What is Ve in mosfet











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet



enter image description here
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??










share|improve this question






















  • Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Nov 26 at 17:36















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet



enter image description here
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??










share|improve this question






















  • Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Nov 26 at 17:36













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet



enter image description here
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??










share|improve this question













In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet



enter image description here
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??







transistors mosfet






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 26 at 12:53









Gh-B

274




274












  • Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Nov 26 at 17:36


















  • Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Nov 26 at 17:36
















Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36




Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote














What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??




The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".



So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).






share|improve this answer





















  • Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:01










  • I get it now thank u for ur help
    – Gh-B
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
    – Andy aka
    Dec 4 at 11:04




















up vote
5
down vote













"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:08










  • That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:11












  • @DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:15










  • No, yours is better +1 LOL
    – Andy aka
    Nov 26 at 14:06











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408914%2fwhat-is-ve-in-mosfet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
6
down vote














What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??




The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".



So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).






share|improve this answer





















  • Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:01










  • I get it now thank u for ur help
    – Gh-B
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
    – Andy aka
    Dec 4 at 11:04

















up vote
6
down vote














What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??




The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".



So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).






share|improve this answer





















  • Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:01










  • I get it now thank u for ur help
    – Gh-B
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
    – Andy aka
    Dec 4 at 11:04















up vote
6
down vote










up vote
6
down vote










What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??




The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".



So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).






share|improve this answer













What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??




The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".



So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 26 at 12:57









Andy aka

237k10173405




237k10173405












  • Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:01










  • I get it now thank u for ur help
    – Gh-B
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
    – Andy aka
    Dec 4 at 11:04




















  • Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:01










  • I get it now thank u for ur help
    – Gh-B
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
    – Andy aka
    Dec 4 at 11:04


















Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01




Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01












I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06




I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06












@Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
– Andy aka
Dec 4 at 11:04






@Gh-B Please consider formally accepting one answer. You do that pressing this button in the answer that is your preference.
– Andy aka
Dec 4 at 11:04














up vote
5
down vote













"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:08










  • That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:11












  • @DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:15










  • No, yours is better +1 LOL
    – Andy aka
    Nov 26 at 14:06















up vote
5
down vote













"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:08










  • That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:11












  • @DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:15










  • No, yours is better +1 LOL
    – Andy aka
    Nov 26 at 14:06













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".






share|improve this answer












"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 26 at 12:58









Hearth

3,485931




3,485931








  • 2




    I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:08










  • That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:11












  • @DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:15










  • No, yours is better +1 LOL
    – Andy aka
    Nov 26 at 14:06














  • 2




    I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:06










  • @DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:08










  • That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
    – Dave Tweed
    Nov 26 at 13:11












  • @DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
    – Hearth
    Nov 26 at 13:15










  • No, yours is better +1 LOL
    – Andy aka
    Nov 26 at 14:06








2




2




I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed
Nov 26 at 13:06




I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed
Nov 26 at 13:06












@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08




@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08












That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed
Nov 26 at 13:11






That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed
Nov 26 at 13:11














@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15




@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15












No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06




No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408914%2fwhat-is-ve-in-mosfet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?