Orthogonal Diagonalization of a $3$ by $3$ Matrix
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$M$ $=$ $begin{pmatrix}3&2&2\ 2&3&2\ 2&2&3end{pmatrix}$. Diagonalize $M$ using an orthogonal matrix.
So I got that the eigenvalues for $M$ were $1$ and $7$. For the eigenvalue of $1$, I got the eigenvectors $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}$ and $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 1\ 0end{pmatrix}$, and for the eigenvalue of $7$, I got the eigenvector $begin{pmatrix}1\ 1\ 1end{pmatrix}$. This gave me the diagonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\ 0&1&0\ 0&0&7end{pmatrix}$ and the orthogonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ 0&frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&0&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}end{pmatrix}$.
But when I multiply the orthogonal matrix by the diagonal matrix and then its transpose, I get an answer that is slightly off what $M$ is, but I am not sure why.
If anyone knows where I may have gone wrong, I would greatly appreciate you telling me!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization orthogonal-matrices
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$M$ $=$ $begin{pmatrix}3&2&2\ 2&3&2\ 2&2&3end{pmatrix}$. Diagonalize $M$ using an orthogonal matrix.
So I got that the eigenvalues for $M$ were $1$ and $7$. For the eigenvalue of $1$, I got the eigenvectors $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}$ and $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 1\ 0end{pmatrix}$, and for the eigenvalue of $7$, I got the eigenvector $begin{pmatrix}1\ 1\ 1end{pmatrix}$. This gave me the diagonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\ 0&1&0\ 0&0&7end{pmatrix}$ and the orthogonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ 0&frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&0&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}end{pmatrix}$.
But when I multiply the orthogonal matrix by the diagonal matrix and then its transpose, I get an answer that is slightly off what $M$ is, but I am not sure why.
If anyone knows where I may have gone wrong, I would greatly appreciate you telling me!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization orthogonal-matrices
1
Both eigenvectors for $;lambda=1;$ are wrong, as you can easily check. The eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal (because the matrix is symmetric), so you must only do GM in each eigenspace...
– DonAntonio
Nov 19 at 2:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
$M$ $=$ $begin{pmatrix}3&2&2\ 2&3&2\ 2&2&3end{pmatrix}$. Diagonalize $M$ using an orthogonal matrix.
So I got that the eigenvalues for $M$ were $1$ and $7$. For the eigenvalue of $1$, I got the eigenvectors $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}$ and $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 1\ 0end{pmatrix}$, and for the eigenvalue of $7$, I got the eigenvector $begin{pmatrix}1\ 1\ 1end{pmatrix}$. This gave me the diagonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\ 0&1&0\ 0&0&7end{pmatrix}$ and the orthogonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ 0&frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&0&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}end{pmatrix}$.
But when I multiply the orthogonal matrix by the diagonal matrix and then its transpose, I get an answer that is slightly off what $M$ is, but I am not sure why.
If anyone knows where I may have gone wrong, I would greatly appreciate you telling me!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization orthogonal-matrices
$M$ $=$ $begin{pmatrix}3&2&2\ 2&3&2\ 2&2&3end{pmatrix}$. Diagonalize $M$ using an orthogonal matrix.
So I got that the eigenvalues for $M$ were $1$ and $7$. For the eigenvalue of $1$, I got the eigenvectors $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 0\ 1end{pmatrix}$ and $begin{pmatrix}-1\ 1\ 0end{pmatrix}$, and for the eigenvalue of $7$, I got the eigenvector $begin{pmatrix}1\ 1\ 1end{pmatrix}$. This gave me the diagonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\ 0&1&0\ 0&0&7end{pmatrix}$ and the orthogonal matrix $begin{pmatrix}-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&-frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ 0&frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}\ frac{1}{sqrt{2}}&0&frac{1}{sqrt{3}}end{pmatrix}$.
But when I multiply the orthogonal matrix by the diagonal matrix and then its transpose, I get an answer that is slightly off what $M$ is, but I am not sure why.
If anyone knows where I may have gone wrong, I would greatly appreciate you telling me!
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization orthogonal-matrices
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization orthogonal-matrices
asked Nov 19 at 2:11
Dev SR
859
859
1
Both eigenvectors for $;lambda=1;$ are wrong, as you can easily check. The eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal (because the matrix is symmetric), so you must only do GM in each eigenspace...
– DonAntonio
Nov 19 at 2:35
add a comment |
1
Both eigenvectors for $;lambda=1;$ are wrong, as you can easily check. The eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal (because the matrix is symmetric), so you must only do GM in each eigenspace...
– DonAntonio
Nov 19 at 2:35
1
1
Both eigenvectors for $;lambda=1;$ are wrong, as you can easily check. The eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal (because the matrix is symmetric), so you must only do GM in each eigenspace...
– DonAntonio
Nov 19 at 2:35
Both eigenvectors for $;lambda=1;$ are wrong, as you can easily check. The eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal (because the matrix is symmetric), so you must only do GM in each eigenspace...
– DonAntonio
Nov 19 at 2:35
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$$(-1, 0, 1) cdot (-1, 1, 0)=1$$
They are not orthogonal.
Just do a gram-schmidt step to find a set of orthogonal eigenvectors for eigenvalues corresponding to $1$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
start with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrr}
1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $sqrt 3, sqrt 2, sqrt 6$
If you had the analogous problem in 4 by 4, you could begin with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $2,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}$
for 5 by 5
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \
end{array}
right).
$$
$sqrt 5,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}, sqrt{20}$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$$(-1, 0, 1) cdot (-1, 1, 0)=1$$
They are not orthogonal.
Just do a gram-schmidt step to find a set of orthogonal eigenvectors for eigenvalues corresponding to $1$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$$(-1, 0, 1) cdot (-1, 1, 0)=1$$
They are not orthogonal.
Just do a gram-schmidt step to find a set of orthogonal eigenvectors for eigenvalues corresponding to $1$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
$$(-1, 0, 1) cdot (-1, 1, 0)=1$$
They are not orthogonal.
Just do a gram-schmidt step to find a set of orthogonal eigenvectors for eigenvalues corresponding to $1$.
$$(-1, 0, 1) cdot (-1, 1, 0)=1$$
They are not orthogonal.
Just do a gram-schmidt step to find a set of orthogonal eigenvectors for eigenvalues corresponding to $1$.
answered Nov 19 at 2:22
Siong Thye Goh
97k1462116
97k1462116
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
start with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrr}
1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $sqrt 3, sqrt 2, sqrt 6$
If you had the analogous problem in 4 by 4, you could begin with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $2,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}$
for 5 by 5
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \
end{array}
right).
$$
$sqrt 5,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}, sqrt{20}$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
start with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrr}
1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $sqrt 3, sqrt 2, sqrt 6$
If you had the analogous problem in 4 by 4, you could begin with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $2,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}$
for 5 by 5
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \
end{array}
right).
$$
$sqrt 5,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}, sqrt{20}$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
start with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrr}
1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $sqrt 3, sqrt 2, sqrt 6$
If you had the analogous problem in 4 by 4, you could begin with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $2,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}$
for 5 by 5
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \
end{array}
right).
$$
$sqrt 5,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}, sqrt{20}$
start with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrr}
1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $sqrt 3, sqrt 2, sqrt 6$
If you had the analogous problem in 4 by 4, you could begin with
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 \
end{array}
right).
$$
and divide the columns by $2,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}$
for 5 by 5
$$
left(
begin{array}{rrrrr}
1 & -1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 3 & -1 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \
end{array}
right).
$$
$sqrt 5,sqrt 2, sqrt 6, sqrt {12}, sqrt{20}$
edited Nov 19 at 2:49
answered Nov 19 at 2:34
Will Jagy
101k598198
101k598198
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004430%2forthogonal-diagonalization-of-a-3-by-3-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Both eigenvectors for $;lambda=1;$ are wrong, as you can easily check. The eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal (because the matrix is symmetric), so you must only do GM in each eigenspace...
– DonAntonio
Nov 19 at 2:35