How do specify double subscript [duplicate]
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Double Subscript for Subsequences
1 answer
For example I need to specify a term x subscript a subscript b.
For a x subscript a, I can write it as x_{a}. However, x_{a}_{b} is not supported. How do I do that?
math-mode subscripts
marked as duplicate by Mico
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 at 20:46
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Double Subscript for Subsequences
1 answer
For example I need to specify a term x subscript a subscript b.
For a x subscript a, I can write it as x_{a}. However, x_{a}_{b} is not supported. How do I do that?
math-mode subscripts
marked as duplicate by Mico
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 at 20:46
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
1
Maybex_{a_b}
or{x_a}_b
(even this last is strange)?
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:16
the first one works well. If you post this as an answer, I would accept it
– GermanShepherd
Dec 3 at 20:21
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Double Subscript for Subsequences
1 answer
For example I need to specify a term x subscript a subscript b.
For a x subscript a, I can write it as x_{a}. However, x_{a}_{b} is not supported. How do I do that?
math-mode subscripts
This question already has an answer here:
Double Subscript for Subsequences
1 answer
For example I need to specify a term x subscript a subscript b.
For a x subscript a, I can write it as x_{a}. However, x_{a}_{b} is not supported. How do I do that?
This question already has an answer here:
Double Subscript for Subsequences
1 answer
math-mode subscripts
math-mode subscripts
edited Dec 3 at 20:23
Phelype Oleinik
21.2k54380
21.2k54380
asked Dec 3 at 20:14
GermanShepherd
19011
19011
marked as duplicate by Mico
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 at 20:46
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Mico
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 at 20:46
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
1
Maybex_{a_b}
or{x_a}_b
(even this last is strange)?
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:16
the first one works well. If you post this as an answer, I would accept it
– GermanShepherd
Dec 3 at 20:21
add a comment |
1
Maybex_{a_b}
or{x_a}_b
(even this last is strange)?
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:16
the first one works well. If you post this as an answer, I would accept it
– GermanShepherd
Dec 3 at 20:21
1
1
Maybe
x_{a_b}
or {x_a}_b
(even this last is strange)?– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:16
Maybe
x_{a_b}
or {x_a}_b
(even this last is strange)?– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:16
the first one works well. If you post this as an answer, I would accept it
– GermanShepherd
Dec 3 at 20:21
the first one works well. If you post this as an answer, I would accept it
– GermanShepherd
Dec 3 at 20:21
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If you want to insert more than one character as index, you have to put it inside braces. This rule is for the index as well, I mean, if index has more than one char, use braces again.
$x_{a_b}$ and $x_{a_{bc}}$ (or ${x_a}_b = {x_a}_p$)
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
I suppose thatx_{a_b}
means "the variablex
, indexed bya_b
", whereas{x_a}_b
means "the variablex_a
, indexed byb
". In the former case,b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (anda
is rendered in "cramped" script style).
– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If you want to insert more than one character as index, you have to put it inside braces. This rule is for the index as well, I mean, if index has more than one char, use braces again.
$x_{a_b}$ and $x_{a_{bc}}$ (or ${x_a}_b = {x_a}_p$)
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
I suppose thatx_{a_b}
means "the variablex
, indexed bya_b
", whereas{x_a}_b
means "the variablex_a
, indexed byb
". In the former case,b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (anda
is rendered in "cramped" script style).
– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If you want to insert more than one character as index, you have to put it inside braces. This rule is for the index as well, I mean, if index has more than one char, use braces again.
$x_{a_b}$ and $x_{a_{bc}}$ (or ${x_a}_b = {x_a}_p$)
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
I suppose thatx_{a_b}
means "the variablex
, indexed bya_b
", whereas{x_a}_b
means "the variablex_a
, indexed byb
". In the former case,b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (anda
is rendered in "cramped" script style).
– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If you want to insert more than one character as index, you have to put it inside braces. This rule is for the index as well, I mean, if index has more than one char, use braces again.
$x_{a_b}$ and $x_{a_{bc}}$ (or ${x_a}_b = {x_a}_p$)
If you want to insert more than one character as index, you have to put it inside braces. This rule is for the index as well, I mean, if index has more than one char, use braces again.
$x_{a_b}$ and $x_{a_{bc}}$ (or ${x_a}_b = {x_a}_p$)
edited Dec 3 at 20:53
answered Dec 3 at 20:27
Sigur
23.7k355136
23.7k355136
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
I suppose thatx_{a_b}
means "the variablex
, indexed bya_b
", whereas{x_a}_b
means "the variablex_a
, indexed byb
". In the former case,b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (anda
is rendered in "cramped" script style).
– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
add a comment |
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
I suppose thatx_{a_b}
means "the variablex
, indexed bya_b
", whereas{x_a}_b
means "the variablex_a
, indexed byb
". In the former case,b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (anda
is rendered in "cramped" script style).
– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
@Mico, I wrote that in the comments... and the output looks strange.
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:51
I suppose that
x_{a_b}
means "the variable x
, indexed by a_b
", whereas {x_a}_b
means "the variable x_a
, indexed by b
". In the former case, b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (and a
is rendered in "cramped" script style).– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
I suppose that
x_{a_b}
means "the variable x
, indexed by a_b
", whereas {x_a}_b
means "the variable x_a
, indexed by b
". In the former case, b
is rendered in script-script style, while in the latter it is rendered in script style (and a
is rendered in "cramped" script style).– Mico
Dec 3 at 20:56
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
@Mico, yes. I also think that. But looks ugly, in my opinion... lol
– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:58
add a comment |
1
Maybe
x_{a_b}
or{x_a}_b
(even this last is strange)?– Sigur
Dec 3 at 20:16
the first one works well. If you post this as an answer, I would accept it
– GermanShepherd
Dec 3 at 20:21