How can a discontinuous function belong to $C_B^1(Omega)$, the space of continuous functions $u$ with bounded...












0














Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
$$
u(x,y) =
begin{cases}
1, quad x > 0, \
0, quad x < 0.
end{cases}
$$



On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.



But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
    $$
    u(x,y) =
    begin{cases}
    1, quad x > 0, \
    0, quad x < 0.
    end{cases}
    $$



    On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.



    But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      1





      Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
      $$
      u(x,y) =
      begin{cases}
      1, quad x > 0, \
      0, quad x < 0.
      end{cases}
      $$



      On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.



      But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $Omega = {(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2 : 0 < |x| < 1, 0 < y < 1}$ and consider the function $u$ defined on $Omega$ by (Sobolev Spaces by Adams, page 68, Example 3.10)
      $$
      u(x,y) =
      begin{cases}
      1, quad x > 0, \
      0, quad x < 0.
      end{cases}
      $$



      On page 80 (item (iv)) of this book Adams says that this function belongs to $C_B^1(Omega)$ which consists of function in $C^1(Omega)$ such that $D^alpha u$ is bounded for $0 le alpha le 1$.



      But this function is discontinuous at $x=0$ so how can it be an element of any space of continuous functions? Is this a typo?







      pde continuity sobolev-spaces regularity-theory-of-pdes discontinuous-functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:58









      eurocoder

      1,095315




      1,095315






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
          $$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
          $f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:23












          • Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26










          • If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
            – Calvin Khor
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007565%2fhow-can-a-discontinuous-function-belong-to-c-b1-omega-the-space-of-continu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
          $$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
          $f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:23












          • Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26










          • If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
            – Calvin Khor
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26


















          3














          Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
          $$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
          $f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:23












          • Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26










          • If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
            – Calvin Khor
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26
















          3












          3








          3






          Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
          $$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
          $f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Its not a typo. The function is defined on two separate sets that are not path connected. On each set, it takes a constant value. Its maybe easier to see in 1D, this function is
          $$ f: [-1,0)cup (0,1] to mathbb R, quad f(x) = frac{operatorname{sgn(x)+1}}2$$
          $f$ is continuous (even $C^infty$) on its domain, but there is no continuous extension to $[-1,1]$ (and certainly no $C^1$ extension).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 '18 at 11:18









          Calvin Khor

          11.2k21438




          11.2k21438












          • Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:23












          • Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26










          • If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
            – Calvin Khor
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26




















          • Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:23












          • Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
            – eurocoder
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26










          • If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
            – Calvin Khor
            Nov 21 '18 at 11:26


















          Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
          – eurocoder
          Nov 21 '18 at 11:23






          Ah right, I had overlooked the function was not defined on $x = 0$. Do you know why he goes on to say that although the function is in $C_B^1(Omega)$, it is not in $C^1(bar Omega)$, which is the closed subspace of $C_1^j(Omega)$ consisting of functions have uniformly continuous derivatives up to order $1$ on $Omega$? ..how can $C^1(bar Omega)$ even be a subspace of $C_B^1(Omega)$ as $C^1(bar Omega)$ is defined on $bar Omega$ which is bigger than $Omega$?
          – eurocoder
          Nov 21 '18 at 11:23














          Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
          – eurocoder
          Nov 21 '18 at 11:26




          Nevermind, he says on page that 10 that this is an abuse of notation.
          – eurocoder
          Nov 21 '18 at 11:26












          If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
          – Calvin Khor
          Nov 21 '18 at 11:26






          If you are continuous on a bigger set, then the restrictions(which are invisible by the abuse of notation you mentioned) to smaller sets are naturally also continuous. That is, the inclusions are reversed; $A subset B$ implies $C^1_B(B) subset C^1_B(A)$. As a quick check, you may want to note that the extreme case of continuous functions defined only at a point $C^0({0})$ contains every function $f:mathbb Rto mathbb R$. @eurocoder
          – Calvin Khor
          Nov 21 '18 at 11:26




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007565%2fhow-can-a-discontinuous-function-belong-to-c-b1-omega-the-space-of-continu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?