N(T) and R(T) are T-invariant: application to proofs.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Am I correct in assuming that since $N(T)$ and $R(T)$ are $T$-invariant,
$N(T^k)= N(T)$ and $R(T^k)=R(T)$,
$dim(N(T^k))= dim(N(T))$ and $dim(R(T^k))=dim(R(T))$
for all $k$?
If true, can someone give me the intuition behind this?
linear-algebra
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Am I correct in assuming that since $N(T)$ and $R(T)$ are $T$-invariant,
$N(T^k)= N(T)$ and $R(T^k)=R(T)$,
$dim(N(T^k))= dim(N(T))$ and $dim(R(T^k))=dim(R(T))$
for all $k$?
If true, can someone give me the intuition behind this?
linear-algebra
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
I can only assume that $N(T)$ is the null space and $R(T)$ is the row space. The notation is not standard. Both equations are false.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:19
2
Invariant is a bit of a misnomer. We say a subspace $A$ is $T$-invariant if $T(A) subseteq A$. Equality is not required.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:24
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Am I correct in assuming that since $N(T)$ and $R(T)$ are $T$-invariant,
$N(T^k)= N(T)$ and $R(T^k)=R(T)$,
$dim(N(T^k))= dim(N(T))$ and $dim(R(T^k))=dim(R(T))$
for all $k$?
If true, can someone give me the intuition behind this?
linear-algebra
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
Am I correct in assuming that since $N(T)$ and $R(T)$ are $T$-invariant,
$N(T^k)= N(T)$ and $R(T^k)=R(T)$,
$dim(N(T^k))= dim(N(T))$ and $dim(R(T^k))=dim(R(T))$
for all $k$?
If true, can someone give me the intuition behind this?
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
asked Nov 19 at 2:08
alwaysiamcaesar
505
505
I can only assume that $N(T)$ is the null space and $R(T)$ is the row space. The notation is not standard. Both equations are false.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:19
2
Invariant is a bit of a misnomer. We say a subspace $A$ is $T$-invariant if $T(A) subseteq A$. Equality is not required.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:24
add a comment |
I can only assume that $N(T)$ is the null space and $R(T)$ is the row space. The notation is not standard. Both equations are false.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:19
2
Invariant is a bit of a misnomer. We say a subspace $A$ is $T$-invariant if $T(A) subseteq A$. Equality is not required.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:24
I can only assume that $N(T)$ is the null space and $R(T)$ is the row space. The notation is not standard. Both equations are false.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:19
I can only assume that $N(T)$ is the null space and $R(T)$ is the row space. The notation is not standard. Both equations are false.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:19
2
2
Invariant is a bit of a misnomer. We say a subspace $A$ is $T$-invariant if $T(A) subseteq A$. Equality is not required.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:24
Invariant is a bit of a misnomer. We say a subspace $A$ is $T$-invariant if $T(A) subseteq A$. Equality is not required.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:24
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004426%2fnt-and-rt-are-t-invariant-application-to-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I can only assume that $N(T)$ is the null space and $R(T)$ is the row space. The notation is not standard. Both equations are false.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:19
2
Invariant is a bit of a misnomer. We say a subspace $A$ is $T$-invariant if $T(A) subseteq A$. Equality is not required.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 19 at 2:24