I know it exists). Is there a find command that could allow me not have to search manually?

find

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

edited yesterday

Rui F Ribeiro

42k1483142

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

asked Mar 29 at 18:27

PascLeRasc

1584

Very similar: unix.stackexchange.com/q/342392/117549; also: unix.stackexchange.com/q/352844/117549

– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 29 at 18:31

2

You can also find it using locate, which should be significantly faster, but only works if the file already existed when updatedb was last run.

– Simon Richter
Mar 29 at 20:01

add a comment |

Very similar: unix.stackexchange.com/q/342392/117549; also: unix.stackexchange.com/q/352844/117549

– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 29 at 18:31

2

You can also find it using locate, which should be significantly faster, but only works if the file already existed when updatedb was last run.

– Simon Richter
Mar 29 at 20:01

Very similar: unix.stackexchange.com/q/342392/117549; also: unix.stackexchange.com/q/352844/117549

– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 29 at 18:31

You can also find it using locate, which should be significantly faster, but only works if the file already existed when updatedb was last run.

– Simon Richter
Mar 29 at 20:01

add a comment |

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

There's a -path predicate that's useful here:

find . -path '*/ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg'

The POSIX description for that predicate is:

The primary shall evaluate as true if the current pathname matches pattern using the pattern matching notation described in Pattern Matching Notation. The additional rules in Patterns Used for Filename Expansion do not apply as this is a matching operation, not an expansion.

The reason that your -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg" failed is because the -name predicate:

shall evaluate as true if the basename of the current pathname matches pattern

In other words, -name never sees the directory of the current filename, only the base filename itself (ABC.jpg, for example).

edited Mar 29 at 18:40

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

add a comment |

Two ways (apart from using -path):

Look for the directory, then detect the file:
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' -exec test -f {}/ABC.jpg ; -print
```
This relies on the find implementation to expand {} to the current pathname of the found directory, even though it's concatenated with /ABC.jpg (it's not required to do that). It could also be written as
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' 

    -exec sh -c 'test -f "$1"/ABC.jpg' sh {} ; -print
```

Look for the file, then check it's parent directory name:

find / -type f -name 'ABC.jpg' -exec sh -c '

    case $(dirname "$1") in

        */ABC_MPSC) exit 0 ;;

        *) exit 1

    esac' sh {} ; -print

Both of these alternatives would be slower than using -path in the way as Jeff shows. I'm leaving them here as examples none the less, as they could possibly be adapted for other things.

edited Mar 29 at 23:34

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509490%2fis-it-possible-to-search-for-a-directory-file-combination%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

There's a -path predicate that's useful here:

find . -path '*/ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg'

The POSIX description for that predicate is:

The primary shall evaluate as true if the current pathname matches pattern using the pattern matching notation described in Pattern Matching Notation. The additional rules in Patterns Used for Filename Expansion do not apply as this is a matching operation, not an expansion.

The reason that your -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg" failed is because the -name predicate:

shall evaluate as true if the basename of the current pathname matches pattern

In other words, -name never sees the directory of the current filename, only the base filename itself (ABC.jpg, for example).

edited Mar 29 at 18:40

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

add a comment |

There's a -path predicate that's useful here:

find . -path '*/ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg'

The POSIX description for that predicate is:

The primary shall evaluate as true if the current pathname matches pattern using the pattern matching notation described in Pattern Matching Notation. The additional rules in Patterns Used for Filename Expansion do not apply as this is a matching operation, not an expansion.

The reason that your -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg" failed is because the -name predicate:

shall evaluate as true if the basename of the current pathname matches pattern

In other words, -name never sees the directory of the current filename, only the base filename itself (ABC.jpg, for example).

edited Mar 29 at 18:40

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

add a comment |

There's a -path predicate that's useful here:

find . -path '*/ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg'

The POSIX description for that predicate is:

The primary shall evaluate as true if the current pathname matches pattern using the pattern matching notation described in Pattern Matching Notation. The additional rules in Patterns Used for Filename Expansion do not apply as this is a matching operation, not an expansion.

The reason that your -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg" failed is because the -name predicate:

shall evaluate as true if the basename of the current pathname matches pattern

In other words, -name never sees the directory of the current filename, only the base filename itself (ABC.jpg, for example).

edited Mar 29 at 18:40

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

There's a -path predicate that's useful here:

find . -path '*/ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg'

The POSIX description for that predicate is:

The primary shall evaluate as true if the current pathname matches pattern using the pattern matching notation described in Pattern Matching Notation. The additional rules in Patterns Used for Filename Expansion do not apply as this is a matching operation, not an expansion.

The reason that your -name "ABC_MPSC/ABC.jpg" failed is because the -name predicate:

shall evaluate as true if the basename of the current pathname matches pattern

In other words, -name never sees the directory of the current filename, only the base filename itself (ABC.jpg, for example).

edited Mar 29 at 18:40

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

edited Mar 29 at 18:40

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

answered Mar 29 at 18:30

Jeff Schaller♦

44.7k1163145

add a comment |

Two ways (apart from using -path):

Look for the directory, then detect the file:
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' -exec test -f {}/ABC.jpg ; -print
```
This relies on the find implementation to expand {} to the current pathname of the found directory, even though it's concatenated with /ABC.jpg (it's not required to do that). It could also be written as
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' 

    -exec sh -c 'test -f "$1"/ABC.jpg' sh {} ; -print
```

Look for the file, then check it's parent directory name:

find / -type f -name 'ABC.jpg' -exec sh -c '

    case $(dirname "$1") in

        */ABC_MPSC) exit 0 ;;

        *) exit 1

    esac' sh {} ; -print

Both of these alternatives would be slower than using -path in the way as Jeff shows. I'm leaving them here as examples none the less, as they could possibly be adapted for other things.

edited Mar 29 at 23:34

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

add a comment |

Two ways (apart from using -path):

Look for the directory, then detect the file:
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' -exec test -f {}/ABC.jpg ; -print
```
This relies on the find implementation to expand {} to the current pathname of the found directory, even though it's concatenated with /ABC.jpg (it's not required to do that). It could also be written as
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' 

    -exec sh -c 'test -f "$1"/ABC.jpg' sh {} ; -print
```

Look for the file, then check it's parent directory name:

find / -type f -name 'ABC.jpg' -exec sh -c '

    case $(dirname "$1") in

        */ABC_MPSC) exit 0 ;;

        *) exit 1

    esac' sh {} ; -print

Both of these alternatives would be slower than using -path in the way as Jeff shows. I'm leaving them here as examples none the less, as they could possibly be adapted for other things.

edited Mar 29 at 23:34

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

add a comment |

Two ways (apart from using -path):

Look for the directory, then detect the file:
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' -exec test -f {}/ABC.jpg ; -print
```
This relies on the find implementation to expand {} to the current pathname of the found directory, even though it's concatenated with /ABC.jpg (it's not required to do that). It could also be written as
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' 

    -exec sh -c 'test -f "$1"/ABC.jpg' sh {} ; -print
```

Look for the file, then check it's parent directory name:

find / -type f -name 'ABC.jpg' -exec sh -c '

    case $(dirname "$1") in

        */ABC_MPSC) exit 0 ;;

        *) exit 1

    esac' sh {} ; -print

Both of these alternatives would be slower than using -path in the way as Jeff shows. I'm leaving them here as examples none the less, as they could possibly be adapted for other things.

edited Mar 29 at 23:34

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

Two ways (apart from using -path):

Look for the directory, then detect the file:
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' -exec test -f {}/ABC.jpg ; -print
```
This relies on the find implementation to expand {} to the current pathname of the found directory, even though it's concatenated with /ABC.jpg (it's not required to do that). It could also be written as
```
find / -type d -name 'ABC_MPSC' 

    -exec sh -c 'test -f "$1"/ABC.jpg' sh {} ; -print
```

Look for the file, then check it's parent directory name:

find / -type f -name 'ABC.jpg' -exec sh -c '

    case $(dirname "$1") in

        */ABC_MPSC) exit 0 ;;

        *) exit 1

    esac' sh {} ; -print

Both of these alternatives would be slower than using -path in the way as Jeff shows. I'm leaving them here as examples none the less, as they could possibly be adapted for other things.

edited Mar 29 at 23:34

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

edited Mar 29 at 23:34

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

answered Mar 29 at 18:37

Kusalananda♦

140k17261435

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Cfrgtkky